Transcription factor SOX4 facilitates BMP2‐regulated gene expression during invasive trophoblast differentiation

2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (12) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuyin Yi ◽  
Hua Zhu ◽  
Christian Klausen ◽  
Peter C. K. Leung
Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 1335
Author(s):  
Marina Mostafizar ◽  
Claudia Cortes-Pérez ◽  
Wanda Snow ◽  
Jelena Djordjevic ◽  
Aida Adlimoghaddam ◽  
...  

The transcription factor nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) is highly expressed in almost all types of cells. NF-κB is involved in many complex biological processes, in particular in immunity. The activation of the NF-κB signaling pathways is also associated with cancer, diabetes, neurological disorders and even memory. Hence, NF-κB is a central factor for understanding not only fundamental biological presence but also pathogenesis, and has been the subject of intense study in these contexts. Under healthy physiological conditions, the NF-κB pathway promotes synapse growth and synaptic plasticity in neurons, while in glia, NF-κB signaling can promote pro-inflammatory responses to injury. In addition, NF-κB promotes the maintenance and maturation of B cells regulating gene expression in a majority of diverse signaling pathways. Given this, the protein plays a predominant role in activating the mammalian immune system, where NF-κB-regulated gene expression targets processes of inflammation and host defense. Thus, an understanding of the methodological issues around its detection for localization, quantification, and mechanistic insights should have a broad interest across the molecular neuroscience community. In this review, we summarize the available methods for the proper detection and analysis of NF-κB among various brain tissues, cell types, and subcellular compartments, using both qualitative and quantitative methods. We also summarize the flexibility and performance of these experimental methods for the detection of the protein, accurate quantification in different samples, and the experimental challenges in this regard, as well as suggestions to overcome common challenges.


2008 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 1262-1266 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kelly A. Jackson ◽  
Ruth A. Valentine ◽  
Lisa J. Coneyworth ◽  
John C. Mathers ◽  
Dianne Ford

Mechanisms through which gene expression is regulated by zinc are central to cellular zinc homoeostasis. In this context, evidence for the involvement of zinc dyshomoeostasis in the aetiology of diseases, including Type 2 diabetes, Alzheimer's disease and cancer, highlights the importance of zinc-regulated gene expression. Mechanisms elucidated in bacteria and yeast provide examples of different possible modes of zinc-sensitive gene regulation, involving the zinc-regulated binding of transcriptional activators and repressors to gene promoter regions. A mammalian transcriptional regulatory mechanism that mediates zinc-induced transcriptional up-regulation, involving the transcription factor MTF1 (metal-response element-binding transcription factor 1), has been studied extensively. Gene responses in the opposite direction (reduced mRNA levels in response to increased zinc availability) have been observed in mammalian cells, but a specific transcriptional regulatory process responsible for such a response has yet to be identified. Examples of single zinc-sensitive transcription factors regulating gene expression in opposite directions are emerging. Although zinc-induced transcriptional repression by MTF1 is a possible explanation in some specific instances, such a mechanism cannot account for repression by zinc of all mammalian genes that show this mode of regulation, indicating the existence of as yet uncharacterized mechanisms of zinc-regulated transcription in mammalian cells. In addition, recent findings reveal a role for effects of zinc on mRNA stability in the regulation of specific zinc transporters. Our studies on the regulation of the human gene SLC30A5 (solute carrier 30A5), which codes for the zinc transporter ZnT5, have revealed that this gene provides a model system by which to study both zinc-induced transcriptional down-regulation and zinc-regulated mRNA stabilization.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 514-531 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Heise ◽  
Julia van der Felden ◽  
Sandra Kern ◽  
Mario Malcher ◽  
Stefan Brückner ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the TEA transcription factor Tec1 is known to regulate target genes together with a second transcription factor, Ste12. Tec1-Ste12 complexes can activate transcription through Tec1 binding sites (TCSs), which can be further combined with Ste12 binding sites (PREs) for cooperative DNA binding. However, previous studies have hinted that Tec1 might regulate transcription also without Ste12. Here, we show that in vivo, physiological amounts of Tec1 are sufficient to stimulate TCS-mediated gene expression and transcription of the FLO11 gene in the absence of Ste12. In vitro, Tec1 is able to bind TCS elements with high affinity and specificity without Ste12. Furthermore, Tec1 contains a C-terminal transcriptional activation domain that confers Ste12-independent activation of TCS-regulated gene expression. On a genome-wide scale, we identified 302 Tec1 target genes that constitute two distinct classes. A first class of 254 genes is regulated by Tec1 in a Ste12-dependent manner and is enriched for genes that are bound by Tec1 and Ste12 in vivo. In contrast, a second class of 48 genes can be regulated by Tec1 independently of Ste12 and is enriched for genes that are bound by the stress transcription factors Yap6, Nrg1, Cin5, Skn7, Hsf1, and Msn4. Finally, we find that combinatorial control by Tec1-Ste12 complexes stabilizes Tec1 against degradation. Our study suggests that Tec1 is able to regulate TCS-mediated gene expression by Ste12-dependent and Ste12-independent mechanisms that enable promoter-specific transcriptional control.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koyel Ghosh ◽  
Kamilla Ankær Brejndal ◽  
Clare L. Kirkpatrick

AbstractToxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are widespread in bacterial chromosomes but their functions remain enigmatic. Although many are transcriptionally upregulated by stress conditions, it is unclear what role they play in cellular responses to stress and to what extent the role of a given TA system homologue varies between different bacterial species. In this work we investigate the role of the DNA damage-inducible TA system HigBA of Caulobacter crescentus in the SOS response and discover that in addition to the toxin HigB affecting cell cycle gene expression through inhibition of the master regulator CtrA, HigBA possesses a transcription factor third component, HigC, which both auto-regulates the TA system and acts independently of it. Through HigC, the system exerts downstream effects on antibiotic (ciprofloxacin) resistance and cell cycle gene expression. HigB and HigC had inverse effects on cell cycle gene regulation, with HigB reducing and HigC increasing the expression of CtrA-dependent promoters. Neither HigBA nor HigC had any effect on formation of persister cells in response to ciprofloxacin. Rather, their role in the SOS response appears to be as transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulators of cell cycle-dependent gene expression, transmitting the status of the SOS response as a regulatory input into the cell cycle control network via CtrA.ImportanceAlmost all bacteria respond to DNA damage by upregulating a set of genes that helps them to repair and recover from the damage, known as the SOS response. The set of genes induced during the SOS response varies between species, but frequently includes toxin-antitoxin systems. However, it is unknown what the consequence of inducing these systems is, and whether they provide any benefit to the cells. We show here that the DNA damage-induced TA system HigBA of the asymmetrically dividing bacterium Caulobacter crescentus affects the cell cycle regulation of this bacterium. HigBA also has a transcription factor encoded immediately downstream of it, named here HigC, which controls expression of the TA system and potentially other genes as well. Therefore, this work identifies a new role for TA systems in the DNA damage response, distinct from non-specific stress tolerance mechanisms which had been proposed previously.


Immunity ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 699-712 ◽  
Author(s):  
Attila Szanto ◽  
Balint L. Balint ◽  
Zsuzsanna S. Nagy ◽  
Endre Barta ◽  
Balazs Dezso ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (8) ◽  
pp. 2871-2882 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan-Jose Ventura ◽  
Norman J. Kennedy ◽  
Jennifer A. Lamb ◽  
Richard A. Flavell ◽  
Roger J. Davis

ABSTRACT The c-Jun NH2-terminal kinase (JNK) is activated by the cytokine tumor necrosis factor (TNF). This pathway is implicated in the regulation of AP-1-dependent gene expression by TNF. To examine the role of the JNK signaling pathway, we compared the effects of TNF on wild-type and Jnk1 −/− Jnk2 −/− murine embryo fibroblasts. We show that JNK is required for the normal regulation of AP-1 by TNF. The JNK-deficient cells exhibited decreased expression of c-Jun, JunD, c-Fos, Fra1, and Fra2; decreased phosphorylation of c-Jun and JunD; and decreased AP-1 DNA binding activity. The JNK-deficient cells also exhibited defects in the regulation of the AP-1-related transcription factor ATF2. These changes were associated with marked defects in TNF-regulated gene expression. The JNK signal transduction pathway is therefore essential for AP-1 transcription factor regulation in cells exposed to TNF.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document