scholarly journals CRISPR/Cas9-Targeted De Novo DNA Methylation Is Maintained and Impacts the Colony Forming Potential of Human Hematopoietic CD34+ Cells

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 2517-2517
Author(s):  
Emily A Saunderson ◽  
Kevin Rouault-Pierre ◽  
John G. Gribben ◽  
Gabriella Ficz
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Promoter Hypermethylation ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Human Cd34 ◽  
Cd34 Cells

Introduction The epigenome is significantly perturbed in hematological malignancies with global DNA hypomethylation and localized hypermethylation of gene promoter CpG islands. Whether specific gene promoter hypermethylation can contribute to the clonal expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs) in humans by affecting HSPC biology, independently of genetic mutations, has not previously been investigated due to the lack of appropriate tools. We show for the first time that it is possible to target de novo DNA methylation using CRISPR/Cas9 in human CD34+ cells isolated from cord blood (CB). DNA methylation targeted to key cell cycle control gene promoters, INK4b (p15) and ARF (p14), is permanently maintained after dCas9 3A3L degradation and inherited as cells differentiate; inhibiting gene expression and affecting the colony forming potential of CD34+ cells. This demonstrates that specific DNA hypermethylation events can permanently change HSPC biology and impact differentiation, potentially contributing to pre-malignant processes. Methods Human CD34+ HSPCs were isolated from human CB and maintained in liquid culture for 24 hours before nucleofection with mRNA encoding an adapted form of CRISPR/Cas9 which has no nuclease activity (dCas9) and is fused to the catalytic domain of DNA methyltransferase 3A (DNMT3A) and 3L (3A3L). The nucleofection cocktail contained dCas9 3A3L or dCas9 3A3L-mut (lacks methyltransferase activity) and 1 to 3 guide RNAs to target DNA methylation to combinations of the INK4a-ARF-INK4b locus. Cells were then seeded into methylcellulose for a primary colony forming assay (CFU). Colonies were scored after 14 days and cells were either harvested and pooled or individual colonies were picked for single-colony molecular analyses. The DNA was extracted and methylation at the INK4a-ARF-INK4b promoters was quantified using targeted bisulfite sequencing; target gene expression was measured using qPCR. The remaining cells from the primary CFU were re-plated a second (secondary CFU) and third (tertiary CFU) time and colonies were again scored after 14 days. Results and Conclusions Targeting DNA methylation to the INK4a-ARF-INK4b locus or INK4b individually in human CD34+ cells resulted in maintenance of hypermethylation at ARF and/or INK4b gene promoters in individual BFU-E (burst-forming unit-erythroid) and CFU-GM (granulocyte, macrophage) colonies as measured by single-colony targeted bisulfite sequencing after the primary CFU; causing heritable repression of INK4b gene expression in the differentiated cells. Some CpGs were up to 90% methylated, indicating that DNA methylation added at these gene promoters is highly stable as cells differentiate. Hypermethylation of ARF and INK4b was found in some colonies even after the tertiary CFU, demonstrating long-term maintenance of promoter hypermethylation. Unexpectedly, no DNA hypermethylation was detected at INK4a in differentiated cells, but whether this is the case for all subpopulations of HSPCs (i.e. HSCs or lymphoid progenitors) is under investigation. Hypermethylation of INK4b and ARF increased the colony forming potential of CD34+ cells in primary, secondary and tertiary CFUs, compared to the control. Conversely, methylation targeted to INK4b alone did not significantly affect the number of colonies in the first CFU, and decreased the number of colonies in the secondary CFU. This suggests a complex interplay between key cell cycle regulators ARF and INK4b in CD34+ cells and during differentiation which can be disrupted by DNA hypermethylation and gene repression. These findings demonstrate the novel insights we can gain by using CRISPR/Cas9 tools to target DNA methylation and these investigations will reveal how gene promoter hypermethylation can impact HSPC function. Furthermore, studying this locus may uncover an important role for DNA hypermethylation in the development of myeloid malignancies, since INK4b is frequently hypermethylated, but rarely mutated, in myeloid dysplastic/proliferative neoplasms and acute myeloid leukemia. Disclosures Gribben: Janssen: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acerta/Astra Zeneca: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals VHL inactivation without hypoxia is sufficient to achieve genome hypermethylation

