scholarly journals Post‐hospitalization venous thromboembolism in COVID‐19 patients: Evidence against routine post‐hospitalization prophylactic anticoagulation

Author(s):  
Jing Yuan Tan ◽  
Chuen Wen Tan ◽  
Wan Hui Wong ◽  
May Anne Cheong ◽  
Lai Heng Lee ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 1191-1193 ◽  
Author(s):  
Takashi Tarumi ◽  
Danko Martincic ◽  
Anne Thomas ◽  
Robert Janco ◽  
Mary Hudson ◽  
...  

Abstract We report on a family with a history of venous thromboembolism associated with fibrinogen Paris V (fibrinogen A-Arg554→Cys). Ten members experienced thrombotic events, including 4 with fatal pulmonary emboli. Pulmonary embolism was the presenting feature in 4. Those with the mutation and a history of thrombosis had somewhat higher fibrinogen concentrations than those with the mutation and no thrombosis (294 ± 70 mg/dL vs 217 ± 37 mg/dL, respectively). The Paris V mutation consistently caused a prolongation of the reptilase time, and fibrin clots containing the abnormal fibrinogen were more translucent than normal clots. Given the early onset of symptoms and the initial presentation with pulmonary embolism in some family members, it was justifiable to offer prophylactic anticoagulation with warfarin to carriers of the mutation. Fibrinogen Paris V has now been reported in 4 apparently unrelated families, indicating that it is a relatively common cause of dysfibrinogenemia-associated thrombosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Algattas ◽  
Spencer E Talentino ◽  
Bradley Eichar ◽  
Abraham A Williams ◽  
Joseph M Murphy ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND Prophylactic anticoagulation helps prevent postoperative venous thromboembolism (VTE) and time to initiation postcraniotomy has relied on clinical judgment and practice patterns. OBJECTIVE To compare risks of postoperative VTE and hemorrhage among patients undergoing tumor resection with initiation of prophylactic anticoagulation on postoperative day 1 (POD1) vs POD2. METHODS Adult patients undergoing craniotomy for tumor between 2008 and 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Outcomes were recorded from the Electronic medical record (EMR) including deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), and hemorrhage. RESULTS Of a total of 1168 patients undergoing craniotomy, 225 initiated anticoagulation on POD1 and 389 initiated on POD2. Of the 171 glioblastoma (GBM) cases, 64 initiated on POD1 and 107 on POD2. There were 9 DVTs (1.5%), 1 PE (0.20%), overall VTE rate of 1.6%, and 7 hemorrhagic complications (1.10%), 4 being clinically significant. The GBM cohort contained 4 DVTs (2.3%) and 3 hemorrhagic complications (1.80%). There was no increased risk of VTE or hemorrhage with anticoagulation initiated on POD2 compared to POD1 in either cohort. Multivariate analysis in both cohorts did not reveal a significant association between DVT, PE, or hemorrhagic complications with age, body mass index, GBM pathology, or extent of resection. Interestingly, glioma patients older than 70 with subtotal resection had a higher likelihood of suffering intracranial hemorrhage when anticoagulation was started on POD1 (odds ratio 12.98). CONCLUSION Risk of VTE or hemorrhagic complication did not significantly differ with prophylactic anticoagulation started on POD1 vs POD2. Early anticoagulation may certainly be considered in high risk cases; however, 1 group where risk may outweigh benefit is the elderly glioma population receiving a subtotal resection.


2020 ◽  
Vol 36 (08) ◽  
pp. 549-555
Author(s):  
Kaushik P. Venkatesh ◽  
Shoshana W. Ambani ◽  
Aris R.L. Arakelians ◽  
Jonas T. Johnson ◽  
Mario G. Solari

