scholarly journals Validity of Wrist and Forehead Temperature in Temperature Screening in the General Population During the Outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus: a prospective real-world study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ge Chen ◽  
Jiarong Xie ◽  
Guangli Dai ◽  
Peijun Zheng ◽  
Xiaqing Hu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Tympanic Temperature ◽  
Infrared Thermometer ◽  
Link Type ◽  
Accuracy And Precision ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

AbstractAimsTemperature screening is important in the population during the outbreak of 2019 Novel Coronavirus (COVID-19). This study aimed to compare the accuracy and precision of wrist and forehead temperature with tympanic temperature under different circumstances.MethodsWe performed a prospective observational study in a real-life population. We consecutively collected wrist and forehead temperatures in Celsius (°C) using a non-contact infrared thermometer (NCIT). We also measured the tympanic temperature using a tympanic thermometers (IRTT) and defined fever as a tympanic temperature ≥37.3°C.ResultsWe enrolled a total of 528 participants including 261 indoor and 267 outdoor participants. We divided outdoor participants into four types according to their means of transportation to the hospital as walk, bicycle, electric vehicle, car, and inside the car. Under different circumstance, the mean difference ranged from −1.72 to −0.56°C in different groups for the forehead measurements, and −0.96 to −0.61°C for the wrist measurements. Both measurements had high fever screening abilities in inpatients (wrist: AUC 0.790; 95% CI: 0.725-0.854, P <0.001; forehead: AUC 0.816; 95% CI: 0.757-0.876, P <0.001). The cut-off value of wrist measurement for detecting tympanic temperature ≥37.3°C was 36.2°C with a 86.4% sensitivity and a 67.0% specificity, and the best threshold of forehead measurement was also 36.2°C with a 93.2% sensitivity and a 60.0% specificity.ConclusionsWrist measurement is more stable than forehead measurement under different circumstance. Both measurements have great fever screening abilities for indoor patients. The cut-off value of both measurements was 36.2°C. (ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT04274621)

scholarly journals Validity of the Use of Wrist and Forehead Temperatures in Screening the General Population for COVID-19: A Prospective Real-World Study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ge CHEN ◽  
Jiarong XIE ◽  
Guangli DAI ◽  
Peijun ZHENG ◽  
Xiaqing HU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
General Population ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Electric Vehicle ◽  
Real World ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Real Life ◽  
High Fever ◽  
Tympanic Temperature ◽  
Infrared Thermometer ◽  
The Mean

Background: We aimed to compare the accuracy of individuals’ wrist and forehead temperatures with their tympanic temperature under different circumstances. Methods: We performed a prospective observational study in a real-life population in Ningbo First Hospital in China. We consecutively recorded individuals’ wrist and forehead temperatures in Celsius (°C) using a noncontact infrared thermometer (NCIT). We also measured individuals’ tympanic temperature using a tympanic thermometer (IRTT) and defined fever as a tympanic temperature of ≥37.3 °C. Results: We enrolled 528 participants, including 261 indoor and 267 outdoor participants. We grouped the outdoor participants into four groups according to their means of transportation to the hospital: by foot, by bicycle/electric vehicle, by car, or as a passenger in a car. Under different circumstances, the mean difference in the forehead measurement ranged from -1.72 to -0.56 °C across groups, and that in the wrist measurement ranged from -0.96 to -0.61°C. Both measurements had high fever screening abilities in indoor patients. (Wrist: AUC 0.790; 95% CI: 0.725-0.854, P<0.001; forehead: AUC 0.816; 95% CI: 0.757-0.876, P <0.001). The cut-off value of the wrist measurement for detecting a tympanic temperature of ≥37.3 °C was 36.2 °C, with 86.4% sensitivity and 67.0% specificity, and the best threshold for the forehead measurement was 36.2 °C, with 93.2% sensitivity and 60.0% specificity. Conclusion: Wrist measurements are more stable than forehead measurements under different circumstances. Both measurements have favorable fever screening abilities in indoor patients. The cut-off values were both 36.2 °C.

scholarly journals Risk perception regarding the COVID-19 outbreak among the general population: a comparative Middle East survey

