static noise margin
Recently Published Documents


TOTAL DOCUMENTS

113
(FIVE YEARS 23)

H-INDEX

14
(FIVE YEARS 2)

Author(s):  
Yihan Zhu ◽  
Takashi Ohsawa

Abstract A novel loadless four-transistor static random access memory cell is proposed that consists of two N-type driver MOSFETs and two P-type access ones whose gate leakage currents from word-line are used for holding data in the cell. It is shown that the proposed cell has a higher tolerance for manufacturing device fluctuations compared with the conventional loadless 4T SRAM. Furthermore, it is free from bit-line disturb in contrast to the conventional cell. It is confirmed by simulation in 32nm technology node that the read static noise margin of the proposed cell reaches 138.7% of the six-transistor SRAM cell and that the hold static noise margin can be acceptable when the gate insulator thickness of the P-type access MOSFETs is made thinner than the N-type driver MOSFETs. The retention current for the proposed cell decreases to 66.7% of the 6TSRAM and the data rate in read increases to 125%.


2021 ◽  
Vol I (I) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bharathabau K

As technology advances, the need for SRAM cells that may be utilised in high-speed applications grows. SRAM cells' static noise margin (SNM) is one of the most important variables to consider when designing a memory cell, and it is the main predictor of SRAM cell speed. The static noise margin will have an impact on the read and write margins. When it comes to the SRAM Cell's stability, the SNM is very important. For high-speed SRAMs, read/write margin analysis is critical since it affects how much data can be read and written. The simulation was run using Mentor Graphics' IC Station, which utilised 350nm technology rather than 180nm technology.


Author(s):  
Ram Murti Rawat ◽  
Vinod Kumar

<span>This article clarifies about the variables that influence the static noise margin (SNM) of a static random-access memory. Track down the improved stability of proposed 8T SRAM cell which is superior to conventional 6T SRAM cell utilizing Swing Restored circuit with voltages Q and QB bar are peruse and Compose activity. This SRAM cell strategy on the circuit or engineering level is needed to improve read static noise margin (RSNM), write static noise margin (WSNM) and hold static noise margin (HSNM). This article relative investigation of conventional 6T, standard 8T and proposed 8T SRAM cells with improved stability and static noise margin is finished for 180 nm CMOS innovation. This paper is coordinated as follows: Introduction in area 1, The 6T SRAM cell are portrayed in segment 2. In area 3, proposed 8T SRAM cell is portrayed. In area 4, standard 8T SRAM cell. Segment 5 incorporates the simulation and results which give examination of different boundaries of 6T and 8T SRAM cells and segment 6 conclusions.</span>


Author(s):  
Jitendra Kumar Mishra ◽  
Lakshmi Likhitha Mankali ◽  
Kavindra Kandpal ◽  
Prasanna Kumar Misra ◽  
Manish Goswami

The present day electronic gadgets have semiconductor memory devices to store data. The static random access memory (SRAM) is a volatile memory, often preferred over dynamic random access memory (DRAM) due to higher speed and lower power dissipation. However, at scaling down of technology node, the leakage current in SRAM often increases and degrades its performance. To address this, the voltage scaling is preferred which subsequently affects the stability and delay of SRAM. This paper therefore presents a negative bit-line (NBL) write assist circuit which is used for enhancing the write ability while a separate (isolated) read buffer circuit is used for improving the read stability. In addition to this, the proposed design uses a tail (stack) transistor to decrease the overall static power dissipation and also to maintain the hold stability. The comparison of the proposed design has been done with state-of-the-art work in terms of write static noise margin (WSNM), write delay, read static noise margin (RSNM) and other parameters. It has been observed that there is an improvement of 48%, 11%, 19% and 32.4% in WSNM while reduction of 33%, 39%, 48% and 22% in write delay as compared to the conventional 6T SRAM cell, NBL, [Formula: see text] collapse and 9T UV SRAM, respectively.


Author(s):  
Umakanta Nanda ◽  
Debasish Nayak ◽  
Suraj Kumar Saw ◽  
Abdul Majeed K K ◽  
Biswajit Jena

2021 ◽  
Vol 7 ◽  
pp. 22-34
Author(s):  
Vinod Kumar ◽  
Ram Murti Rawat

A paper that examines the factors thataffect the Static Noise Margin (SNM) of a StaticRandom Access memories. At an equivalent time,they specialise in optimizing Read and Writeoperation of 8T SRAM cell which is best than 6TSRAM cell Using Swing Restoration Dual NodeVoltage. The read and Write operation and improveStability analysis. This SRAM technique on thecircuit or architecture level is required to improveread and write operation. during this paperComparative Analysis of 6T and 8T SRAM Cellswith Improved Read and Write Margin is completedfor 180 nm Technology with Cadence Virtuososchematics Tool.This Paper is organized as follows: thecharacteristics of 6T SRAM cell are described arerepresented in section VIII. In section IX, proposed8T SRAM cell is described. In section X, Standard8T SRAM cell is described. Section XI includes thesimulation results which give comparison of variousparameters of 6T and 8T SRAM cells. In Section XIISimulation Results and DC analysis and sectionXIII conclusion the work.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document