scholarly journals Hidden conformations differentiate day and night in a circadian pacemaker

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Swan ◽  
Colby Sandate ◽  
Archana Chavan ◽  
Alfred Freeberg ◽  
Diana Etwaru ◽  
...  

The AAA+ protein KaiC is the central pacemaker for cyanobacterial circadian rhythms. Composed of two hexameric rings with tightly coupled activities, KaiC undergoes changes in autophosphorylation on its C-terminal (CII) domain that restrict binding of of clock proteins on its N-terminal (CI) domain to the evening. Here, we use cryo-electron microscopy to investigate how daytime and nighttime states of CII regulate KaiB binding to CI. We find that the CII hexamer is destabilized during the day but takes on a rigidified C2-symmetric state at night, concomitant with ring-ring compression. Residues at the CI-CII interface are required for phospho-dependent KaiB association, coupling ATPase activity on CI to cooperative KaiB recruitment. Together these studies reveal how daily changes in KaiC phosphorylation regulate cyanobacterial circadian rhythms.

1998 ◽  
Vol 274 (4) ◽  
pp. R991-R996 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elizabeth B. Klerman ◽  
David W. Rimmer ◽  
Derk-Jan Dijk ◽  
Richard E. Kronauer ◽  
Joseph F. Rizzo ◽  
...  

In organisms as diverse as single-celled algae and humans, light is the primary stimulus mediating entrainment of the circadian biological clock. Reports that some totally blind individuals appear entrained to the 24-h day have suggested that nonphotic stimuli may also be effective circadian synchronizers in humans, although the nonphotic stimuli are probably comparatively weak synchronizers, because the circadian rhythms of many totally blind individuals “free run” even when they maintain a 24-h activity-rest schedule. To investigate entrainment by nonphotic synchronizers, we studied the endogenous circadian melatonin and core body temperature rhythms of 15 totally blind subjects who lacked conscious light perception and exhibited no suppression of plasma melatonin in response to ocular bright-light exposure. Nine of these fifteen blind individuals were able to maintain synchronization to the 24-h day, albeit often at an atypical phase angle of entrainment. Nonphotic stimuli also synchronized the endogenous circadian rhythms of a totally blind individual to a non-24-h schedule while living in constant near darkness. We conclude that nonphotic stimuli can entrain the human circadian pacemaker in some individuals lacking ocular circadian photoreception.


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 194-202 ◽  
Author(s):  
Colleen A. McClung

Drug addiction is a devastating disease that affects millions of individuals worldwide. Through better understanding of the genetic variations that create a vulnerability for addiction and the molecular mechanisms that underlie the progression of addiction, better treatment options can be created for those that suffer from this condition. Recent studies point to a link between abnormal or disrupted circadian rhythms and the development of addiction. In addition, studies suggest a role for specific genes that make up the molecular clock in the regulation of drug sensitivity, sensitization, and reward. The influence of circadian genes and rhythms on drug-induced behaviors may be mediated through the mesolimbic dopaminergic system. This system has long been implicated in the development of addiction, and recent evidence supports a regulatory role for the brain's central pacemaker and circadian gene expression in the regulation of dopaminergic transmission. This review highlights the association between circadian genes and drug addiction, and the possible role of the mesolimbic dopaminergic system in this association.


1986 ◽  
Vol 251 (2) ◽  
pp. E215-E226 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. B. Jaspan ◽  
E. Lever ◽  
K. S. Polonsky ◽  
E. Van Cauter

In vivo oscillations of pancreatic peptides are recognized in primates. To determine whether such oscillations also occur in other mammalian species and to examine their underlying mechanisms, portal vein levels of insulin, C-peptide, glucagon, somatostatin, pancreatic polypeptide (PP), and glucose were measured simultaneously at 1- or 2-min intervals in nine conscious dogs. For comparison with primates, additional experiments were conducted in baboons and humans. Computer-assisted pulse identification for both raw and smoothed data was performed and spectral estimations calculated after detrending. Concomitance and comovement between the fluctuations of the various peptides and glucose were tested. Prominent pulses at 10- to 14-min intervals were detected most regularly for insulin and glucagon and were frequently reflected in PP and somatostatin levels. Corresponding relative increments in plasma concentration averaged 54% for insulin, 16% for glucagon, 25% for PP, and 24% for somatostatin. Insulin pulses were concomitant with glucagon pulses in 80% of the cases. Pulses of PP were less frequent, although consistently associated with insulin pulses. Somatostatin pulses were less consistently associated with those of other peptides. Peptide oscillations were unrelated to glucose changes. Spectral analysis confirmed these results with peaks in the 10- to 14-min range for all peptides but no significant periodicity for glucose. No consistent delays or advances between the oscillations of the various peptides could be demonstrated. It is speculated that oscillatory behavior in the pancreas may be related to a central pacemaker mechanism, which involves insulin tightly coupled to glucagon, entraining the fluctuations of PP, and, inconsistently, of somatostatin.


