scholarly journals Homeostatic plasticity rules control the wiring of axo-axonic synapses at the axon initial segment

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Pan-Vazquez ◽  
Winnie Wefelmeyer ◽  
Victoria Gonzalez Sabater ◽  
Juan Burrone

AbstractGABAergic interneurons are chiefly responsible for controlling the activity of local circuits in the cortex1,2. However, the rules that govern the wiring of interneurons are not well understood3. Chandelier cells (ChCs) are a type of GABAergic interneuron that control the output of hundreds of neighbouring pyramidal cells through axo-axonic synapses which target the axon initial segment (AIS)4. Despite their importance in modulating circuit activity, our knowledge of the development and function of axo-axonic synapses remains elusive. In this study, we investigated the role of activity in the formation and plasticity of ChC synapses. In vivo imaging of ChCs during development uncovered a narrow window (P12-P18) over which axons arborized and formed connections. We found that increases in the activity of either pyramidal cells or individual ChCs during this temporal window resulted in a reversible decrease in axo-axonic connections. Voltage imaging of GABAergic transmission at the AIS showed that axo-axonic synapses were depolarising during this period. Identical manipulations of network activity in older mice (P40-P46), when ChC synapses are inhibitory, resulted in an increase in axo-axonic synapses. We propose that the direction of ChC plasticity follows homeostatic rules that depend on the polarity of axo-axonic synapses.

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunobu Murata ◽  
Matthew T. Colonnese

AbstractGABAergic interneurons are proposed to be critical for early activity and synapse formation by directly exciting, rather than inhibiting, neurons in developing hippocampus and neocortex. However, the role of GABAergic neurons in the generation of neonatal network activity has not been tested in vivo, and recent studies have challenged the excitatory nature of early GABA. By locally manipulating interneuron activity in unanesthetized neonatal mice, we show that GABAergic neurons are indeed excitatory in hippocampus at postnatal-day 3 (P3), and responsible for most of the spontaneous firing of pyramidal cells at that age. Hippocampal interneurons become inhibitory by P7, whereas cortical interneurons are inhibitory at P3 and remain so throughout development. This regional and age heterogeneity is the result of a change in chloride reversal potential as activation of light-gated anion channels expressed in glutamatergic neurons causes firing in hippocampus at P3, but silences it at P7. This study in the intact brain reveals a critical role for GABAergic interneuron excitation in neonatal hippocampus, and a surprising heterogeneity of interneuron function in cortical circuits that was not predicted from in vitro studies.


2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (24) ◽  
pp. eaba1430 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunobu Murata ◽  
Matthew T. Colonnese

GABAergic interneurons are proposed to be critical for early activity and synapse formation by directly exciting, rather than inhibiting, neurons in developing hippocampus and neocortex. However, the role of GABAergic neurons in the generation of neonatal network activity has not been tested in vivo, and recent studies have challenged the excitatory nature of early GABA. By locally manipulating interneuron activity in unanesthetized neonatal mice, we show that GABAergic neurons are excitatory in CA1 hippocampus at postnatal day 3 (P3) and are responsible for most of the spontaneous firing of pyramidal cells at that age. Hippocampal interneurons become inhibitory by P7, whereas visual cortex interneurons are already inhibitory by P3 and remain so throughout development. These regional and age-specific differences are the result of a change in chloride reversal potential, because direct activation of light-gated anion channels in glutamatergic neurons drives CA1 firing at P3, but silences it at P7 in CA1, and at all ages in visual cortex. This study in the intact brain reveals that GABAergic interneuron excitation is essential for network activity in neonatal hippocampus and confirms that visual cortical interneurons are inhibitory throughout early postnatal development.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pernille Bülow ◽  
Peter A Wenner ◽  
Victor Faundez ◽  
Gary J Bassell

Abstract Mitochondrial dysfunction has long been overlooked in neurodevelopmental disorders, but recent studies have provided new links to genetic forms of autism, including Rett syndrome and Fragile X Syndrome (FXS). In parallel, recent studies have uncovered important basic functions of mitochondria to power protein synthesis, synaptic plasticity and neuronal maturation. The mitochondrion also responds to neuronal activity by altering its morphology and function, and this plasticity of the mitochondrion appear important for proper neuronal plasticity. Previous research has reported disease induced changes in mitochondrial morphology and function, but it remains unknown how such abnormalities affect the ability of mitochondria to express activity dependent plasticity. This study addresses this gap in knowledge using a mouse model of FXS. We previously reported abnormalities in one type of homeostatic plasticity, called homeostatic intrinsic plasticity, which is known to involve structural changes in the axon initial segment (AIS). Another form of homeostatic plasticity, called synaptic scaling, which involves postsynaptic changes in dendrites, is also impaired in FXS. It remains unknown if or how homeostatic plasticity affects mitochondria in axons and/or dendrites and whether impairments occur in neurodevelopmental disorders. Here, we test the hypothesis that mitochondria are structurally and functionally modified in a compartment specific manner during homeostatic plasticity in cortical neurons from wild type mice, and that this plasticity-induced regulation is altered in Fmr1 KO neurons, as a model of FXS. We uncovered dendritic specific regulation of mitochondrial surface area, whereas AIS mitochondria show changes in polarity; both responses are lost in Fmr1 KO. Taken together our results demonstrate impairments in mitochondrial plasticity in FXS, which has not previously been reported. These results suggest that mitochondrial dysregulation in FXS contributes to abnormal neuronal plasticity, with broader implications to other neurodevelopmental disorders and therapeutic strategies.


