Comparison between Salbutamol and Salbutamol with Magnesium Sulphate by nebulization in Treatment of Acute Asthma in Asthmatic Patient

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Galal Adel El kady ◽  
Fady Adeb Abd Elmalek ◽  
Gerges Amine Shahaat

Abstract Background Asthma exacerbations are acute or subacute episodes of breathlessness, cough, wheezing, and chest tightness, or any combination of these symptoms. Exacerbations are associated with airways obstruction that should be documented and quantified by PEF or FEVI measurement. Early treatment of asthma exacerbations should be the best strategy for management. Objective To compare fast effectiveness between the nebulized salbutamol with normal Saline and salbutamol with magnesium sulphate by nebulizer in treatment of acute asthma. Patients and Methods: This two armed prospective randomized study included 60 patients admitted to Intensive Care Unit, Ain Shams University Hospital from July 2019 to July 2020. Patients were randomized into two equal groups: group A which included 30 patients on salbutamol nebulization and group B that included 30 patients on combination of salbutamol and magnesium sulphate. Results systolic blood pressure, diastolic Bl. P and FEVI were higher among salbutamol group (A) than combination group (B), meanwhile HR and 02% were significantly lower among group A than group B with statistically insignificant differences (p > 0.05). Group A had significantly higher mean of RR (20±1.33) than group B (17.2 ±1.14) (p < 0.001). Also, Group A had significantly higher mean of PEFR (217.5 ±74.72) than group B (125±78.05) (p = 0.014). There were significant differences between in group A in HR and 02% before and after TTT (p < 0.05). With treatment, the pulse rate rose significantly (p = 0.010) but there was no significant change in the systolic or diastolic blood pressure. The 02% rose significantly (p<O.001). There were significant differences between in group B in RR, HR, 02%, PEFR and FEVI before and after TTT (p < 0.05). With treatment, the respiratory rate declined significantly (p < 0.001), the pulse rate declined significantly (p = 0.013) in but there was no significant change in the systolic or diastolic blood pressure. The PEFR rose significantly (p = 0.001) and also the 02% rose significantly (p < 0.001). Conclusion Nebulized MgS04, either alone or combined with salbutamol, has a clinically significant bronchodilator effect in acute asthma. This suggests that a combination of MgS04 and salbutamol may be the best choice for the management of acute exacerbations of asthma.

2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 29
Author(s):  
Tan Yeung R'ong

<strong>Objective:</strong>To evaluate and compare blood pressure and pulse rate Pre- and Post-extraction of teeth.<p><strong>Materials &amp; Methods:</strong> The Systolic &amp; Diastolic blood pressure of 40 Indian patients in the age group of 20-50 years old were recorded using a Dial-type BP apparatus &amp; Stethoscope before and after dental extraction. The Pulse rate was also recorded pre- and post-extraction by palpating the radial pulse and recording it with a stopwatch for 1 minute.</p><p><strong>Results:</strong> 75 per cent of the patients had no significant change in blood pressure pre- and post-extraction, while 17.5 percent of the patients had an increase in blood pressure post-extraction. 7.5 per cent of the patients had a fall in blood pressure following dental extraction. Evaluation of pre- and post-extraction pulse rate shows no significant change in pulse rate in 92.5 per cent of the patients studied and 5 per cent of the patient had an increase in pulse rate post-extraction. 2.5 percent of the 40 patients studied had a decrease in pulse rate post-extraction.</p><p><strong>Conclusion:</strong> There's no significant difference in blood pressure &amp; pulse rate pre- and post-extraction.</p>


Author(s):  
Md Harun-or-Rashid ◽  
ASM Meftahuzzaman ◽  
Manirul Islam ◽  
AKM Aktaruzzaman

To compare the haemodynamic changes between LMA insertion & endotracheal intubation, 60 patients were assigned randomly to one of the two groups of thirty each. They were grouped randomly by card sampling. Every patient included in the study was allowed a card preoperatively. According to the card number patients were grouped. Group A. Airway was maintained by LMA. Group B: Airway was maintained by ETT. Haemodynamic parameter i.e. pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and presence of any dysrhythmia were monitored after 1,3,5 & 10 minutes after LMA insertion or ETT intubations. There was statistically significant changes (P<0.05) in pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and (appearance of dysrhythmia in some patients) in group ti patients whereas there was less changes in pulse rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure whose airway was maintained by LMA insertion (Group-A). We conclude that LMA insertion causes less Haemodynamic changes than that of endotracheal intubation. So LMA insertion is safer than ETT intubations in some selected patients.   Journal of BSA, Vol. 19, No. 1 & 2, 2006 p.28-32


Author(s):  
Rishman Tandi ◽  
Tanvi Kumar ◽  
Amritpal Singh Kahlon ◽  
Aaftab Sethi

