scholarly journals Effect of corticosteroid treatment on 1376 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. A cohort study.

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Albani ◽  
Federica Fusina ◽  
Enza Granato ◽  
Cristina Capotosto ◽  
Claudia Ceracchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Corticosteroid Therapy ◽  
Corticosteroid Treatment ◽  
Limited Resources ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

Background: Since the start of the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, corticosteroid use has been the subject of debate. The available evidence is uncertain, and knowledge on the subject is evolving. The aim of our cohort study was to evaluate the association between corticosteroid therapy and hospital mortality, in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 after balancing for possible confounders. Results: One thousand four hundred forty four patients were admitted to our hospital with a positive RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, 559 patients (39%) were exposed to corticosteroids during hospital stay, 844 (61%) were not exposed to corticosteroids.In the cohort of patients exposed to corticosteroids, 171 (30.6%) died. In the cohort of patients not exposed to corticosteroids, 183 (21.7%) died (unadjusted p <0.001). Nonetheless, exposure to corticosteroids was not associated with in-hospital mortality after balancing with overlap weight propensity score (adjusted p = 0.25). Patients in the corticosteroids cohort had reduced risk of ICU admission (adjusted p <0.001). Conclusions: Treatment with corticosteroids did not affect hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 after balancing for confounders. A possible advantage of corticosteroid therapy was to reduce Intensive Care Unit admission, which could be useful in reducing pressure on the Intensive Care Units in times of limited resources, as during the COVID-19 pandemic.

scholarly journals Corticosteroid treatment has no effect on hospital mortality in COVID-19 patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Filippo Albani ◽  
Federica Fusina ◽  
Enza Granato ◽  
Cristina Capotosto ◽  
Claudia Ceracchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Corticosteroid Therapy ◽  
Corticosteroid Treatment ◽  
Limited Resources ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
The Subject ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Pcr Test

AbstractSince the start of the novel coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, corticosteroid use has been the subject of debate. The available evidence is uncertain, and knowledge on the subject is evolving. The aim of our cohort study was to evaluate the association between corticosteroid therapy and hospital mortality, in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 after balancing for possible confounders. One thousand four hundred forty four patients were admitted to our hospital with a positive RT-PCR test for SARS-CoV-2, 559 patients (39%) were exposed to corticosteroids during hospital stay, 844 (61%) were not exposed to corticosteroids. In the cohort of patients exposed to corticosteroids, 171 (30.6%) died. In the cohort of patients not exposed to corticosteroids, 183 (21.7%) died (unadjusted p < 0.001). Nonetheless, exposure to corticosteroids was not associated with in-hospital mortality after balancing with overlap weight propensity score (adjusted p = 0.25). Patients in the corticosteroids cohort had a reduced risk of ICU admission (adjusted p < 0.001). Treatment with corticosteroids did not affect hospital mortality in patients with COVID-19 after balancing for confounders. A possible advantage of corticosteroid therapy was to reduce Intensive Care Unit admission, which could be useful in reducing pressure on Intensive Care Units in times of limited resources, as during the COVID-19 pandemic.

scholarly journals SARS-CoV-2: preliminary study of infected human nasopharyngeal tissue by high resolution microscopy

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian Mondeja ◽  
Odalys Valdes ◽  
Sonia Resik ◽  
Ananayla Vizcaino ◽  
Emilio Acosta ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Resolution ◽  
Control Sample ◽  
Negative Control ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Apical Region ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Crown Shape ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
High Resolution Microscopy

Abstract Background The novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 is the etiological agent of COVID-19. This virus has become one of the most dangerous in recent times with a very high rate of transmission. At present, several publications show the typical crown-shape of the novel coronavirus grown in cell cultures. However, an integral ultramicroscopy study done directly from clinical specimens has not been published. Methods Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 12 Cuban individuals, six asymptomatic and RT-PCR negative (negative control) and six others from a COVID-19 symptomatic and RT-PCR positive for SARS CoV-2. Samples were treated with an aldehyde solution and processed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), confocal microscopy (CM) and, atomic force microscopy. Improvement and segmentation of coronavirus images were performed by a novel mathematical image enhancement algorithm. Results The images of the negative control sample showed the characteristic healthy microvilli morphology at the apical region of the nasal epithelial cells. As expected, they do not display virus-like structures. The images of the positive sample showed characteristic coronavirus-like particles and evident destruction of microvilli. In some regions, virions budding through the cell membrane were observed. Microvilli destruction could explain the anosmia reported by some patients. Virus-particles emerging from the cell-surface with a variable size ranging from 80 to 400 nm were observed by SEM. Viral antigen was identified in the apical cells zone by CM. Conclusions The integral microscopy study showed that SARS-CoV-2 has a similar image to SARS-CoV. The application of several high-resolution microscopy techniques to nasopharyngeal samples awaits future use.

