Assessment of Gestational Age: The Value of a Maturity Scoring System for Head Circumference and Mid-arm Circumference

1991 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 182-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. O. Eregie
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Scoring System ◽  
Arm Circumference

scholarly journals Mid-upper arm circumference in pregnant women and its relation to birth weight

1998 ◽  
Vol 32 (2) ◽  
pp. 112-117 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anamaría E. Ricalde ◽  
Gustavo Velásquez-Meléndez ◽  
Ana Cristina d'A. Tanaka ◽  
Arnaldo A.F. de Siqueira
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Maternal Nutritional Status ◽  
Arm Circumference ◽  
Mother’S Age ◽  
Mid Upper Arm Circumference ◽  
Pregnancy Weight

OBJECTIVE: In order to determine the relationship between some maternal anthropometric indicators and birth weight, crown-heel length and newborn's head circumference, 92 pregnant women were followed through at the prenatal service of hospital in S. Paulo, Brazil. MATERIAL AND METHOD: The following variables were established for the mother: weight, height, mid-upper arm circumference, pre-pregnancy weight, gestational weight gain and Quetelet's index. For the newborn the following variables were recorded: birth weight, crown-heel length, head circumference and gestational age by Dubowitz's method. RESULTS: Significant associations were noted between gestational age and newborn variables. In addition, maternal mid-arm circumference (MUAC) and pre-pregnancy weight were found to be positively correlated to birth weight (r=0.399; r=0.378, respectively). The multivariate linear regression shows that gestational age, mother's arm circumference and pre-pregnancy weight continue to be significant predictors of birth weight. On the other hand, only gestational age and mother's age was associated with crown-heel length. Similarly MUAC was significantly associated with crown-heel length (r= 0.306; P=0.0030). CONCLUSION: Maternal mid-upper arm circumference is a potential indicator of maternal nutritional status. It could be used in association with other anthropometric measurements, instead of pre-pregnancy weight, as an alternative indicator to assess women at risk of poor pregnancy outcome.

scholarly journals Assessment & correlation of gestational age in newborns with head circumference: A Hospital-based cross-sectional study in Central India

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-115
Author(s):  
Dr. Vishal Shrivastava ◽  
◽  
Dr. Purnendu Shekhar Lohia ◽  
Ms. Anita Sahu ◽  
◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Predictive Equations ◽  
Arm Circumference

Introduction: Preterm birth is the leading cause of death in children younger than 5 yearsworldwide. Although preterm survival rates have increased in high-income countries, pretermnewborns still die because of a lack of adequate newborn care in many low-income and middle-income countries. This study was aimed to find out the effectiveness of anthropometricmeasurement, a simple and inexpensive method, for identifying premature babies at birth. Method:We conducted a cross-sectional study in a tertiary care hospital with 350 consecutively live-bornnewborns. Their birth weight, mid-arm circumference, length and head circumference weremeasured and compared with gestational age assessed by New Ballard score. We summarized thevariables using descriptive statistics, and the strength of association was determined throughcorrelation analysis. The correlation was strong for head circumference. Linear regression analysiswas done to develop predictive equations. Result: Amongst 350 newborns, 76% were term and24% were preterm. Pearson's correlation coefficient between gestational age as assessed by NewBallard score and head circumference, birth weight, mid-arm circumference and length all showed asignificant positive correlation in the decreasing order [maximum with head circumference (r =0.566)]. Linear regression analysis was done to develop predictive equations. Conclusion: Headcircumference measurement can be a surrogate marker to predict prematurity as a significantcorrelation is seen between it and gestational age assessed by the New Ballard score. Furtherstudies are needed to cross-validate our result.

scholarly journals Mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in term newborns

2004 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 53-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bettina Barbosa Duque Figueira ◽  
Conceição Aparecida de Mattos Segre
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Mean Value ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Mean Values ◽  
Arm Circumference ◽  
Term Newborns ◽  
The Mean

