Crustacean Limb Morphogenesis during Normal Development and Regeneration

2020 ◽  
pp. 46-79
Author(s):  
Anastasios Pavlopoulos ◽  
Carsten Wolff
Keyword(s):  
Limb Development ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Limb Regeneration ◽  
Daphnia Pulex ◽  
Experimental Models ◽  
Full Potential ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Embryonic Limb ◽  
Cellular Behaviors

Crustaceans have been favored in developmental biology for the study of the diversification of body plans and their associated appendages, which exhibit remarkable diversity within and between species. Until recently, because of technical limitations, crustacean studies were restricted in scope to the comparison of appendage morphologies and expression patterns of candidate limb patterning genes already known from classic developmental animal models. To remedy this limitation and explore their full potential, a few select crustacean experimental models have been reinforced with powerful genomic and transcriptomic resources, new methods for forward and reverse genetic investigations, and for live imaging of entire embryos, or cell and tissue-specific markers, with exceptional spatial and temporal resolution. These models include the malacostracan amphipod Parhyale hawaiensis and the branchiopod cladocerans Daphnia magna and Daphnia pulex, which display collectively all the different uniramous, biramous, and phyllopodous crustacean limb types. Within the past couple years, important discoveries have been made on the molecular and cellular basis of embryonic limb development and postembryonic limb regeneration. In Parhyale alone, gain and loss-of-function studies of Hox genes have revealed the combinatorial logic used by these genes for appendage specialization, whereas the reconstruction of single-cell-resolution fate maps of developing and regenerating appendages have identified the lineage restrictions and cellular behaviors driving both morphogenetic processes. Century-old questions regarding the conservation and divergence of appendage patterning mechanisms across arthropods and bilaterians, or how these mechanisms can be used and reused throughout the lifetime of an organism, can now be addressed productively with crustaceans.

Why we have (only) five fingers per hand: hox genes and the evolution of paired limbs

Development ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 116 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.J. Tabin
Keyword(s):  
Limb Development ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Developmental Constraint ◽  
Limb Morphogenesis ◽  
Different Types ◽  
Embryonic Limb ◽  
Limb Pattern ◽  
Anterior Posterior

Limb development has long been a model system for studying vertebrate pattern formation. The advent of molecular biology has allowed the identification of some of the key genes that regulate limb morphogenesis. One important class of such genes are the homeobox-containing, or Hox genes. Understanding of the roles these genes play in development additionally provides insights into the evolution of limb pattern. Hox gene expression patterns divide the embryonic limb bud into five sectors along the anterior/posterior axis. The expression of specific Hox genes in each domain specifies the developmental fate of that region. Because there are only five distinct Hox-encoded domains across the limb bud there is a developmental constraint prohibiting the evolution of more than five different types of digits. The expression patterns of Hox genes in modern embryonic limb buds also gives clues to the shape of the ancestral fin field from which the limb evolved, hence elucidating the evolution of the tetrapod limb.

scholarly journals Ulnaless (Ul), a regulatory mutation inducing both loss-of-function and gain-of-function of posterior Hoxd genes

Development ◽  
1997 ◽  
Vol 124 (18) ◽  
pp. 3493-3500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Herault ◽  
N. Fraudeau ◽  
J. Zakany ◽  
D. Duboule
Keyword(s):  
Limb Development ◽  
Control Mechanism ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Appendicular Skeleton ◽  
Chromosome 2 ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Regulatory Mutation ◽  
Dominant Mutation ◽  
X Ray ◽  
Limb Morphogenesis

