Ultra-Low Power Sub-threshold SRAM Cell Design to Improve Read Static Noise Margin

Author(s):  
Chandrabhan Kushwah ◽  
Santosh K. Vishvakarma
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 22-34
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Ram Murti Rawat

A paper that examines the factors thataffect the Static Noise Margin (SNM) of a StaticRandom Access memories. At an equivalent time,they specialise in optimizing Read and Writeoperation of 8T SRAM cell which is best than 6TSRAM cell Using Swing Restoration Dual NodeVoltage. The read and Write operation and improveStability analysis. This SRAM technique on thecircuit or architecture level is required to improveread and write operation. during this paperComparative Analysis of 6T and 8T SRAM Cellswith Improved Read and Write Margin is completedfor 180 nm Technology with Cadence Virtuososchematics Tool.This Paper is organized as follows: thecharacteristics of 6T SRAM cell are described arerepresented in section VIII. In section IX, proposed8T SRAM cell is described. In section X, Standard8T SRAM cell is described. Section XI includes thesimulation results which give comparison of variousparameters of 6T and 8T SRAM cells. In Section XIISimulation Results and DC analysis and sectionXIII conclusion the work.


Circuit World ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 45 (4) ◽  
pp. 196-207
Author(s):  
Shilpi Birla

Purpose Major area of a die is consumed in memory components. Almost 60-70% of chip area is being consumed by “Memory Circuits”. The dominant memory in this market is SRAM, even though the SRAM size is larger than embedded DRAM, as SRAM does not have yield issues and the cost is not high as compared to DRAM. At the same time, the other attractive feature for the SRAM is speed, and it can be used for low power applications. CMOS SRAM is the crucial component in microprocessor chips and applications, and as the said major portion of the area is dedicated to SRAM arrays, CMOS SRAM is considered to be the stack holders in the memory market. Because of the scaling feature of CMOS, SRAM had its hold in the market over the past few decades. In recent years, the limitations of the CMOS scaling have raised so many issues like short channel effects, threshold voltage variations. The increased thrust for alternative devices leads to FinFET. FinFET is emerging as one of the suitable alternatives for CMOS and in the region of memory circuits. Design/methodology/approach In this paper, a new 11 T SRAM cell using FinFET technology has been proposed, the basic component of the cell is the 6 T SRAM cell with 4 NMOS access transistors to improve the stability and also makes it a dual port memory cell. The proposed cell uses a header scheme in which one extra PMOS transistor is used which is biased at different voltages to improve the read and write stability thus, helps in reducing the leakage power and active power. Findings The cell shows improvement in RSNM (read static noise margin) with LP8T by 2.39× at sub-threshold voltage 2.68× with D6T SRAM cell, 5.5× with TG8T. The WSNM (write static noise margin) and HM (hold margin) of the SRAM cell at 0.9 V is 306 mV and 384  mV. It shows improvement at sub-threshold operation also. The leakage power is reduced by 0.125× with LP8T, 0.022× with D6T SRAM cell, TG8T and SE8T. The impact of process variation on cell stability is also discussed. Research limitations/implications The FinFet has been used in place of CMOS even though the FinFet has been not been a matured technology; therefore, pdk files have been used. Practical implications SRAM cell has been designed which has good stability and reduced leakage by which we can make an array and which can be used as SRAM array. Social implications The cell can be used for SRAM memory for low power consumptions. Originality/value The work has been done by implementing various leakage techniques to design a stable and improved SRAM cell. The advantage of this work is that the cell has been working for low voltage without degrading the stability factor.