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mahmoud Abdel Hameed Shahin ◽  
Rasha Mohammed Hussien
Keyword(s):  
Risk Perception ◽  
General Population ◽  
Self Efficacy ◽  
Risk Perceptions ◽  
Preventive Measures ◽  
Public Awareness ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Convenience Sample ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

Abstract Background People’s perceptions of pandemic-associated risk are key factors contributing to increased public participation in disease preventive measures. The aim of the study was to investigate risk perceptions regarding the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, among the general population. A descriptive, cross-sectional design was used with a convenience sample of 723 participants, recruited from the general population of Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Jordan. Data collection was performed using a standardized risk perception assessment questionnaire, in April 2020. Results The mean score for the perception of COVID-19 seriousness was significantly higher and the mean scores for the perception of disease susceptibility and extent of anxiety were also higher among Saudi Arabian participants than participants from Egypt and Jordan. Participants from Egypt had significantly lower mean scores for the perception of efficacy and self-efficacy to cope with COVID-19, and significantly lower intention to comply with COVID-19 precautionary measures than the other populations. A significant positive correlation was detected between the perception of COVID-19 seriousness and self-efficacy to handle COVID-19, for the entire sample. The primary reasons reported by participants driving their willingness to perform certain preventive measures against COVID-19 was a feeling of responsibility toward their own health, followed by preventing transmission to other people and the feeling that COVID-19 can be serious. Most of the study sample reported a desire to receive information about COVID-19 treatment, ways to prevent disease contraction, and the incubation period for the novel coronavirus. Also, most of the study sample reported that they prefer receiving COVID-19 updates from national authorities. Conclusions During the COVID-19 pandemic, communications designed to promote the adoption of preventive behaviors should focus on increasing the perception of seriousness, the risk perception, self-efficacy to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic, and the effectiveness of the adopted behavioral measures for reducing risk. Health education programs that are tailored to various sociodemographic categories, to improve public awareness, perceptions, and attitudes, are vital for increasing the adoption of outbreak preventive measures.

scholarly journals Anaesthesia and Perioperative Care in Remote Health Camps- Patients’ Concerns

2010 ◽  
Vol 49 (179) ◽  
Author(s):  
Balkrishna Bhattarai ◽  
A Ghimire ◽  
BK Baral ◽  
A Shrestha ◽  
Y Dhungana
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Perioperative Care ◽  
Local Anaesthesia ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Main Concern ◽  
Surgical Experience ◽  
Female Ratio ◽  
Male Female Ratio ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Remote Health

INTRODUCTION:Identifying patients' concerns and expectations regarding anaesthesia and perioperative care in mobile surgical camps is relevant for the camp workers. This prospective observational study was conducted to assess knowledge, concerns, and expectations about anaesthesia and perioperative care in patients undergoing surgery in mobile surgical camps in remote mountainous districts of Eastern Nepal.METHODS:A questionnaire with seven items related to anaesthesia and perioperative care was used for interviewing 80 individuals of age > or = 12 years, 20 from each camp at Solukhumbu, Sankhuwasabha, Khotang and Bhojpur districts.RESULTS:Data of two patients were lost leaving only 78 individuals for analysis. The mean age of the subjects was 30.5 (+/- 14.6) years with the male: female ratio of 43: 35. Fifty-eight (74.4%) patients had some gross idea about the modality of administration of anaesthetics. Twenty-six (33.3%) individuals preferred GA over local anaesthesia, whereas 22 (28.2%) were happy either way if there was no pain. Pain was the main concern for 73.1% of the patients. Of the 25 patients expressing fear of GA, death or not being able to wake up anymore was the main concern for 60.0%. Increasing age was associated with lower fear of GA (p < 0.05). Surgical experience was distressing for 17 (21.8%) patients. The overall experience of the anaesthesia and surgery was worse than expected for 25.6% of the patients.CONCLUSIONS:Patients presenting to these health camps have limited knowledge regarding anaesthesia and perioperative care but have valid concerns and expectations in respect of their safety, comfort and outcome.

