A review on wood downdraft gasifier plant design for Biomethane gas production

Author(s):  
Sunil Kumar ◽  
S.K. Shukla
2018 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 1034-1044 ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhammad Mubashar Omar ◽  
Anjum Munir ◽  
Manzoor Ahmad ◽  
Asif Tanveer

Author(s):  
Syed Haseeb Sultan ◽  
Arkom Palamanit ◽  
Kua-Anan Techato ◽  
Muhammad Amin ◽  
Khurshid Ahmed Baloch

Bioenergy has gained great interest in the recent years for being environmentally friendly and renewable energy resource. Southern Thailand is well-known for agro-industry including rubber tree plantations and processing, which provide biomass that could be applied to produce bioenergy. Thus, this study aimed to investigate the energy potential of Rubber Wood Chips (RWC), Rubber Wood Pellets (RWP), Unburned Char (UBC) from rubber wood, blended RWC:UBC (50:50%) and blended RWP:UBC (50:50%). The physiochemical properties including bulk density, proximate composition, ultimate composition, heating value, Thermogravimetric Analysis (TGA), and lignocellulose content were determined for the biomass samples. The thermochemical conversion of biomass to syngas was performed using a downdraft gasifier operated at equivalence ratio 0.3. The results showed that the biomass was rich in carbon (content ranging from 44.77 to 58.54%) making it suitable for use as a solid fuel for gasification or combustion. The moisture contents of the biomass samples were below 10%. The contents of volatile matter in RWC and RWP were 74.40 and 75.40%, respectively. The UBC had a high fixed carbon content (50.60%) and comparatively low volatile matter (19%). The bulk densities of RWC, RWP and UBC were 193, 555 and 177 (kg/m3), respectively. The TGA showed the maximum weight loss of RWC and RWP around 400 °C, but this was at 800 °C for UBC. The higher heating values of RWC, RWP and UBC were 17.8 MJ/kg, 17.4 MJ/kg and 19.3 MJ/kg, respectively. The RWC and RWP had high cellulose and hemicellulose contents while UBC was rich in lignin. The syngas obtained from any of these biomass samples was mainly CO (10.81-22.67%) and CH4 (0.06-3.16%) with the lower heating value ranging from 2.78 to 4.72 MJ/Nm3. These results indicate that rubber wood biomass in various forms has relatively high potential for bioenergy applications via gasification, and it can help to support the renewable energy sector in Thailand.


2007 ◽  
Vol 32 (13) ◽  
pp. 2173-2185 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pengmei Lv ◽  
Zhenhong Yuan ◽  
Longlong Ma ◽  
Chuangzhi Wu ◽  
Yong Chen ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 79 ◽  
pp. 45-50 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jurarat Nisamaneenate ◽  
Duangduen Atong ◽  
Panchaluck Sornkade ◽  
Viboon Sricharoenchaikul

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 179 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nigran Homdoung ◽  
Nattawud Dussadee ◽  
Kittikorn Sasujit ◽  
Tanongkiat Kiatsiriroat ◽  
Nakorn Tippayawong

Municipal solid waste (MSW) and charcoal can be used as a substitute fuel in a gas engine. In this work, performance of a downdraft gasifier and gas engine system operated on MSW briquette fuel was investigated. Experimental test was carried out on a 62 kW, four-cylinder, naturally aspirated engine coupled to a 20 kW dynamometer. The downdraft gasifier was used to generate producer gas from MSW briquettes and charcoal. The engine load was varied between 1.5-9.0 kW. Biomass consumption, producer gas production, cold gas efficiency, thermal efficiency of the gas engine, carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbon (HC) emissions and exhaust temperature were evaluated. The MSW briquette fuelled operation was compared against that with charcoal. It was found that, the use of MSW briquette led to lowering performance of the downdraft gasifier and gas engine system, in comparison with the use of charcoal. Maximum cold gas and thermal efficiencies obtained were 64.6% and 16% at 4.5 kW and 9 kW loading, respectively. The CO and HC emissions of the gas engine operated on MSW briquettes were higher than that on charcoal, while the exhaust temperatures were similar. ©2019. CBIORE-IJRED. All rights reserved


2001 ◽  
Vol 42 (2) ◽  
pp. 157-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adnan Midilli ◽  
Murat Dogru ◽  
Colin R. Howarth ◽  
Mike J. Ling ◽  
Teoman Ayhan

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document