scholarly journals P216 Effects of filgotinib on anaemia, thrombocytopoenia and leukopoenia: results from a Phase 3 study in patients with active RA and prior inadequate response or intolerance to bDMARDs

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Walker ◽  
Mark C Genovese ◽  
Kenneth Kalunian ◽  
Jacques-Eric Gottenberg ◽  
Beatrix Bartok ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Stock Ownership ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Normal Platelet ◽  
Haematopoietic Growth Factor ◽  
Baseline Haemoglobin ◽  
Low Levels

Abstract Background Cytopoenias are common in patients treated for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with non-janus kinase 1 (JAK1)-selective inhibitors, possibly due to JAK2-mediated haematopoietic growth factor inhibition. We investigated the extent of cytopoenia in patients with active RA, despite prior treatment with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs), treated with the JAK1-selective inhibitor filgotinib (FIL), in a Phase 3 trial (FINCH2; NCT02873936). Methods In the double-blind, Phase 3 FINCH2 trial, patients were randomised 1:1:1 to receive oral FIL 200mg, 100mg, or placebo (PBO) once daily for 24 weeks (W) + conventional synthetic DMARDs. We assessed shifts from baseline at 12 and 24 weeks in haemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils and lymphocytes. Results 448 patients were treated: FIL 200mg, n = 147; FIL 100mg, n = 153; PBO, n = 148. Overall, haemoglobin, platelet, lymphocyte and neutrophil levels remained consistent throughout the study. At baseline, 129 (28.8%), 4 (0.9%), 10 (2.2%) and 26 (5.8%) patients had mild-moderate low levels of haemoglobin, platelets, neutrophils and lymphocytes, respectively, and 5 (1.1%) had severely low levels of lymphocytes. Of the patients with mild-moderate low haemoglobin levels at baseline, 10-13% achieved normal levels by W24 vs 8% receiving PBO (Table). Of those with normal baseline haemoglobin levels, 6-10% had mild low levels at W24. All patients with baseline mild-moderate low platelets and neutrophils had normal levels at W24, except one patient with mild neutropoenia receiving FIL 100mg. Of the patients with normal platelet and neutrophil levels at baseline, >94% maintained these at W24 in all treatment groups. By W24, 3.2%, 5.2% and 2.2% of patients treated with FIL 200mg, FIL 100mg and PBO, respectively in the baseline mild-moderate subgroup and 1.7% in the severe subgroup treated with FIL 100mg had normal lymphocyte counts. Conclusion In this study, most patients in the baseline normal cell count subgroups maintained this status over 24 weeks of FIL treatment. Of the patients with mild-to-moderately low haemoglobin at baseline, >9% shifted towards haemoglobin normalisation. Similar patterns of improvement from baseline were observed for platelet, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts. FIL appears not to increase the incidence of cytopenias in patients with active RA despite prior biologic therapies. Disclosures D. Walker: Other; Received support from Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche. M.C. Genovese: Other; Received support from Gilead Sciences Inc., Galapagos NV, AbbVie Inc. Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer. K. Kalunian: Grants/research support; Grand support from Gilead. J. Gottenberg: None. B. Bartok: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Y. Tan: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc... Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Y. Guo: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. C. Tasset: Other; Employee of Galapagos. J.S. Sundy: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. K. de Vlam: None. T. Takeuchi: None.

scholarly journals P372 Effects of filgotinib on anaemia, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia: Phase 3 study results in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and prior inadequate response/intolerance to biological DMARDs

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S350-S352
Author(s):  
R Besuyen ◽  
M Genovese ◽  
K de Vlam ◽  
J E Gottenberg ◽  
K Kalunian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Janus Kinase 1 ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Synthetic Dmards

