Inclusive special education: development of a new theory for the education of children with special educational needs and disabilities

2015 ◽  
Vol 42 (3) ◽  
pp. 234-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Garry Hornby
Author(s):  
MARIUSZ WIELEBSKI

Mariusz Wielebski, Od orzeczenia o potrzebie kształcenia specjalnego do indywidualnego programu edukacyjno-terapeutycznego [From the decision on special education eligibility to an individual educational and therapeutic plan]. Interdyscyplinarne Konteksty Pedagogiki Specjalnej, nr 22, Poznań 2018. Pp. 339-354. Adam Mickiewicz University Press. ISSN 2300-391X. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/ikps.2018.22.19 In my article I would like to show the complicated way from the decision about special education to individual educational and therapeutic plan. I am going to show how government statements are sometimes hard and complicated for parents, teachers and other specialists, who are looking after the children with special educational needs. I try to show everyday life in my job – teacher, specialist of pedagogical therapy. I hope my article will help and change our reality.


Author(s):  
Sónia Leite ◽  
Diana Brás

Resumo As sociedades têm, ao longo dos tempos, desenvolvido práticas e conceitos diversos face ao que consideram como “o diferente”. A forma como as pessoas “diferentes” têm sido encaradas em diversos momentos históricos traduz, de alguma forma, fatores de ordem social, cultural, religiosa e económica, próprios das diversas épocas (Pereira, 1999). Na última década, foram introduzidas mudanças significativas no apoio a prestar aos alunos com Necessidades Educativas Especiais (NEE) pelas escolas do ensino regular. O Decreto-Lei no 3/2008, de 7 de Janeiro veio revogar o Decreto-Lei no 319/91, de 23 de Agosto, o qual determina os apoios especializados a prestar aos alunos com NEE. Este diploma gerou muita controvérsia por parte dos investigadores nacionais, por limitar o público-alvo de apoios especializados e defender um modelo de avaliação das NEE por referência à Classificação Internacional de funcionalidade, incapacidade e saúde (CIF). Uma década depois, o diploma que regulamenta a Educação Especial foi novamente revisto, tendo surgido o Decreto-Lei 54/2018. Através de um questionário com questões abertas e fechadas foi nosso intuito obter informação relativamente à perspetiva dos professores de ensino regular acerca da inclusão de alunos com NEE nas salas de ensino regular e às alterações previstas no novo Decreto-Lei que regulamenta a Educação Especial e os apoios a prestar a estes alunos.Palavras-chave: Educação Especial, Necessidades Educativas Especiais, Decreto-Lei Abstract Societies have, over time, developed diverse practices and concepts in relation to what they consider as "the different". The way in which "different" people have been viewed at various historical moments translates in some way into social, cultural, religious and economic factors characteristic of the various eras (Pereira, 1999). In the last decade, significant changes have been introduced in support for pupils with Special Educational Needs (SEN) in regular schools. Decree- Law no. 3/2008, of 7 January, revoked Decree-Law no. 319/91, of 23 August, which determines the specialized support to be provided to students with SEN. This diploma generated much controversy on the part of the national researchers, for limiting the target audience of specialized supports and to defend a model of evaluation of the SEN with reference to the International Classification of functionality, incapacity and health (CIF). A decade later, the diploma that regulates Special Education was again revised, and Decree-Law 54/2018 emerged. Through a questionnaire with open and closed questions, it was our intention to obtain information regarding the perspective of teachers of regular education about the inclusion of students with SEN in the regular teaching rooms and the changes provided for in the new Decree- Law that regulates Special Education and the support to these students.Keywords: Special Education, Special Educational Needs, Decree-Law


Author(s):  
Pam Epler

This chapter is designed to inform and educate the reader about high-leverage practices used in the general education classroom and with students with identified special educational needs. The chapter starts by explaining how high-leverage practices originated and continues with a discussion about the similarities and differences between the general and special education high-leverage practices. The chapter then finishes with a discussion about how both types of practices can be applied to any educational situation.


2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Remigijus Bubnys

The basis of the study is the findings of scientific research dealing with experiential reflections of university students studying in the special education Bachelor degree study program in Lithuania. The special educator is a teacher of children with special educational needs, an educational assistance specialist who is able to recognize, assess, and meet children’s special educational needs arising due to disabilities, disorders, or learning difficulties, and to professionally provide special pedagogical assistance in the conditions of inclusive and special education. In order to analyze the experience of prospective special educators who study at the university for four years, first year students were chosen. At the start of their studies at the university, in the first month of their studies, students do their practice in the institutions of the educational system: Pre-school, general, and/or special education institutions. The aim of the practice is to get familiar with the subtleties of the future professional activity. It is maintained that students’ initial experience outlived at the start of studies is important and significant for further studies at the university. The article deals with the results of written reflections of students who have returned from practice. The phenomenological hermeneutics method enabled to disclose students’ experiences in their practical activities during their observational practice, providing deeper understanding of the study area, as a precondition for reflective learning in further university studies, and by interacting with participants of the (self) education process, the article presents future special educators’ practical experiences and perceptions of their roles in the profession. The results disclosed that self-reflection provides students with deeper perception of themselves as people with special educators’ needs and problems, personal strengths and competence limitations that enable them to identify sources and means for solving existing and future professional activity problems. It further reveals that cooperation with family members, university teachers, social pedagogues, teachers, children with special educational needs, sharing experiences with student colleagues could lead to greater self-confidence in oneself as a future specialist. Curiosity and personal initiative enabled students to identify positive and difficult moments of the professional activity and future professional role while learning from experience.


