Treatment decision-making in a group of patients with colo-rectal cancer before surgery and a one-year follow-up

2005 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
pp. 327-335 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. RAMFELT ◽  
K. LUTZEN ◽  
G. NORDSTROM
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
One Year

Patient involvement in multidisciplinary treatment planning (MTP).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 145-145
Author(s):  
Irene Prabhu Das ◽  
Heather Rozjabek ◽  
Mary L. Fennell ◽  
Katherine Mallin ◽  
E. Greer Gay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Multidisciplinary Treatment ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Case Presentation ◽  
Patient Navigators ◽  
Treatment Decision Making

145 Background: Patient involvement in treatment decision-making has been well-studied. However, little is known about how patients are involved in the MTP process prior to their consideration of treatment options. Methods: An online survey was administered to 1,261 Commission on Cancer (CoC)-accredited programs to describe current MTP practice. Survey items addressed team structure and process, case presentation, and patient involvement. A total of 797 (63%) facilities responded. Multiple aspects of patient involvement focusing on the initial case presentation and post-meeting follow-up regarding information provision and communication are examined. Initial descriptive analyses are presented. Results: 97% of facilities reported patients are not invited to attend MTP meetings. Reasons for not inviting patients included: patients may find it overwhelming (62%), physicians not able to speak freely (58%), liability (43%) and privacy (42%) concerns. Of the facilities that do invite patients, 1/3 reported that patients often or always attend. Treatment recommendations from MTP meetings are shared with patients at 75% of facilities, 42% share treatment plans, and 28% give a meeting summary to patients. Nine percent of facilities do not give patients any information from the meeting. Prior to treatment, a written treatment plan is developed at 43% of facilities, and among these, 15% give the plan to patients. Regarding communication about MTP meetings, facilities reported pre-meeting discussions with attending physicians (95%) and patient navigators (21%). Post-meeting follow-up by 93% of facilities is usually done by physicians, 26% by patient navigators and 16% by PA/NPs, and 66% follow-up within 1 week. Conclusions: Initial findings suggest that even if facilities do not invite patients to MTP meetings, they engage patients in various ways at pre- and post-MTP meetings, providing information and having discussions. Physicians are integral in communicating with patients throughout the MTP process. Further study on the multiple facets of patient involvement in MTP is needed to better understand its influence on treatment decision-making.

Impact of a novel decision counseling program on treatment knowledge, decisional conflict, and choice in men with early-stage, low-risk prostate cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9-9
Author(s):  
Jean H. Hoffman-Censits ◽  
Anett Petrich ◽  
Anna Quinn ◽  
Amy Leader ◽  
Leonard G. Gomella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Decisional Conflict ◽  
Counseling Program ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Knowledge ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Low Risk Prostate Cancer

9 Background: Active surveillance (AS - serial follow-up PSA, exam, and biopsy) is an option for men with early stage, low risk prostate cancer (LRPca). While data show comparable survival for AS vs active treatment (AT - surgery or radiation), currently most men with LRPca undergo AT. A pilot Decision Counseling Program (DCP) to assist men in making an informed, shared LRPca treatment decision was implemented. Methods: Men with LRPca seen at the Jefferson Genitourinary Multidisciplinary Cancer Center (JGUMDCC) were consented. A nurse educator (NE) reviewed risks/benefits of AS and AT; had the participant identify factors influencing treatment decision making and specify decision factor weights; entered data into an online DCP; and generated a report of participant treatment preference and decision factors. The report was used by the participant and clinicians in shared treatment decision making. A follow-up survey was administered 30 days after the visit, with treatment status assessed. Change in treatment-related knowledge and decisional conflict were measured using baseline and 30-day survey data. Results: Baseline decision counseling preference of 16 participants: 4 - AS, 8 equal for AS and AT, 4 - AT. At 30 days, 12 participants initiated AS, 4 chose AT; participant mean treatment knowledge scores (8-point scale) increased (+1.13 points); decisional conflict subscale scores (strongly disagree = 1, strongly agree = 5) decreased (uncertain: -1.15, uninformed: -1.36, unclear: -1.12; and unsupported: -1.15). Conclusions: Decision counseling and shared decision making helped participants become better informed about treatment choices and reduced uncertainty in treatment decision making. The combined intervention resulted in most participants choosing AS. Ongoing study recruitment, data collection, and analyses are planned.

scholarly journals Assessment of T and N staging with MRI3T in lower and middle rectal cancer and impact on clinical strategy

2020 ◽  
Vol 48 (6) ◽  
pp. 030006052092868 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liping Xu ◽  
Zhaoyue Zhang ◽  
Qin Qin ◽  
Chi Zhang ◽  
Xinchen Sun
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Diagnostic Accuracy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Clinical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Preoperative Assessment ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
N Stage ◽  
N Staging

