scholarly journals Tuning intercellular adhesion with membrane-anchored oligonucleotides

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (159) ◽  
pp. 20190299
Author(s):  
Ian T. Hoffecker ◽  
Yusuke Arima ◽  
Hiroo Iwata

Adhesive interactions between cells play an integral role in development, differentiation and regeneration. Existing methods for controlling cell–cell cohesion and adhesion by manipulating protein expression are constrained by biological interdependencies, e.g. coupling of cadherins to actomyosin force-feedback mechanisms. We use oligonucleotides conjugated to PEGylated lipid anchors (ssDNAPEGDPPE) to introduce artificial cell–cell adhesion that is largely decoupled from the internal cytoskeleton. We describe cell–cell doublets with a mechanical model based on isotropic, elastic deformation of spheres to estimate the adhesion at the cell–cell interface. Physical manipulation of adhesion by modulating the PEG-lipid to ssDNAPEGDPPE ratio, and conversely treating with actin-depolymerizing cytochalasin D, resulted in decreases and increases in doublet contact area, respectively. Our data are relevant to the ongoing discussion over mechanisms of tissue surface tension and in agreement with models based on opposing cortical and cohesive forces. PEG-lipid modulation of doublet geometries resulted in a well-defined curve indicating continuity, enabling prescriptive calibration for controlling doublet geometry. Our study demonstrates tuning of basic doublet adhesion, laying the foundation for more complex multicellular adhesion control independent of protein expression.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian T. Hoffecker ◽  
Yusuke Arima ◽  
Hiroo Iwata

AbstractCohesive interactions between cells play an integral role in development, differentiation, and regeneration. Existing methods for controlling cell-cell cohesion by manipulating protein expression are constrained by biological interdependencies, e.g. coupling of cadherins to actomyosin force-feedback mechanisms. We use oligonucleotides conjugated to PEGylated lipid anchors (ssDNAPEGDPPE) to introduce artificial cell-cell cohesion that is largely decoupled from the internal cytoskeleton. We describe cell-cell doublets with a mechanical model based on isotropic, elastic deformation of spheres to estimate the cohesion at the cell-cell interface. Physical manipulation of cohesion by modulating PEG-lipid to ssDNAPEGDPPE ratio, and conversely treatment with actin-depolymerizing cytochalsin-D, resulted respectively in decreases and increases in doublet contact area. Our data are relevant to the ongoing discussion over mechanisms of tissue surface tension and in agreement with models based on opposing cortical and cohesive forces. PEG-lipid modulation of doublet geometries resulted in a well-defined curve indicating continuity, enabling prescriptive calibration for controlling doublet geometry. Our study demonstrates tuning of basic doublet cohesion, laying the foundation for more complex multicellular cohesion control independent of protein expression.


Cells ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 118
Author(s):  
David de Agustín-Durán ◽  
Isabel Mateos-White ◽  
Jaime Fabra-Beser ◽  
Cristina Gil-Sanz

The neocortex is an exquisitely organized structure achieved through complex cellular processes from the generation of neural cells to their integration into cortical circuits after complex migration processes. During this long journey, neural cells need to establish and release adhesive interactions through cell surface receptors known as cell adhesion molecules (CAMs). Several types of CAMs have been described regulating different aspects of neurodevelopment. Whereas some of them mediate interactions with the extracellular matrix, others allow contact with additional cells. In this review, we will focus on the role of two important families of cell–cell adhesion molecules (C-CAMs), classical cadherins and nectins, as well as in their effectors, in the control of fundamental processes related with corticogenesis, with special attention in the cooperative actions among the two families of C-CAMs.


2021 ◽  
Vol 35 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Takayuki Kohno ◽  
Takumi Konno ◽  
Shin Kikuchi ◽  
Masuo Kondoh ◽  
Takashi Kojima

F1000Research ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 1544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vivian W. Tang

The epithelial lateral membrane plays a central role in the integration of intercellular signals and, by doing so, is a principal determinant in the emerging properties of epithelial tissues. Mechanical force, when applied to the lateral cell–cell interface, can modulate the strength of adhesion and influence intercellular dynamics. Yet the relationship between mechanical force and epithelial cell behavior is complex and not completely understood. This commentary aims to provide an investigative look at the usage of cellular forces at the epithelial cell–cell adhesion interface.


