scholarly journals Bivalent chromatin protects reversibly repressed genes from irreversible silencing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhirendra Kumar ◽  
Raja Jothi

ABSTRACTBivalent chromatin is characterized by the simultaneous presence of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, histone modifications generally associated with transcriptionally active and repressed chromatin, respectively. Prevalent in embryonic stem cells, bivalency is postulated to poise lineage-controlling developmental genes for rapid activation during embryogenesis while maintaining a transcriptionally repressed state in the absence of activation cues, but its function in development and disease remains a mystery. Here we show that bivalency does not poise genes for rapid activation but protects reversibly repressed genes from irreversible silencing. We find that H3K4me3 at bivalent gene promoters—a product of the underlying DNA sequence—persists in nearly all cell types irrespective of gene expression and confers protection from de novo DNA methylation. Accordingly, loss of H3K4me3 at bivalent promoters is strongly associated with aberrant hypermethylation and irreversible silencing in adult human cancers. Bivalency may thus represent a distinct regulatory mechanism for maintaining epigenetic plasticity.HIGHLIGHTSBivalent chromatin does not poise genes for rapid activationH3K4me3 at bivalent promoters is not instructive for transcription activationH3K4me3 at bivalent promoters protects reversibly repressed genes from de novo DNA methylationLoss of H3K4me3/bivalency is associated with aberrant DNA hypermethylation in cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. gr.275736.121
Author(s):  
Dhirendra Kumar ◽  
Senthilkumar Cinghu ◽  
Andrew J Oldfield ◽  
Pengyi Yang ◽  
Raja Jothi