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Artem V. Artemov ◽  
Nadezhda Zhigalova ◽  
Svetlana Zhenilo ◽  
Alexander M. Mazur ◽  
Egor B. Prokhortchouk
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Promoter Hypermethylation ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Hypoxic Conditions ◽  
Transcription Regulators

AbstractVHL inactivation is a key oncogenic event for renal carcinomas. In normoxia, VHL suppresses HIF1a-mediated response to hypoxia. It has previously been shown that hypoxic conditions inhibit TET-dependent hydroxymethylation of cytosines and cause DNA hypermethylation at gene promoters. In this work, we performed VHL inactivation by CRISPR/Cas9 and studied its effects on gene expression and DNA methylation. We showed that even without hypoxia, VHL inactivation leads to hypermethylation of the genome which mainly occurred in AP-1 and TRIM28 binding sites. We also observed promoter hypermethylation of several transcription regulators associated with decreased gene expression.

scholarly journals Integrated Analysis of Global DNA Methylation and Transcription Reveals a Leukemia Subtype with Extreme Hypermethylation Associated with Silencing of Regulators of Differentiation

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2608-2608
Author(s):  
Claudia Gebhard ◽  
Roger Mulet-Lazaro ◽  
Lucia Schwarzfischer ◽  
Dagmar Glatz ◽  
Margit Nuetzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Promoter Methylation ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Promoter Hypermethylation ◽  
Ctcf Binding ◽  
P Value ◽  
Global Dna Methylation ◽  
Employment Equity ◽  
Equity Ownership

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) represents a highly heterogeneous myeloid stem cell disorder classified based on various genetic defects. Besides genetic alterations, epigenetic changes are recognized as an additional mechanism contributing to leukemogenesis, but insight into the latter process remains minor. Using a combination of Methyl-CpG-Immunoprecipitation (MCIp-chip) and MALDI-TOF analysis of bisulfite-treated DNA in a cohort of 196 AML patients we previously demonstrated that (cyto)genetically defined AML subtypes, including CBFB-MYH11, AML-ETO, NPM1-mut, CEBPA-mut or IDH1/2-mut subtypes, express specific DNA-methylation profiles (Gebhard et al, Leukemia, 2018). A fraction of AML patients (5/196) displayed a unique abnormal hypermethylation profile that was completely distinct from any other AML subtype. These patients present immature leukemia (FAB M0, M1) with various chromosomal aberrations but very few mutations (e.g. no IDH1/2, KRAS, DNMT3A) that might explain the CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) phenotype. The CIMP patients showed high resemblance with a recently reported CEBPA methylated subgroup (Wouters et al, 2007 and Figueroa et al, 2009), which we confirmed by MCIp-chip and MALDI-TOF analysis. To explore the whole range of epigenetic alterations in the CIMP-AML patients we performed in-depth global DNA methylation and gene expression analyses (MCIp-seq and RNA-seq) in 45 AML and 12 CIMP patients from both studies. Principle component analysis and t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE) revealed that CIMP patients express a unique DNA-methylation and gene-expression signature that separated them from all other AMLs. We could discriminate promoter methylation from non-promoter methylation by selecting MCIp-seq peaks within 3kb around TSS. Promoter hypermethylation was highly associated with repression of genes (PCC = -0.053, p-value = 0.00075). Hypermethylation of non-promoter regions was more strongly associated with upregulation of genes (PCC = 0.046, p-value = 4.613e-06). Interestingly, differentially methylated regions also showed a positive association with myeloid lineage CTCF binding sites (27% vs 18% expected, p-value < 2.2e-16 in a chi-square test of independence). Methylation of CTCF sites causes loss of CTCF binding, which has been reported to disrupt boundaries between so-called topologically associated domains (TADs), allowing enhancers located in a particular TAD to become accessible to genes in adjacent TADs and affect their transcription. Whether this is the case is under investigation. In this study we particularly focused on the role of hypermethylation of promoters in CIMP-AMLs. Promoters of many transcriptional regulators that are involved in the differentiation of myeloid lineages of which several are frequently mutated in AML were hypermethylated and repressed, including CEBPA, CEBPD, IRF8, GATA2, KLF4, MITF or MAFB. Notably, HMGA2, a critical regulator of myeloid progenitor expansion, exhibited the largest degree of CIMP promoter hypermethylation compared to the other AMLs, accompanied by a reduction in gene expression. Moreover, multiple members of the HOXB family and KLF1 (erythroid differentiation) were methylated and repressed as well. In addition, these patients frequently showed hypermethylation of many chromatin factors (e.g. LMNA, CHD7 or TET2). Hypermethylation of the TET2 promoter could result in a loss of maintenance DNA demethylation and therefore successive hypermethylation at CpG islands. We carried out regulome-capture-bisulfite sequencing on CIMP-AMLs compared to other AML samples and normal blood cell controls and confirmed methylation of the same transcription and chromatin factor promoters. We conclude that these leukemias represent very primitive HSCPs which are blocked in differentiation into multiple hematopoietic lineages, due to the absence of regulators of these lineages. Although the underlying cause for the extreme hypermethylation signature is still subject to ongoing studies, the consequence of promoter hypermethylation is silencing of key lineage regulators causing the differentiation arrest in these cells. We argue that these patients may particularly benefit from therapies that revert DNA methylation. Disclosures Ehninger: Cellex Gesellschaft fuer Zellgewinnung mbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; GEMoaB Monoclonals GmbH: Employment, Equity Ownership; Bayer: Research Funding. Thiede:AgenDix: Other: Ownership; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding.