2003 ◽  
pp. 137-145
Author(s):  
Douglas J. Goetz ◽  
Daniel M. Greif ◽  
Jian Shen ◽  
Francis W. Luscinskas

2008 ◽  
pp. 948 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alice Merca ◽  
Hartmut Bögge ◽  
Marc Schmidtmann ◽  
Yunshan Zhou ◽  
Erhard T. K. Haupt ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 362-362
Author(s):  
Eileen M. Finnegan ◽  
Aslihan Turhan ◽  
Jennifer Gaines ◽  
David E. Golan ◽  
Gilda Barabino

Abstract Microvascular vaso-occlusion in sickle cell disease is thought to involve adhesive interactions among erythrocytes (RBCs), leukocytes and vascular endothelial cells. Recent studies have demonstrated the presence of a significant inflammatory response in sickle cell disease, including changes in the cell surface adhesion molecules that mediate cell-cell interactions in the microvasculature. In this study, we used a parallel-plate flow chamber assay to determine the subpopulations of leukocytes that are involved in sickle leukocyte-RBC interactions. We also studied the effect of treatment with hydroxyurea (HU) on these adhesive interactions. Populations of monocytes, neutrophils (PMNs) and T cells were isolated by negative selection from the peripheral blood of untreated patients with sickle cell disease (SS), sickle patients receiving HU (SS-HU), and healthy control subjects (AA). Adhesive interactions involving these leukocyte subpopulations, human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) pretreated with tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α ), and autologous RBCs were measured under a shear stress of 1 dyne/cm2. Compared to the corresponding cell populations from AA individuals, PMNs, monocytes, and T cells from SS individuals were significantly more adherent to TNF-α-treated HUVECs (774±59 vs. 502±27 cells/mm2, p=0.001; 533±66 vs. 348±36 cells/mm2, p=0.024; and 470±75 vs. 227±26 cells/mm2, p=0.009, respectively). HU therapy significantly decreased the adhesion of SS PMNs to HUVECs (774±59 cells/mm2 for SS vs. 604±36 for SS-HU, p=0.025). Compared to adherent AA leukocytes, adherent SS leukocytes exhibited greater participation in adhesive interactions with autologous RBCs (41±3% for SS vs. 27±3% for AA, p=0.002), and HU treatment decreased the fraction of leukocytes that captured autologous RBCs to the control level (29±3% for SS-HU, p=0.006 vs. SS). Compared to adherent PMNs from SS individuals, adherent PMNs from SS-HU individuals showed significantly reduced participation in the capture of RBCs (53±6% for SS vs. 35±5% for SS-HU, p=0.021). Although adherent T cells from SS individuals participated significantly more in RBC capture than adherent T cells from AA individuals (28±5% for SS vs. 10±2% for AA, p=0.007), HU therapy did not have a significant effect on this parameter (21±5% for SS-HU, p=0.373). Compared to AA leukocytes, SS leukocytes captured more RBCs per participating adherent leukocyte (2.8±0.2 vs. 1.9±0.1 RBCs/cell, p=0.001). HU therapy reduced the number of RBCs captured per PMN but not the number captured per T cell. Compared to AA T cells, SS T cells captured adherent RBCs for a significantly longer period of time (51±9 vs. 26±6 seconds, p=0.035). Our data suggest that sickle neutrophils, monocytes and T cells may all be involved in adhesive interactions with sickle RBCs. PMN-RBC and monocyte-RBC interactions appear to be more numerous than T cell-RBC interactions, although T cell-RBC interactions may be stronger. HU therapy appears to target PMN-RBC and monocyte-RBC interactions preferentially. Future studies will focus on the role of particular adhesion molecules in mediating these interactions and on the potential for therapeutic interventions targeting cell-cell adhesion.


2014 ◽  
Vol 106 (10) ◽  
pp. 2196-2205 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrienne C. Greene ◽  
Samuel J. Lord ◽  
Aiwei Tian ◽  
Christopher Rhodes ◽  
Hiroyuki Kai ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 17 (24) ◽  
pp. 15534-15537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuval Elani ◽  
Robert V. Law ◽  
Oscar Ces

Spatially segregated in vitro protein expression in a vesicle-based artificial cell, with different proteins synthesised in defined vesicle regions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document