Abstract Background Anaemia, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with non-Janus Kinase 1 (JAK1) selective inhibitors may be due to inhibition of haematopoietic growth factors signalling through JAK2. Therefore, we investigated anaemia, thrombocytopenia and leukopenia in patients with active RA with prior inadequate response/intolerance to biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) treated with filgotinib (FIL), a selective JAK1 inhibitor (FINCH-2; NCT02873936). Methods In the randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase 3 FINCH-2 trial, patients were randomised 1:1:1 to oral FIL 200 mg, 100 mg, or placebo (PBO) once daily plus conventional synthetic DMARDs for 24 weeks. In this subgroup analysis, we assessed shifts from baseline (BL) in haemoglobin (hgb), platelets (plt), neutrophils and lymphocytes. Results A total of 448 patients were treated; FIL 200 mg, n = 147; FIL 100 mg, n = 153; PBO, n = 148. Hgb, plt, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts remained consistent throughout the study. At BL, 28.8%, 0.9%, 2.2% and 5.8% patients had mild–moderate low hgb, plt, neutrophil and lymphocyte, respectively, and 1.1% had severely low lymphocyte levels. Of patients with mild–moderate hgb levels at BL, 13.1% with FIL 200 mg, 9.5% FIL 100 mg, and 7.6% PBO achieved normal hgb at Week 24, respectively (Table). Of those with normal BL hgb, only 6–9.8% had mild low levels at Week 24. Patients with BL mild-moderate low plts and neutrophils had normal levels at Week 24, except one with mild neutropenia on FIL 100 mg. Of patients with normal plt and neutrophil levels at BL, >94% maintained these at Week 24 in all treatment groups. By Week 24, 3.2%, 5.2% and 2.2% of patients treated with FIL 200 mg, FIL 100 mg and PBO, respectively, in the mild–moderate subgroup and 1.7% in the severe subgroup treated with FIL 100 mg had normal lymphocyte counts. Conclusion In this subgroup analysis, most patients with normal hgb, plt, lymphocyte and neutrophil at BL maintained them over 24 weeks of FIL treatment. Of the patients with mild–moderately low hgb at BL, >9% shifted towards normalisation. Similar patterns of improvement were observed for plt, lymphocyte and neutrophil counts. These results suggest that FIL does not increase the incidence of anaemia, thrombocytopenia or leukopenia in patients who entered the study with active RA despite prior bDMARDs.

scholarly journals P210 Efficacy and safety of filgotinib for patients with RA with inadequate response to methotrexate: FINCH1 primary outcome results

