scholarly journals Chromatin Dynamics and Transcriptional Control of Circadian Rhythms in Arabidopsis

Genes ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1170
Author(s):  
Aida Maric ◽  
Paloma Mas

Circadian rhythms pervade nearly all aspects of plant growth, physiology, and development. Generation of the rhythms relies on an endogenous timing system or circadian clock that generates 24-h oscillations in multiple rhythmic outputs. At its bases, the plant circadian function relies on dynamic interactive networks of clock components that regulate each other to generate rhythms at specific phases during the day and night. From the initial discovery more than 13 years ago of a parallelism between the oscillations in chromatin status and the transcriptional rhythms of an Arabidopsis clock gene, a number of studies have later expanded considerably our view on the circadian epigenome and transcriptome landscapes. Here, we describe the most recent identification of chromatin-related factors that are able to directly interact with Arabidopsis clock proteins to shape the transcriptional waveforms of circadian gene expression and clock outputs. We discuss how changes in chromatin marks associate with transcript initiation, elongation, and the rhythms of nascent RNAs, and speculate on future interesting research directions in the field.

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153473541983649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui-Hsien Lin ◽  
Maan Qraitem ◽  
Yue Lian ◽  
Stephanie R. Taylor ◽  
Michelle E. Farkas

From an epidemiological standpoint, disruptions to circadian rhythms have been shown to contribute to the development of various disease pathologies, including breast cancer. However, it is unclear how altered circadian rhythms are related to malignant transformations at the molecular level. In this article, a series of isogenic breast cancer cells representing disease progression was used to investigate the expression patterns of core circadian clock proteins BMAL1 and PER2. Our model is indicative of 4 stages of breast cancer and includes the following cells: MCF10A (non-malignant), MCF10AT.Cl2 (pre-malignant), MCF10Ca1h (well-differentiated, malignant), and MCF10Ca1a (poorly differentiated, malignant). While studies of circadian rhythms in cancer typically use low-resolution reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction assays, we also employed luciferase reporters BMAL1:Luc and PER2:Luc in real-time luminometry experiments. We found that across all 4 cancer stages, PER2 showed relatively stable oscillations compared with BMAL1. Period estimation using both wavelet-based and damped-sine-fitting methods showed that the periods are distributed over a wide circadian range and there is no clear progression in mean period as cancer severity progresses. Additionally, we used the K-nearest neighbors algorithm to classify the recordings according to cancer line, and found that cancer stages were largely differentiated from one another. Taken together, our data support that there are circadian discrepancies between normal and malignant cells, but it is difficult and insufficient to singularly use period evaluations to differentiate them. Future studies should employ other progressive disease models to determine whether these findings are representative across cancer types or are specific to this series.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren Foley ◽  
Jinli Ling ◽  
Radhika Joshi ◽  
Naveh Evantal ◽  
Sebastian Kadener ◽  
...  

AbstractThe Drosophila circadian pacemaker consists of transcriptional feedback loops subjected to both post-transcriptional and post-translational regulation. While post-translational regulatory mechanisms have been studied in detail, much less is known about circadian post-transcriptional control. To have a better understanding of the role and mechanisms of circadian post-transcriptional regulation, we targeted 364 RNA binding and RNA associated proteins with RNA interference. Among the 43 genes we identified was the alternative splicing regulator P-element somatic inhibitor (PSI). PSI downregulation shortens the period of circadian rhythms both in the brain and in peripheral tissues. Interestingly, we found that PSI regulates the thermosensitive alternative splicing of timeless (tim), promoting splicing events favored at warm temperature over those increased at cold temperature. Moreover, the period of circadian behavior was insensitive to PSI downregulation when flies could produce functional TIM proteins only from a transgene that cannot form the thermosensitive splicing isoforms. Therefore, we conclude that PSI regulates the period of Drosophila circadian rhythms through its modulation of the tim splicing pattern.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yani Zheng ◽  
Yongbo Xue ◽  
Xingjie Ren ◽  
Xiao-Jun Xie ◽  
Mengmeng Liu ◽  
...  

