Mapping seedling resistance to net form of net blotch (Pyrenophora teresf.teres) in barley using detached leaf assay

2014 ◽  
Vol 133 (3) ◽  
pp. 356-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine König ◽  
Dragan Perovic ◽  
Doris Kopahnke ◽  
Frank Ordon
Plant Disease ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 102 (4) ◽  
pp. 760-763
Author(s):  
I. M. El-Mor ◽  
R. A. Fowler ◽  
G. J. Platz ◽  
M. W. Sutherland ◽  
A. Martin

Net blotch, caused by Pyrenophora teres, is a major barley (Hordeum vulgare) leaf disease worldwide. P. teres occurs as two forms—P. teres f. teres, and P. teres f. maculata—inducing net and spot-like symptoms, respectively. An intact-seedling assay, where entire seedlings are inoculated by spraying with a conidial suspension, is frequently used for phenotyping net blotch. However, this presents a biosecurity risk in the glasshouse when nonlocal isolates are being screened. Alternatively, a detached-leaf assay (DLA-droplet method) can be used in which leaf segments laid out in a covered tray are inoculated with droplets of a conidial suspension, confining the inoculum. However, using this method, net and spot form symptoms cannot be distinguished from each other. We have developed an improved DLA (DLA-spray method) in which detached whole leaves are sprayed with the inoculum to produce distinct lesions. We compare the results for the three phenotyping methods above using four isolates from both net and spot forms of the disease to inoculate a standard set of eight barley genotypes. Results indicate that the DLA-spray method is a functional, informative and rapid test that readily differentiates the two forms of the pathogen in a biosecure environment.


Plant Disease ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 98 (11) ◽  
pp. 1586-1586 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. Q. Yuan ◽  
Y. L. Xie ◽  
D. C. Tan ◽  
Q. Q. Li ◽  
W. Lin

Kiwifruit (Actinidia) is a common fruit cultivated in many countries. Actinidia deliciosa and A. chinensis are two commercially important kiwifruit species. Over 70,000 ha are grown annually in China. In 2012, a leaf spot disease of A. chinensis was observed in several orchards in Leye County (106°34′ E, 24°47′ N), Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region, China. The disease mainly damaged the leaves during the fruit development stage through to the maturity stage. Initially reddish-brown small lesions appeared on the leaves; later, typical symptoms were tan to taupe lesions surrounded by purple brown margins, nearly circular to irregular, 2 to 10 × 2.2 to 15.5 mm in diameter. Some lesions exhibited a concentric pattern. The lesions eventually coalesced, causing extensive leaf necrosis and defoliation. The fungus that sporulated from lesions had the following morphological characteristics: light brown conidiophores with slightly swollen apexes, light brown conidia formed singly or in acropetal chains, straight or curved, cylindrical to oblavate, 52.9 to 240.5 μm long (avg. 138.9 μm) and 5.3 to 13.6 μm wide (avg. 8.4 μm), 5 to 12 distoseptate, with a flat, darkened, and thickened hilum. These morphological characteristics corresponded with that of Corynespora cassiicola (Berk. & Curt.) Wei (1). To isolate the pathogen of the disease, small pieces of symptomatic foliar tissues, including young lesions, typical older lesions, and atypical older lesions with concentric pattern were surface sterilized with 75% ethanol for 30 to 60 s, disinfected in 0.1% HgCl2 for 1 min followed by washing with sterile water, plated on PDA, and incubated at 28°C for 7 to 10 days. Gray to dark gray colonies and conidia of C. cassiicola were observed. To validate the identity of the fungus, the sequence of the ITS region of one of the purified strains, LYCc-1, was determined. DNA was extracted from the isolate that was grown on PDA at 28°C for 4 days, and the ITS region was amplified using the universal primer pair ITS4/ITS5 (2). The double strand consensus sequence was submitted to GenBank (KJ747095) and had 99% nt identity with published sequences of C. cassiicola in GenBank (JN853778, FJ852574, and FJ852587). Pathogenicity tests were carried out on detached leaves in petri dishes in an incubator at 28°C and on whole plants in a glasshouse at 25 ± 3°C. The isolations did not produce enough conidia in pure culture, so mycelial discs were used in pathogenicity tests. For both assays, 60-day-old healthy kiwifruit leaves were inoculated with a 5-mm mycelial disc obtained from the periphery of a 5-day-old C. cassiicola strain (LYCc-1) grown on PDA. The PDA discs were placed on the leaf surface with their mycelial surface down and secured with sterile wet cotton. Controls consisted of leaves that were inoculated with sterile PDA discs. For the detached leaf assay, the leaves were placed on filter paper reaching water saturation in petri dishes, and for the whole plant assays the inoculated leaves were kept moist with intermittent water sprays for 48 h. Four leaves of each plant were inoculated with the isolate in both assays, and experiment was repeated twice. Eight inoculated leaves of the detached leaf assay all showed the first water soaked lesions 36 h after inoculation, followed by extensive leaf rot 72 h after inoculation, and yielded abundant conidia of C. cassiicola. Six out of eight leaves inoculated on whole plants showed the first lesions 5 days after inoculation, whereas control leaves remained healthy. Only C. cassiicola was re-isolated from the lesions in both assays, fulfilling Koch's postulates. This is the first report of leaf spot caused by C. cassiicola on kiwifruit in China. References: (1) M. B. Ellis. Dematiaceous Hyphomycetes. CMI, Kew, Surrey, UK, 1971. (2) T. J. White et al. In: PCR Protocols: A Guide to Methods and Applications. Academic Press, San Diego, 1990.