scholarly journals A blueprint for academic laboratories to produce SARS-CoV-2 quantitative RT-PCR test kits

2020 ◽  
Vol 295 (46) ◽  
pp. 15438-15453 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha J. Mascuch ◽  
Sara Fakhretaha-Aval ◽  
Jessica C. Bowman ◽  
Minh Thu H. Ma ◽  
Gwendell Thomas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Support Group ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Research Teams ◽  
Environmental Testing ◽  
Resource Limited ◽  
Test Kit ◽  
Institute Of Technology ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

Widespread testing for the presence of the novel coronavirus severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in individuals remains vital for controlling the COVID-19 pandemic prior to the advent of an effective treatment. Challenges in testing can be traced to an initial shortage of supplies, expertise, and/or instrumentation necessary to detect the virus by quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR), the most robust, sensitive, and specific assay currently available. Here we show that academic biochemistry and molecular biology laboratories equipped with appropriate expertise and infrastructure can replicate commercially available SARS-CoV-2 RT-qPCR test kits and backfill pipeline shortages. The Georgia Tech COVID-19 Test Kit Support Group, composed of faculty, staff, and trainees across the biotechnology quad at Georgia Institute of Technology, synthesized multiplexed primers and probes and formulated a master mix composed of enzymes and proteins produced in-house. Our in-house kit compares favorably with a commercial product used for diagnostic testing. We also developed an environmental testing protocol to readily monitor surfaces for the presence of SARS-CoV-2. Our blueprint should be readily reproducible by research teams at other institutions, and our protocols may be modified and adapted to enable SARS-CoV-2 detection in more resource-limited settings.

scholarly journals The influence of volume and intensive care unit organization on hospital mortality in patients admitted with severe sepsis: a retrospective multicentre cohort study

Critical Care ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. R40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Peelen ◽  
Nicolette F de Keizer ◽  
Niels Peek ◽  
Gert Scheffer ◽  
Peter HJ van der Voort ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Severe Sepsis ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Multicentre Cohort Study ◽  
Unit Organization ◽  
Multicentre Cohort

scholarly journals An atypical case: RT-PCR-negative, sero-positive covid-19 patient

Pneumologia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-114
Author(s):  
William Suriady ◽  
Andika Chandra Putra ◽  
Wiwien Heru Wiyono ◽  
Mohammad Fahmi Alatas ◽  
Bettia Bermawi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
False Negative ◽  
Severe Pneumonia ◽  
World Health ◽  
Diagnostic Process ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Atypical Case ◽  
Polymerase Chain ◽  
Novel Coronavirus ◽  
Health Organization

Abstract The novel coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), caused by the severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), has become a public health emergency of international concern. The first confirmed COVID-19 case in Indonesia was announced on 2 March 2020, and later on, 11,192 confirmed cases were reported as of 3 May. The World Health Organization has stated that performing a real-time reverse transcription–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) specific for SARS-CoV-2 on specimens from the upper and the lower respiratory tracts, especially nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal swabs, is the standard diagnostic procedure for COVID-19. In Indonesia, we also use other diagnostic tests, such as rapid antibody tests specific for SARS-CoV-2. Herein, we report an atypical case of COVID-19 and describe the diagnostic process, the clinical course, with progression to severe pneumonia on Week 3 of illness and the case management. We also try to highlight the possibility of false-negative RT-PCR tests.

scholarly journals Association between Malnutrition and Hospital Mortality and Duration of Intensive Care Unit Admission in the Critically Ill: A Prospective Cohort Study

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles Chin Han Lew ◽  
Gabriel Jun Yung Wong ◽  
Ka Po Cheung ◽  
Ai Ping Chua ◽  
Mary Foong Fong Chong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Critically Ill ◽  
Prospective Cohort Study ◽  
Critically Ill Patients ◽  
Prospective Cohort ◽  
Unit Length ◽  
Increased Risk