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Walker ◽  
Bernard G Combe ◽  
Alan J Kivitiz ◽  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Repeated Measures ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Stock Ownership ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL) is an oral, potent, selective Janus kinase 1 inhibitor that has shown good efficacy and was well tolerated for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The objective of this study was to evaluate efficacy and safety of FIL treatment in patients with RA who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX). Methods This Phase 3, double-blind, active- and placebo (PBO)-controlled study randomised patients with active RA (3:3:2:3) to FIL 200mg, FIL 100mg, adalimumab [ADA] 40mg every 2 weeks, or PBO daily for up to 52 weeks; results through week 24 are presented. Patients also received background MTX. Primary efficacy endpoint was proportion of patients achieving ACR20 at week 12; additional clinical assessments included ACR50 and ACR70 and DAS28-CRP score ≤3.2 and <2.6, and patient-reported outcomes including HAQ-DI. Safety endpoints included adverse event types and rates. Logistic regression was used for superiority test of FIL vs PBO for ACR response and other binary endpoints, while mixed-effect model for repeated measures (MMRM) were used for continuous endpoints. Non-inferiority test of FIL to ADA (preserving >50% of ADA response) was performed for DAS28-CRP ≤3.2 and <2.6. Results Of 1,759 patients randomised, 1,755 received study drug: 475 FIL 200mg; 480 FIL 100mg; 325 ADA; and 475 PBO, of which 89.5%, 90.4%, 88.9%, and 81.3%, respectively, completed 24 weeks of study drug. 81.8% were female, mean (standard deviation [SD]) duration of RA was 7.8 (7.6) years, and mean (SD) DAS28-CRP was 5.7 (0.9). At week 12, significantly more patients in the FIL 200mg and 100mg arms achieved an ACR20 improvement vs PBO (Table 1). More patients receiving FIL achieved ACR50 and ACR70 improvements, DAS28-CRP scores ≤3.2 and <2.6 and reported improvements in HAQ-DI scores versus PBO (Table 1). Non-inferiority of FIL 200mg to ADA was met based on DAS28-CRP ≤3.2. The FIL safety profile was consistent with prior studies through Week 24. Conclusion FIL 200mg and 100mg led to significant improvement in signs and symptoms of RA, prevented radiographic progression, improved physical function compared to PBO, and was well-tolerated. Efficacy of FIL 200mg was non-inferior to ADA based on DAS28-CRP ≤3.2. Disclosures D. Walker: Other; Received support from Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis and Roche. B.G. Combe: Honoraria; Received honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Co., MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi and UCB. A.J. Kivitiz: Consultancies; Consultant to AbbVie, Celgene, Horizon, Jansses, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Genzyme, Sanofi, Regeneron, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, Boehringer Ingelheim, Flexion and Novartis. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Novartis. Y. Tanaka: Honoraria; Honoraria from Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly ans Co., Pfizer, AbbVie, YL Biologics, BMS, Takeda, Misubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Teijin. Grants/research support; Grant support from Asahi-Kasei, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Takeda, Sanofi, BMS, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Ono, Astellas, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, Abbvi and YL. D. van der Heijde: Corporate appointments; Director of Imaging Rheumatology bv. Consultancies; Consultant for consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Daiichi, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Glaxo-Smith-Kline, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, Sanofi, Takeda, and UCB. F. Matzkies: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. B. Bartok: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. L. Ye: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc.. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Y. Guo: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. C. Tasset: Corporate appointments; Employee of Galapagos NV. J.S. Sundy: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. N. Mozaffarian: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. R.B.M. Landewé: Consultancies; Consultant for AbbVie, AstraZeneca, BMS, Galapagos, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Novartis, and UCB.. S. Bae: None. E.C. Keystone: Consultancies; Consultant for AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, BMS Canada, Celltrion, Crescendo, Bioscience, F.Hoffman-La Roche Inc., Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Co., Merck, Pfizer,, PuraPharm, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Samsumg Bioepsis, and UCB. P. Nash: Consultancies; Consultant for AbbVie, BMS, Jansses, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Sanofi, MSD, Novartis, Celgene and Gilead.

scholarly journals O09 Pooled safety analyses from Phase 3 studies of filgotinib in patients with RA

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Walker ◽  
Kevin Winthrop ◽  
Mark C Genovese ◽  
Bernard G Combe ◽  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Data ◽  
Study Drug ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Tender Joint Count ◽  
Stock Ownership ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Phase 3