CONTEXT: Mid-arm circumference of the newborn is strongly associated with birth weight and is a very good indicator of low and insufficient birth weight. However, there are few Brazilian studies on the relationship between mid-arm and head circumferences and, thus, this does not form part of the routine evaluation for newborns. OBJECTIVES: To establish the mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in a population of term newborns. TYPE OF STUDY: Cross-sectional study carried out between June 1997 and August 1999. SETTING: Hospital Maternidade Leonor Mendes de Barros, São Paulo. PARTICIPANTS: Term newborns (66 males and 65 females) of appropriate growth for gestational age, whose mothers were healthy, were included in the study. MAIN MEASUREMENTS: Arm circumference, arm circumference/head circumference ratio, birth weight and gestational age were measured within 48 hours of birth. Data were considered significant when p < 0.01. RESULTS: The mean values for the mid-arm circumference were 10.76 cm (standard deviation, SD = 0.68) for females and 10.76 (SD = 0.81) for males. The mean value for the mid-arm/head circumference ratio was 0.31 (SD = 0.02) for both sexes. Mid-arm circumference values were significantly related to birth weight and gestational age, whereas mid-arm/head circumference ratio was related only to birth weight. CONCLUSIONS: Mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio values were established for the studied population. It was possible to obtain curves for both mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in relation to birth weight. However, for mid-arm circumference, it was only possible to obtain curves in relation to gestational age. The use of the regression curves did not seem powerful enough to predict the mid-arm circumference and mid-arm/head circumference ratio in this population of term newborns. There were no gender differences for either of the measurements studied.

A Simple Method For Assessment of Gestational Age in Neonates Using Head Circumference

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (5) ◽  
pp. 211-213
Author(s):  
Dhaval Gandhi ◽  
◽  
Rupesh Masand ◽  
Alok Purohit
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Simple Method

scholarly journals 61 Maternal mid-upper arm circumference is associated with small for gestational age in a Zambian cohort

2021 ◽  
Vol 224 (2) ◽  
pp. S43
Author(s):  
Ashley A. Appiagyei ◽  
Bellington Vwalika ◽  
Anne West Honart ◽  
Andrew Kumwenda ◽  
Chileshe Mabula ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Arm Circumference ◽  
Mid Upper Arm Circumference

Growth and Development of Children Conceived by In Vitro Fertilization

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 90 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-429
Author(s):  
Joseph M. Brandes ◽  
Joseph Itzkovits ◽  
Anat Scher ◽  
Miriam Sarid ◽  
Israel Thaler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
In Vitro Fertilization ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Healthy Population ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Vitro Fertilization ◽  
General Physical ◽  
And Control

To assess the physical and mental development of infants born after in vitro fertilization (IVF), we performed a general physical and developmental examination (Bayley and Stanford-Binet scales) on a cohort of 116 IVF children, conceived and born at our institution between February 1985 and March 1989, and on 116 non-IVF matched controls. Study and control groups were each composed of 66 singletons, 19 pairs of twins and 4 sets of triplets, whose age at examination ranged from 12 to 45 months. The developmental indices of IVF infants were within the normal range and did not differ from those of their matched controls. The indices were positively correlated to gestational age, birth weight, head circumference at birth and at examination, and mother's education. Mean birth weight, gestational age, and birth weight percentile of IVF infants were lower than the mean of the healthy population. Mean percentiles of weight and length at examination (mean age 22.4 months) were equally low but did not differ from those of the matched controls. However, mean percentiles of head circumference at birth and at examination compare well with the normal mean, both in IVF and control groups. Twins and triplets (IVF and controls) had significantly lower physical and mental indices as compared to singletons.

Letters to the Editor

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1982 ◽  
Vol 69 (1) ◽  
pp. 130-130
Author(s):  
Evelyn Lipper ◽  
Kwang-sun Lee ◽  
Lawrence M. Gartner ◽  
Bruce Grellong
Keyword(s):  
Birth Weight ◽  
Low Birth Weight ◽  
Gestational Age ◽  
Small For Gestational Age ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Low Birth Weight Infants ◽  
Letters To The Editor

All of the infants entered into the study were low-birth-weight infants (&lt;2,500 gm). The majority of infants had a gestational age less than 37 completed weeks, and, of these, some were also small for gestational age. Sixteen infants had a gestational age of ≥37 weeks but were included in the study because their birth weight was below the tenth percentile for their gestational age. We agree with Drs Knobloch and Malone's comment about the interrelationship of all three figures: as gastation advances, birth weight and head circumference increase.