Abstract Background Patients undergoing head and neck (H&N) microvascular reconstruction comprise a population at high risk for venous thromboembolism (VTE). Free flap and VTE thromboprophylaxis may coincide but tend to vary from surgeon to surgeon. This study identifies VTE prophylaxis patterns and perceptions among H&N microsurgeons in the United States. Methods An online survey on VTE prophylaxis practice patterns and perceptions was emailed to 172 H&N microsurgeons in the United States using an anonymous link. Results There were 74 respondents (43% response rate). These surgeons completed residencies in otolaryngology (59%), plastic surgery (31%), and oral maxillofacial surgery (7%). Most underwent fellowship training (95%) and have practiced at an academic center (97%) for at least 6 years (58%), performing an average of 42 ± 31 H&N free flap cases per year (range = 1–190). Most adhered to general VTE prophylaxis guidelines (69%) while 11% did not and 20% were unsure. Nearly all surgeons (99%) would provide prophylactic anticoagulation, mostly in the form of subcutaneous heparin (51%) or enoxaparin (44%); 64% additionally used aspirin, while 4% used aspirin alone. The majority of surgeons (68%) reported having postoperative VTE complications, with six surgeons (8%) reporting patient deaths due to pulmonary embolism. A third of the surgeons have encountered VTE prophylaxis-related adverse bleeding events, but most still believe that chemoprophylaxis is important for VTE prevention (92%). While 35% of surgeons were satisfied with their current practice, most would find it helpful to have official prophylactic anticoagulation guidelines specific to H&N free flap cases. Conclusion The majority of microsurgeons experienced postoperative VTE complications after H&N free flap reconstruction despite the routine use of prophylactic anticoagulation. Though bleeding events are a concern, most surgeons believe chemoprophylaxis is important for VTE prevention and would welcome official guidelines specific to this high-risk population.


Blood ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 128 (22) ◽  
pp. 1182-1182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marion K Mateos ◽  
Toby N. Trahair ◽  
Chelsea Mayoh ◽  
Pasquale M Barbaro ◽  
Rosemary Sutton ◽  
...  

Abstract Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is an unpredictable and life-threatening toxicity that occurs early in acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) therapy. The incidence is approximately 5% in children diagnosed with ALL [Caruso et al. Blood. 2006;108(7):2216-22], which is higher than in other pediatric cancer types [Athale et al. Pediatric Blood & Cancer. 2008;51(6):792-7]. Clinical risk factors for VTE in children during ALL therapy include older age and the use of asparaginase. We hypothesized that there may be additional risk factors that can modify VTE risk, beyond those previously reported [Mitchell et al. Blood. 2010;115(24):4999-5004]. We sought to define early predictive clinical factors that could select a group of children at highest risk of VTE, with possible utility in an interventional trial of prophylactic anticoagulation. We conducted a retrospective study of 1021 Australian children, aged 1-18 years, treated between 1998-2013 on successive BFM-based ALL therapies. Patient records were reviewed to ascertain incidence of VTE; and to systematically document clinical variables present at diagnosis and during induction/consolidation phases of therapy. The CTCAE v4.03 system was used for grading of VTE events. Multivariate logistic and cox regression were used to determine significant clinical risk factors associated with VTE (SPSS v23.0). All P values were 2-tailed, significance level <.05. The incidence of on-treatment VTE was 5.09% [96% ≥Grade 2 (CTCAE v4.0)]. Age ≥10 years [P =.048, HR 1.96 (95% confidence interval= 1.01-3.82)], positive blood culture in induction/consolidation [ P =.009, HR 2.35 (1.24-4.46)], extreme weight at diagnosis <5th or >95th centile [ P =.028, HR 2.14 (1.09-4.20)] and elevated peak gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) >5 x upper limit normal in induction/consolidation [ P =.018, HR 2.24 (1.15-4.36)] were significantly associated with VTE in multivariate cox regression modeling. The cumulative incidence of VTE, if all 4 clinical risk factors in our model were present, was 33.33%, which is significantly greater than the incidence of VTE for a patient without any risk factors (1.62%, P <.001). These 4 clinical factors could be used as a basis for assigning thromboprophylaxis in children with ALL. Our model detected 80% (42/52) of all VTE events by incorporating one or more risk factors. An equal proportion of patients eventually developing VTE could be predicted by weight and age ≥10 years; or later bacteremia and elevated GGT. Bacteremia, when present as a risk factor, preceded VTE in 80% of cases (20/25 cases) at a median of 29 days before VTE (range 3-668 days). The negative predictive value (NPV), specificity and sensitivity for the 4 risk factor model were 98.38%, 98.70% and 28.57% respectively. If 3 specified risk factors were included in the algorithm, such as 2 baseline and one treatment-related variable, the incidence of VTE was ≥25%, NPV 98.38%, specificity ≥96.19% and sensitivity 80%. The high NPV and high specificity mean the model can successfully exclude children who are not at increased risk of VTE. The challenge is to balance unnecessary exposure to anticoagulation against the risk of development of VTE. We have identified novel clinical risk factors in induction/consolidation - positive blood culture, hepatic enzymatic elevation and extreme weight at diagnosis- that may highlight risk mechanisms related to VTE pathogenesis. Our predictive model can define a group at highest risk of VTE who may benefit from randomized trials of prophylactic anticoagulation in childhood ALL therapy. Acknowledgments: The authors acknowledge support from the Kids Cancer Alliance (a Translational Cancer Research Centre of Cancer Institute NSW), Cancer Institute New South Wales, Royal Australasian College of Physicians - Kids Cancer Project Research Entry Scholarship, Cancer Therapeutics CRC (CTx) PhD Clinician Research Top-Up Scholarship, The Kids Cancer Project, Australian and New Zealand Children's Haematology Oncology Group, ASSET study members, data managers and clinical research associates at each site. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 96 (3) ◽  
pp. 1191-1193
Author(s):  
Takashi Tarumi ◽  
Danko Martincic ◽  
Anne Thomas ◽  
Robert Janco ◽  
Mary Hudson ◽  
...  

