The debate over genetically modified organisms: scientific uncertainty and public controversy

foresight ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 2 (3) ◽  
pp. 257-268 ◽  
Author(s):  
Linda Hadfield
2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (8) ◽  
pp. 952-966 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carla Almeida ◽  
Luisa Massarani

Genetically modified organisms have been at the centre of a major public controversy, involving different interests and actors. While much attention has been devoted to consumer views on genetically modified food, there have been few attempts to understand the perceptions of genetically modified technology among farmers. By investigating perceptions of genetically modified organisms among Brazilian farmers, we intend to contribute towards filling this gap and thereby add the views of this stakeholder group to the genetically modified debate. A comparative analysis of our data and data from other studies indicate there is a complex variety of views on genetically modified organisms among farmers. Despite this diversity, we found variations in such views occur within limited parameters, concerned principally with expectations or concrete experiences regarding the advantages of genetically modified crops, perceptions of risks associated with them, and ethical questions they raise. We then propose a classification of prevailing profiles to represent the spectrum of perceptions of genetically modified organisms among farmers.


2010 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. 1347-1372 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary Dobbs

In a pluralistic society, agreement over complex issues is frequently difficult to achieve. This is amply demonstrated by the question of cultivation of Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs), where scientific uncertainty relating to potential threats to the environment or human health runs parallel with concerns over ethics, freedom of choice, and competing agricultural and economic interests. Conflict centres over the objective of free trade of GMOs and the circumstances in which restrictions may legitimately be imposed to deal with the abovementioned concerns, in particular regarding cultivation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (3) ◽  
pp. 409-437
Author(s):  
Andrei Moldovan

In this paper I discuss appeals to nature, a particular kind of argument that has received little attention in argumentation theory. After a quick review of the existing literature, I focus on the use of such arguments in the public controversy over the acceptabil-ity of genetically-modified organisms in the food industry. Those who reject this biotechnology invoke its unnatural character. Such arguments have re-ceived attention in bioethics, where they have been analyzed by distinguishing different meanings that “nature” and “natural” might have. I argue that in many such appeals to nature the main deficiency of these arguments is semantic, in particular, that these words cannot be assigned a determi-nate meaning at all. In doing so, I rely on semantic externalism, a widely accepted theory of linguistic meaning.


2017 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Sarah Edwards

New Zealand is known around the world as a country that is clean, green and “100% Pure.” The existence of genetically modified organisms in New Zealand is generally viewed as inconsistent with this identity, and there is therefore considerable public controversy surrounding research that utilises genetic modification techniques. In this paper, I examine the variety of interacting factors that are serving to shape this controversy, the influence it is having on research practices, and the implications for future risk management policy.


2017 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 110
Author(s):  
Gabriele Borges Rodrigues ◽  
Leonardo Da Rocha de Souza

Resumo: O objetivo deste artigo é analisar o princípio da precaução como critério utilizado pela Administração Pública para a liberação de organismos geneticamente modificados (OGMs). Para isso, realiza-se um estudo a respeito da importância do princípio da precaução para a realização da proteção ambiental, trazendo-se um enfoque da sua regulação em instrumentos internacionais. A seguir, trabalha-se com os problemas provenientes da incerteza científica e como eles afetam o dever que o Estado tem de evitar danos, incertezas essas que geram dificuldades para a aplicação do princípio da precaução. Esse contexto leva este texto a algumas propostas de soluções para Administração Pública aplicar o princípio da precaução apesar (e em virtude) das incertezas científicas. Permeia o texto, e enfatiza-se ao final, uma aplicação do princípio da precaução na liberação de organismos geneticamente modificados. A abordagem é realizada utilizando-se o método hipotético-dedutivo, levantando-se hipóteses e possibilidades para aplicação prática do princípio da precaução na atuação da Administração Pública. Utiliza-se a técnica de pesquisa de documentação indireta, com a revisão bibliográfica de obras nacionais e estrangeiras, incluindo periódicos e textos normativos. Como resultado, pretende-se que este artigo subsidie o aperfeiçoamento de políticas públicas de proteção ambiental, de forma a evitar que as incertezas científicas gerem danos ambientais e propondo-se maior cautela na inserção dos OGMs no meio ambiente.Abstract: The purpose of this article is to analyze the precautionary principle as a criterion used by public authorities for the release of genetically modified organisms (GMOs). For this, we carried out a study about the importance of the precautionary principle for the realization of environmental protection, bringing a focus of its regulation on international rules. Next, we work with problems arising from scientific uncertainty and how they affect the duty that the state has to prevent damage, such uncertainties that generate difficulties for the application of the precautionary principle. This context leads this text to some proposed solutions for Public Administration apply the precautionary principle despite (and because) of scientific uncertainty. During the text, with an emphasis on end, we carry out an application of the precautionary principle in the release of genetically modified organisms. The approach is performed using the hypothetical-deductive method, rising hypotheses and possibilities for practical application of the precautionary principle in the operation of Public Administration. We use the indirect documentation search technique, the literature review of national and foreign works, including periodicals and normative texts. As a result, we intend this article to subsidize the improvement of public policies for environmental protection, in order to prevent the scientific uncertainties, generate environmental damage and proposing greater caution in the insertion of GMOs into the environment.


2011 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
pp. 624-625
Author(s):  
Marcos A. Orellana

Biotechnology is one of the great innovations of our time. While Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) present an advance in food safety and other fields, GMOs also pose risks to human health and biodiversity that are still subject to scientific uncertainty. Given the scientific uncertainty about the risks to people and the environment, the precautionary principle acquires a central role in the debate on these organisms. At the same time, the existence of an adequate regulatory framework that allows the management of those risks becomes critical.


2016 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 20-44 ◽  
Author(s):  
Miranda GEELHOED

AbstractThis article analyses the recent reform to the EU’s genetically modified organisms (GMO) regime which allows Member States to restrict the cultivation of GMO on their territory for reasons that do not relate to issues of health and safety or the environment. By allowing for national differentiation – although on legally questionable grounds – new Article 26b of Directive 2001/18/EC has been presented as a solution to overcome the impasse in GMO decision-making. However, this article finds that the reform fails to provide a solution for the EU regime’s most pressing problem, namely its disregard for scientific uncertainty and disagreement.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document