Ulnaless (Ul), an X-ray-induced dominant mutation in mice, severely disrupts development of forearms and forelegs. The mutation maps on chromosome 2, tightly linked to the HoxD complex, a cluster of regulatory genes required for proper morphogenesis. In particular, 5′-located (posterior) Hoxd genes are involved in limb development and combined mutations within these genes result in severe alterations in appendicular skeleton. We have used several engineered alleles of the HoxD complex to genetically assess the potential linkage between these two loci. We present evidence indicating that Ulnaless is allelic to Hoxd genes. Important modifications in the expression patterns of the posterior Hoxd-12 and Hoxd-13 genes at the Ul locus suggest that Ul is a regulatory mutation that interferes with a control mechanism shared by multiple genes to coordinate Hoxd function during limb morphogenesis.

scholarly journals Panarthropod tiptop/teashirt and spalt orthologs and their potential role as “trunk”-selector genes

EvoDevo ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brenda I. Medina-Jiménez ◽  
Graham E. Budd ◽  
Ralf Janssen
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Potential Role ◽  
Additional Data ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Head Development ◽  
Early Expression ◽  
Vinegar Fly ◽  
Selector Genes

Abstract Background In the vinegar fly Drosophila melanogaster, the homeodomain containing transcription factor Teashirt (Tsh) appears to specify trunk identity in concert with the function of the Hox genes. While in Drosophila there is a second gene closely related to tsh, called tiptop (tio), in other arthropods species only one copy exists (called tio/tsh). The expression of tsh and tio/tsh, respectively, is surprisingly similar among arthropods suggesting that its function as trunk selector gene may be conserved. Other research, for example on the beetle Tribolium castaneum, questions even conservation of Tsh function among insects. The zinc-finger transcription factor Spalt (Sal) is involved in the regulation of Drosophila tsh, but this regulatory interaction does not appear to be conserved in Tribolium either. Whether the function and interaction of tsh and sal as potential trunk-specifiers, however, is conserved is still unclear because comparative studies on sal expression (except for Tribolium) are lacking, and functional data are (if at all existing) restricted to Insecta. Results Here, we provide additional data on arthropod tsh expression, show the first data on onychophoran tio/tsh expression, and provide a comprehensive investigation on sal expression patterns in arthropods and an onychophoran. Conclusions Our data support the idea that tio/tsh genes are involved in the development of “trunk” segments by regulating limb development. Our data suggest further that the function of Sal is indeed unlikely to be conserved in trunk vs head development like in Drosophila, but early expression of sal is in line with a potential homeotic function, at least in Arthropoda.

An extracellular matrix molecule of newt and axolotl regenerating limb blastemas and embryonic limb buds: immunological relationship of MT1 antigen with tenascin

Development ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 108 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-668 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Onda ◽  
D.J. Goldhamer ◽  
R.A. Tassava
Keyword(s):  
Extracellular Matrix ◽  
Limb Development ◽  
Limb Regeneration ◽  
Growth Control ◽  
Thick Layer ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Extracellular Matrix Molecule ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
Embryonic Limb ◽  
Immunological Relationship

Several well-characterized extracellular matrix (ECM) components have been localized to the amphibian limb regenerate, but the identification and characterization of novel ECM molecules have received little attention. Here we describe, using mAb MT1 and immunocytochemistry, an ECM molecule expressed during limb regeneration and limb development. In limb stumps, mAb MT1 reactivity was restricted to tendons, myotendinous junctions, granules in the basal layers of epidermis, periosteum (newts) and perichondrium (axolotls). In regenerating limbs, reactivity in the distal limb stump was first detected 5 days and 1 day after amputation of newt and axolotl limbs, respectively. In both species, mAb MT1 recognized what appeared to be an abundant blastema matrix antigen, localized in both thin and thick cords between and sometimes closely associated with blastema cells. Reactivity was generally uniform throughout the blastema except for a particularly thick layer that was present immediately beneath the wound epithelium. During redifferentiation stages, mAb MT1 reactivity persisted among blastema cells and redifferentiating cartilage but was lost proximally in areas of muscle and connective tissue differentiation. During the entire period of embryonic limb development, mAb MT1 reactivity was seen in the ECM of the mesenchyme and in a layer beneath the limb bud ectoderm, similar to its distribution during regeneration. Considerable mAb MT1 reactivity was also associated with the developing somites. The reactivity of mAb MT1 in blastema and limb bud was similar if not identical to that of a polyclonal Ab against tenascin (pAbTN), a large, extracellular matrix glycoprotein implicated in growth control, inductive interactions, and other developmental events. This pAbTN effectively competed against mAb MT1 binding on blastema sections. In immunoblots, both mAb MT1 and pAbTN recognized a very high molecular weight (approximately Mr 1000 × 10(3)) protein in blastema extracts of both newts and axolotls. mAb MT1 immunoprecipitated a protein of Mr 1000K size which reacted to both mAb MT1 and pAbTN in immunoblots. These data show that tenascin is in the matrix of the urodele blastema and limb bud, and suggest that mAb MT1 identifies urodele tenascin.