We report on a family with a history of venous thromboembolism associated with fibrinogen Paris V (fibrinogen A-Arg554→Cys). Ten members experienced thrombotic events, including 4 with fatal pulmonary emboli. Pulmonary embolism was the presenting feature in 4. Those with the mutation and a history of thrombosis had somewhat higher fibrinogen concentrations than those with the mutation and no thrombosis (294 ± 70 mg/dL vs 217 ± 37 mg/dL, respectively). The Paris V mutation consistently caused a prolongation of the reptilase time, and fibrin clots containing the abnormal fibrinogen were more translucent than normal clots. Given the early onset of symptoms and the initial presentation with pulmonary embolism in some family members, it was justifiable to offer prophylactic anticoagulation with warfarin to carriers of the mutation. Fibrinogen Paris V has now been reported in 4 apparently unrelated families, indicating that it is a relatively common cause of dysfibrinogenemia-associated thrombosis.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6073-6073
Author(s):  
Derman Basaran ◽  
Jessa Suhner ◽  
Dib Sassine ◽  
Thomas Boerner ◽  
Ying L Liu ◽  
...  

6073 Background: To identify the incidence of newly occurring venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with ovarian cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Methods: Using our prospectively maintained ovarian cancer database, we identified all ovarian cancer patients who received NACT at our institution from 4/15-9/18. VTE events included clinically diagnosed deep venous thrombosis (DVT) or pulmonary embolism (PE). Patients who presented with VTE prior to induction of NACT or patients on anticoagulation therapy prior to diagnosis were excluded. The incidence of newly occurring thrombotic events were categorized according to treatment phases, defined as 1) NACT prior to interval debulking surgery (IDS); 2) intraoperative and 30-day post-IDS; and 3) adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: 290 patients underwent NACT during the study period. Thirty-eight patients (13%) who presented with VTE, 12 (4%) on anticoagulation at presentation, and 4 (1.4%) seeking only a second opinion were excluded from analysis. Of the 236 evaluable patients, the overall rate of VTE during all treatment phases was 15% (35/236). In treatment phase I, 11% (27/236) of patients experienced VTE during NACT. In phase II, an additional 2.5% (6/236) developed VTE in the intraoperative and 30-day postoperative period. In phase III, an additional 0.8% (2/236) experienced a thrombotic event >30 days postoperatively. Sevety-seven percent (27/35) of VTE events occured during phase I. Conclusions: Patients receiving NACT for advanced ovarian cancer are at high risk for the development of clinically detectable thromboembolic events. The highest rate of new VTE events was seen during induction of NACT, a phase of treatment traditionally without any prophylactic anticoagulation. Further research regarding the timing of thromboprophylaxis for this patient population is warranted. [Table: see text]


2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
pp. 152-159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lauren S. Prescott ◽  
Lisa M. Kidin ◽  
Rebecca L. Downs ◽  
David J. Cleveland ◽  
Ginger L. Wilson ◽  
...  