AbstractPost-translational modification of histones, such as histone methylation controlled by specific methyltransferases and demethylases, play critical roles in modulating chromatin dynamics and transcription in eukaryotes. Misregulation of histone methylation can lead to aberrant gene expression, thereby contributing to abnormal development and diseases such as cancer. As such, the mammalian lysine-specific demethylase 2 (KDM2) homologs, KDM2A and KDM2B, are either oncogenic or tumor suppressive, depending on specific pathological contexts. However, the role of KDM2 proteins during development in the whole organisms remains poorly understood. Unlike vertebrates, Drosophila has only one KDM2 homolog (dKDM2), but its functions in vivo remain elusive due to the complexities of the existing mutant alleles. To address this problem, we have generated two dKdm2 null alleles using the CRISPR/Cas9 technique. These dKdm2 homozygous mutants are fully viable and fertile, with no developmental defects observed under laboratory conditions. However, the dKdm2 null mutant adults display defects in circadian rhythms. Most of the dKdm2 mutants become arrhythmic under constant darkness, while the circadian period of the rhythmic mutant flies is approximately one hour shorter than the control. Interestingly, opposite defects are observed when dKDM2 is overexpressed in circadian pacemaker neurons. Taken together, these results demonstrate that dKdm2 is not essential for viability; instead, dKDM2 protein plays important roles in regulating circadian rhythms in Drosophila. Further analyses of the molecular mechanisms of how dKDM2 and its orthologs in vertebrates regulate circadian rhythms will advance our understanding of the epigenetic regulations of circadian clocks.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yangbo Xiao ◽  
Ye Yuan ◽  
Mariana Jimenez ◽  
Neeraj Soni ◽  
Swathi Yadlapalli

ABSTRACTCircadian clocks regulate ∼24 hour oscillations in gene expression, behavior, and physiology. While the molecular and neural mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well characterized, how cellular organization of clock components controls circadian clock regulation remains poorly understood. Here, we elucidate how clock proteins regulate circadian rhythms by controlling the spatiotemporal organization of clock genes. Using high-resolution live imaging techniques we demonstrate that Drosophila clock proteins are concentrated in a few discrete foci and are organized at the nuclear envelope; these results are in contrast to longstanding expectations that clock proteins are diffusely distributed in the nucleus. We also show that clock protein foci are highly dynamic and change in number, size, and localization over the circadian cycle. Further, we demonstrate that clock genes are positioned at the nuclear periphery by the clock proteins precisely during the circadian repression phase, suggesting that subnuclear localization of clock genes plays an important role in the control of rhythmic gene expression. Finally, we show that Lamin B receptor, a nuclear envelope protein, is required for peripheral localization of clock protein foci and clock genes and for normal circadian rhythms. These results reveal that clock proteins form dynamic nuclear foci and play a hitherto unexpected role in the subnuclear reorganization of clock genes to control circadian rhythms, identifying a novel mechanism of circadian regulation. Our results further suggest a new role for clock protein foci in the clustering of clock-regulated genes during the repression phase to control gene co-regulation and circadian rhythms.SIGNIFICANCEAlmost all living organisms have evolved circadian clocks to tell time. Circadian clocks regulate ∼24-hour oscillations in gene expression, behavior and physiology. Here, we reveal the surprisingly sophisticated spatiotemporal organization of clock proteins and clock genes and its critical role in circadian clock function. We show, in contrast to current expectations, that clock proteins are concentrated in a few discrete, dynamic nuclear foci at the nuclear envelope during the repression phase. Further, we uncovered several unexpected features of clock protein foci, including their role in positioning the clock genes at the nuclear envelope precisely during the repression phase to enable circadian rhythms. These studies provide fundamental new insights into the cellular mechanisms of circadian rhythms and establish direct links between nuclear organization and circadian clocks.


2021 ◽  
Vol 118 (28) ◽  
pp. e2019756118
Author(s):  
Yangbo Xiao ◽  
Ye Yuan ◽  
Mariana Jimenez ◽  
Neeraj Soni ◽  
Swathi Yadlapalli