Author(s):  
Pernille Bülow ◽  
Peter A. Wenner ◽  
Victor Faundez ◽  
Gary J. Bassell

Mitochondrial dysfunction has long been overlooked in neurodevelopmental disorders, but recent studies have provided new links to genetic forms of autism, including Rett syndrome and fragile X syndrome (FXS). Mitochondria show plasticity in morphology and function in response to neuronal activity, and previous research has reported impairments in mitochondrial morphology and function in disease. We and others have previously reported abnormalities in distinct types of homeostatic plasticity in FXS. It remains unknown if or how activity deprivation triggering homeostatic plasticity affects mitochondria in axons and/or dendrites and whether impairments occur in neurodevelopmental disorders. Here, we test the hypothesis that mitochondria are structurally and functionally modified in a compartment-specific manner during homeostatic plasticity using a model of activity deprivation in cortical neurons from wild-type mice and that this plasticity-induced regulation is altered in Fmr1-knockout (KO) neurons. We uncovered dendrite-specific regulation of the mitochondrial surface area, whereas axon initial segment (AIS) mitochondria show changes in polarity; both responses are lost in the Fmr1 KO. Taken together, our results demonstrate impairments in mitochondrial plasticity in FXS, which has not previously been reported. These results suggest that mitochondrial dysregulation in FXS could contribute to abnormal neuronal plasticity, with broader implications to other neurodevelopmental disorders and therapeutic strategies.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Abouelezz ◽  
Holly Stefen ◽  
Mikael Segerstråle ◽  
David Micinski ◽  
Rimante Minkeviciene ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe axon initial segment (AIS) is the site of action potential initiation and serves as a vesicular filter and diffusion barrier that help maintain neuronal polarity. Recent studies have revealed details about a specialized structural complex in the AIS. While an intact actin cytoskeleton is required for AIS formation, pharmacological disruption of actin polymerization compromises the AIS vesicle filter but does not affect overall AIS structure. In this study, we found that the tropomyosin isoform Tpm3.1 decorates a population of relatively stable actin filaments in the AIS. Inhibiting Tpm3.1 in cultured hippocampal neurons led to the loss of AIS structure, the AIS vesicle filter, the clustering of sodium ion channels, and reduced firing frequency. We propose that Tpm3.1-decorated actin filaments form a stable actin filament network under the AIS membrane which provides a scaffold for membrane organization and AIS proteins.


Author(s):  
Peter Wenner ◽  
Pernille Bülow

Homeostatic plasticity refers to a collection of mechanisms that function to homeostatically maintain some feature of neural function. The field began with the view that homeostatic plasticity exists predominantly for the maintenance of spike rate. However, it has become clear that multiple features undergo some form of homeostatic control, including network activity, burst rate, or synaptic strength. There are several different forms of homeostatic plasticity, which are typically triggered following perturbations in activity levels. Homeostatic intrinsic plasticity (HIP) appears to compensate for the perturbation with changes in membrane excitability (voltage-gated conductances); synaptic scaling is thought to be a multiplicative increase or decrease of synaptic strengths throughout the cell following an activity perturbation; presynaptic homeostatic plasticity is a change in probability of release following a perturbation to postsynaptic receptor activity. Each form of homeostatic plasticity can be different in terms of the mechanisms that are engaged, the feature that is homeostatically regulated, the trigger that initiates the compensation, and the signaling cascades that mediate these processes. Homeostatic plasticity is often described in development, but can extend into maturity and has been described in vitro and in vivo.


2007 ◽  
Vol 97 (1) ◽  
pp. 746-760 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yousheng Shu ◽  
Alvaro Duque ◽  
Yuguo Yu ◽  
Bilal Haider ◽  
David A. McCormick

Cortical pyramidal cells are constantly bombarded by synaptic activity, much of which arises from other cortical neurons, both in normal conditions and during epileptic seizures. The action potentials generated by barrages of synaptic activity may exhibit a variable site of origin. Here we performed simultaneous whole cell recordings from the soma and axon or soma and apical dendrite of layer 5 pyramidal neurons during normal recurrent network activity (up states), the intrasomatic or intradendritic injection of artificial synaptic barrages, and during epileptiform discharges in vitro. We demonstrate that under all of these conditions, the real or artificial synaptic bombardments propagate through the dendrosomatic-axonal arbor and consistently initiate action potentials in the axon initial segment that then propagate to other parts of the cell. Action potentials recorded intracellularly in vivo during up states and in response to visual stimulation exhibit properties indicating that they are typically initiated in the axon. Intracortical axons were particularly well suited to faithfully follow the generation of action potentials by the axon initial segment. Action-potential generation was more reliable in the distal axon than at the soma during epileptiform activity. These results indicate that the axon is the preferred site of action-potential initiation in cortical pyramidal cells, both in vivo and in vitro, with state-dependent back propagation through the somatic and dendritic compartments.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Martin Montmerle ◽  
Fani Koukouli ◽  
Andrea Aguirre ◽  
Jeremy Peixoto ◽  
Vikash Choudhary ◽  
...  

Perisomatic inhibition of neocortical pyramidal neurons (PNs) coordinates cortical network activity during sensory processing, and it has been mainly attributed to parvalbumin-expressing basket cells (BCs). However, cannabinoid receptor type 1 (CB1)-expressing interneurons also inhibit the perisomatic region of PNs but the connectivity and function of these elusive, yet prominent, neocortical GABAergic cells is unknown. We found that the connectivity pattern of CB1-positive BCs strongly differs between primary and high-order cortical visual areas. Moreover, persistently active CB1 signaling suppresses GABA release from CB1 BCs in the medial secondary visual cortex (V2M), but not in the primary (V1) visual area. Accordingly, in vivo, tonic CB1 signaling is responsible for higher but less coordinated PN activity in V2M than in V1. Our results indicate a differential CB1-mediated mechanism controlling PN activity, and suggest an alternative connectivity schemes of a specific GABAergic circuit in different cortical areas


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document