scholarly journals Diverse motif ensembles specify non-redundant DNA binding activities of AP-1 family members in macrophages

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory J. Fonseca ◽  
Jenhan Tao ◽  
Emma M. Westin ◽  
Sascha H. Duttke ◽  
Nathanael J. Spann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Family Members ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Chip Sequencing ◽  
Collaborative Interactions ◽  
Genomic Locations

ABSTRACTMechanisms by which members of the AP-1 family of transcription factors play both redundant and non-redundant biological roles despite recognizing the same DNA sequence remain poorly understood. To address this question, we investigated the molecular functions and genome-wide DNA binding patterns of AP-1 family members in macrophages. ChIP-sequencing showed overlapping and distinct binding profiles for each factor that were remodeled following TLR4 ligation. Development of a machine learning approach that jointly weighs hundreds of DNA recognition elements yielded dozens of motifs predicted to drive factor-specific binding profiles. Machine learning-based predictions were confirmed by analysis of the effects of mutations in genetically diverse mice and by loss of function experiments. These findings provide evidence that non-redundant genomic locations of different AP-1 family members in macrophages largely result from collaborative interactions with diverse, locus-specific ensembles of transcription factors and suggest a general mechanism for encoding functional specificities of their common recognition motif.

scholarly journals Binding of disparate transcriptional activators to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (3) ◽  
pp. 1405-1421 ◽  
Author(s):  
C C Adams ◽  
J L Workman
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Sites ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Nf Kappa B ◽  
Nucleosomal Dna ◽  
Nucleosome Binding

To investigate mechanisms by which multiple transcription factors access complex promoters and enhancers within cellular chromatin, we have analyzed the binding of disparate factors to nucleosome cores. We used a purified in vitro system to analyze binding of four activator proteins, two GAL4 derivatives, USF, and NF-kappa B (KBF1), to reconstituted nucleosome cores containing different combinations of binding sites. Here we show that binding of any two or all three of these factors to nucleosomal DNA is inherently cooperative. Thus, the binuclear Zn clusters of GAL4, the helix-loop-helix/basic domains of USF, and the rel domain of NF-kappa B all participated in cooperative nucleosome binding, illustrating that this effect is not restricted to a particular DNA-binding domain. Simultaneous binding by two factors increased the affinity of individual factors for nucleosomal DNA by up to 2 orders of magnitude. Importantly, cooperative binding resulted in efficient nucleosome binding by factors (USF and NF-kappa B) which independently possess little nucleosome-binding ability. The participation of GAL4 derivatives in cooperative nucleosome binding required only DNA-binding and dimerization domains, indicating that disruption of histone-DNA contacts by factor binding was responsible for the increased affinity of additional factors. Cooperative nucleosome binding required sequence-specific binding of all transcription factors, appeared to have spatial constraints, and was independent of the orientation of the binding sites on the nucleosome. These results indicate that cooperative nucleosome binding is a general mechanism that may play a significant role in loading complex enhancer and promoter elements with multiple diverse factors in chromatin and contribute to the generation of threshold responses and transcriptional synergy by multiple activator sites in vivo.

Molecular genetics of chromosome translocations involving EWS and related family members

1999 ◽  
Vol 1 (3) ◽  
pp. 127-138 ◽  
Author(s):  
JUNGHO KIM ◽  
JERRY PELLETIER
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Molecular Genetics ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Chromosome Translocations ◽  
Amino Terminal ◽  
Terminal Domain ◽  
Related Family

Kim, Jungho, and Jerry Pelletier. Molecular genetics of chromosome translocations involving EWS and related family members. Physiol. Genomics 1: 127–138, 1999.—Many types of sarcomas are characterized by specific chromosomal translocations that appear to result in the production of novel, tumor-specific chimeric transcription factors. Many of these show striking similarities: the emerging picture is that the amino-terminal domain of the fusion product is donated by the Ewing's sarcoma gene ( EWS) or a related member from the same gene family, whereas the carboxy-terminal domain often consists of a DNA-binding domain derived from one of a number of transcription factors. Given the observation that the different translocation partners of the EWS protooncogene are associated with distinct types of sarcomas, the functional consequence of fusing EWS (or a related family member) to a different DNA-binding domain can only be understood in the context of functional studies that define the specificity of action of the different fusion products. An understanding of the molecular structure and function of these translocations provides new methods for diagnosis and novel targets for therapeutics.