Introduction: Acute coronary syndrome remains as one of the most important causes for morbidity and mortality in developed countries. Therefore, evidence-based management strategy is required to offset the loss of health during an acute coronary syndrome. An effective approach includes both medical and surgical methods. This study was conducted to evaluate the medical method of management. Objective: To study blood pressure and heart rate variability after administration of Ivabradine or metoprolol in cases with acute coronary syndrome. Materials and methods: The study was a Prospective single center observational study conducted in patients attending Cardiology Intensive Care Unit in Nayyar Heart and Superspecialty Hospital, a tertiary care centre located in an urban area. All patients with Acute coronary syndrome admitted to the emergency or cardiac care unit were analysed with ECG as a preliminary diagnostic test and confirmed with troponin markers. They were either given Ivabradine or Metoprolol. Baseline evaluation and follow up was done and necessary data was collected and analysed.   Results: 100 patients were included in the study out of which 50 were given Metoprolol (Group A) and 50 were given Ivabradine (Group B). Themean age of studied cases was found to be 66.54 years in group A and 68.69 years in group B. It was observed that there was a fall in heart rate by 26.8 beats per minute with beta blocker and 24.4 beats per minute with Ivabradine. In case of blood pressure measurement, in patients with beta blocker administration, there was a fall of 25 mm Hg in systolic blood pressure and 17 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure However, with Ivabradine there was only a fall of 8mm Hg in systolic Blood pressure and 6 mm Hg in diastolic blood pressure. Conclusion: Although Metoprolol is the drug of choice to decrease heart rate and blood pressure in acute coronary syndrome, Ivabradine is being increasingly used in cases where beta blockers are contraindicated as it has similar efficacy in lowering heart rate without compromising contractility of cardiac muscle, thereby maintaining LVEF and blood pressure. Keywords: Acute coronary syndrome, Beta Blockers, Metoprolol, Ivabradine.


2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 9-14
Author(s):  
Ninik Mas Ulfa

ABSTRAKHipertensi adalah peningkatan tekanan darah sistolik lebih dari 140 mmHg dan tekanan darah diastolik lebih dari 90 mmHg pada dua kali pengukuran dengan selang waktu lima menit dalam keadaan cukup istirahat. Faktor penyebab hipertensi adalah faktor gaya hidup, faktor genetika dan faktor usia. Hipertensi termasuk dalam penyakit degeneratif dimana terjadi penurunan organ tubuh. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efektifitas kontrol penurunan teakanan darah dari terapi obat Candersartan, Valsartan dan Kalium Losartan. Pada penelitian ini dilakukan di RS X wilayah Surabaya Selatan dan RS Y wilayah Surabaya Timur. Penelitian ini bersifat retrospektif dengan pengamatan observasioanl. Penelitian ini terbagi dalam 3 kelompok terapi dengan jumlah total populasi adalah 57 pasien. Data tekanan darah sistolik-diastolik diamati selama 5 bulan terapi darimasing-masing kelompok terapi A (Candersartan n = 19), kelompok terapi B (Valsartan n= 19), dan kelompok terapi C (Kalium Losartan n= 19).Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa terjadi penurunan tekanan darah sistolik pada kelompok A sebesar 21,18%, kelompok B = 24,20%, dan kelompok C = 22,51%. Penurunan tekanan darah diastolic pada kelompok A sebesar 12,14%, kelompok B = 14,04% dan kelompok C = 10,98%. Berdasarkan hasil analisa statistik diperoleh hasil p = 0,967 > α = 0,05 yang berarti tidak ada perbedaan yang bermakna dari ketiga kelompok terapi tersebut dalam penurunan tekanan darah sistolik maupun diastolik pada pasien hipertensi. Hal ini berarti bahwa efektifitas ketiga obat tersebut dalam kontrol penurunan tekanan darah pada pasien Hipertensi mempunyai efektifitas yangKata Kunci: Candersartan, Valsartan, Kalium Losartan, HipertensiABSTRACTHypertension is an increase in systolic blood pressure of more than 140 mmHg and diastolic blood pressure of more than 90 mmHg in two measurements with an interval of five minutes in a resting state. Factors causing hypertension are lifestyle factors, genetic factors and age factors. Hypertension is included in degenerative diseases where there is a decrease in body organs. The purpose of this study was to determine the effectiveness of blood pressure control of Candersartan, Valsartan and Potassium Losartan. This research was conducted in RS X of South Surabaya and RS Y of East Surabaya. This study is retrospective with observational. The study was divided into 3 therapeutic groups with a total population of 57 patients. Data on systolic-diastolic blood pressurewere observed for 5 months of therapy from each of the therapy groups A (Candersartan n = 19), therapy group B (Valsartan n = 19), and therapy group C (Potassium Losartan n = 19). That there was a decrease in systolic blood pressure in group A of 21,18%, group B = 24,20%, and group C = 22,51%. Diastolic blood pressure decrease in group A was 12,14%, group B = 14,04% and group C = 10,98%. Based on the results of statistical analysis obtained results p = 0.967> α = 0.05 which means there is no significant difference of the three groups of therapy in the reduction of systolic blood pressure and diastolic in hypertensive patients. This means that the effectiveness of the three drugs in the control of blood pressure reduction in hypertensive patients has the same effectiveness.Key Words: Candersartan, Valsartan, Potasium Losartan, Hypertesion