scholarly journals DNA Hypermethylation of a panel of genes as an urinary biomarker for bladder cancer diagnosis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Petros Georgopoulos ◽  
Maria Papaioannou ◽  
Soultana Markopoulou ◽  
Aikaterini Fragou ◽  
George Kouvatseas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Bladder Cancer ◽  
Smoking Status ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Diagnostic Potential ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Promoter Dna

Abstract PurposeThe aim of this study was to explore the diagnostic potential of a panel of five hypermethylated gene promoters in bladder cancer. Individuals with primary BCa and control individuals matching the gender, age and smoking status of the cancer patients were recruited. DNA methylation was assessed for the gene promoters of RASSF1, RARβ, DAPK, hTERT and APC in urine samples collected by spontaneous urination. Fifty patients and 35 healthy controls were recruited, with average age of 70.26 years and average smoking status of 44.78 pack-years. In the BCa group, DNA methylation was detected in 27(61.4%) samples. RASSF1 was methylated in 52.2% of samples. Only 3(13.6%) samples from the control group were methylated, all in the RASSF1 gene promoter. The specificity and sensitivity of this panel of genes to diagnose BCa was 86% and 61% respectively. The RASSF1 gene could diagnose BCa with specificity 86.4% and sensitivity 52.3%. Promoter DNA methylation of this panel of five genes could be further investigated as urine biomarker for the diagnosis of BCa. The RASSF1 could be a single candidate biomarker for predicting BCa patients versus controls. Studies are required in order to develop a geographically adjusted diagnostic biomarker for BCa.Trial registration: ACTRN12620000258954

scholarly journals Reversible DNA Hypermethylation of the Interleukin-15 (IL-15) Promoter Induces IL-15 Expression, Drives the Pathogenesis of T-Cell Large Granular Lymphocytic Leukemia and Provides a Potential Therapeutic Approach Using 5-Azacitidine