scholarly journals Analysis of DNA Binding by a Eubacterial Zinc Finger Transcription Factor

2009 ◽  
Vol 191 (14) ◽  
pp. 4513-4521 ◽  
Author(s):  
Victor J. McAlister ◽  
Gail E. Christie
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Zinc Finger ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Dna Interaction ◽  
Late Gene ◽  
Major Groove ◽  
Late Gene Expression ◽  
Zinc Finger Transcription Factor

ABSTRACT The Serratia marcescens NucC protein is structurally and functionally homologous to the P2 Ogr family of eubacterial zinc finger transcription factors required for late gene expression in P2- and P4-related bacteriophages. These activators exhibit site-specific binding to a conserved DNA sequence, TGT-N3-R-N4-Y-N3-aCA, that is located upstream of NucC-dependent S. marcescens promoters and the late promoters of P2-related phages. In this report we describe the interactions of NucC with the P2 FETUD late operon promoter P F . NucC is shown to bind P F as a tetramer and to make 12 symmetrical contacts to the DNA phosphodiester backbone. The backbone contacts are centered on the TGT-N3-R-N4-Y-N3-aCA motif. Major groove base contacts can be seen at most positions within the ∼24-bp binding site. Minor groove contacts map to adjacent positions in the downstream half of the binding site, which corresponds to the area in which the DNA also appears to be bent by NucC binding. NucC binding provides a new example of protein-DNA interaction that is strikingly different from the DNA binding demonstrated for eukaryotic zinc-finger transcription factors.

scholarly journals Reciprocal cross-regulation of VND and SND multigene TF families for wood formation in Populus trichocarpa

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (45) ◽  
pp. E9722-E9729 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ying-Chung Jimmy Lin ◽  
Hao Chen ◽  
Quanzi Li ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Jack P. Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Splice Variant ◽  
Reciprocal Cross ◽  
Splice Variants ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Wood Formation ◽  
Negative Regulator ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Nac Domain

Secondary cell wall (SCW) biosynthesis is the biological process that generates wood, an important renewable feedstock for materials and energy. NAC domain transcription factors, particularly Vascular-Related NAC-Domain (VND) and Secondary Wall-Associated NAC Domain (SND) proteins, are known to regulate SCW differentiation. The regulation of VND and SND is important to maintain homeostasis for plants to avoid abnormal growth and development. We previously identified a splice variant, PtrSND1-A2IR, derived from PtrSND1-A2 as a dominant-negative regulator, which suppresses the transactivation of all PtrSND1 family members. PtrSND1-A2IR also suppresses the self-activation of the PtrSND1 family members except for its cognate transcription factor, PtrSND1-A2, suggesting the existence of an unknown factor needed to regulate PtrSND1-A2. Here, a splice variant, PtrVND6-C1IR, derived from PtrVND6-C1 was discovered that suppresses the protein functions of all PtrVND6 family members. PtrVND6-C1IR also suppresses the expression of all PtrSND1 members, including PtrSND1-A2, demonstrating that PtrVND6-C1IR is the previously unidentified regulator of PtrSND1-A2. We also found that PtrVND6-C1IR cannot suppress the expression of its cognate transcription factor, PtrVND6-C1. PtrVND6-C1 is suppressed by PtrSND1-A2IR. Both PtrVND6-C1IR and PtrSND1-A2IR cannot suppress their cognate transcription factors but can suppress all members of the other family. The results indicate that the splice variants from the PtrVND6 and PtrSND1 family may exert reciprocal cross-regulation for complete transcriptional regulation of these two families in wood formation. This reciprocal cross-regulation between families suggests a general mechanism among NAC domain proteins and likely other transcription factors, where intron-retained splice variants provide an additional level of regulation.

scholarly journals Local DNA shape is a general principle of transcription factor binding specificity in Arabidopsis thaliana

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Janik Sielemann ◽  
Donat Wulf ◽  
Romy Schmidt ◽  
Andrea Bräutigam
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Arabidopsis Thaliana ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
Binding Prediction ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
A Genome ◽  
Dna Shape