2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (Number 1) ◽  
pp. 32-35
Author(s):  
N Habib ◽  
Md. R Amin ◽  
US N Begum ◽  
N Akhter ◽  
D Akther ◽  
...  

This descriptive study was done in the Deponment of Physiology. Dhaka Medical College, Dhaka. during the period of January 2008 to December 2008. The objective of the study was to measure pulse and blood pressure in smokers and nonsmoker adult male stroke patients and to find out changes in pulse and blood pressure among the smoker and non-smoker stroke patients. To accomplish this purpose 105 patient of over 20 years of age were selected. They were divided into two groups: Group A consisting of thirty n on-smoker and group B consisting of seven,' five smoker stroke patients. The finding showed that smoking caused no statistical significant difference 1p>0.05) in pulse and systolic blood pressure among she groups. Diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher (p<0.05) fill smokers than non-smokers. The study therefore provides the scope to understand the altered physiology of smoker stroke pollen's.


2005 ◽  
Vol 33 (03) ◽  
pp. 357-364 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sang Pil Yun ◽  
Woo Sang Jung ◽  
Seong Uk Park ◽  
Sang Kwan Moon ◽  
Chang Nam Ko ◽  
...  

Hypertension is one of the modifiable risk factors for stroke. Lowering blood pressure is helpful for primary and secondary prevention of stroke. This study is aimed to assess the efficacy of Chunghyul-dan on stroke patients with stage 1 hypertension using 24 hours ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (24ABPM). Forty hospitalized stroke patients with stage 1 hypertension were included in the study and they were randomly assigned into two groups: group A was treated with Chunghyul-dan 1200 mg once a day for 2 weeks, while group B was not. Twelve subjects were dropped out because of unexpected early discharge or data errors, thus the remaining 28 subjects were included in the final analysis (15 in group A and 13 in group B). Blood pressure was monitored every 30 minutes for 24 hours at baseline and 2 weeks after medication. Blood pressure, pulse rate, trough/peak ratio (TPR) [the value calculated by dividing the blood pressure change at trough (22 to 24 hours after drug intake) by the change at peak (2 adjacent hours with a maximal blood pressure reduction between the second and eighth hour after drug intake)] and smoothness index (SI) (the value calculated as the ratio between the average of the 24 hours, treatment-induced blood pressure changes and its standard deviation) were compared to assess the efficacy of Chunghyul-dan. To assess the safety of Chunghyul-dan, any adverse effects during medication period were monitored. There was no significant difference in the baseline assessment between the two groups. Systolic blood pressure was lower in group A than in group B (141.37 ± 8.96 mmHg versus 132.28 ± 9.46 mmHg , P = 0.03), while diastolic blood pressure and pulse rate had no significant difference between the two groups. Systolic TPR and SI was 0.87 and 1.04 in group A, respectively. This suggests that Chunghyul-dan have anti-hypertensive effect on stroke patients with stage 1 hypertension.


2018 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepti M. Kotwani ◽  
Manish B. Kotwani ◽  
Amit Hiwarkar

<p class="abstract"><strong>Background:</strong> Laryngoscopy and tracheal Intubation are invariably associated with certain stress responses due to the sympatho-adrenal stimulation. These cardiovascular and neurohumoral alterations may directly affect the physiology and increase the risk. So far, various drugs have been tried but none has been considered ideal for blunting this presser response. We therefore, planned this comparative study to evaluate and compare the efficacy of intravenous magnesium sulphate (30 mg/kg) versus sublingual nitroglycerine spray (0.4 mg/spray) in attenuating the presser response to Laryngoscopy and Tracheal Intubation.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Methods:</strong> Fifty patients, aged 15–50 years, scheduled for elective surgery under general anaesthesia, were randomly assigned to one of the two groups of 25 each, Group A (magnesium group) and Group B<strong> </strong>(nitroglycerine group). Study drug was given 90-120 seconds before tracheal intubation. Heart rate, Systolic blood pressure and Rate pressure product were recorded at different intervals after administering the study drug till 3 minutes after intubation.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Results:</strong> Mean heart rate was significantly higher from the baseline at all times after administering the study drug in both the groups. Increase in systolic blood pressure as a presser response was limited to 7.25% in Group A and 5.83% in Group B from the baseline after tracheal intubation. There was relative hypotension after administration of the study drug in both the groups.</p><p class="abstract"><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Intravenous magnesium or sublingual nitroglycerine pre-treatment is found to be effective in attenuating the presser response to laryngoscopy and intubation. These drugs may lead to rise in HR but it is transient and dose dependent. However, both the drugs can significantly control the hypertensive response after laryngoscopy and intubation.</p><p class="abstract"> </p>