Blood ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 134 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 3776-3776
Author(s):  
Jonathan E Brammer ◽  
Amy E Boles ◽  
Anthony Mansour ◽  
Aharon G. Freud ◽  
Monique Mathé-Allainmat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
T Cell ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Marked Decrease ◽  
Lymphocytic Leukemia ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Reduced Representation ◽  
Primary Driver ◽  
Interleukin 15

Background and Rationale: T-cell large granular lymphocytic leukemia (T-LGLL) is an incurable clonal proliferation of CD8+ memory T-cells that leads to profound neutropenia and anemia with limited treatment options. The primary driver of T-LGLL is overexpression of interleukin-15 (IL-15), a gamma-chain cytokine. Previously, we have demonstrated that mice overexpressing IL-15 develop DNA hypermethylation and chromosomal instability that leads to the spontaneous development of LGLL (Mishra et al. Cancer Cell 2012). Further, the IL-15 promoter is known to be hypermethylated in cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL), another IL-15 driven malignancy (Mishra et al. Cancer Discovery 2016). In CTCL patients, the counterintuitive increase in IL-15 mRNA was due to hypermethylation of its promoter at the repressor binding sequences in the IL-15 gene. However, the methylation status of the IL-15 promoter in T-LGLL patients remains unknown. Concept: We hypothesize that the IL-15 promoter is hypermethylated in patients with T-LGLL, leading to aberrant overexpression of IL-15 and that this hypermethylation is a critical event in the leukemogenesis of T-LGLL. If true, demethylation of the IL-15 promoter with a resultant decrease in IL-15 transcripts should lead to apoptosis of T-LGLL cells. Hypomethylation of the IL-15 promoter, therefore, may provide a novel therapeutic approach to inhibiting IL-15, the primary driver of T-LGLL. Results: CD3+/CD8+/CD5-/dim T-cells were purified from peripheral blood of LGLL patient (n=3) and normal donor (ND) (n=3) by flow cytometry sorting. We analyzed DNA methylation and gene expression profiling using reduced representation bisulfite and RNA sequencing. With bioinformatics analysis, we determined differential methylation (1-way ANOVA P= 0.0178) and expression (1-way ANOVA P =0.0059). These data sets revealed significant differential hypermethylation of gene promoters in leukemic samples, compared to controls (Figure 1A). Reduced representation bisulfite sequencing that can identify differentially methylated regions at single base-pair resolutions demonstrated an increase in DNA methylation of the IL-15 promoter in patient samples over controls. To determine the functional significance of this finding, we treated the MOTN-1 T-LGLL cell line in vitro with the hypomethylating agent, 5-azacytidine (5-aza) at concentrations of 0.5 uM, 1 uM, 2.5 uM, and 5 uM. At 24 and 48 hours, a marked decrease in the viability of T-LGLL cells was observed, from 100% to 49.50%, p=0.037; particularly at higher concentrations of 5-aza (100% to 27% +11.30%, p=0.0030). Next, we sought to determine whether 5-aza induced hypomethylation of the IL-15 promoter. IL-15 gene expression in MOTN-1 T-LGLL cells treated with 5-aza was measured in comparison to control treated MOTN-1 cells. A marked decrease in IL-15 expression was observed at all concentrations of 5-aza compared to control (Figure 1B, p=0.0001). These results confirm that 5-aza leads to decreased transcription of the IL-15 gene, possibly due to hypomethylation of the IL-15 promoter. Finally, to determine whether a decrease in IL-15 alone was the cause of increased apoptosis of T-LGLL cells, we exposed MOTN-1 cells to a novel IL-15 inhibitor, IBI-15, and compared cell viability against MOTN-1 cells exposed to an inactive control, IBI-40. Even more profound decrease in cell viability was observed utilizing IBI-15 that targets the binding of IL-15 to its receptor (Figure 1C). Together, these data suggest that hypermethylation of the IL-15 promoter is critical to the pathogenesis of T-LGLL, and that treatment with 5-aza is sufficient to induce hypomethylation of the IL-15 promoter, decrease IL-15 transcription, and induce apoptosis in T-LGLL cells. Conclusions: Hypermethylation of the IL-15 promoter, with subsequent increase in IL-15, is critical to the pathogenesis of T-LGLL. Inhibition of the IL-15 promoter hypermethylation by 5-aza leads to down-regulation of the IL-15 gene transcript, which is sufficient to induce apoptosis of T-LGLL cells. These data suggest that 5-aza induced hypomethylation may be a novel method to induce IL-15 inhibition and a potentially efficacious clinical strategy against T-LGLL. Disclosures Brammer: Bioniz Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Viracta Therapeutics, Inc.: Research Funding; Verastem, Inc: Research Funding. Porcu:Daiichi: Research Funding; BeiGene: Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; Spectrum: Consultancy; Viracta: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; Innate Pharma: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; Kyowa: Honoraria, Other: Scientific Board, Research Funding; ADCT: Research Funding; Incyte: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: IBI-15 IBI-40 IL-15 inhibitor