Background To determine the diagnostic accuracy of preoperative T/N stage using MRI in lower and middle rectal cancer patients and the impacts on clinical decision-making. Patients and methods There were 354 patients recruited from May 2017 to February 2019. MRI was performed within 2 weeks before surgery. Histopathologic results were evaluated for the postoperative T/N stage and MRI diagnostic accuracy was assessed based on the postoperative histopathologic results. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and Kappa values were used to evaluate MRI diagnostic accuracy and analysis consistency compared with postoperative histopathologic staging. Results Overall MRI diagnostic accuracy was 78.2% and 56.8% for T1–4 and N0–2 staging. The Kappa values were 0.625 and 0.323 for T1–4 and N0–2 staging, respectively. After combination, MRI diagnostic accuracy was 85% and 69.5% for T and N staging. The Kappa values were 0.693 and 0.4 for T and N staging. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for treatment decision-making was 79.1%. Conclusion MRI enables a highly accurate preoperative assessment of T stage but only a fairly accurate preoperative assessment of the N stage for rectal cancer with surgery. The diagnostic accuracy of MRI for treatment decision-making is promising.

Persistency of neutralizing antibodies depends on titer and interferon-beta preparation

2011 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 610-615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Harald Hegen ◽  
Manuel Schleiser ◽  
Claudia Gneiss ◽  
Franziska Di Pauli ◽  
Rainer Ehling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Longitudinal Study ◽  
Neutralizing Antibodies ◽  
Interferon Beta ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Individual Treatment ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Mean Time

Background: Neutralizing antibodies (NAbs) affect the efficacy of interferon-beta (IFNβ) treatment in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, particularly if NAbs persist. Persistency depends on NAb titers, which differ between IFNβ preparations. Objective: This study evaluated IFNβ preparation-specific NAb cut-off titers during early treatment for prediction of NAb persistency. Methods: Patients who had at least one NAb test between 12 and 30 months (baseline) as well as after more than 48 months (follow-up) on IFNβ treatment were included in this longitudinal study. Results: At baseline 1064 patients had a NAb test. Of those, 203 had a follow-up test. In the follow-up group 23.2% of patients were NAb positive during baseline. NAb frequency significantly decreased by 40.7% in the IFNβ-1a and by 60% in the IFNβ-1b group at follow-up after a mean time of 75.4 months on treatment, and median NAb titers decreased significantly in both groups. During baseline, NAb titers of >258 neutralizing units (NU) had a sensitivity of 81.3% and a specificity of 90.9% in the IFNβ-1a group, whereas titers of >460 NU had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 91.7% in the IFNβ-1b group to predict persistency at follow-up. When these cut-off titers are applied, 10.2% of all treated patients developed persistent NAbs. Conclusion: IFNβ preparation-specific NAb cut-off titers for prediction of NAb persistency, which may be useful in individual treatment decision making, are provided.

Considering patient values and treatment preferences enhances patient involvement in rectal cancer treatment decision making

2015 ◽  
Vol 117 (2) ◽  
pp. 338-342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marleen Kunneman ◽  
Corrie A.M. Marijnen ◽  
Monique C.M. Baas-Thijssen ◽  
Yvette M. van der Linden ◽  
Tom Rozema ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Patient Involvement ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Treatment Preferences ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Rectal Cancer Treatment ◽  
Patient Values

Patients’ practices for taking the initiative in decision-making in outpatient psychiatric consultations

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuya Kushida ◽  
Takeshi Hiramoto ◽  
Yuriko Yamakawa
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Conversation Analysis ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Close Inspection ◽  
Important Resource ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
The Way

In spite of increasing advocacy for patients’ participation in psychiatric decision-making, there has been little research on how patients actually participate in decision-making in psychiatric consultations. This study explores how patients take the initiative in decision-making over treatment in outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan. Using the methodology of conversation analysis, we analyze 85 video-recorded ongoing consultations and find that patients select between two practices for taking the initiative in decision-making: making explicit requests for a treatment and displaying interest in a treatment without explicitly requesting it. A close inspection of transcribed interaction reveals that patients make explicit requests under the circumstances where they believe the candidate treatment is appropriate for their condition, whereas they merely display interest in a treatment when they are not certain about its appropriateness. By fitting practices to take the initiative in decision-making with the way they describe their current condition, patients are optimally managing their desire for particular treatments and the validity of their initiative actions. In conclusion, we argue that the orderly use of the two practices is one important resource for patients’ participation in treatment decision-making.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document