2013 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-31
Author(s):  
N Habib ◽  
M Rashid ◽  
USN Begum ◽  
N Ahter ◽  
D Akhter

This cross-sectional study was carried out to assess blood pressure parameters among adult male smokers and smokeless tobacco users. For this purpose, 105 male respondents were selected. They were divided into two groups; Group A-consisting of 30 were smokeless tobacco users and group B consisting of 75 smoker patients The participants were selected from medicine outdoor of Dhaka Medical College Hospital. In this study, the mean (±SD) of systolic blood pressure were 154.50±26.793 mm of Hg in Group A and 151.67±19.248 mm of Hg in group B respectively. Statistical analysis was done by unpaired‘t’ test, there were no statistical significant differences (P>0.05) of systolic blood pressure between Group A and Group B. The mean (±SD) of diastolic blood pressure were 96.67±10.933 mm of Hg in Group A and 86.47±14.745 mm of Hg in group B respectively. The mean (± SD) of diastolic blood pressure were significantly higher (P<0.05) in Group A than Group B. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/medtoday.v25i1.16066 Medicine Today 2013 Vol.25(1): 28-31


2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (03) ◽  
pp. 425-430
Author(s):  
GHULAM RASOOL BHURGRI ◽  
HUSSAIN BUX KOREJO ◽  
MUHAMMAD ALI QURESHI ◽  
Raj Kumar ◽  
Nasrullah Aamir

Objective: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of Losartan and Atenolol in alone and combination in treatment of hypertension. Study Design: Comparative study. Setting: Medical out patients department of Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre Karachi from January 2007 to June 2007. Methods: There were 60 patients previously untreated with mild and moderate essential hypertensions were registered for study. The selected patients were divided into three groups. Group A was given atenolol, Group B was given Losartan, and Group C was given both drugs. The target blood pressure was 120-140/80-90 mmHg. There were 42 males and 18 females with age range 25-65 years. Results: The mean baseline score of groups A, B and C were showed systolic blood pressure 182±19, 174 ± 20 and 168 ± 12 respectively. The diastolic blood pressure was 104.5±11, 102.5±9 and 104.5±10 respectively. The difference in mean systolic and diastolic blood pressure was not significant statistically as P = 0.06 and 0.76 respectively. After 4 months of treatment with atenolol, systolic blood pressure decreased to 147±17, and diastolic blood pressure fell to 87±4. Losartan decreased systolic blood pressure 138±13 and diastolic blood pressure 87±4 in 4 months of treatment. The combined therapy decreased systolic blood pressure 115±4.6 and diastolic blood pressure 75±4.7. The effect of treatments on systolic and diastolic blood pressure was significantly different as (p < 0.001) and ( p = 0.036) respectively. Side effects observed in 2 (10%) patients from group C, 8 (40%) in group A and 4 (20%) in group B. Combination therapy proved more effective in controlling hypertension than mono therapy and also fewer side effects. Patients showed better control on combination therapy as compared to mono therapy. Losartan proved a little better in controlling hypertension then atenolol and was more expensive. Conclusion: Patients showed better results with combination therapy for hypertension compared to individual drug.


2013 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 6-9
Author(s):  
Nasrin Habib ◽  
Mamunur Rashid ◽  
Farzana Afzal ◽  
Mahfizur Rahman ◽  
ASM Shahin

In Bangladesh, use of different kinds of smokeless tobacco and smoking is common among adult men. The study aimed to assess blood pressure parameters among adult male smokers and smokeless tobacco users as data on related field is limited and inclusive. For this study, 105 male respondents were selected from outdoor department of Dhaka Medical College Hospital. Among them, 30 were smokeless tobacco users and 75 were smokers. All data were recorded in data collection form. Statistical analysis of results between the groups were calculated by using unpaired students't' test. In this study, the mean (±SD) of systolic blood pressure was 154.50±26.79 mm of Hg in Group A and 151.67±19.24 mm of Hg in group B respectively. The mean (±SD) of diastolic blood pressure was 96.67±10.93 mm of Hg in Group A and 86.47±14.74 mm of Hg in group B respectively. The mean (± SD) of diastolic blood pressure was significantly higher (P<0.05) in Group A than Group B. Future research should aim to clarify the cardiovascular risks of smokeless tobacco. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3329/updcj.v1i1.13946 Update Dent. Coll. j: 2011; 1 (1): 06-09 In


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document