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL) is an oral, selective janus kinase 1 inhibitor under development for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and other inflammatory diseases. Safety and efficacy of FIL was investigated in the FINCH clinical program, which includes three Phase 3, summarized, summarized studies in patients with moderate to severely active RA. FINCH1: patients with inadequate response to MTX (NCT02889796); FINCH2: patients receiving conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) with inadequate response to biological DMARDs (NCT02873936); FINCH3: MTX-naïve patients initiating MTX ± FIL, or receiving FIL monotherapy (NCT02886728). We present pooled safety data up to 24 weeks (W24). Methods The FINCH studies enrolled patients with RA (2010 ACR/EULAR criteria), ≥6 swollen joints and ≥6 tender joints at screening and Day 1. Safety analyses included patients receiving ≥1 dose of study drug. Patients in FINCH 1 and 2 who did not experience at least a 20% improvement in both swollen joint count and tender joint count by W14 discontinued study drug and switched to standard of care. W24 safety data from all studies were aggregated and ummarized. Key safety endpoints were treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), serious TEAEs, TEAEs of interest, deaths and treatment-emergent laboratory abnormalities. Results 3,452 patients were evaluated; 2,088 received FIL. At W24, the frequency of TEAEs and TEAEs of interest were similar for those who received FIL and those in the control groups (Table 1). Most TEAEs were infections. Laboratory abnormality rates were similar between FIL and control groups, and were mild to moderate (grades 1 and 2). Overall, the frequency of major adverse cardiac events, herpes zoster virus, deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism was low, and similar across groups. Conclusion Pooled data from this large database highlights the favourable safety and tolerability profile of FIL in patients with RA both as monotherapy and in combination with MTX/csDMARD. Disclosures D. Walker: Other; Received support from Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis and Roche. K. Winthrop: Grants/research support; Received grants for clinical research from Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Insmed Incorporated. Other; Received support from AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly & Co., MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi, and UCB. M.C. Genovese: Other; Gilead Sciences Inc., Galapagos NV, AbbVie Inc. Eli Lilly and Company, Pfizer. B.G. Combe: Honoraria; Honoraria from AbbVie, BMS, Gilead, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Co., MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche-Chugai, Sanofi and UCB. Y. Tanaka: Honoraria; Received from Daiichi-Sankyo, Astellas, Chugai, Eli Lilly and Co., Pfizer, AbbVie, YL Biologics, BMS, Takeda, Misubishi-Tanabe, Novartis, Eisai, Janssen, Teijin. Grants/research support; Received grant support from Asahi-Kasei, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Chugai, Takeda, Sanofi, BMS, UCB, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, and Ono. A. Kivitiz: Consultancies; Consultant for AbbVie, Celgene, Horizon, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Genzyme,Sanofi, Regeneron, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, Boehringer Ingelheim and Flexion. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Novartis. F. Matzkies: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. B. Bartok: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. L. Ye: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Y. Guo: Corporate appointments; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. C. Tasset: Corporate appointments; Employee of Galapagos NV. J.S. Sundy: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. E. Keystone: Consultancies; AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, BMS Canada, Celltrion, Crescendo, Bioscience, F.Hoffman-La Roche Inc., Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Co., Merck, Pfizer, PuraPharm, Sandoz,, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi- Genzyme Samsung Bioepsis, and UCB. Other; AbbVie, Amgen, AstraZeneca Pharma, Biotest, BMS Canada, Celltrion, Crescendo, Bioscience, F.Hoffman-La Roche Inc., Genentech, Janssen, Eli Lilly and Co., Merck, Pfizer, PuraPharm, Sandoz,, Sanofi-Aventis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Samsumg Bioepsis, and UCB. R. Westhovens: Corporate appointments; An investigator and advisor for Celltrion and Galapagos/Gilead. W. Rigby: Consultancies; Consultancy for Gilead. G.R. Burmester: Consultancies; Consultancy from AbbVie, Gilead, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer. Honoraria; Honoraria from AbbVie, Gilead, Eli Lilly, and Pfizer.

scholarly journals P133 Filgotinib in patients with RA with inadequate response to methotrexate: FINCH 1 52-week efficacy and patient reported outcomes data

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
David Walker ◽  
Alan Kivitz ◽  
Yoshiya Tanaka ◽  
Susan Lee ◽  
Lei Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Short Form ◽  
Pain Scale ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Stock Ownership ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Sf 36 ◽  
Patient Reported