2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153473541983649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Hsien Lin ◽  
Maan Qraitem ◽  
Yue Lian ◽  
Stephanie R. Taylor ◽  
Michelle E. Farkas

From an epidemiological standpoint, disruptions to circadian rhythms have been shown to contribute to the development of various disease pathologies, including breast cancer. However, it is unclear how altered circadian rhythms are related to malignant transformations at the molecular level. In this article, a series of isogenic breast cancer cells representing disease progression was used to investigate the expression patterns of core circadian clock proteins BMAL1 and PER2. Our model is indicative of 4 stages of breast cancer and includes the following cells: MCF10A (non-malignant), MCF10AT.Cl2 (pre-malignant), MCF10Ca1h (well-differentiated, malignant), and MCF10Ca1a (poorly differentiated, malignant). While studies of circadian rhythms in cancer typically use low-resolution reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays, we also employed luciferase reporters BMAL1:Luc and PER2:Luc in real-time luminometry experiments. We found that across all 4 cancer stages, PER2 showed relatively stable oscillations compared with BMAL1. Period estimation using both wavelet-based and damped-sine-fitting methods showed that the periods are distributed over a wide circadian range and there is no clear progression in mean period as cancer severity progresses. Additionally, we used the K-nearest neighbors algorithm to classify the recordings according to cancer line, and found that cancer stages were largely differentiated from one another. Taken together, our data support that there are circadian discrepancies between normal and malignant cells, but it is difficult and insufficient to singularly use period evaluations to differentiate them. Future studies should employ other progressive disease models to determine whether these findings are representative across cancer types or are specific to this series.


Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1170
Author(s):  
Aida Maric ◽  
Paloma Mas

Circadian rhythms pervade nearly all aspects of plant growth, physiology, and development. Generation of the rhythms relies on an endogenous timing system or circadian clock that generates 24-h oscillations in multiple rhythmic outputs. At its bases, the plant circadian function relies on dynamic interactive networks of clock components that regulate each other to generate rhythms at specific phases during the day and night. From the initial discovery more than 13 years ago of a parallelism between the oscillations in chromatin status and the transcriptional rhythms of an Arabidopsis clock gene, a number of studies have later expanded considerably our view on the circadian epigenome and transcriptome landscapes. Here, we describe the most recent identification of chromatin-related factors that are able to directly interact with Arabidopsis clock proteins to shape the transcriptional waveforms of circadian gene expression and clock outputs. We discuss how changes in chromatin marks associate with transcript initiation, elongation, and the rhythms of nascent RNAs, and speculate on future interesting research directions in the field.


2015 ◽  
Vol 36 (6) ◽  
pp. 855-870 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evrim Yildirim ◽  
Joanna C. Chiu ◽  
Isaac Edery

The main components regulating the pace of circadian (≅24 h) clocks in animals are PERIOD (PER) proteins, transcriptional regulators that undergo daily changes in levels and nuclear accumulation by means of complex multisite phosphorylation programs. In the present study, we investigated the function of two phosphorylation sites, at Ser826 and Ser828, located in a putative nuclear localization signal (NLS) on theDrosophila melanogasterPER protein. These sites are phosphorylated by DOUBLETIME (DBT;Drosophilahomolog of CK1δ/ε), the key circadian kinase regulating the daily changes in PER stability and phosphorylation. Mutant flies in which phosphorylation at Ser826/Ser828 is blocked manifest behavioral rhythms with periods slightly longer than 1 h and with altered temperature compensation properties. Intriguingly, although phosphorylation at these sites does not influence PER stability, timing of nuclear entry, or transcriptional autoinhibition, the phospho-occupancy at Ser826/Ser828 is rapidly stimulated by light and blocked by TIMELESS (TIM), the major photosensitive clock component inDrosophilaand a crucial binding partner of PER. Our findings identify the first phosphorylation sites on core clock proteins that are acutely regulated by photic cues and suggest that some phosphosites on PER proteins can modulate the pace of downstream behavioral rhythms without altering central aspects of the clock mechanism.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangbo Xiao ◽  
Ye Yuan ◽  
Mariana Jimenez ◽  
Neeraj Soni ◽  
Swathi Yadlapalli

