Static Noise Margin Analysis for Cryo-CMOS SRAM Cell

Author(s):  
Vita Pi-Ho Hu ◽  
Chang-Ju Liu
2021 ◽  
Vol I (I) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharathabau K

As technology advances, the need for SRAM cells that may be utilised in high-speed applications grows. SRAM cells' static noise margin (SNM) is one of the most important variables to consider when designing a memory cell, and it is the main predictor of SRAM cell speed. The static noise margin will have an impact on the read and write margins. When it comes to the SRAM Cell's stability, the SNM is very important. For high-speed SRAMs, read/write margin analysis is critical since it affects how much data can be read and written. The simulation was run using Mentor Graphics' IC Station, which utilised 350nm technology rather than 180nm technology.


Author(s):  
Jitendra Kumar Mishra ◽  
Lakshmi Likhitha Mankali ◽  
Kavindra Kandpal ◽  
Prasanna Kumar Misra ◽  
Manish Goswami

The present day electronic gadgets have semiconductor memory devices to store data. The static random access memory (SRAM) is a volatile memory, often preferred over dynamic random access memory (DRAM) due to higher speed and lower power dissipation. However, at scaling down of technology node, the leakage current in SRAM often increases and degrades its performance. To address this, the voltage scaling is preferred which subsequently affects the stability and delay of SRAM. This paper therefore presents a negative bit-line (NBL) write assist circuit which is used for enhancing the write ability while a separate (isolated) read buffer circuit is used for improving the read stability. In addition to this, the proposed design uses a tail (stack) transistor to decrease the overall static power dissipation and also to maintain the hold stability. The comparison of the proposed design has been done with state-of-the-art work in terms of write static noise margin (WSNM), write delay, read static noise margin (RSNM) and other parameters. It has been observed that there is an improvement of 48%, 11%, 19% and 32.4% in WSNM while reduction of 33%, 39%, 48% and 22% in write delay as compared to the conventional 6T SRAM cell, NBL, [Formula: see text] collapse and 9T UV SRAM, respectively.


2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 22-34
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Ram Murti Rawat

A paper that examines the factors thataffect the Static Noise Margin (SNM) of a StaticRandom Access memories. At an equivalent time,they specialise in optimizing Read and Writeoperation of 8T SRAM cell which is best than 6TSRAM cell Using Swing Restoration Dual NodeVoltage. The read and Write operation and improveStability analysis. This SRAM technique on thecircuit or architecture level is required to improveread and write operation. during this paperComparative Analysis of 6T and 8T SRAM Cellswith Improved Read and Write Margin is completedfor 180 nm Technology with Cadence Virtuososchematics Tool.This Paper is organized as follows: thecharacteristics of 6T SRAM cell are described arerepresented in section VIII. In section IX, proposed8T SRAM cell is described. In section X, Standard8T SRAM cell is described. Section XI includes thesimulation results which give comparison of variousparameters of 6T and 8T SRAM cells. In Section XIISimulation Results and DC analysis and sectionXIII conclusion the work.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (05) ◽  
pp. 2050067
Author(s):  
S. R. Mansore ◽  
R. S. Gamad ◽  
D. K. Mishra

Data stability, write ability and leakage power are major concerns in submicron static random access memory (SRAM) cell design. This paper presents an 11T SRAM cell with differential write and single-ended read. Proposed cell offers improved write ability by interrupting its ground connection during write operation. Separate read buffer provides disturb-free read operation. Characteristics are obtained from HSPICE simulation using 32[Formula: see text]nm high-performance predictive technology model. Simulation results show that the proposed cell achieves 4.5[Formula: see text] and 1.06[Formula: see text] higher read static noise margin (RSNM) as compared to conventional 6T (C6T) and PNN-based 10T cells, respectively, at 0.4[Formula: see text]V. Write static noise margin (WSNM) of the proposed design is 1.65[Formula: see text], 1.71[Formula: see text] and 1.77[Formula: see text] larger as compared to those of C6T, PPN-based 10T and PNN-based 10T cells, respectively, at 0.4V. Write “1” delay of the proposed cell is 0.108[Formula: see text] and 0.81[Formula: see text] as those of PPN10T and PNN10T cells, respectively. Proposed circuit consumes 1.40[Formula: see text] lesser read power as compared to PPN10T cell at 0.4[Formula: see text]V. Leakage power of the proposed cell is 0.35[Formula: see text] of C6T cell at 0.4[Formula: see text]V. Proposed 11T cell occupies 1.65[Formula: see text] larger area as compared to that of conventional 6T.


2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Takeda ◽  
Y. Hagihara ◽  
Y. Aimoto ◽  
M. Nomura ◽  
Y. Nakazawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document