Abstract Background/Aims  Filgotinib (FIL) is an oral, potent, selective Janus kinase 1 (JAK1) inhibitor. FINCH 1 (NCT02889796) assessed FIL efficacy, safety and patient reported outcome (PRO) data in patients (pts) with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX-IR). We report data through week 52 (W52) of the FINCH 1 study. Primary outcome results at week (W)12 and W24 were previously reported. Methods  This global, phase 3, double-blind, active- and placebo (PBO)-controlled study randomised MTX-IR pts with active RA on a background of stable MTX 3:3:2:3 to oral FIL 200 mg or FIL 100 mg once daily, subcutaneous adalimumab (ADA) 40 mg every 2W, or PBO up to W52; pts receiving PBO at W24 were re-randomised to FIL 100 or 200 mg. Efficacy was assessed using clinical, radiographic, and pt-reported outcomes; W52 comparisons were not adjusted for multiplicity, and nominal p-values are reported. Safety endpoints included types and rates of adverse events (AEs) and laboratory abnormalities. PRO assessment included the HAQ-DI and VAS pain scale, SF-36, and FACIT-Fatigue questionnaire. Change from baseline (CFB) at various time points was assessed up to W52 for each treatment group. Results  Of 1,755 treated pts, 1,417 received study drug through W52. FIL efficacy was sustained through W52 with DAS28(CRP) <2.6 remission rates of 54%, 43%, and 46% of pts receiving FIL 200 and 100 mg and ADA, respectively, (nominal p for FIL 200 vs ADA = 0.024) (Table 1). FIL safety profile through W52 was consistent with W24 data. AEs of interest were infrequent and balanced among treatments. As early as W2, through W24, pts receiving either dose of FIL experienced nominally significantly greater (p < 0.001) CFB in HAQ-DI and VAS pain scale than those receiving PBO. These improvements were sustained up to W52. In general, CFB for HAQ-DI, VAS pain scale, and FACIT-Fatigue observed for the FIL groups was higher or comparable to ADA through W52 (Table 1). P133 Table 1:Efficacy and PRO outcomes at Week 52Efficacy OutcomeFIL 200 mg (n = 475)FIL 100 mg (n = 480)ADA (n = 325)ACR20/50/70, %a78/62/4476/59/3874/59/39DAS28(CRP) ≤3.2, %a66+5959mTSSb,c0.18+++0.450.61HAQ-DIc,d−0.93+−0.85−0.85VAS pain scalec,d−42−40−40SF-36 PCSc,d12.011.512.4FACIT-Fc,d11.912.211.7aNon-responder imputation,bLeast squares mean change from baseline,cObserved case,dMean change from baseline.+nominal p < 0.05, +++nominal p < 0.001 vs ADA ADA, adalimumab; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue; FIL, filgotinib; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; mTSS, modified van der Heijde TSS; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Survey. Conclusion  Through W52, both FIL 200 and 100 mg showed sustained efficacy, rapid and sustained improvement in patient QoL based on clinical and pt-reported outcomes and were well tolerated in MTX-IR pts with RA. Disclosure  D. Walker: Consultancies; Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Roche. A. Kivitz: Consultancies; AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Flexion, Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Regeneron, SUN Pharma Advanced Research, Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Pfizer, Sanofi, GlaxoSmithKline, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Novartis. Member of speakers’ bureau; Celgene, Merck, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, Genzyme, Flexion, AbbVie. Y. Tanaka: Honoraria; AbbVie, Asahi Kasei, Astellas, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi and Y. Grants/research support; AbbVie, Chugai, Daiichi-Sankyo, Eisai, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Takeda and UCB. S. Lee: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. L. Ye: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. H. Hu: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. F. Matzkies: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. B. Bartok: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. B. Bartok: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Y. Guo: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. J.S. Sundy: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. A. Jahreis: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. R. Besuyen: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos BV. Other; Employee of Galapagos BV. B. Combe: Other; Reports research support, honoraria, consulting and speaker fees from AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche-Chugai; Sanofi; and UCB. D. van der Heijde: Consultancies; AbbVie; Amgen; Astellas; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Boehringer Ingelheim; Celgene; Cyxone; Daiichi-Sankyo; Eisai; Eli Lilly & Co.; Galapagos; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Glaxo-Smith-Kline; Janssen;, Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Regeneron; Roche; Sanofi; Takeda; and UCB. J. Simon-Campos: None. H.S.B. Baraf: Grants/research support; AbbVie; Horizon; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Pfizer; Janssen; and Merck. U. Kumar: None. C. Tasset: Shareholder/stock ownership; Galapagos NV. Other; Employee of Galapagos NV. N. Mozaffarian: Shareholder/stock ownership; Gilead Sciences, Inc. Other; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. R.B.M. Landewé: Consultancies; AbbVie; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Galapagos NV; Novartis; Pfizer; and UCB. S. Bae: None. E. Keystone: Other; Reports research support, consulting, and speaker fees from AbbVie; Amgen; AstraZeneca; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celltrion; F. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd.; Genentech, Inc; Gilead Sciences, Inc.; Janssen; Lilly, ; Merck; Myriad Autoimmune; Pfizer; PuraPharm; Sandoz; Sanofi-Genzyme; Samsung Bioepsis; and UCB. P. Nash: Other; Reports research support, consulting, and speaker and personal fees from AbbVie; Bristol-Myers Squibb; Celgene; Eli Lilly & Co.; Gilead Sciences, Inc; Janssen; Merck Sharp & Dohme; Novartis; Pfizer;, Roche; Sanofi; and UCB.