There is limited evidence for the association between malnutrition and hospital mortality as well as Intensive Care Unit length-of-stay (ICU-LOS) in critically ill patients. We aimed to examine the aforementioned associations by conducting a prospective cohort study in an ICU of a Singapore tertiary hospital. Between August 2015 and October 2016, all adult patients with &ge;24 h of ICU-LOS were included. The 7-point Subjective Global Assessment (7-point SGA) was used to determine patients&rsquo; nutritional status within 48 hours of ICU admission. Multivariate analyses were conducted in two ways: 1) presence versus absence of malnutrition, and 2) dose-dependent association for each 1-point decrease in the 7-point SGA. There were 439 patients of which 28.0% were malnourished, and 29.6% died before hospital discharge. Malnutrition was associated with an increased risk of hospital mortality [adjusted-RR 1.39 (95%CI: 1.10&ndash;1.76)], and this risk increased with a greater degree of malnutrition [adjusted-RR 1.09 (95%CI: 1.01&ndash;1.18) for each 1-point decrease in the 7-point SGA]. No significant association was found between malnutrition and ICU-LOS. Conclusion: There was a clear association between malnutrition and higher hospital mortality in critically ill patients. The association between malnutrition and ICU-LOS could not be replicated and hence requires further evaluation.

scholarly journals Recurrence of COVID-19 related symptoms and viral detection in patient discharged after complete recovery and test negativization

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiara Vassallo ◽  
Francesca Pupo ◽  
Luca Marri ◽  
Chiara Schiavi ◽  
Francesca Giusti ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Complete Recovery ◽  
Viral Reactivation ◽  
Nasopharyngeal Swab ◽  
Double Negative ◽  
The Novel ◽  
Lung Involvement ◽  
Rt Pcr ◽  
Pcr Assay ◽  
Virus Escape ◽  
Novel Coronavirus

Since the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has declared pandemic, the possibility of recurrence of the disease after recovery has become a debated issue. We report a case of an 84-yearsold male patient who was admitted to our hospital for dyspnea and fever. Lab and clinical workout showed that he had COVID-19. After a full recovery of symptoms and a double negative nasopharyngeal swab of SARS-CoV-2 by RT-PCR assay, he was dismissed from the hospital. One month later, he developed again dyspnea and fever with lung involvement. Surprisingly, nasopharyngeal swab of SARS-CoV-2 was positive. Since he denied contacts with confirmed or suspected cases of COVID-19, he probably experienced a reactivation of a persistent infection. The failed eradication of the virus could depend on both virus’ escape mechanisms and dysfunctional immune response. Further studies are needed to confirm the hypothesis of viral reactivation and to identify signs of an incomplete clearance.

scholarly journals Characteristics and resource utilization of high-cost users in the intensive care unit: a population-based cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudia Dziegielewski ◽  
Robert Talarico ◽  
Haris Imsirovic ◽  
Danial Qureshi ◽  
Yasmeen Choudhri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Intensive Care Unit ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Intensive Care ◽  
Length Of Stay ◽  
Hospital Mortality ◽  
Healthcare Costs ◽  
Healthcare Expenditure ◽  
Healthcare Spending ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Icu Length Of Stay

Abstract Background Healthcare expenditure within the intensive care unit (ICU) is costly. A cost reduction strategy may be to target patients accounting for a disproportionate amount of healthcare spending, or high-cost users. This study aims to describe high-cost users in the ICU, including health outcomes and cost patterns. Methods We conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study of patients with ICU admissions in Ontario from 2011 to 2018. Patients with total healthcare costs in the year following ICU admission (including the admission itself) in the upper 10th percentile were defined as high-cost users. We compared characteristics and outcomes including length of stay, mortality, disposition, and costs between groups. Results Among 370,061 patients included, 37,006 were high-cost users. High-cost users were 64.2 years old, 58.3% male, and had more comorbidities (41.2% had ≥3) when likened to non-high cost users (66.1 years old, 57.2% male, 27.9% had ≥3 comorbidities). ICU length of stay was four times greater for high-cost users compared to non-high cost users (22.4 days, 95% confidence interval [CI] 22.0–22.7 days vs. 5.56 days, 95% CI 5.54–5.57 days). High-cost users had lower in-hospital mortality (10.0% vs.14.2%), but increased dispositioning outside of home (77.4% vs. 42.2%) compared to non-high-cost users. Total healthcare costs were five-fold higher for high-cost users ($238,231, 95% CI $237,020–$239,442) compared to non-high-cost users ($45,155, 95% CI $45,046–$45,264). High-cost users accounted for 37.0% of total healthcare costs. Conclusion High-cost users have increased length of stay, lower in-hospital mortality, and higher total healthcare costs when compared to non-high-cost users. Further studies into cost patterns and predictors of high-cost users are necessary to identify methods of decreasing healthcare expenditure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document