scholarly journals A roadblock-and-kill model explains the dynamical response to the DNA-targeting antibiotic ciprofloxacin

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikola Ojkic ◽  
Elin Lilja ◽  
Susana Direito ◽  
Angela Dawson ◽  
Rosalind J. Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Production Rate ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Dynamical Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Resistance Evolution ◽  
Dna Production ◽  
Biochemical Systems

AbstractFluoroquinolones - antibiotics that cause DNA damage by inhibiting DNA topoisomerases - are clinically important, but their mechanism of action is not yet fully understood. In particular, the dynamical response of bacterial cells to fluoroquinolone exposure has hardly been investigated, although the SOS response, triggered by DNA damage, is often thought to play a key role. Here we investigate growth inhibition of the bacterium Escherichia coli by the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin at low doses (up to 5x the minimum inhibitory concentration). We measure the long-term and short-term (dynamic) response of the growth rate and DNA production rate to ciprofloxacin, at both population- and single-cell level. We show that despite the molecular complexity of DNA metabolism, a simple `roadblock-and-kill’ model focusing on replication fork blockage and DNA damage by ciprofloxacin-poisoned DNA topoisomerase II (gyrase) quantitatively reproduces long-term growth rates. The model also predicts dynamical changes in DNA production rate in wild type E. coli and in an SOS-deficient mutant, following a step-up of ciprofloxacin. Our work reveals new insights into the dynamics of fluoroquinolone action, with important implications for predicting the rate of resistance evolution. Most importantly, our model explains why the response is delayed: it takes many doubling times to fragment the DNA sufficiently to inhibit gene expression. Our model also challenges the view that the SOS response plays a central role: the dynamical response is controlled by the timescale of DNA replication and gyrase binding/unbinding to the DNA rather than by the SOS response. More generally, our work highlights the importance of including biophysical processes in biochemical-systems models to fully understand bacterial response to antibiotics.

scholarly journals A Roadblock-and-Kill Mechanism of Action Model for the DNA-Targeting Antibiotic Ciprofloxacin

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikola Ojkic ◽  
Elin Lilja ◽  
Susana Direito ◽  
Angela Dawson ◽  
Rosalind J. Allen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Growth Rate ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Production Rate ◽  
Mechanism Of Action ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Dynamical Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Dna Production

ABSTRACT Fluoroquinolones, antibiotics that cause DNA damage by inhibiting DNA topoisomerases, are clinically important, but their mechanism of action is not yet fully understood. In particular, the dynamical response of bacterial cells to fluoroquinolone exposure has hardly been investigated, although the SOS response, triggered by DNA damage, is often thought to play a key role. Here, we investigated the growth inhibition of the bacterium Escherichia coli by the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin at low concentrations. We measured the long-term and short-term dynamical response of the growth rate and DNA production rate to ciprofloxacin at both the population and single-cell levels. We show that, despite the molecular complexity of DNA metabolism, a simple roadblock-and-kill model focusing on replication fork blockage and DNA damage by ciprofloxacin-poisoned DNA topoisomerase II (gyrase) quantitatively reproduces long-term growth rates in the presence of ciprofloxacin. The model also predicts dynamical changes in the DNA production rate in wild-type E. coli and in a recombination-deficient mutant following a step-up of ciprofloxacin. Our work highlights that bacterial cells show a delayed growth rate response following fluoroquinolone exposure. Most importantly, our model explains why the response is delayed: it takes many doubling times to fragment the DNA sufficiently to inhibit gene expression. We also show that the dynamical response is controlled by the timescale of DNA replication and gyrase binding/unbinding to the DNA rather than by the SOS response, challenging the accepted view. Our work highlights the importance of including detailed biophysical processes in biochemical-systems models to quantitatively predict the bacterial response to antibiotics.

scholarly journals Regulation of Cell Division in Bacteria by Monitoring Genome Integrity and DNA Replication Status

2019 ◽  
Vol 202 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter E. Burby ◽  
Lyle A. Simmons
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Division ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Content Type

ABSTRACT All organisms regulate cell cycle progression by coordinating cell division with DNA replication status. In eukaryotes, DNA damage or problems with replication fork progression induce the DNA damage response (DDR), causing cyclin-dependent kinases to remain active, preventing further cell cycle progression until replication and repair are complete. In bacteria, cell division is coordinated with chromosome segregation, preventing cell division ring formation over the nucleoid in a process termed nucleoid occlusion. In addition to nucleoid occlusion, bacteria induce the SOS response after replication forks encounter DNA damage or impediments that slow or block their progression. During SOS induction, Escherichia coli expresses a cytoplasmic protein, SulA, that inhibits cell division by directly binding FtsZ. After the SOS response is turned off, SulA is degraded by Lon protease, allowing for cell division to resume. Recently, it has become clear that SulA is restricted to bacteria closely related to E. coli and that most bacteria enforce the DNA damage checkpoint by expressing a small integral membrane protein. Resumption of cell division is then mediated by membrane-bound proteases that cleave the cell division inhibitor. Further, many bacterial cells have mechanisms to inhibit cell division that are regulated independently from the canonical LexA-mediated SOS response. In this review, we discuss several pathways used by bacteria to prevent cell division from occurring when genome instability is detected or before the chromosome has been fully replicated and segregated.