Dysregulation of HOX as a Potential Therapeutic Target in Breast Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ji-Yeon Lee ◽  
Myoung Hee Kim
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Therapeutic Potential ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Genome Structure ◽  
Control Cell ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Cellular Processes ◽  
Hox Protein

: HOX genes belong to the highly conserved homeobox superfamily, responsible for the regulation of various cellular processes that control cell homeostasis, from embryogenesis to carcinogenesis. The abnormal expression of HOX genes is observed in various cancers, including breast cancer; they act as oncogenes or as suppressors of cancer, according to context. In this review, we analyze HOX gene expression patterns in breast cancer and examine their relationship, based on the three-dimensional genome structure of the HOX locus. The presence of non-coding RNAs, embedded within the HOX cluster, and the role of these molecules in breast cancer have been reviewed. We further evaluate the characteristic activity of HOX protein in breast cancer and its therapeutic potential.

scholarly journals Distinct Expression Patterns of Carbonic Anhydrase IX in Clear Cell, Microcystic, and Angiomatous Meningiomas

2019 ◽  
Vol 78 (12) ◽  
pp. 1081-1088
Author(s):  
Rati Chkheidze ◽  
Patrick J Cimino ◽  
Kimmo J Hatanpaa ◽  
Charles L White ◽  
Manuel Ferreira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Carbonic Anhydrase ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Carbonic Anhydrase Ix ◽  
World Health ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Ca Ix ◽  
Hypoxia Marker ◽  
Other World ◽  
Health Organization

Abstract Clear cell, microcytic, and angiomatous meningiomas are 3 vasculature-rich variants with overlapping morphological features but different prognostic and treatment implications. Distinction between them is not always straightforward. We compared the expression patterns of the hypoxia marker carbonic anhydrase IX (CA-IX) in meningiomas with predominant clear cell (n = 15), microcystic (n = 9), or angiomatous (n = 11) morphologies, as well as 117 cases of other World Health Organization recognized histological meningioma variants. Immunostaining for SMARCE1 protein, whose loss-of-function has been associated with clear cell meningiomas, was performed on all clear cell meningiomas, and selected variants of meningiomas as controls. All clear cell meningiomas showed absence of CA-IX expression and loss of nuclear SMARCE1 expression. All microcystic and angiomatous meningiomas showed diffuse CA-IX immunoreactivity and retained nuclear SMARCE1 expression. In other meningioma variants, CA-IX was expressed in a hypoxia-restricted pattern and was highly associated with atypical features such as necrosis, small cell change, and focal clear cell change. In conclusion, CA-IX may serve as a useful diagnostic marker in differentiating clear cell, microcystic, and angiomatous meningiomas.

scholarly journals ATRT-13. DIFFERENT CELLS OF ORIGIN PAVE THE WAY FOR MOLECULAR HETEROGENEITY IN RHABDOID TUMORS

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii278-iii278
Author(s):  
Monika Graf ◽  
Marta Interlandi ◽  
Natalia Moreno ◽  
Dörthe Holdhof ◽  
Viktoria Melcher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Cell ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Precursor Cells ◽  
Genetically Engineered ◽  
Molecular Heterogeneity ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Cellular Origin ◽  
Cells Of Origin ◽  
Rhabdoid Tumors