ABSTRACTCircadian clocks regulate ∼24 hour oscillations in gene expression, behavior, and physiology. While the molecular and neural mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well characterized, how cellular organization of clock components controls circadian clock regulation remains poorly understood. Here, we elucidate how clock proteins regulate circadian rhythms by controlling the spatiotemporal organization of clock genes. Using high-resolution live imaging techniques we demonstrate that Drosophila clock proteins are concentrated in a few discrete foci and are organized at the nuclear envelope; these results are in contrast to longstanding expectations that clock proteins are diffusely distributed in the nucleus. We also show that clock protein foci are highly dynamic and change in number, size, and localization over the circadian cycle. Further, we demonstrate that clock genes are positioned at the nuclear periphery by the clock proteins precisely during the circadian repression phase, suggesting that subnuclear localization of clock genes plays an important role in the control of rhythmic gene expression. Finally, we show that Lamin B receptor, a nuclear envelope protein, is required for peripheral localization of clock protein foci and clock genes and for normal circadian rhythms. These results reveal that clock proteins form dynamic nuclear foci and play a hitherto unexpected role in the subnuclear reorganization of clock genes to control circadian rhythms, identifying a novel mechanism of circadian regulation. Our results further suggest a new role for clock protein foci in the clustering of clock-regulated genes during the repression phase to control gene co-regulation and circadian rhythms.SIGNIFICANCEAlmost all living organisms have evolved circadian clocks to tell time. Circadian clocks regulate ∼24-hour oscillations in gene expression, behavior and physiology. Here, we reveal the surprisingly sophisticated spatiotemporal organization of clock proteins and clock genes and its critical role in circadian clock function. We show, in contrast to current expectations, that clock proteins are concentrated in a few discrete, dynamic nuclear foci at the nuclear envelope during the repression phase. Further, we uncovered several unexpected features of clock protein foci, including their role in positioning the clock genes at the nuclear envelope precisely during the repression phase to enable circadian rhythms. These studies provide fundamental new insights into the cellular mechanisms of circadian rhythms and establish direct links between nuclear organization and circadian clocks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (28) ◽  
pp. e2019756118
Author(s):  
Yangbo Xiao ◽  
Ye Yuan ◽  
Mariana Jimenez ◽  
Neeraj Soni ◽  
Swathi Yadlapalli

Circadian clocks regulate ∼24-h oscillations in gene expression, behavior, and physiology. While the genetic and molecular mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well characterized, what remains poorly understood are the intracellular dynamics of circadian clock components and how they affect circadian rhythms. Here, we elucidate how spatiotemporal organization and dynamics of core clock proteins and genes affect circadian rhythms in Drosophila clock neurons. Using high-resolution imaging and DNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques, we demonstrate that Drosophila clock proteins (PERIOD and CLOCK) are organized into a few discrete foci at the nuclear envelope during the circadian repression phase and play an important role in the subnuclear localization of core clock genes to control circadian rhythms. Specifically, we show that core clock genes, period and timeless, are positioned close to the nuclear periphery by the PERIOD protein specifically during the repression phase, suggesting that subnuclear localization of core clock genes might play a key role in their rhythmic gene expression. Finally, we show that loss of Lamin B receptor, a nuclear envelope protein, leads to disruption of PER foci and per gene peripheral localization and results in circadian rhythm defects. These results demonstrate that clock proteins play a hitherto unexpected role in the subnuclear reorganization of core clock genes to control circadian rhythms, revealing how clocks function at the subcellular level. Our results further suggest that clock protein foci might regulate dynamic clustering and spatial reorganization of clock-regulated genes over the repression phase to control circadian rhythms in behavior and physiology.


1988 ◽  
Vol 255 (6) ◽  
pp. R1055-R1058
Author(s):  
S. T. Inouye ◽  
J. S. Takahashi ◽  
F. Wollnik ◽  
F. W. Turek

The suprachiasmatic nucleus (SCN) of the hypothalamus contains a circadian pacemaker that regulates many circadian rhythms in mammals. Experimental work in microorganisms and invertebrates suggests that protein synthesis is required for the function of the circadian oscillator, and recent experiments in golden hamsters suggest an acute inhibition of protein synthesis can induce phase shifts in a mammalian circadian pacemaker. To determine whether protein synthesis in the SCN region is involved in the generation of circadian rhythms in mammals, a protein synthesis inhibitor, anisomycin, was microinjected into the SCN region, and the effect on the circadian rhythm of locomotor activity of hamsters was measured. A single injection of anisomycin into the SCN region induced phase shifts in the circadian activity rhythm that varied systematically as a function of the phase of injection within the circadian cycle. These results suggest that protein synthesis may be involved in the generation of circadian rhythms in mammals and that the anatomic site of action of anisomycin is within the hypothalamic suprachiasmatic region.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document