Plant Disease ◽  
1998 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. 316-321 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Douiyssi ◽  
D. C. Rasmusson ◽  
A. P. Roelfs

Net blotch, caused by Pyrenophora teres, is among the most damaging foliar diseases of barley worldwide. A knowledge of the reaction of local cultivars, putative resistant lines, and variability in the net blotch pathogen is necessary to develop a successful resistance breeding program. Disease responses of 38 barley lines to 15 P. teres isolates were studied at the seedling and adult plant stages in the glasshouse, and field responses to net blotch were evaluated at three Moroccan locations. No tested barley was resistant to all isolates, and resistance was apparently of the specific type. Pathogenic variability was great, as none of the 15 isolates were identical. For each isolate tested, a specific high level of resistance was found in one or more host lines. Seedling and adults plants often differed in response to the same isolate. Adult plant resistance was commonly observed in response to isolate I-1, and seedling resistance was more common to isolate I-14. Adult plant resistance of nine lines was undetected in seedling evaluations using isolate I-1. The seedling glasshouse and field responses of the barley lines varied considerably, limiting the value of seedling testing for resistance. Field reactions of resistant and moderately resistant were consistent across the three locations for the lines Heartland, Minn 7, CI 2333, and CI 2549. The variability observed in P. teres and failure to find lines with resistance to all isolates suggests that breeding for resistance should emphasize pyramiding of resistance genes.


Genome ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 49 (7) ◽  
pp. 855-859 ◽  
Author(s):  
T L Friesen ◽  
J D Faris ◽  
Z Lai ◽  
B J Steffenson

Net blotch, caused by Pyrenophora teres, is one of the most economically important diseases of barley worldwide. Here, we used a barley doubled-haploid population derived from the lines SM89010 and Q21861 to identify major quantitative trait loci (QTLs) associated with seedling resistance to P. teres f. teres (net-type net blotch (NTNB)) and P. teres f. maculata (spot-type net blotch (STNB)). A map consisting of simple sequence repeat (SSR) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers was used to identify chromosome locations of resistance loci. Major QTLs for NTNB and STNB resistance were located on chromosomes 6H and 4H, respectively. The 6H locus (NTNB) accounted for as much as 89% of the disease variation, whereas the 4H locus (STNB resistance) accounted for 64%. The markers closely linked to the resistance gene loci will be useful for marker-assisted selection.Key words: disease resistance, Drechslera teres, molecular markers.


HortScience ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 51 (7) ◽  
pp. 805-809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ed Stover ◽  
David G. Hall ◽  
Robert G. Shatters ◽  
Gloria A. Moore

Assessments of the resistance of citrus germplasm to huanglongbing (HLB) can be expedited by inoculating plants under laboratory or greenhouse settings with the HLB bacterium, Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus (CLas). Consistent rapid screening is critical to efficiently assess disease resistance among plant materials; however, a number of factors may govern the efficacy of such inoculations. Despite the rapidity at which HLB can spread in a grove, it often takes 8 to 10 months for high levels of CLas and HLB symptoms to develop even in highly susceptible sweet orange. Therefore, two experiments were conducted to assess factors that might influence efficiency in screening for HLB resistance. In one experiment, three test citrus genotypes (‘Kuharske’, previously shown to be HLB resistant; rough lemon, previously shown to be HLB tolerant; and ‘Valencia’, HLB susceptible) were bud grafted using CLas-infected buds from four different source genotypes. All bud source genotypes had similar levels of CLas titer, but citron, rough lemon, and Volkamer lemon were hypothesized to be better bud inoculum sources as they are more tolerant of HLB than ‘Valencia’. Among the three test genotypes over all sources of infected buds, inoculations of ‘Kuharske’ resulted in lower CLas titers and fewer HLB symptoms than inoculations of rough lemon or ‘Valencia’. Inoculations of rough lemon resulted in higher CLas titers and more pronounced HLB symptoms when it was inoculated using infected buds from rough lemon or ‘Valencia’. Grafting ‘Valencia’ with infected buds from Volkamer lemon resulted in less disease than when ‘Valencia’ was grafted with infected citron, rough lemon, or ‘Valencia’ buds. Overall, these results suggest that the source of CLas-infected buds used to graft-inoculate some genotypes will influence disease development. Trunk cross-sectional area increase for the year following infection was 3× higher in ‘Kuharske’ and rough lemon, compared with ‘Valencia’. ‘Kuharske’ had very low levels of CLas (30 CLas/µg DNA), whereas ‘Valencia’ (43,000 CLas/µg DNA) and rough lemon (6700 CLas/ µg DNA) had relatively high levels. As an alternative to graft-inoculating plants with CLas-infected buds, plants can be subjected to infestations of CLas-infected Asian citrus psyllid (ACP) as occurs naturally. Of interest is if transmission rates of CLas and the development of HLB in a genotype are greater when the ACP have been feeding on the same host genotype. An experiment was therefore conducted to assess transmission of CLas by ACP reared on CLas-infected rough lemon to five different genotypes (‘Carrizo’, ‘Flame’ grapefruit, rough lemon, ‘Temple’, and ‘Valencia’). These assessments were made using a detached leaf assay recognized as a faster method of gauging transmission rates of CLas than using whole plants. Higher percentages of ACP died when they were transferred from infected rough lemon to healthy ‘Carrizo’, and lower percentages died when they were transferred to rough lemon or ‘Flame’. However, CLas transmission by infected ACP occurred to at least some leaves of each genotype in each of the five different assays, with 70% or more leaves of each genotype becoming infected in at least one assay. Over all assays, there was relatively little variation among genotypes in the percentage of leaves becoming CLas infected and in the titer of CLas developing in infected leaves. However, there were relatively large differences in transmission rates among individual assays unrelated to differences among test genotypes. Because of the rapidity of the detached leaf assay, efforts are merited to improve consistency of this inoculation method.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document