Abstract 17071: Growth Asymmetry, Head Circumference and Neurodevelopmental Outcomes in Infants with Single Ventricles

Circulation ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 130 (suppl_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas A Miller ◽  
Victor Zak ◽  
Peter Shrader ◽  
Chitra Ravishankar ◽  
Victoria L Pemberton ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gestational Age ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Single Ventricle ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Somatic Growth ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Neurodevelopmental Outcomes ◽  
Head Growth ◽  
Developmental Index ◽  
Asymmetric Growth

Poor somatic growth is common in infants with single ventricle (SV) physiology and has been linked to increased morbidity and impaired neurodevelopment. Asymmetry in somatic growth, a potential brain-sparing adaptation, is important in predicting outcomes in premature and small for gestational age (SGA) infants. Objectives: To assess variability in growth asymmetry and its associations with neurodevelopment in infants with SV. Methods: We analyzed growth asymmetry (weight for age z-score (WAZ) minus head circumference for age z-score (HCAZ)), relative head growth (change in cm/change in kg), HCAZ, and change in HCAZ from baseline to pre-Glenn in subjects prospectively enrolled in the Pediatric Heart Network Infant Single Ventricle (ISV) trial. Associations between these indices and results of the Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) and Mental Developmental Index (MDI) of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II (BSID) at 14 months were assessed. Results: Of the 230 patients enrolled in ISV, complete biometric data and BSID results were available in 168 (73%). For this cohort, age at enrollment was 21±9 days, age at pre-Glenn was 167±52 days, gestational age was 38.3±1.4 weeks, and 71% were male. Growth asymmetry varied across the cohort at enrollment (0.43 ±1.02, range -2.85 to 4.84) and the pre-Glenn visit (-0.23 ±1.21, range -4.45 to 3.00) as did the relative head growth (2.40±0.86, range 0.50 to 8.00). BSID scores were not associated with indices of growth asymmetry. In univariate analysis, larger pre-Glenn HCAZ correlated with higher MDI (r=0.21, p=0.006) and PDI (r=0.38, p<0.001) and greater increase in HCAZ from enrollment to pre-Glenn was associated with higher PDI (r=0.15, p=0.049). In multivariable modeling adjusting for site, serious adverse events, stage 1 length of stay, and height at 14 months, pre-Glenn HCAZ was an independent predictor of PDI (p=0.03), but not MDI. For each one unit Z-score increase in pre-Glenn HCAZ, the predicted PDI score increased by 2.5 points. Conclusions: In infants with SV, BSID scores were associated with pre-Glenn HCAZ but not with the degree of asymmetric growth. Future studies should explore why asymmetric growth that seems important in premature and SGA infants appears less relevant in infants with SV.

scholarly journals The Effect of Massage Stimulation on Anthropometric Measures of Preschool Aged Children at Integrated PAUD Merpati Anggrek Surabaya

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 635-643
Author(s):  
Setiawandari - Setiawandari
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Head Circumference ◽  
Research Method ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Control Groups ◽  
Upper Arm ◽  
Anthropometric Measures ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Arm Circumference ◽  
Reducing Stress

Massage stimulation is a traditional therapy of the Indonesian, which combines auditory, visual and tactile kinesthetic stimuli, which can be given from early to unlimited age.  Massage stimulation for preschoolers in addition to relaxing the child is also reducing stress, increasing immunity, stimulating the vagus nerve, also increasing growth by stimulating cell growth. This research aims to determine the effect of massage stimulation on the anthropometric size of preschoolers. This research method uses Randomized Controlled Trial. The results obtained a significant value of p = 0,000 or p <0.05 in the treatment group, but in the two control groups there was no difference in anthropometric measurements of height and head circumference p> 0.05. In conclusion, there was the effect of massage stimulation on body weight, height, upper arm circumference and head circumference. But the height and head circumference were not found differences in the two groups. 

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document