scholarly journals Deletion of Tet proteins results in quantitative disparities during ESC differentiation partially attributable to alterations in gene expression

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Reimer ◽  
Kirthi Pulakanti ◽  
Linzheng Shi ◽  
Alex Abel ◽  
Mingyu Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Intermediate Phenotype ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Tet Proteins ◽  
Tet Protein

Abstract Background: The Tet protein family (Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3) regulate DNA methylation through conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which can ultimately result in DNA demethylation and play a critical role during early mammalian development and pluripotency¬. While multiple groups have generated knockouts combining loss of different Tet proteins in murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), differences in genetic background and approaches has made it difficult to directly compare results and discern the direct mechanism by which Tet proteins regulate the transcriptome. To address this concern, we utilized genomic editing in an isogenic pluripotent background which permitted a quantitative, flow-cytometry based measurement of pluripotency in combination with genome-wide assessment of gene expression and DNA methylation changes. Our ultimate goal was to generate a resource of large-scale datasets to permit hypothesis-generating experiments. Results: We demonstrate a quantitative disparity in the differentiation ability among Tet protein deletions, with Tet2 single knockout exhibiting the most severe defect, while loss of Tet1 ¬alone or combinations of Tet genes showed a quantitatively intermediate phenotype. Using a combination of transcriptomic and epigenomic approaches we demonstrate an increase in DNA hypermethylation and a divergence of transcriptional profiles in pluripotency among Tet deletions, with loss of Tet2 having the most profound effect in undifferentiated ESCs. Conclusions: We conclude that loss of Tet2 has the most dramatic effect both on the phenotype of ESCs and the transcriptome compared to other genotypes. While loss of Tet proteins increased DNA hypermethylation, especially in gene promoters, these changes in DNA methylation did not correlate with gene expression changes. Thus, while loss of different Tet proteins alters DNA methylation, this change does not appear to be directly responsible for transcriptome changes. Thus, loss of Tet proteins likely regulates the transcriptome epigenetically both through altering 5mC but also through additional mechanisms. Nonetheless, the transcriptome changes in pluripotent Tet2-/- ESCs compared to wild-type implies that the disparities in differentiation can be partially attributed to baseline alterations in gene expression.

scholarly journals Detection of differentially methylated gene promoters in failing and nonfailing human left ventricle myocardium using computation analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (14) ◽  
pp. 597-605 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher A. Koczor ◽  
Eva K. Lee ◽  
Rebecca A. Torres ◽  
Amy Boyd ◽  
J. David Vega ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Left Ventricle ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Mixed Integer ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Two Stage ◽  
Differentially Methylated Gene ◽  
Expression Microarrays ◽  
Computation Analysis