Bivalent chromatin is characterized by the simultaneous presence of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, histone modifications generally associated with transcriptionally active and repressed chromatin, respectively. Prevalent in embryonic stem cells (ESCs), bivalency is postulated to poise/prime lineage-controlling developmental genes for rapid activation during embryogenesis while maintaining a transcriptionally repressed state in the absence of activation cues; however, this hypothesis remains to be directly tested. Most gene promoters DNA-hypermethylated in adult human cancers are bivalently marked in ESCs, and it was speculated that bivalency predisposes them for aberrant de novo DNA methylation and irreversible silencing in cancer, but evidence supporting this model is largely lacking. Here we show that bivalent chromatin does not poise genes for rapid activation but protects promoters from de novo DNA methylation. Genome-wide studies in differentiating ESCs reveal that activation of bivalent genes is no more rapid than that of other transcriptionally silent genes, challenging the premise that H3K4me3 is instructive for transcription. H3K4me3 at bivalent promoters, a product of the underlying DNA sequence, persists in nearly all cell types irrespective of gene expression and confers protection from de novo DNA methylation. Bivalent genes in ESCs that are frequent targets of aberrant hypermethylation in cancer are particularly strongly associated with loss of H3K4me3/bivalency in cancer. Altogether, our findings suggest that bivalency protects reversibly repressed genes from irreversible silencing and that loss of H3K4me3 may make them more susceptible to aberrant DNA methylation in diseases such as cancer. Bivalency may thus represent a distinct regulatory mechanism for maintaining epigenetic plasticity.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Reimer ◽  
Kirthi Pulakanti ◽  
Linzheng Shi ◽  
Alex Abel ◽  
Mingyu Liang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The Tet protein family (Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3) regulate DNA methylation through conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which can ultimately result in DNA demethylation and play a critical role during early mammalian development and pluripotency¬. While multiple groups have generated knockouts combining loss of different Tet proteins in murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), differences in genetic background and approaches has made it difficult to directly compare results and discern the direct mechanism by which Tet proteins regulate the transcriptome. To address this concern, we utilized genomic editing in an isogenic pluripotent background which permitted a quantitative, flow-cytometry based measurement of pluripotency in combination with genome-wide assessment of gene expression and DNA methylation changes. Our ultimate goal was to generate a resource of large-scale datasets to permit hypothesis-generating experiments. Results: We demonstrate a quantitative disparity in the differentiation ability among Tet protein deletions, with Tet2 single knockout exhibiting the most severe defect, while loss of Tet1 ¬alone or combinations of Tet genes showed a quantitatively intermediate phenotype. Using a combination of transcriptomic and epigenomic approaches we demonstrate an increase in DNA hypermethylation and a divergence of transcriptional profiles in pluripotency among Tet deletions, with loss of Tet2 having the most profound effect in undifferentiated ESCs. Conclusions: We conclude that loss of Tet2 has the most dramatic effect both on the phenotype of ESCs and the transcriptome compared to other genotypes. While loss of Tet proteins increased DNA hypermethylation, especially in gene promoters, these changes in DNA methylation did not correlate with gene expression changes. Thus, while loss of different Tet proteins alters DNA methylation, this change does not appear to be directly responsible for transcriptome changes. Thus, loss of Tet proteins likely regulates the transcriptome epigenetically both through altering 5mC but also through additional mechanisms. Nonetheless, the transcriptome changes in pluripotent Tet2-/- ESCs compared to wild-type implies that the disparities in differentiation can be partially attributed to baseline alterations in gene expression.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Reimer ◽  
Kirthi Pulakanti ◽  
Linzheng Shi ◽  
Alex Abel ◽  
Mingyu Liang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The Tet protein family (Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3) regulate DNA methylation through conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which can ultimately result in DNA demethylation and play a critical role during early mammalian development and pluripotency¬. While multiple groups have generated knockouts combining loss of different Tet proteins in murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), differences in genetic background and approaches has made it difficult to directly compare results and discern the direct mechanism by which Tet proteins regulate the transcriptome. To address this concern, we utilized genomic editing in an isogenic pluripotent background which permitted a quantitative, flow-cytometry based measurement of pluripotency in combination with genome-wide assessment of gene expression and DNA methylation changes. Our ultimate goal was to generate a resource of large-scale datasets to permit hypothesis-generating experiments. Results: We demonstrate a quantitative disparity in the differentiation ability among Tet protein deletions, with Tet2 single knockout exhibiting the most severe defect, while loss of Tet1 ¬alone or combinations of Tet genes showed a quantitatively intermediate phenotype. Using a combination of transcriptomic and epigenomic approaches we demonstrate an increase in DNA hypermethylation and a divergence of transcriptional profiles in pluripotency among Tet deletions, with loss of Tet2 having the most profound effect in undifferentiated ESCs. Conclusions: We conclude that loss of Tet2 has the most dramatic effect both on the phenotype of ESCs and the transcriptome compared to other genotypes. While loss of Tet proteins increased DNA hypermethylation, especially in gene promoters, these changes in DNA methylation did not correlate with gene expression changes. Thus, while loss of different Tet proteins alters DNA methylation, this change does not appear to be directly responsible for transcriptome changes. Thus, loss of Tet proteins likely regulates the transcriptome epigenetically both through altering 5mC but also through additional mechanisms. Nonetheless, the transcriptome changes in pluripotent Tet2-/- ESCs compared to wild-type implies that the disparities in differentiation can be partially attributed to baseline alterations in gene expression.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Reimer ◽  
Kirthi Pulakanti ◽  
Linzheng Shi ◽  
Alex Abel ◽  
Mingyu Liang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The Tet protein family (Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3) regulate DNA methylation through conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which can ultimately result in DNA demethylation and play a critical role during early mammalian development and pluripotency¬. While multiple groups have generated knockouts combining loss of different Tet proteins in murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), differences in genetic background and approaches has made it difficult to directly compare results and discern the direct mechanism by which Tet proteins regulate the transcriptome. To address this concern, we utilized genomic editing in an isogenic pluripotent background which permitted a quantitative, flow-cytometry based measurement of pluripotency in combination with genome-wide assessment of gene expression and DNA methylation changes. Our ultimate goal was to generate a resource of large-scale datasets to permit hypothesis-generating experiments. Results: We demonstrate a quantitative disparity in the differentiation ability among Tet protein deletions, with Tet2 single knockout exhibiting the most severe defect, while loss of Tet1 ¬alone or combinations of Tet genes showed a quantitatively intermediate phenotype. Using a combination of transcriptomic and epigenomic approaches we demonstrate an increase in DNA hypermethylation and a divergence of transcriptional profiles in pluripotency among Tet deletions, with loss of Tet2 having the most profound effect in undifferentiated ESCs. Conclusions: We conclude that loss of Tet2 has the most dramatic effect both on the phenotype of ESCs and the transcriptome compared to other genotypes. While loss of Tet proteins increased DNA hypermethylation, especially in gene promoters, these changes in DNA methylation did not correlate with gene expression changes. Thus, while loss of different Tet proteins alters DNA methylation, this change does not appear to be directly responsible for transcriptome changes. Thus, loss of Tet proteins likely regulates the transcriptome epigenetically both through altering 5mC but also through additional mechanisms. Nonetheless, the transcriptome changes in pluripotent Tet2-/- ESCs compared to wild-type implies that the disparities in differentiation can be partially attributed to baseline alterations in gene expression.


Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2517-2517
Author(s):  
Emily A Saunderson ◽  
Kevin Rouault-Pierre ◽  
John G. Gribben ◽  
Gabriella Ficz

Introduction The epigenome is significantly perturbed in hematological malignancies with global DNA hypomethylation and localized hypermethylation of gene promoter CpG islands. Whether specific gene promoter hypermethylation can contribute to the clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in humans by affecting HSPC biology, independently of genetic mutations, has not previously been investigated due to the lack of appropriate tools. We show for the first time that it is possible to target de novo DNA methylation using CRISPR/Cas9 in human CD34+ cells isolated from cord blood (CB). DNA methylation targeted to key cell cycle control gene promoters, INK4b (p15) and ARF (p14), is permanently maintained after dCas9 3A3L degradation and inherited as cells differentiate; inhibiting gene expression and affecting the colony forming potential of CD34+ cells. This demonstrates that specific DNA hypermethylation events can permanently change HSPC biology and impact differentiation, potentially contributing to pre-malignant processes. Methods Human CD34+ HSPCs were isolated from human CB and maintained in liquid culture for 24 hours before nucleofection with mRNA encoding an adapted form of CRISPR/Cas9 which has no nuclease activity (dCas9) and is fused to the catalytic domain of DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) and 3L (3A3L). The nucleofection cocktail contained dCas9 3A3L or dCas9 3A3L-mut (lacks methyltransferase activity) and 1 to 3 guide RNAs to target DNA methylation to combinations of the INK4a-ARF-INK4b locus. Cells were then seeded into methylcellulose for a primary colony forming assay (CFU). Colonies were scored after 14 days and cells were either harvested and pooled or individual colonies were picked for single-colony molecular analyses. The DNA was extracted and methylation at the INK4a-ARF-INK4b promoters was quantified using targeted bisulfite sequencing; target gene expression was measured using qPCR. The remaining cells from the primary CFU were re-plated a second (secondary CFU) and third (tertiary CFU) time and colonies were again scored after 14 days. Results and Conclusions Targeting DNA methylation to the INK4a-ARF-INK4b locus or INK4b individually in human CD34+ cells resulted in maintenance of hypermethylation at ARF and/or INK4b gene promoters in individual BFU-E (burst-forming unit-erythroid) and CFU-GM (granulocyte, macrophage) colonies as measured by single-colony targeted bisulfite sequencing after the primary CFU; causing heritable repression of INK4b gene expression in the differentiated cells. Some CpGs were up to 90% methylated, indicating that DNA methylation added at these gene promoters is highly stable as cells differentiate. Hypermethylation of ARF and INK4b was found in some colonies even after the tertiary CFU, demonstrating long-term maintenance of promoter hypermethylation. Unexpectedly, no DNA hypermethylation was detected at INK4a in differentiated cells, but whether this is the case for all subpopulations of HSPCs (i.e. HSCs or lymphoid progenitors) is under investigation. Hypermethylation of INK4b and ARF increased the colony forming potential of CD34+ cells in primary, secondary and tertiary CFUs, compared to the control. Conversely, methylation targeted to INK4b alone did not significantly affect the number of colonies in the first CFU, and decreased the number of colonies in the secondary CFU. This suggests a complex interplay between key cell cycle regulators ARF and INK4b in CD34+ cells and during differentiation which can be disrupted by DNA hypermethylation and gene repression. These findings demonstrate the novel insights we can gain by using CRISPR/Cas9 tools to target DNA methylation and these investigations will reveal how gene promoter hypermethylation can impact HSPC function. Furthermore, studying this locus may uncover an important role for DNA hypermethylation in the development of myeloid malignancies, since INK4b is frequently hypermethylated, but rarely mutated, in myeloid dysplastic/proliferative neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia. Disclosures Gribben: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta/Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros Georgopoulos ◽  
Maria Papaioannou ◽  
Soultana Markopoulou ◽  
Aikaterini Fragou ◽  
George Kouvatseas ◽  
...  

