scholarly journals Are vasomotor symptoms associated with sleep characteristics among symptomatic midlife women? Comparisons of self-report and objective measures

Author(s):  
Rebecca C. Thurston ◽  
Nanette Santoro ◽  
Karen A. Matthews
2002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arlene Michaels Miller ◽  
Peggy J. Chandler ◽  
Dorie Schwertz ◽  
Olga Sorokin ◽  
JoEllen Wilbur

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas Parry ◽  
Brittany I Davidson ◽  
Craig Sewall ◽  
Jacob T. Fisher ◽  
Hannah Mieczkowski ◽  
...  

The influence of digital media on personal and social well-being is a question of immense public and academic interest. Scholars in this domain often use retrospective self-report measures of the quantity or duration of media use as a proxy for more objective measures, but the validity of these self-report measures remains unclear. Recent advancements in log-based data collection techniques have produced a growing collection of studies indexing both self-reported media use and device-logged measurements. Herein, we report a meta-analysis of this body of research. Based on 104 effect sizes, we found that self-reported media use was only moderately correlated with device-logged measurements, and that these self-report measures were rarely an accurate reflection of logged media use. These results demonstrate that self-reported measures of the quantity or duration of media use are not a valid index of the amount of time people actually spend using media. These findings have serious implications for the study of media use and well- being, suggesting that cautiousness is warranted in drawing conclusions regarding media effects from studies relying solely on self-reported measures of media use.


2017 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
pp. 60-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Kempert ◽  
Ethan Benore ◽  
Rachel Heines

AbstractPurposeThis study evaluates the clinical usefulness of patient-rated and objective measures to identify physically-oriented functional changes after an intensive chronic pain program in a pediatric setting. Past studies have demonstrated the importance of adolescents’ perception of their abilities and measurement tools used for rehabilitation outcomes within physical and occupational therapy; however, these tools used are not often easily utilized or have not been examined with a pediatric chronic pain population. In chronic pain rehabilitation, it is important to have a primary focus on functional improvement not on pain reduction as a leading outcome. This study examines how both self-report and objective physical activity measures can be meaningful constructs and can be used as reliable outcome measures. It was hypothesized that adolescents completing an interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program would report functional gains from admission to discharge, and that perceived gains in physical ability would be associated with objective physical activities. Further, it was hypothesized that gains in functioning would be associated with mild pain reduction.MethodsData from 78 children and adolescents with chronic pain that participated in an intensive multidisciplinary treatment program completed self-report measures including the Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS), Upper Extremity Functional Index (UEFI). In addition, adolescents were objectively monitored for repetitions of selected physical activities for 1 min intervals.ResultsData demonstrated significant gains in all measures of functioning during the program. Correlations between self-report and objective outcomes suggest they are measuring similar yet distinct factors.ConclusionsThe LEFS, UEFI, and objective exercises provide a meaningful way to track progress in pediatric chronic pain rehabilitation. Despite similarities, they appear to track separate but related aspects of rehabilitation and capture important short-term response to rehabilitation. Both measures appear distinct from pain as an outcome. These findings increase our understanding of rehabilitation practices provide opportunities to promote clinical improvement in pediatric pain.ImplicationsThe use of self-report measures along with objective measures can help therapists gain understanding in regards to a patient’s insight and how that may impact their overall outcome compared to the use of a single outcome measure. Viewing these rated measures at any point in the rehabilitation process can be useful to facilitate discussion about challenges they can identify and how therapies can facilitate improvement and functional gains.


Menopause ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (11) ◽  
pp. 1228-1235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ekta Kapoor ◽  
Stephanie Faubion ◽  
Ryan T. Hurt ◽  
Karen Fischer ◽  
Darrell Schroeder ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 72 (6) ◽  
pp. 471-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arie Kapteyn ◽  
James Banks ◽  
Mark Hamer ◽  
James P Smith ◽  
Andrew Steptoe ◽  
...  