Abstract Rhabdoid tumors (RT) are rare but highly aggressive pediatric neoplasms. These tumors carry homozygous loss-of-function alterations of SMARCB1 in almost all cases with an otherwise low mutational load. RT arise at different intracranial (ATRT) as well as extracranial (MRT) anatomical sites. Three main molecular subgroups (ATRT-SHH, ATRT-TYR, ATRT-MYC) have been characterized for ATRT which are epigenetically and clinically diverse, while MRT show remarkable similarities with ATRT-MYC distinct from ATRT-SHH and ATRT-TYR. Even though there are hypotheses about various cells of origin among RT subgroups, precursor cells of RT have not yet been identified. Previous studies on the temporal control of SMARCB1 knockout in genetically engineered mouse models have unveiled a tight vulnerable time frame during embryogenesis with regard to the susceptibility of precursor cells to result in RT. In this study, we employed single-cell RNA sequencing to describe the intra- and intertumoral heterogeneity of murine ATRT-SHH and -MYC as well as extracranial MYC tumor cells. We defined subgroup-specific tumor markers for all RT classes but also observed a notable overlap of gene expression patterns in all MYC subgroups. By comparing these single-cell transcriptomes with available single-cell maps of early embryogenesis, we gained first insights into the cellular origin of RT. Finally, unsupervised clustering of published human RT methylation data and healthy control tissues confirmed the existence of different cells of origin for intracranial SHH tumors and MYC tumors independent of their anatomical localizations.

Analysis of Hox gene expression in the chick limb bud

Development ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 1449-1466 ◽  
Author(s):  
C.E. Nelson ◽  
B.A. Morgan ◽  
A.C. Burke ◽  
E. Laufer ◽  
E. DiMambro ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Cell Proliferation ◽  
Sonic Hedgehog ◽  
Hind Limb ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Limb Bud ◽  
Posterior Portion ◽  
Hox Gene ◽  
Hoxd Gene

The vertebrate Hox genes have been shown to be important for patterning the primary and secondary axes of the developing vertebrate embryo. The function of these genes along the primary axis of the embryo has been generally interpreted in the context of positional specification and homeotic transformation of axial structures. The way in which these genes are expressed and function during the development of the secondary axes, particularly the limb, is less clear. In order to provide a reference for understanding the role of the Hox genes in limb patterning, we isolated clones of 23 Hox genes expressed during limb development, characterized their expression patterns and analyzed their regulation by the signalling centers which pattern the limb. The expression patterns of the Abd-B-related Hoxa and Hoxd genes have previously been partially characterized; however, our study reveals that these genes are expressed in patterns more dynamic and complex than generally appreciated, only transiently approximating simple, concentric, nested domains. Detailed analysis of these patterns suggests that the expression of each of the Hoxa and Hoxd genes is regulated in up to three independent phases. Each of these phases appears to be associated with the specification and patterning of one of the proximodistal segments of the limb (upper arm, lower arm and hand). Interestingly, in the last of these phases, the expression of the Hoxd genes violates the general rule of spatial and temporal colinearity of Hox gene expression with gene order along the chromosome. In contrast to the Abd-B-related Hoxa and Hoxd genes, which are expressed in both the fore and hind limbs, different sets of Hoxc genes are expressed in the two limbs. There is a correlation between the relative position of these genes along the chromosome and the axial level of the limb bud in which they are expressed. The more 3′ genes are expressed in the fore limb bud while the 5′ genes are expressed in the hind limb bud; intermediate genes are transcribed in both limbs. However, there is no clear correlation between the relative position of the genes along the chromosome and their expression domains within the limb. With the exception of Hoxc-11, which is transcribed in a posterior portion of the hind limb, Hoxc gene expression is restricted to the anterior/proximal portion of the limb bud. Importantly, comparison of the distributions of Hoxc-6 RNA and protein products reveals posttranscriptional regulation of this gene, suggesting that caution must be exercised in interpreting the functional significance of the RNA distribution of any of the vertebrate Hox genes. To understand the genesis of the complex patterns of Hox gene expression in the limb bud, we examined the propagation of Hox gene expression relative to cell proliferation. We find that shifts in Hox gene expression cannot be attributed to passive expansion due to cell proliferation. Rather, phase-specific Hox gene expression patterns appear to result from a context-dependent response of the limb mesoderm to Sonic hedgehog. Sonic hedgehog (the patterning signal from the Zone of Polarizing Activity) is known to be able to activate Hoxd gene expression in the limb. Although we find that Sonic hedgehog is capable of initiating and polarizing Hoxd gene expression during both of the latter two phases of Hox gene expression, the specific patterns induced are not determined by the signal, but depend upon the temporal context of the mesoderm receiving the signal. Misexpression of Sonic hedgehog also reveals that Hoxb-9, which is normally excluded from the posterior mesenchyme of the leg, is negatively regulated by Sonic hedgehog and that Hoxc-11, which is expressed in the posterior portion of the leg, is not affected by Sonic hedgehog and hence is not required to pattern the skeletal elements of the lower leg.