AbstractUnderstanding gene expression will require understanding where regulatory factors bind genomic DNA. The frequently used sequence-based motifs of protein-DNA binding are not predictive, since a genome contains many more binding sites than are actually bound and transcription factors of the same family share similar DNA-binding motifs. Traditionally, these motifs only depict sequence but neglect DNA shape. Since shape may contribute non-linearly and combinational to binding, machine learning approaches ought to be able to better predict transcription factor binding. Here we show that a random forest machine learning approach, which incorporates the 3D-shape of DNA, enhances binding prediction for all 216 tested Arabidopsis thaliana transcription factors and improves the resolution of differential binding by transcription factor family members which share the same binding motif. We observed that DNA shape features were individually weighted for each transcription factor, even if they shared the same binding sequence.

scholarly journals Machine learning study of DNA binding by transcription factors from the LacI family

2011 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 667-679 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. G. Fedonin ◽  
A. B. Rakhmaninova ◽  
Yu. D. Korostelev ◽  
O. N. Laikova ◽  
M. S. Gelfand
Keyword(s):  
Machine Learning ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Learning Study ◽  
Laci Family

scholarly journals Presence and significance of a R110W mutation in the DNA-binding domain of GCM2 gene in patients with isolated hypoparathyroidism and their family members

2010 ◽  
Vol 162 (2) ◽  
pp. 407-421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neeraj Tomar ◽  
Hema Bora ◽  
Ratnakar Singh ◽  
Nandita Gupta ◽  
Punit Kaur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Nuclear Localization ◽  
Family Members ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Compound Heterozygous ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Mobility Shift ◽  
Mobility Shift Assay

ObjectiveGlial cells missing 2 (GCM2) gene encodes a parathyroid-specific transcription factor. We assessed GCM2 gene sequence in patients with isolated hypoparathyroidism (IH).DesignCase–control study.MethodsComplete DNA sequencing of the GCM2 gene including its exons, promoter, and 5′ and 3′ UTRs was performed in 24/101 patients with IH. PCR–restriction fragment length polymorphism was used to detect a novel R110W mutation in all 101 IH patients and 655 healthy controls. Significance of the mutation was assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay (EMSA) and nuclear localization on transfection.ResultsA heterozygous R110W mutation was present in DNA-binding domain in 11/101 patients (10.9%) and absent in 655 controls (P<10−7). Four of 13 nonaffected first-degree relatives for five of these index cases had R110W mutation. Four heterozygous single nucleotide polymorphisms were found in the 5′ region. One of the 11 patients with R110W also had T370M change in compound heterozygous form. Mutant R110W and T370M GCM2 proteins showed decreased binding with GCM recognition elements on EMSA indicating loss of function. Both wild-type and R110W mutant GCM2 proteins showed nuclear localization.ConclusionsThe present study indicates a significant association of R110W variant with IH. Absence of effect of heterozygous R110W mutation on DNA binding and presence of the same mutation in asymptomatic family members indicate that additional genetic (akin to T370M change) or nongenetic factors might contribute to the expression of diseases in IH. Alternatively, it is possible that association of R110W with IH could be due to linkage disequilibrium with the unidentified relevant genes in IH.

scholarly journals Quantitative models for accelerated protein dissociation from nucleosomal DNA

2014 ◽  
Vol 42 (15) ◽  
pp. 9753-9760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cai Chen ◽  
Ralf Bundschuh
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor ◽  
Transcription Factors ◽  
Specific Binding ◽  
Regulation Of Gene Expression ◽  
Transcription Factor Binding ◽  
General Mechanism ◽  
Binding Model ◽  
Factor Binding ◽  
Protein Dissociation

Abstract Binding of transcription factors to their binding sites in promoter regions is the fundamental event in transcriptional gene regulation. When a transcription factor binding site is located within a nucleosome, the DNA has to partially unwrap from the nucleosome to allow transcription factor binding. This reduces the rate of transcription factor binding and is a known mechanism for regulation of gene expression via chromatin structure. Recently a second mechanism has been reported where transcription factor off-rates are dramatically increased when binding to target sites within the nucleosome. There are two possible explanations for such an increase in off-rate short of an active role of the nucleosome in pushing the transcription factor off the DNA: (i) for dimeric transcription factors the nucleosome can change the equilibrium between monomeric and dimeric binding or (ii) the nucleosome can change the equilibrium between specific and non-specific binding to the DNA. We explicitly model both scenarios and find that dimeric binding can explain a large increase in off-rate while the non-specific binding model cannot be reconciled with the large, experimentally observed increase. Our results suggest a general mechanism how nucleosomes increase transcription factor dissociation to promote exchange of transcription factors and regulate gene expression.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document