Human dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by congestive heart failure and altered myocardial gene expression. Epigenetic changes, including DNA methylation, are implicated in the development of DCM but have not been studied extensively. Clinical human DCM and nonfailing control left ventricle samples were individually analyzed for DNA methylation and expressional changes. Expression microarrays were used to identify 393 overexpressed and 349 underexpressed genes in DCM (GEO accession number: GSE43435 ). Gene promoter microarrays were utilized for DNA methylation analysis, and the resulting data were analyzed by two different computational methods. In the first method, we utilized subtractive analysis of DNA methylation peak data to identify 158 gene promoters exhibiting DNA methylation changes that correlated with expression changes. In the second method, a two-stage approach combined a particle swarm optimization feature selection algorithm and a discriminant analysis via mixed integer programming classifier to identify differentially methylated gene promoters. This analysis identified 51 hypermethylated promoters and six hypomethylated promoters in DCM with 100% cross-validation accuracy in the group assignment. Generation of a composite list of genes identified by subtractive analysis and two-stage computation analysis revealed four genes that exhibited differential DNA methylation by both methods in addition to altered gene expression. Computationally identified genes ( AURKB, BTNL9, CLDN5, and TK1) define a central set of differentially methylated gene promoters that are important in classifying DCM. These genes have no previously reported role in DCM. This study documents that rigorous computational analysis applied to microarray analysis of healthy and diseased human heart samples helps to define clinically relevant DNA methylation and expressional changes in DCM.

scholarly journals Deletion of Tet proteins results in quantitative disparities during ESC differentiation partially attributable to differences in gene expression

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Reimer ◽  
Kirthi Pulakanti ◽  
Linzheng Shi ◽  
Alex Abel ◽  
Mingyu Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Intermediate Phenotype ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Tet Proteins ◽  
Tet Protein

Abstract Background: The Tet protein family (Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3) regulate DNA methylation through conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which can ultimately result in DNA demethylation and play a critical role during early mammalian development and pluripotency¬. While multiple groups have generated knockouts combining loss of different Tet proteins in murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), differences in genetic background and approaches has made it difficult to directly compare results and discern the direct mechanism by which Tet proteins regulate the transcriptome. To address this concern, we utilized genomic editing in an isogenic pluripotent background which permitted a quantitative, flow-cytometry based measurement of pluripotency in combination with genome-wide assessment of gene expression and DNA methylation changes. Our ultimate goal was to generate a resource of large-scale datasets to permit hypothesis-generating experiments. Results: We demonstrate a quantitative disparity in the differentiation ability among Tet protein deletions, with Tet2 single knockout exhibiting the most severe defect, while loss of Tet1 ¬alone or combinations of Tet genes showed a quantitatively intermediate phenotype. Using a combination of transcriptomic and epigenomic approaches we demonstrate an increase in DNA hypermethylation and a divergence of transcriptional profiles in pluripotency among Tet deletions, with loss of Tet2 having the most profound effect in undifferentiated ESCs. Conclusions: We conclude that loss of Tet2 has the most dramatic effect both on the phenotype of ESCs and the transcriptome compared to other genotypes. While loss of Tet proteins increased DNA hypermethylation, especially in gene promoters, these changes in DNA methylation did not correlate with gene expression changes. Thus, while loss of different Tet proteins alters DNA methylation, this change does not appear to be directly responsible for transcriptome changes. Thus, loss of Tet proteins likely regulates the transcriptome epigenetically both through altering 5mC but also through additional mechanisms. Nonetheless, the transcriptome changes in pluripotent Tet2-/- ESCs compared to wild-type implies that the disparities in differentiation can be partially attributed to baseline alterations in gene expression.

scholarly journals Deletion of Tet proteins results in quantitative disparities during ESC differentiation partially attributable to alterations in gene expression

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael J Reimer ◽  
Kirthi Pulakanti ◽  
Linzheng Shi ◽  
Alex Abel ◽  
Mingyu Liang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Dna Demethylation ◽  
Intermediate Phenotype ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Tet Proteins ◽  
Tet Protein

