Landmark identification based on projective and permutation invariant vectors

Author(s):  
C.I. Colios ◽  
P.E. Trahanias
PLoS ONE ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. e105623 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katerina Sheardova ◽  
Jan Laczó ◽  
Martin Vyhnalek ◽  
Ross Andel ◽  
Ivana Mokrisova ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad-Reza Siadat ◽  
Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh ◽  
Farshad Fotouhi ◽  
Kost Elisevich

2009 ◽  
Vol 2009 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rosalia Leonardi ◽  
Daniela Giordano ◽  
Francesco Maiorana

Several efforts have been made to completely automate cephalometric analysis by automatic landmark search. However, accuracy obtained was worse than manual identification in every study. The analogue-to-digital conversion of X-ray has been claimed to be the main problem. Therefore the aim of this investigation was to evaluate the accuracy of the Cellular Neural Networks approach for automatic location of cephalometric landmarks on softcopy of direct digital cephalometric X-rays. Forty-one, direct-digital lateral cephalometric radiographs were obtained by a Siemens Orthophos DS Ceph and were used in this study and 10 landmarks (N, A Point, Ba, Po, Pt, B Point, Pg, PM, UIE, LIE) were the object of automatic landmark identification. The mean errors and standard deviations from the best estimate of cephalometric points were calculated for each landmark. Differences in the mean errors of automatic and manual landmarking were compared with a 1-way analysis of variance. The analyses indicated that the differences were very small, and they were found at most within 0.59 mm. Furthermore, only few of these differences were statistically significant, but differences were so small to be in most instances clinically meaningless. Therefore the use of X-ray files with respect to scanned X-ray improved landmark accuracy of automatic detection. Investigations on softcopy of digital cephalometric X-rays, to search more landmarks in order to enable a complete automatic cephalometric analysis, are strongly encouraged.


PeerJ ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. e4088 ◽  
Author(s):  
Malia A. Gehan ◽  
Noah Fahlgren ◽  
Arash Abbasi ◽  
Jeffrey C. Berry ◽  
Steven T. Callen ◽  
...  

Systems for collecting image data in conjunction with computer vision techniques are a powerful tool for increasing the temporal resolution at which plant phenotypes can be measured non-destructively. Computational tools that are flexible and extendable are needed to address the diversity of plant phenotyping problems. We previously described the Plant Computer Vision (PlantCV) software package, which is an image processing toolkit for plant phenotyping analysis. The goal of the PlantCV project is to develop a set of modular, reusable, and repurposable tools for plant image analysis that are open-source and community-developed. Here we present the details and rationale for major developments in the second major release of PlantCV. In addition to overall improvements in the organization of the PlantCV project, new functionality includes a set of new image processing and normalization tools, support for analyzing images that include multiple plants, leaf segmentation, landmark identification tools for morphometrics, and modules for machine learning.


1991 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 309-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. J. Drage ◽  
C. F. Winzar ◽  
N. Killingback

The Reflex Microscope has become a standard instrument for the precision measurement of orthodontic record models. In this study, 31 individuals with no previous experience of the microscope were assessed for their precision at identifying well defined landmarks. Considerable initial variation existed in the precision of landmark identification, but despite only a limited training period, some of the novices tested achieved a high standard of precision. Mean errors were greatest in the z axis, i.e. along the axis of the eye, and astigmatism was common amongst those recording the greatest errors in this axis. A group of individuals who performed poorly initially, were retested after additional training and practice with the microscope. Method errors were significantly reduced for the majority of those retested, but the test apparatus identified two individuals for whom further measurement with the microscope would be inadvisable.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document