scholarly journals EXPRESS: Efficacy and Safety of Tadalafil in a Pediatric Population with Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Phase 3 randomized, Double Blind Placebo-Controlled Study

2021 ◽  
pp. 204589402110249
Author(s):  
David D Ivy ◽  
Damien Bonnet ◽  
Rolf MF Berger ◽  
Gisela Meyer ◽  
Simin Baygani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pediatric Patients ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Significance Testing ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Statistical Significance Testing ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Double Blind Placebo ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Pulmonary Arterial

Objective: This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of tadalafil in pediatric patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods: This phase-3, international, randomized, multicenter (24 weeks double-blind placebo controlled period; 2-year, open-labelled extension period), add-on (patient’s current endothelin receptor antagonist therapy) study included pediatric patients aged <18 years with PAH. Patients received tadalafil 20 mg or 40 mg based on their weight (Heavy-weight: ≥40 kg; Middle-weight: ≥25—<40 kg) or placebo orally QD for 24 weeks. Primary endpoint was change from baseline in 6-minute walk (6MW) distance in patients aged ≥6 years at Week 24. Sample size was amended from 134 to ≥34 patients, due to serious recruitment challenges. Therefore, statistical significance testing was not performed between treatment groups. Results: Patient demographics and baseline characteristics (N=35; tadalafil=17; placebo=18) were comparable between treatment groups; median age was 14.2 years (6.2 to 17.9 years) and majority (71.4%, n=25) of patients were in HW cohort. Least square mean (SE) changes from baseline in 6MW distance at Week 24 was numerically greater with tadalafil versus placebo (60.48 [20.41] vs 36.60 [20.78] meters; placebo-adjusted mean difference [SD] 23.88 [29.11]). Safety of tadalafil treatment was as expected without any new safety concerns. During study period 1, two patients (1 in each group) discontinued due to investigator’s reported clinical worsening, and no deaths were reported. Conclusions: The statistical significance testing was not performed between the treatment groups due to low sample size, however, the study results show positive trend in improvement in non invasive measurements, commonly utilized by clinicians to evaluate the disease status for children with PAH. Safety of tadalafil treatment was as expected without any new safety signals.

scholarly journals Exenatide once weekly over 2 years as a potential disease-modifying treatment for Parkinson’s disease: protocol for a multicentre, randomised, double blind, parallel group, placebo controlled, phase 3 trial: The ‘Exenatide-PD3’ study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. e047993
Author(s):  
Nirosen Vijiaratnam ◽  
Christine Girges ◽  
Grace Auld ◽  
Marisa Chau ◽  
Kate Maclagan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Parkinson’S Disease ◽  
Parkinson's Disease ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Treatment Groups ◽  
Link Type ◽  
South Central ◽  
Disease Modifying ◽  
Secondary Outcomes

IntroductionParkinson’s disease (PD) is a common neurodegenerative disorder with substantial morbidity. No disease-modifying treatments currently exist. The glucagon like peptide-1 receptor agonist exenatide has been associated in single-centre studies with reduced motor deterioration over 1 year. The aim of this multicentre UK trial is to confirm whether these previous positive results are maintained in a larger number of participants over 2 years and if effects accumulate with prolonged drug exposure.Methods and analysisThis is a phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled trial of exenatide at a dose of 2 mg weekly in 200 participants with mild to moderate PD. Treatment duration is 96 weeks. Randomisation is 1:1, drug to placebo. Assessments are performed at baseline, week 12, 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, 84 and 96 weeks.The primary outcome is the comparison of Movement Disorders Society Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale part 3 motor subscore in the practically defined OFF medication state at 96 weeks between participants according to treatment allocation. Secondary outcomes will compare the change between groups among other motor, non-motor and cognitive scores. The primary outcome will be reported using descriptive statistics and comparisons between treatment groups using a mixed model, adjusting for baseline scores. Secondary outcomes will be summarised between treatment groups using summary statistics and appropriate statistical tests to assess for significant differences.Ethics and disseminationThis trial has been approved by the South Central-Berkshire Research Ethics Committee and the Health Research Authority. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed journals, presented at scientific meetings and to patients in lay-summary format.Trial registration numbersNCT04232969, ISRCTN14552789.