Abstract Background: The Tet protein family (Tet1, Tet2, and Tet3) regulate DNA methylation through conversion of 5-methylcytosine to 5-hydroxymethylcytosine which can ultimately result in DNA demethylation and play a critical role during early mammalian development and pluripotency¬. While multiple groups have generated knockouts combining loss of different Tet proteins in murine embryonic stem cells (ESCs), differences in genetic background and approaches has made it difficult to directly compare results and discern the direct mechanism by which Tet proteins regulate the transcriptome. To address this concern, we utilized genomic editing in an isogenic pluripotent background which permitted a quantitative, flow-cytometry based measurement of pluripotency in combination with genome-wide assessment of gene expression and DNA methylation changes. Our ultimate goal was to generate a resource of large-scale datasets to permit hypothesis-generating experiments. Results: We demonstrate a quantitative disparity in the differentiation ability among Tet protein deletions, with Tet2 single knockout exhibiting the most severe defect, while loss of Tet1 ¬alone or combinations of Tet genes showed a quantitatively intermediate phenotype. Using a combination of transcriptomic and epigenomic approaches we demonstrate an increase in DNA hypermethylation and a divergence of transcriptional profiles in pluripotency among Tet deletions, with loss of Tet2 having the most profound effect in undifferentiated ESCs. Conclusions: We conclude that loss of Tet2 has the most dramatic effect both on the phenotype of ESCs and the transcriptome compared to other genotypes. While loss of Tet proteins increased DNA hypermethylation, especially in gene promoters, these changes in DNA methylation did not correlate with gene expression changes. Thus, while loss of different Tet proteins alters DNA methylation, this change does not appear to be directly responsible for transcriptome changes. Thus, loss of Tet proteins likely regulates the transcriptome epigenetically both through altering 5mC but also through additional mechanisms. Nonetheless, the transcriptome changes in pluripotent Tet2-/- ESCs compared to wild-type implies that the disparities in differentiation can be partially attributed to baseline alterations in gene expression.

Genome-Wide Chip-Seq Analysis of Histone Methylation Reveals Modulators of NF-κB Signaling and the Histone Demethylase JMJD3 as Implicated in Disease Progression in Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS).

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 291-291
Author(s):  
Yue Wei ◽  
Rui Chen ◽  
Carlos E. Bueso-Ramos ◽  
Hui Wang ◽  
Xingzhi Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Gene Activation ◽  
Gene Promoter ◽  
Histone Demethylase ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Promoter Regions ◽  
Expression Levels ◽  
Cd34 Cells ◽  
Normal Controls