Author(s):  
Pooran Singh ◽  
Santosh Vishvakarma

An ultra-low power (ULP), power gated static random access memory (SRAM) is presented for Internet of Things (IoT) applications, which operates in sub-threshold voltage ranges from 300mV to 500mV. The proposed SRAM has tendency to operate in low supply voltages with high static and dynamic noise margins. The IoT application involves battery enabled low leakage memory architecture in subthreshold regime which has low power consumption. Therefore, to improve power consumption along with better cell stability, a power gated 10T SRAM is presented. The proposed cell uses a power gated p-MOS transistor to reduce the leakage power or static power in standby mode. Moreover, due to the schmitt triggering and read decoupling of 10T SRAM the static and dynamic behavior in read, write and standby mode has shown enhanced tolerance at different process, voltage and temperature (PVT) conditions. The proposed SRAM shows better results in terms of leakage power, read static noise margin (RSNM), write static noise margin (WSNM), write-ability or write trip point (WTP), read-write energy and dynamic read margin (DRM). Further, these parameters are observed at 8-Kilo bit (Kb) and compared with already existing SRAM architectures. It is observed that the leakage power is reduced by 1/81×, 1/75× of the conventional 6T (C6T) SRAM and read decoupled 8T (RD8T) SRAM, respectively at 300mV VDD. On the contrary, RSNM, WSNM, WTP and DRM values are improved by 3×, 2×, 11.11% and 31.8% as compared to C6T SRAM, respectively. Similarly, proposed 10T has 1.48×, 25% and 9.75% better RSNM, WSNM and WTP values as compared to RD8T SRAM, respectively at 300mV VDD.


Author(s):  
Jitendra Kumar Mishra ◽  
Lakshmi Likhitha Mankali ◽  
Kavindra Kandpal ◽  
Prasanna Kumar Misra ◽  
Manish Goswami

The present day electronic gadgets have semiconductor memory devices to store data. The static random access memory (SRAM) is a volatile memory, often preferred over dynamic random access memory (DRAM) due to higher speed and lower power dissipation. However, at scaling down of technology node, the leakage current in SRAM often increases and degrades its performance. To address this, the voltage scaling is preferred which subsequently affects the stability and delay of SRAM. This paper therefore presents a negative bit-line (NBL) write assist circuit which is used for enhancing the write ability while a separate (isolated) read buffer circuit is used for improving the read stability. In addition to this, the proposed design uses a tail (stack) transistor to decrease the overall static power dissipation and also to maintain the hold stability. The comparison of the proposed design has been done with state-of-the-art work in terms of write static noise margin (WSNM), write delay, read static noise margin (RSNM) and other parameters. It has been observed that there is an improvement of 48%, 11%, 19% and 32.4% in WSNM while reduction of 33%, 39%, 48% and 22% in write delay as compared to the conventional 6T SRAM cell, NBL, [Formula: see text] collapse and 9T UV SRAM, respectively.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (05) ◽  
pp. 2050067
Author(s):  
S. R. Mansore ◽  
R. S. Gamad ◽  
D. K. Mishra

Data stability, write ability and leakage power are major concerns in submicron static random access memory (SRAM) cell design. This paper presents an 11T SRAM cell with differential write and single-ended read. Proposed cell offers improved write ability by interrupting its ground connection during write operation. Separate read buffer provides disturb-free read operation. Characteristics are obtained from HSPICE simulation using 32[Formula: see text]nm high-performance predictive technology model. Simulation results show that the proposed cell achieves 4.5[Formula: see text] and 1.06[Formula: see text] higher read static noise margin (RSNM) as compared to conventional 6T (C6T) and PNN-based 10T cells, respectively, at 0.4[Formula: see text]V. Write static noise margin (WSNM) of the proposed design is 1.65[Formula: see text], 1.71[Formula: see text] and 1.77[Formula: see text] larger as compared to those of C6T, PPN-based 10T and PNN-based 10T cells, respectively, at 0.4V. Write “1” delay of the proposed cell is 0.108[Formula: see text] and 0.81[Formula: see text] as those of PPN10T and PNN10T cells, respectively. Proposed circuit consumes 1.40[Formula: see text] lesser read power as compared to PPN10T cell at 0.4[Formula: see text]V. Leakage power of the proposed cell is 0.35[Formula: see text] of C6T cell at 0.4[Formula: see text]V. Proposed 11T cell occupies 1.65[Formula: see text] larger area as compared to that of conventional 6T.


2006 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 113-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. Takeda ◽  
Y. Hagihara ◽  
Y. Aimoto ◽  
M. Nomura ◽  
Y. Nakazawa ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document