scholarly journals P215 Filgotinib, a janus kinase 1 selective inhibitor, modulates disease-associated cytokines in patients with active RA

Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter C Taylor ◽  
Emon Elboudwarej ◽  
Wanying Li ◽  
Rachael E Hawtin ◽  
Jinfeng Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Migration ◽  
Disease Activity ◽  
Clinical Response ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Selective Inhibitor ◽  
Janus Kinase ◽  
Stock Ownership ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Bone Biology ◽  
Immune Cell Migration

Abstract Background Filgotinib (FIL), an oral JAK1-selective inhibitor, was safe and effective in FINCH2, a randomised, double-blind, placebo (PBO)-controlled, phase 3 study in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who had an inadequate response to methotrexate (MTX) and ≥1 biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug. A longitudinal study of cytokines from patients in FINCH2 was conducted to identify RA-associated biomarkers related to bone biology, immune cell migration, and inflammation that are altered by FIL therapy; and FIL-associated biomarkers that correlate with clinical response (DAS28CRP, swollen and tender joint counts, pain, and fatigue). Methods Plasma, serum and urine samples from RA patients (n = 449) receiving FIL (100mg, 200mg) or PBO once daily plus MTX were analysed at baseline (BL) and week 12 (W12) for 42 disease-relevant cytokines using validated, commercially available single- or multiplex assays. PBO corrected on-treatment changes in cytokine levels from BL to W12 were compared between treatment arms (Wilcoxon rank sum). Spearman rank correlation was used to compare changes in cytokine level from BL to W12 and clinical response. P-values &lt;0.05 were considered significant. Results At W12, 18 of 42 cytokines significantly decreased with FIL 100mg treatment relative to PBO; FIL 200mg decreased these cytokines to a similar or greater degree. An additional 6 cytokines were significantly decreased by FIL 200mg. Conversely, 2 cytokines increased relative to PBO with FIL 100mg, and 6 cytokines increased with FIL 200mg (sIL-6R, IL10, GMCSF, IL2, leptin, and IL17A). Biomarkers most significantly modulated by FIL 200mg (p &lt; 0.0001) included markers related to bone biology (MMP1 [-22.8%], MMP3 [-24.7%], CTX1 [-27.4% ], and NTX [-16.4%]), immune cell migration (VCAM1 [-20.0%], ICAM1 [-14.2%], CXCL13 [-45.0%], and CXCL10 [-32.3%]), and inflammation (TNFRI[-20.7%], CRP [-77.4%], SAA [-61.8%], and resistin [-20.2%]). Hierarchical clustering of BL biomarker levels revealed distinct groups of cytokines that were strongly correlated with each other. Among them, SAA, IL6 and CXCL10, were significantly positively correlated with each other (rho&gt;0.6) and with RA disease activity (DAS28CRP) at BL (rho&gt;0.3). Biomarkers, including CRP (IL6, SAA), PainVAS (CRP, SAA), and SJC28 (CRP, IL6, CXCL10), were also significantly correlated with individual components of DAS28CRP. Several biomarkers associated with RA disease activity at BL were decreased with FIL at W12 relative to PBO (FIL 100mg: CRP [-48.7%], SAA [-36.9%], and IL6 [-2.6%] and FIL 200mg: CRP [-77.4%], SAA [-61.8%], IL6 [-13.6%], CXCL10 [-32.3%]), suggesting FIL impacts these disease activities at a molecular level. Conclusion Twelve weeks of FIL treatment significantly reduced 24 disease-relevant cytokines in patients with active RA. Effects were dose-dependent and suggest a shift toward restored immune homeostasis. Findings are consistent with the clinical efficacy of FIL in FINCH2. Disclosures P.C. Taylor: Consultancies; Consultant for AbbVie, BMS, Jansses, Pfizer, Roche, Lilly, Sanofi, MSD, Novartis, Celgene and Gilead. E. Elboudwarej: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. W. Li: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. R.E. Hawtin: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. J. Liu: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc. A.M. Mirza: Corporate appointments; Employee of Gilead Sciences, Inc. Shareholder/stock ownership; Shareholder of Gilead Sciences, Inc.