Conserved and distinct roles of kreisler in regulation of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes

Development ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 126 (4) ◽  
pp. 759-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Manzanares ◽  
S. Cordes ◽  
L. Ariza-McNaughton ◽  
V. Sadl ◽  
K. Maruthainar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Binding Sites ◽  
Hox Genes ◽  
Expression Patterns ◽  
Regulatory Elements ◽  
Enhancer Activity ◽  
Anteroposterior Patterning ◽  
Endogenous Gene ◽  
Transgenic Embryos ◽  
The Individual ◽  
Segmental Expression

During anteroposterior patterning of the developing hindbrain, the anterior expression of 3′ Hox genes maps to distinct rhombomeric boundaries and, in many cases, is upregulated in specific segments. Paralogous genes frequently have similar anterior boundaries of expression but it is not known if these are controlled by common mechanisms. The expression of the paralogous Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 genes extends from the posterior spinal cord up to the rhombomere (r) 4/5 boundary and both genes are upregulated specifically in r5. However, in this study, we have found that Hoxa3 expression is also upregulated in r6, showing that there are differences in segmental expression between paralogues. We have used transgenic analysis to investigate the mechanisms underlying the pattern of segmental expression of Hoxa3. We found that the intergenic region between Hoxa3 and Hoxa4 contains several enhancers, which summed together mediate a pattern of expression closely resembling that of the endogenous Hoxa3 gene. One enhancer specifically directs expression in r5 and r6, in a manner that reflects the upregulation of the endogenous gene in these segments. Deletion analysis localized this activity to a 600 bp fragment that was found to contain a single high-affinity binding site for the Maf bZIP protein Krml1, encoded by the kreisler gene. This site is necessary for enhancer activity and when multimerized it is sufficient to direct a kreisler-like pattern in transgenic embryos. Furthermore the r5/r6 enhancer activity is dependent upon endogenous kreisler and is activated by ectopic kreisler expression. This demonstrates that Hoxa3, along with its paralog Hoxb3, is a direct target of kreisler in the mouse hindbrain. Comparisons between the Krml1-binding sites in the Hoxa3 and Hoxb3 enhancers reveal that there are differences in both the number of binding sites and way that kreisler activity is integrated and restricted by these two control regions. Analysis of the individual sites revealed that they have different requirements for mediating r5/r6 and dorsal roof plate expression. Therefore, the restriction of Hoxb3 to r5 and Hoxa3 to r5 and r6, together with expression patterns of Hoxb3 in other vertebrate species suggests that these regulatory elements have a common origin but have later diverged during vertebrate evolution.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document