ObjectiveNational guidelines recommend prophylactic anticoagulation for all hospitalized patients with cancer to prevent hospital-acquired venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, adherence to these evidence-based recommended practice patterns remains low. We performed a quality improvement (QI) project to increase VTE pharmacologic prophylaxis rates among patients with gynecologic malignancies hospitalized for nonsurgical indications and evaluated the resulting effect on rates of development of VTE.Materials and MethodsIn June 2011, departmental VTE practice guidelines were implemented for patients with gynecologic malignancies who were hospitalized for nonsurgical indications. A standardized VTE prophylaxis module was added to the admission electronic order sets. Outcome measures included number of admissions receiving VTE pharmacologic prophylaxis within 24 hours of admission; and number of potentially preventable hospital-acquired VTEs diagnosed within 30 and 90 days of discharge. Outcomes were compared between a preguideline implementation cohort (n = 99), a postguideline implementation cohort (n = 127), and a sustainability cohort assessed 2 years after implementation (n = 109). Patients were excluded if upon admission they had a VTE, were considered low risk for VTE, or had a documented contraindication to pharmacologic prophylaxis.ResultsAdministration of pharmacologic prophylaxis within 24 hours of admission increased from 20.8% to 88.2% immediately following the implementation of guidelines, but declined to 71.8% in our sustainability cohort (P < 0.001). There was no difference in VTE incidence among the 3 cohorts [n = 2 (4.2%) vs n = 3 (3.9%) vs n = 3 (4.2%), respectively; P = 1.00].ConclusionsOur QI project improved pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis rates. A small decrease in prophylaxis during the subsequent 2 years suggests a need for continued surveillance to optimize QI initiatives. Despite increased adherence to guidelines, VTE rates did not decline in this high-risk population.


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasser Sakr ◽  
Manuela Giovini ◽  
Marc Leone ◽  
Giacinto Pizzilli ◽  
Andreas Kortgen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Preliminary reports have described significant procoagulant events in patients with coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19), including life-threatening pulmonary embolism (PE). Main text We review the current data on the epidemiology, the possible underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms, and the therapeutic implications of PE in relation to COVID-19. The incidence of PE is reported to be around 2.6–8.9% of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients and up to one-third of those requiring intensive care unit (ICU) admission, despite standard prophylactic anticoagulation. This may be explained by direct and indirect pathologic consequences of COVID-19, complement activation, cytokine release, endothelial dysfunction, and interactions between different types of blood cells. Conclusion Thromboprophylaxis should be started in all patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19 admitted to the hospital. The use of an intermediate therapeutic dose of low molecular weight (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin can be considered on an individual basis in patients with multiple risk factors for venous thromboembolism, including critically ill patients admitted to the ICU. Decisions about extending prophylaxis with LMWH after hospital discharge should be made after balancing the reduced risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) with the risk of increased bleeding events and should be continued for 7–14 days after hospital discharge or in the pre-hospital phase in case of pre-existing or persisting VTE risk factors. Therapeutic anticoagulation is the cornerstone in the management of patients with PE. Selection of an appropriate agent and correct dosing requires consideration of underlying comorbidities.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mouhand F.H. Mohamed ◽  
Shaikha D. Al-Shokri ◽  
Khaled M. Shunnar ◽  
Sara F. Mohamed ◽  
Mostafa S. Najim ◽  
...  

Background: Recent studies revealed a high prevalence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) events in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients, especially in those who are critically ill. Available studies report varying prevalence rates. Hence, the exact prevalence remains uncertain. Moreover, there is an ongoing debate regarding the appropriate dosage of thromboprophylaxis. Methods: We performed a systematic review and proportion meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. We searched PubMed and EMBASE for studies exploring the prevalence of VTE in critically ill COVID-19 patients till 22/07/2020. We pooled the proportion of VTE. Additionally, in a subgroup analysis, we pooled VTE events detected by systematic screening. Finally, we compared the odds of VTE in patients on prophylactic compared to therapeutic anticoagulation. Results: The review comprised of 24 studies and over 2500 patients. The pooled proportion of VTE prevalence was 0.31 (95% CI 0.24, 0.39 I2 94%), of VTE utilizing systematic screening was 0.48 (95% CI 0.33, 0.63 I2 91%), of deep-venous-thrombosis was 0.23 (95% CI 0.14, 0.32 I2 96%), of pulmonary embolism was 0.14 (95% CI 0.09, 0.20 I2 90%). In a subgroup of studies, utilizing systematic screening, VTE risk increased significantly with prophylactic, compared to therapeutic anticoagulation (OR 5.45; 95% CI 1.90, 15.57 I2 0%). Discussion: Our review revealed a high prevalence of VTE in critically ill COVID-19 patients. Almost 50% of patients had VTE detected by systematic screening. Higher thromboprophylaxis dosages seem to reduce VTE burden in this patient's cohort compared to standard prophylactic anticoagulation; ongoing randomized controlled trials will further confirm this.


2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Russell A. Trigonis ◽  
Daniel B. Holt ◽  
Rebecca Yuan ◽  
Asma A. Siddiqui ◽  
Mitchell K. Craft ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document