scholarly journals Role of JIGSAW method of teaching in improving clinical diagnosis among final year medical students – A prospective observational study

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 44-49
Author(s):  
Appandraj S ◽  
Sivagamasundari V ◽  
Varatharajan Sakthivadivel
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Test Score ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Post Test ◽  
Jigsaw Method ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Didactic Lecture ◽  
Teaching Learning

Background: The Jigsaw method is a form of cooperative learning, in which students are actively involved in the teaching-learning process that improves the long-term retention of acquired knowledge. Aims and Objectives: The objective of this study was to assess the knowledge acquired by students using the Jigsaw learning method in Internal Medicine. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted with 100 students. The acute coronary syndrome was taken for 1 h as a didactic lecture, and a pre-test was conducted. The students were divided into five groups and were put for the intervention “Jigsaw.” The pre- and post-test were conducted, and feedback was collected from the students. Paired t-test was used to perform analysis of pre- and post-test. Feedback evaluation was done by a 5-point Liker scale. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant, and the data were analyzed using CoGuide software. Results: The mean pre-test score was 8.44 ± 2.33 ranged (3–14) and the mean post-test score was 11.03 ± 2.07 (ranged 6–15). The difference of 2.39 (95% CI: 2.19–2.59) increase in marks post-test after the Jigsaw method was statistically significant (P<0.001). The satisfaction level was 50–55% on the Likert scale based on the questionnaire given. There was a significant improvement in the post-test scores of the students after Jigsaw. Conclusion: The Jigsaw method improved knowledge in the short-term by engaging students in group work and motivation to learn. Overall response based on the questionnaire about the Jigsaw method was positive.

scholarly journals Incisional Hernia Repair in Contaminated Surgical fields (I.H.R.C.S.) study using biological prostheses in emergency surgery setting with contaminated hernias: a multicenter prospective observational study

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda De Simone ◽  
Fausto Catena ◽  
Antonio Biondi ◽  
Gianluca Baiocchi ◽  
Fabio Campanile ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Incisional Hernia ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Wound Complication ◽  
Hernia Recurrence ◽  
Mesh Placement ◽  
Asa Score ◽  
Surgical Field ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Biological Prostheses

There are still difficulties to find appropriate indication for prosthetic implant in hernia surgery in contaminated surgical fields. Biologic prosthetic materials have been developed and proposed for the clinical use in contaminated surgical fields with interesting outcomes. The aim of this study is to analyze data from nine Italian Emergency Surgery Units concerning patients consecutively admitted with diagnosis of strangulated incisional hernia (IH), submitted to surgery in emergency and treated with biological prostheses. This is a prospective observational study. Subjects submitted to singlestaged IH repair in a contaminated surgical field, with the use of biologic mesh, were prospectively studied over a 1-year time period. All patients enrolled in this study were submitted to bowel/intestinal resection at the same operative time for perforation. Primary end points of our study were wound complication and hernia recurrence. Seventy-one patients were enrolled (F=21, M=50); the mean age was 69.2±11.1 standard deviation (SD) years and the mean American Society of Anesthesiologist (ASA) score was 3.1±0.8 SD. Twenty-one patients (29.57%) had a wound complication, associated with high ASA score, diabetes, smoking, chronic immunosuppression, number of previous hernia repairs, dirty surgical field, sublay extra peritoneal mesh placement and no anterior fascia closure. After a mean follow up time of 27.2 months, hernia recurrence occurred in 19 patients (26.76%). Predictors of hernia recurrence included wound complications, high ASA score, diabetes, chronic immunosuppression, dirty surgical field and sublay extra peritoneal mesh placement. Use of biological prostheses in contaminated fields is safe with favorable medium term recurrence rate (26.76% in our experience). Surgical technique performed is important to decrease hernia recurrence rate.

scholarly journals Premedication practices for tracheal intubation in neonates transported by French medical transport teams: a prospective observational study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (11) ◽  
pp. e034052 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ricardo Carbajal ◽  
Noella Lode ◽  
Azzedine Ayachi ◽  
Ourida Chouakri ◽  
Véronique Henry-Larzul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Adverse Events ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Drug Regimen ◽  
Muscle Rigidity ◽  
Neonatal Transport ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Medical Transport ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Paris Region