Circadian clocks regulate ∼24-h oscillations in gene expression, behavior, and physiology. While the genetic and molecular mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well characterized, what remains poorly understood are the intracellular dynamics of circadian clock components and how they affect circadian rhythms. Here, we elucidate how spatiotemporal organization and dynamics of core clock proteins and genes affect circadian rhythms in Drosophila clock neurons. Using high-resolution imaging and DNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques, we demonstrate that Drosophila clock proteins (PERIOD and CLOCK) are organized into a few discrete foci at the nuclear envelope during the circadian repression phase and play an important role in the subnuclear localization of core clock genes to control circadian rhythms. Specifically, we show that core clock genes, period and timeless, are positioned close to the nuclear periphery by the PERIOD protein specifically during the repression phase, suggesting that subnuclear localization of core clock genes might play a key role in their rhythmic gene expression. Finally, we show that loss of Lamin B receptor, a nuclear envelope protein, leads to disruption of PER foci and per gene peripheral localization and results in circadian rhythm defects. These results demonstrate that clock proteins play a hitherto unexpected role in the subnuclear reorganization of core clock genes to control circadian rhythms, revealing how clocks function at the subcellular level. Our results further suggest that clock protein foci might regulate dynamic clustering and spatial reorganization of clock-regulated genes over the repression phase to control circadian rhythms in behavior and physiology.


2011 ◽  
Vol 124 (3) ◽  
pp. 311-320 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Kojima ◽  
D. L. Shingle ◽  
C. B. Green

2011 ◽  
Vol 286 (9) ◽  
pp. 7033-7042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongjin Lee ◽  
Rongmin Chen ◽  
Hyeong-min Lee ◽  
Choogon Lee

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Delventhal ◽  
Meghan Pantalia ◽  
Reed M. O’Connor ◽  
Matthew Ulgherait ◽  
Han X. Kim ◽  
...  

AbstractIn Drosophila, ~150 neurons expressing molecular clock proteins regulate circadian behavior. Sixteen of these clock neurons secrete the neuropeptide Pdf and have been called “master pacemakers” because they are essential for circadian rhythms. A subset of Pdf+ neurons (the morning oscillator) regulates morning activity and communicates with other non-Pdf+ neurons, including a subset called the evening oscillator. It is assumed that the molecular clock in Pdf+ neurons is required for these functions. To test this, we developed and validated Gal4-UAS based CRISPR tools for cell-specific disruption of key molecular clock components, period and timeless. While loss of the molecular clock in both the morning and evening oscillators eliminates circadian locomotor activity, the molecular clock in either oscillator alone is sufficient for circadian locomotor activity. This suggests that clock neurons do not act in a hierarchy but as a distributed network to regulate circadian activity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (5) ◽  
pp. 707-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong Hoon Kim ◽  
Mitchell A Lazar

Abstract All biological processes, living organisms, and ecosystems have evolved with the Sun that confers a 24-hour periodicity to life on Earth. Circadian rhythms arose from evolutionary needs to maximize daily organismal fitness by enabling organisms to mount anticipatory and adaptive responses to recurrent light-dark cycles and associated environmental changes. The clock is a conserved feature in nearly all forms of life, ranging from prokaryotes to virtually every cell of multicellular eukaryotes. The mammalian clock comprises transcription factors interlocked in negative feedback loops, which generate circadian expression of genes that coordinate rhythmic physiology. In this review, we highlight previous and recent studies that have advanced our understanding of the transcriptional architecture of the mammalian clock, with a specific focus on epigenetic mechanisms, transcriptomics, and 3-dimensional chromatin architecture. In addition, we discuss reciprocal ways in which the clock and metabolism regulate each other to generate metabolic rhythms. We also highlight implications of circadian biology in human health, ranging from genetic and environment disruptions of the clock to novel therapeutic opportunities for circadian medicine. Finally, we explore remaining fundamental questions and future challenges to advancing the field forward.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Swan ◽  
Colby Sandate ◽  
Archana Chavan ◽  
Alfred Freeberg ◽  
Diana Etwaru ◽  
...  

The AAA+ protein KaiC is the central pacemaker for cyanobacterial circadian rhythms. Composed of two hexameric rings with tightly coupled activities, KaiC undergoes changes in autophosphorylation on its C-terminal (CII) domain that restrict binding of of clock proteins on its N-terminal (CI) domain to the evening. Here, we use cryo-electron microscopy to investigate how daytime and nighttime states of CII regulate KaiB binding to CI. We find that the CII hexamer is destabilized during the day but takes on a rigidified C2-symmetric state at night, concomitant with ring-ring compression. Residues at the CI-CII interface are required for phospho-dependent KaiB association, coupling ATPase activity on CI to cooperative KaiB recruitment. Together these studies reveal how daily changes in KaiC phosphorylation regulate cyanobacterial circadian rhythms.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document