Abstract PurposeThe aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic potential of a panel of five hypermethylated gene promoters in bladder cancer. Individuals with primary BCa and control individuals matching the gender, age and smoking status of the cancer patients were recruited. DNA methylation was assessed for the gene promoters of RASSF1, RARβ, DAPK, hTERT and APC in urine samples collected by spontaneous urination. Fifty patients and 35 healthy controls were recruited, with average age of 70.26 years and average smoking status of 44.78 pack-years. In the BCa group, DNA methylation was detected in 27(61.4%) samples. RASSF1 was methylated in 52.2% of samples. Only 3(13.6%) samples from the control group were methylated, all in the RASSF1 gene promoter. The specificity and sensitivity of this panel of genes to diagnose BCa was 86% and 61% respectively. The RASSF1 gene could diagnose BCa with specificity 86.4% and sensitivity 52.3%. Promoter DNA methylation of this panel of five genes could be further investigated as urine biomarker for the diagnosis of BCa. The RASSF1 could be a single candidate biomarker for predicting BCa patients versus controls. Studies are required in order to develop a geographically adjusted diagnostic biomarker for BCa.Trial registration: ACTRN12620000258954


2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (12) ◽  
pp. eaay7246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhiyuan Chen ◽  
Qiangzong Yin ◽  
Azusa Inoue ◽  
Chunxia Zhang ◽  
Yi Zhang

Faithful maintenance of genomic imprinting is essential for mammalian development. While germline DNA methylation–dependent (canonical) imprinting is relatively stable during development, the recently found oocyte-derived H3K27me3-mediated noncanonical imprinting is mostly transient in early embryos, with some genes important for placental development maintaining imprinted expression in the extraembryonic lineage. How these noncanonical imprinted genes maintain their extraembryonic-specific imprinting is unknown. Here, we report that maintenance of noncanonical imprinting requires maternal allele–specific de novo DNA methylation [i.e., somatic differentially methylated regions (DMRs)] at implantation. The somatic DMRs are located at the gene promoters, with paternal allele–specific H3K4me3 established during preimplantation development. Genetic manipulation revealed that both maternal EED and zygotic DNMT3A/3B are required for establishing somatic DMRs and maintaining noncanonical imprinting. Thus, our study not only reveals the mechanism underlying noncanonical imprinting maintenance but also sheds light on how histone modifications in oocytes may shape somatic DMRs in postimplantation embryos.


PLoS ONE ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. e9937 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodoniki Athanasiadou ◽  
Dina de Sousa ◽  
Kevin Myant ◽  
Cara Merusi ◽  
Irina Stancheva ◽  
...  

ISRN Urology ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Ahmed Yaqinuddin ◽  
Sohail A. Qureshi ◽  
Shahid Pervez ◽  
Mohammed Umair Bashir ◽  
Ressam Nazir ◽  
...  

DNA methylation has emerged as a potentially robust biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa). Since DNA methylomes appear to be disease as well as population specific, we have assessed the DNA methylation status of RASSF1A, APC, and p16 (potential biomarkers of PCa) in Pakistani population. Primary prostate cancer tissues were obtained from 27 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded blocks (FFPE) of cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy and transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) during 2003–2008. As controls, twenty-four benign prostatic FFPE tissues were obtained from patients who underwent TURP for benign prostatic hyperplasia during 2008. DNA was extracted, and methylation-specific PCR was used to assess the methylation status for RASSF1A, APC, and p16 gene promoters. Our results revealed that the RASSF1A promoter was hypermethylated in all the tested cancer samples but was also hypermethylated in 3 out of 24 control tissues. The APC promoter was hypermethylated in 15 out of 27 cancer samples and in none of the control samples. Strikingly, none of the samples showed methylation at the p16 promoter. Our findings suggest that RASSF1A and APC gene promoters are frequently hypermethylated in the Pakistani population and therefore have the potential to develop into universally dependable biomarkers for detecting PCa.


2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (16) ◽  
pp. 5594-5605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taiping Chen ◽  
Yoshihide Ueda ◽  
Jonathan E. Dodge ◽  
Zhenjuan Wang ◽  
En Li

ABSTRACT We have previously shown that the DNA methyltransferases Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b carry out de novo methylation of the mouse genome during early postimplantation development and of maternally imprinted genes in the oocyte. In the present study, we demonstrate that Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b are also essential for the stable inheritance, or “maintenance,” of DNA methylation patterns. Inactivation of both Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b in embryonic stem (ES) cells results in progressive loss of methylation in various repeats and single-copy genes. Interestingly, introduction of the Dnmt3a, Dnmt3a2, and Dnmt3b1 isoforms back into highly demethylated mutant ES cells restores genomic methylation patterns; these isoforms appear to have both common and distinct DNA targets, but they all fail to restore the maternal methylation imprints. In contrast, overexpression of Dnmt1 and Dnmt3b3 failed to restore DNA methylation patterns due to their inability to catalyze de novo methylation in vivo. We also show that hypermethylation of genomic DNA by Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b is necessary for ES cells to form teratomas in nude mice. These results indicate that genomic methylation patterns are determined partly through differential expression of different Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b isoforms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document