Abstract Abstract 291 Although cytogenetic abnormalities are common in MDS, search for genetic alterations has been less informative with few prevalent abnormalities thus far known. To identify genes aberrantly activated in MDS, we developed a novel approach based on chromatin immuno-precipitation combined with massive parallel sequencing (CHIP-Seq) using the Solexa 1G sequencing technology. To our knowledge this is the first example of the use of this technology in primary human samples. For CHIP analysis we used an antibody against H3K4me3 (histone-H3-lysine 4-trimethylation). H3K4me3 is a chromatin mark of gene activation that localizes to active gene promoter regions. CHIP-Seq was performed in CD34+, CD34 neg cells and whole bone marrow (WBM) from 6 patients with MDS and 4 normal controls. In total 30 samples were sequenced. Patients samples were obtained at the time of initial referral at MDACC and were sorted immediately using standard separation procedures. When compared to normal controls for each cellular compartment, we identified 36, 156 and 32 potential active gene promoters associated with H3K4me3 in CD34+, CD34 neg cells and WBM respectively. Of importance, gene promoter regions identified did not overlap among the different cellular compartments analyzed (differences were observed comparing normal vs MDS but also among different MDS compartments), indicating that chromatin structure and gene expression profiles are aberrant and distinct in non-CD34+ cells that may also contribute to the pathobiology of MDS. Here we focus on H3K4me3-associated gene promoters in CD34+ cells. To confirm the results obtained with the CHIP-seq approach, we studied the expression levels of the top 9 CHIP-Seq identified genes in an independent cohort of in CD34+ cells obtained from 54 MDS at the time of initial diagnosis. Patient characteristics have been previously reported (Leukemia, in press): 11 (20%) low risk, 20 (37%) int-1, 15 (27%) int-2 and 8 (14%) high risk by IPSS. We confirmed gene expression up-regulation of 7 (C5AR1, FPR1, FPR2, AQ9, FYB, FCAR, IL8RA) of 9 genes detected by CHIP-Seq. Using Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of the 36 genes identified in CD34+ cells revealed NF-κB as central activated knot in CD34+ cells. This was confirmed by phospho-p65 immuno-staining in primary cells. Furthermore up-regulation of all 10 NF-κB activation associated genes was confirmed in MDS CD34+ cells by Q-RT-PCR. Transfection of OCI-AML3 cells with a siRNAs cocktail targeting 4 of the CD34+ NF-κB activation genes dramatically repressed NF-κB activation as well as expression and promoter NF-κB association of JMJD3 gene, a known NF-κB transcriptional target. JMJD3 encodes a Jmjc-domain K27me3 demethylase, which positively regulates H3K4me3. We further characterized expression levels of 17 known histone demethylases known in human in 35 patients with MDS and identified JMJD3 as the only histone demethylase overexpressed in MDS CD34+ cells. siRNA targeting JMJD3 reduced expression and promoter H3K4me3 levels of several CHIP-Seq detected MDS- CD34+-NF-κB activation genes. Finally expression profile of JMJD3 and the panel CD34+-NF-κB activation genes in the 54 patients with MDS indicated that expression levels were consistently overexpressed in patients with higher-risk (high and int-2) disease compared to patients with lower (low and int-1) risk disease. In view of the known antiapoptotic and proliferative role of the NF-κB pathway, this data indicates that expression of upstream and downstream modulators of NF-κB signaling, regulated at the chromatin level by JMJD3, have a role in MDS progression and could serve as therapeutic targets. Through this novel in vivo CHIP-Seq analysis, we demonstrated that a positive regulatory loop exists in MDS CD34+ cells. This loop contains JMJD3 promoted gene activation through positive regulation of H3K4me3, which leads to NF-κB signaling activation, and then further promotion of JMJD3 expression and activation of the whole signaling cascade. Our study also demonstrates that in vivo CHIP-Seq can be used to discover disease specific targets. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals Bivalent chromatin protects reversibly repressed genes from irreversible silencing

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dhirendra Kumar ◽  
Raja Jothi
Keyword(s):  
Dna Methylation ◽  
Regulatory Mechanism ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Embryonic Stem ◽  
Cell Types ◽  
List Type ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Dna Hypermethylation ◽  
Rapid Activation ◽  
Bivalent Gene

ABSTRACTBivalent chromatin is characterized by the simultaneous presence of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3, histone modifications generally associated with transcriptionally active and repressed chromatin, respectively. Prevalent in embryonic stem cells, bivalency is postulated to poise lineage-controlling developmental genes for rapid activation during embryogenesis while maintaining a transcriptionally repressed state in the absence of activation cues, but its function in development and disease remains a mystery. Here we show that bivalency does not poise genes for rapid activation but protects reversibly repressed genes from irreversible silencing. We find that H3K4me3 at bivalent gene promoters—a product of the underlying DNA sequence—persists in nearly all cell types irrespective of gene expression and confers protection from de novo DNA methylation. Accordingly, loss of H3K4me3 at bivalent promoters is strongly associated with aberrant hypermethylation and irreversible silencing in adult human cancers. Bivalency may thus represent a distinct regulatory mechanism for maintaining epigenetic plasticity.HIGHLIGHTSBivalent chromatin does not poise genes for rapid activationH3K4me3 at bivalent promoters is not instructive for transcription activationH3K4me3 at bivalent promoters protects reversibly repressed genes from de novo DNA methylationLoss of H3K4me3/bivalency is associated with aberrant DNA hypermethylation in cancer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document