ObjectivesPremedication practices for neonatal tracheal intubations have not yet been described for neonatal transport teams. Our objective is to describe the use of sedation/analgesia (SA) for tracheal intubations and to assess its tolerance in neonates transported by medical transport teams in France.SettingThis prospective observational study was part of the EPIPPAIN 2 project and collected around-the-clock data on SA practices in neonates intubated by all five paediatric medical transport teams of the Paris region during a 2-month period. Intubations were classified as emergent, semiemergent and non-emergent. Sedation level and conditions of intubation were assessed with the Tonus, Reactivity, Awareness and Conditions of intubation to Help in Endotracheal intubation Assessment (TRACHEA score). The scores range from 0 to 10 representing an increasing ladder from adequate to inadequate sedation, and from excellent to very poor conditions of intubation.Participants40 neonates intubated in 28 different centres.ResultsThe mean (SD) age was 34.9 (3.9) weeks, and 62.5% were intubated in the delivery room. 30/40 (75%) of intubations were performed with the use of SA. In 18/30 (60.0%) intubations performed with SA, the drug regimen was the association of sufentanil and midazolam. Atropine was given in 19/40 intubations. From the 16, 21 and 3 intubations classified as emergent, semiemergent and non-emergent, respectively, 8 (50%), 19 (90.5%) and 3 (100%) were performed with SA premedication. 79.3% of intubations performed with SA had TRACHEA scores of 3 or less. 22/40 (55%) infants had at least one of the following adverse events: muscle rigidity, bradycardia below 100/min, desaturation below 80% and nose or pharynx–larynx bleeding. 7/24 (29.2%) of those who had only one attempt presented at least one of these adverse events compared with 15/16 (93.8%) of those who needed two or more attempts (p<0.001).ConclusionSA premedication is largely feasible for tracheal intubations performed in neonates transported by medical transport teams including intubations judged as emergent or semiemergent.Trial registration numberNCT01346813; Results.

scholarly journals How do palliative care doctors recognise imminently dying patients? A judgement analysis

BMJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. e024996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola White ◽  
Priscilla Harries ◽  
Adam JL Harris ◽  
Victoria Vickerstaff ◽  
Philip Lodge ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Prospective Observational Study ◽  
Clinical Signs ◽  
Brier Score ◽  
Prognostic Test ◽  
Probability Of Death ◽  
The Mean

ObjectivesTo identify a group of palliative care doctors who perform well on a prognostic test and to understand how they make their survival predictions.DesignProspective observational study and two cross-sectional online studies.SettingPhase I: an online prognostic test, developed from a prospective observational study of patients referred to palliative care. Phase II: an online judgement task consisting of 50 hypothetical vignettes.ParticipantsAll members of the Association of Palliative Medicine (APM) were eligible (n=~1100). 99 doctors completed the prognostic test and were included in the phase I analysis. The top 20% were invited to participate in phase II; 14/19 doctors completed the judgement task and were included in the phase II analysis.MeasuresPhase I: participants were asked to give a probability of death within 72 hours (0%–100%) for all 20 cases. Accuracy on the prognostic test was measured with the Brier score which was used to identify the ‘expert’ group (scale range: 0 (expert)–1 (non-expert)). Phase II: participants gave a probability of death within 72 hours (0%–100%). A mixed model regression analysis was completed using the percentage estimate as the outcome and the patient information included in the vignettes as the predictors.ResultsThe mean Brier score of all participants was 0.237 (95% CI 0.235 to 0.239). The mean Brier score of the ‘experts’ was 0.184 (95% CI 0.176 to 0.192). Six of the seven prognostic variables included in the hypothetical vignettes were significantly associated with clinician predictions of death. The Palliative Performance Score was identified as being the most influential in the doctors’ prognostic decision making (β=0.48, p<0.001).ConclusionsThis study identified six clinical signs and symptoms which influenced the judgement policies of palliative care doctors. These results may be used to teach novice doctors how to improve their prognostic skills.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document