BackgroundPhysical activity (PA) is important for maintaining health, but there are fundamental unanswered questions on how best it should be measured.MethodsWe measured PA in the Netherlands (n=748), the USA (n=540) and England (n=254), both by a 7 day wrist-worn accelerometer and by self-reports. The self-reports included a global self-report on PA and a report on the frequency of vigorous, moderate and mild activity.ResultsThe self-reported data showed only minor differences across countries and across groups within countries (such as different age groups or working vs non-working respondents). The accelerometer data, however, showed large differences; the Dutch and English appeared to be much more physically active than Americans h (For instance, among respondents aged 50 years or older 38% of Americans are in the lowest activity quintile of the Dutch distribution). In addition, accelerometer data showed a sharp decline of PA with age, while no such pattern was observed in self-reports. The differences between objective measures and self-reports occurred for both types of self-reports.ConclusionIt is clear that self-reports and objective measures tell vastly different stories, suggesting that across countries people use different response scales when answering questions about how physically active they are.


Author(s):  
Catherine C. Gao ◽  
Ekta Kapoor ◽  
Melissa C. Lipford ◽  
Virginia M. Miller ◽  
Darrell R. Schroeder ◽  
...  

PM&R ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (8) ◽  
pp. 858-867
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Stevens ◽  
Chung‐Wei C. Lin ◽  
Hidde P. van der Ploeg ◽  
Maria De Sousa ◽  
Jessica Castle ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 569-569
Author(s):  
Shauna McManus ◽  
Jolinta Y Lin ◽  
Manali A. Bhave ◽  
Gabrielle Brown ◽  
India Green ◽  
...  

569 Background: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of cosmesis after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) are increasingly emphasized as meaningful treatment endpoints but little is known about the relationship between objective measures, mood, and PROs following radiation (XRT). We hypothesized that pre-XRT depression, assessed by Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR), would influence PROs of breast cosmesis 1-year post-XRT independent of objective measures of breast asymmetry. Methods: 98 women were enrolled on two prospective longitudinal studies of breast cosmesis. Percentage breast retraction assessment (pBRA) was used as an objective measure of breast asymmetry pre- and 1 year post-XRT. At the same time points, pBRA was measured and compared with two different PRO ratings of cosmetic outcome (0-10 scale): 1) happiness with cosmesis and 2) perceived differences in treated vs. untreated breast. We performed univariate and multivariate analysis to evaluate the relationship between PROs, pBRA, IDS-SR scores, clinical, tumor, and treatment characteristics. Results: Among subjects, 50% were African American. Mean age was 56.45 years. At 1 year, 65.3% of patients were happy with their cosmetic outcome (Score > 8) although 59.5% noted moderate to severe differences in the treated vs. untreated breast (Score < 6). Mean pBRA increased from 7.20 (SD 3.88) pre-XRT to 9.69 (SD 6.22) confirming more breast asymmetry 1-year post-XRT. Prior to XRT, 23% of patients had moderate-to-severe depression (IDS-SR scores > 26). In multivariate analyses, 1 year PROs of happiness with cosmetic outcome did not correlate with pBRA (p = 0.3) but were strongly correlated with pre and post-XRT depression (all p < 0.05). Patients were more likely to perceive differences in breast texture or asymmetry (i.e. lower PRO ratings of asymmetry) if they had higher pBRA measurements at 1 year (all p = 0.004). Neither pre- nor post- XRT depression were associated with specific PRO ratings of breast asymmetry in multivariate analysis. Conclusions: Our study suggests that PROs may not always reflect the effects of cancer treatment. For patients treated with BCT, baseline depression strongly influenced patient reported happiness with overall cosmetic outcome 1 year post-XRT. Perceived differences in the treated vs. untreated breast correlated with objective measures of breast asymmetry. Our data suggests that this PRO may be more indicative of treatment-related toxicities than patient ratings of overall satisfaction and happiness with cosmetic outcome. Clinical trial information: NCT03167359 .


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document