scholarly journals POS0928 NETAKIMAB EFFICACY IN ANTI-TNF-NAIVE AND ANTI-TNF-EXPERIENCED PATIENTS WITH ACTIVE ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS: RESULTS OF SUBANALYSIS OF PHASE 3 ASTERA TRIAL

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 726.2-727
Author(s):  
S. Erdes ◽  
V. Mazurov ◽  
T. Dubinina ◽  
I. Gaydukova ◽  
A. Kundzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
P Value ◽  
Interleukin 17 ◽  
Inadequate Response ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Asas Criteria

Background:According to previous studies, the effectiveness of interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors was higher in anti-TNF-naïve patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) [1,2]. Netakimab (NTK) is a humanized anti-IL-17A antibody approved for the treatment of AS, psoriatic arthritis, moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in Russia and Belarus.Objectives:To compare the efficacy of NTK in anti-TNF-naïve patients with anti-TNF-experienced patients with active AS at week 16 of therapy.Methods:ASTERA (NCT03447704) is an ongoing phase 3 placebo (PBO)-controlled clinical study, aimed at evaluating NTK efficacy in AS [3]. 228 adult patients with active AS (BASDAI ≥ 4) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 120 mg NTK or PBO subcutaneously at week 0,1,2 and then q2w. This analysis includes 112 patients in NTK group. Efficacy endpoints included ASAS20/40, ASAS5/6 and ASAS partial remission (PR) at week 16 of therapy.Results:28 (25.0%) of 112 patients in NTK group had previous inadequate response/intolerance to anti-TNF (anti-TNF-IR): 24 (21.4%) – one anti-TNF, and 4 (3.6%) – two anti-TNF. 84 (75.0%) patients were TNF-naive. Achievement of ASAS criteria response at week 16 was similar in both groups (Table 1).Table 1.Efficacy of NTK at week 16ParameterTNF-naïve (n = 84)anti-TNF-IR (n = 28)p-value*ASAS20, n (%)52 (61.9%)17 (60.7%)0.91ASAS40, n (%)35 (41.7%)11 (39.3%)0.82ASAS5/6, n (%)39 (46.4%)11 (39.3%)0.51ASAS(PR), n (%)15 (17.9%) 4 (14.3%)0.78*- Fisher’s exact testConclusion:NTK 120 mg provided sustained improvements in signs and symptoms of AS in anti-TNF-naive and anti-TNF-IR patients at 16 weeks of therapy.References:[1]Blair HA, Dhillon S. Secukinumab: A Review in Ankylosing Spondylitis. Drugs. 2016;76(10):1023-30.[2]Dougados M, et al. Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab through 52 weeks in two phase 3, randomised, controlled clinical trials in patients with active radiographic axial spondyloarthritis (COAST-V and COAST-W). Ann Rheum Dis. 2020;79(2):176-185.[3]Mazurov VI, et al. Efficacy and safety of Netakimab, anti-IL-17A monoclonal antibody, in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Results of phase III international, multicenter, randomized double-blind clinical trial BCD-085-5/ASTERA. Nauchno-Practicheskaya Revmatologia=Rheumatology Science and Practice. 2020;58 (4):376–386 (In Russ).Acknowledgements:This study was sponsored by JSC BIOCAD.Disclosure of Interests:Shandor Erdes: None declared, V Mazurov: None declared, Tatiana Dubinina: None declared, Inna Gaydukova Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Biocad, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Alena Kundzer: None declared, Nikolaj Soroka: None declared, Anna Eremeeva Employee of: Biocad

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document