2010 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 241-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin J.W. Powell

AbstractHow do we make sense of considerable cultural differences and change in disability classification? How are disability’s categorical boundaries being redrawn in special education to realign with shifting paradigms of normality? Based in particular on the case of provided services to students “with special educational needs,” this analysis examines classification systems of student disability and their categorical boundaries in the United States and Germany. Sketching the origins and evolution of special education categories from 1920 to 2005, the comparison shows how categorical boundaries have been redrawn, giving rise to new groups of students.


2021 ◽  
Vol 98 ◽  
pp. 01019
Author(s):  
Oksana Titova ◽  
Margarita Bratkova ◽  
Olga Karanevskaya ◽  
Elena Gravitskaya ◽  
Irma Barbakadze

There is currently a trend towards an increase in the number of children with special educational needs enrolled in inclusive schools. Thus, the number of children with special educational needs enrolled in inclusive schools is growing. This is caused both by significant changes in the legal regulatory framework, including the 2012 Federal Law on Education, the adoption of the Federal State Educational Standard of Primary General Education for Children with Special Needs, etc. and by the fact that in some regions the number of specialized schools is decreasing, inclusive education becomes a more affordable option for children with special education needs. School specialists, parents, and the public engage in an active dialogue about choosing the most efficient path for an educational route for special needs children, comparing the advantages and disadvantages of inclusive and special education. The design and implementation of an individual educational route, an individual curriculum is essential for children with special needs in terms of improving the quality of education and efficiently entering social life. The relevance of the study is determined by identifying the components that facilitate and complicate, hinder the development and implementation of an individual educational route for these children in an educational organization; the determination of the content of an individual educational route based on the current situation in a practical institution considering the requirements of inclusive education. The purpose of the study is to explore the problems of developing and implementing individual educational routes for children with special needs in the context of inclusion and to determine ways to solve these problems. The key methods of the study are a questionnaire and a structured interview. The empirical data confirms the assumption that the development and implementation of an individual educational route for children with special needs in an educational organization are problematic and inefficient for several reasons. The data obtained is new since similar research results have not been found in the open sources over the past five years.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 1
Author(s):  
Rosemeire De Araujo Rangni ◽  
Maria da Piedade Resende da Costa

Com caráter inclusivo, as leis educacionais brasileiras e as ações políticas direcionam os serviços da Educação Especial ao categorizar as necessidades educacionais especiais (NEE) e separálas em grupos, quais sejam: deficiências, transtorno global do desenvolvimento e altas habilidades ou superdotação. Este artigo objetiva expor (i) a possibilidade de educandos possuirem duplicidade de NEE, no caso em questão, altas habilidades ou superdotação e perda auditiva e (ii) as implicações dos serviços educacionais vigentes com as políticas públicas. O presente artigo se deu por meio de pesquisasbibliográficas e documentais. Os resultados indicaram que o sistema educacional brasileiro, voltado à Educação, privilegia a identificação e o atendimento dos educandos com NEE de maneira categorial, não contemplando a possibilidade de figurarem concomitantemente em duas categorias de NEE – altas habilidades ou superdotação e perda auditiva -, foco deste estudo.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Duplicidade de necessidades educacionais especiais. Perda auditiva. Altas habilidadesou superdotação.HIGH ABILITIES OR GIFTEDNESS AND HEARING LOSS: twice special educational needs and public policiesABSTRACT: With the inclusive perspective, the Brazilian educational laws and the politic actions guide the Special Educational services when categorize the special educational needs (SEN) getting them apart in groups as well: disabilities, developmental disturbs, and high skills or giftedness. This paper aims to show (i) the possibility of the student with twice SEN, in case the high skills or giftedness and hearing loss and (ii) the implications of the educational services and public policies. The present paper was done by bibliographical and documental researches. The results indicate that the Brazilian educational system for the special education privileges the identification and the provisions for the SEN students on the categorical way. It doesn’t consider the students possibilities to be in two categories of the SEN – high skills or giftedness and hearing loss, aim of this study.KEYWORDS: Twice special educational needs. Hearing loss. High skills or giftedness.ALTAS HABILIDADES O SOBREDOTACIÓN Y PÉRDIDA AUDITIVA: doble necesidad educacional especial y política públicaRESUMEN: Con una perspectiva inclusiva, las leyes educacionales brasileñas y las acciones políticas dirigenlos servicios de la educación especial al clasificar las necesidades educacionales especiales (NEE) dividiéndolas en grupos cuales sean: discapacidades, trastornos globales del desarrollo y altas habilidades o sobredotación. Este artículo se propone presentar (i) la posibilidad de tener esos estudiantes doble NEE, en caso de altas habilidades o sobredotación y pérdida auditiva y (ii) las implicaciones de los servicios vigentes y las políticas públicas. El presente artículo se desarrolló por medio de investigación bibliográfica y documental. Los resultados indicaron que el sistema educacional brasileño para la educación especial privilegia la identificación y atención a los estudiantes con NEE de manera categorial, no contemplando la posibilidad de los estudiantes representarse al mismo tiempo en dos categorías de NEE – altas habilidades o sobredotación y pérdida auditiva.PALABRAS CLAVE: Doble necesidad educacional especial. Pérdida auditiva. Altas habilidades o sobredotación.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document