Attachment of oral bacteria to titanium surfaces: An SEM study

1994 ◽  
Vol 52 ◽  
pp. 468-469
Author(s):  
J. E. Laffoon ◽  
R. L. Anderson ◽  
J. C. Keller ◽  
C. D. Wu-Yuan
Keyword(s):  
Technical Problem ◽  
Titanium Implant ◽  
Oral Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Thin Sections ◽  
Surface Ultrastructure ◽  
Sem Study ◽  
Key Factor ◽  
Titanium Surfaces

Titanium (Ti) dental implants have been used widely for many years. Long term implant failures are related, in part, to the development of peri-implantitis frequently associated with bacteria. Bacterial adherence and colonization have been considered a key factor in the pathogenesis of many biomaterial based infections. Without the initial attachment of oral bacteria to Ti-implant surfaces, subsequent polymicrobial accumulation and colonization leading to peri-implant disease cannot occur. The overall goal of this study is to examine the implant-oral bacterial interfaces and gain a greater understanding of their attachment characteristics and mechanisms. Since the detailed cell surface ultrastructure involved in attachment is only discernible at the electron microscopy level, the study is complicated by the technical problem of obtaining titanium implant and attached bacterial cells in the same ultra-thin sections. In this study, a technique was developed to facilitate the study of Ti implant-bacteria interface.Discs of polymerized Spurr’s resin (12 mm x 5 mm) were formed to a thickness of approximately 3 mm using an EM block holder (Fig. 1). Titanium was then deposited by vacuum deposition to a film thickness of 300Å (Fig. 2).

Increased xylitol production rate during long-term cell recycle fermentation of Candida tropicalis

2004 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 623-627 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teak-Bum Kim ◽  
Yong-Joo Lee ◽  
Pil Kim ◽  
Chang Sup Kim ◽  
Deok-Kun Oh
Keyword(s):  
Production Rate ◽  
Candida Tropicalis ◽  
Xylitol Production ◽  
Cell Recycle

Stimulation of Topoisomerase II-Mediated DNA Damage via a Mechanism Involving Protein Thiolation†

Biochemistry ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 3316-3323 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huimin Wang ◽  
Yong Mao ◽  
Allan Y. Chen ◽  
Nai Zhou ◽  
Edmond J. LaVoie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Topoisomerase Ii ◽  
Stimulation Of

Mutagenesis and More: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS Response

Genetics ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. 1599-1610 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley T Smith ◽  
Graham C Walker
Keyword(s):  
Escherichia Coli ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Sos Response ◽  
Posttranslational Regulation ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Sos Mutagenesis ◽  
Induced Mutagenesis ◽  
Mechanistic Basis ◽  
Increase Cell Survival

Abstract The cellular response to DNA damage that has been most extensively studied is the SOS response of Escherichia coli. Analyses of the SOS response have led to new insights into the transcriptional and posttranslational regulation of processes that increase cell survival after DNA damage as well as insights into DNA-damage-induced mutagenesis, i.e., SOS mutagenesis. SOS mutagenesis requires the recA and umuDC gene products and has as its mechanistic basis the alteration of DNA polymerase III such that it becomes capable of replicating DNA containing miscoding and noncoding lesions. Ongoing investigations of the mechanisms underlying SOS mutagenesis, as well as recent observations suggesting that the umuDC operon may have a role in the regulation of the E. coli cell cycle after DNA damage has occurred, are discussed.

scholarly journals The kfrA gene is the first in a tricistronic operon required for survival of IncP-1 plasmid R751

Microbiology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 152 (6) ◽  
pp. 1621-1637 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malgorzata Adamczyk ◽  
Patrycja Dolowy ◽  
Michal Jonczyk ◽  
Christopher M. Thomas ◽  
Grazyna Jagura-Burdzy
Keyword(s):  
Coiled Coil ◽  
Broad Host Range ◽  
Gram Negative Bacteria ◽  
Bacterial Cells ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
C Terminus ◽  
Low Copy Number ◽  
And Control ◽  
Broad Host Range Plasmids

The kfrA gene of the IncP-1 broad-host-range plasmids is the best-studied member of a growing gene family that shows strong linkage to the minimal replicon of many low-copy-number plasmids. KfrA is a DNA binding protein with a long, alpha-helical, coiled-coil tail. Studying IncP-1β plasmid R751, evidence is presented that kfrA and its downstream genes upf54.8 and upf54.4 were organized in a tricistronic operon (renamed here kfrA kfrB kfrC), expressed from autoregulated kfrAp, that was also repressed by KorA and KorB. KfrA, KfrB and KfrC interacted and may have formed a multi-protein complex. Inactivation of either kfrA or kfrB in R751 resulted in long-term accumulation of plasmid-negative bacteria, whereas wild-type R751 itself persisted without selection. Immunofluorescence studies showed that KfrAR751 formed plasmid-associated foci, and deletion of the C terminus of KfrA caused plasmid R751ΔC 2 kfrA foci to disperse and mislocalize. Thus, the KfrABC complex may be an important component in the organization and control of the plasmid clusters that seem to form the segregating unit in bacterial cells. The studied operon is therefore part of the set of functions needed for R751 to function as an efficient vehicle for maintenance and spread of genes in Gram-negative bacteria.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document