Aerodynamic Comparison and Validation of RANS, URANS and SAS Simulations of Flat Plate Film-Cooling

2010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Voigt ◽  
Berthold Noll ◽  
Manfred Aigner
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
3 Dimensional ◽  
Commercial Code ◽  
Sst Model ◽  
Rans Models

The present paper deals with the detailed numerical simulation of film cooling including conjugate heat transfer. Five different turbulence models are used to simulate a film cooling configuration. The models include three steady and two unsteady models. The steady RANS models are the Shear stress transport (SST) model of Menter, the Reynolds stress model of Speziale, Sarkar and Gatski and a k-ε explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model. The unsteady models are a URANS formulation of the SST model and a scale-adaptive simulation (SAS). The solver used in this study is the commercial code ANSYS CFX 11.0. The results are compared to available experimental data. These data include velocity and turbulence intensity fields in several planes. It is shown that the steady RANS approach has difficulties with predicting the flow field due to the high 3-dimensional unsteadiness. The URANS and SAS simulations on the other hand show good agreement with the experimental data. The deviation from the experimental data in velocity values in the steady cases is about 20% whereas the error in the unsteady cases is below 10%.

Improved Prediction of Turbomachinery Flows Using Near-Wall Reynolds-Stress Model

2001 ◽  
Vol 124 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Gerolymos ◽  
J. Neubauer ◽  
V. C. Sharma ◽  
I. Vallet
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Flow Equations ◽  
Near Wall

In this paper an assessment of the improvement in the prediction of complex turbomachinery flows using a new near-wall Reynolds-stress model is attempted. The turbulence closure used is a near-wall low-turbulence-Reynolds-number Reynolds-stress model, that is independent of the distance-from-the-wall and of the normal-to-the-wall direction. The model takes into account the Coriolis redistribution effect on the Reynolds-stresses. The five mean flow equations and the seven turbulence model equations are solved using an implicit coupled OΔx3 upwind-biased solver. Results are compared with experimental data for three turbomachinery configurations: the NTUA high subsonic annular cascade, the NASA_37 rotor, and the RWTH 1 1/2 stage turbine. A detailed analysis of the flowfield is given. It is seen that the new model that takes into account the Reynolds-stress anisotropy substantially improves the agreement with experimental data, particularily for flows with large separation, while being only 30 percent more expensive than the k−ε model (thanks to an efficient implicit implementation). It is believed that further work on advanced turbulence models will substantially enhance the predictive capability of complex turbulent flows in turbomachinery.

scholarly journals Effects of the Duct Angle and Propeller Location on the Hydrodynamic Characteristics of the Ducted Propeller

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (22) ◽  
pp. 41
Author(s):  
Mehdi Chamanara ◽  
Hassan Ghassemi ◽  
Manouchehr Fadavie ◽  
Mohammad Aref Ghassemi
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Numerical Results ◽  
Navier Stokes ◽  
Hydrodynamic Characteristics ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Ducted Propeller ◽  
Rans Method

In the present study, the effect of the duct angle and propeller location on the hydrodynamic characteristics of the ducted propeller using Reynolds-Averaged Navier Stokes (RANS) method is reported. A Kaplan type propeller is selected with a 19A duct. The ducted propeller is analyzed by three turbulence models including the k-ε standard, k-ω SST and Reynolds stress model (RSM). The numerical results are compared with experimental data. The effects of the duct angle and the location of the propeller inside the propeller are presented and discussed.

Improved Prediction of Turbomachinery Flows Using Near-Wall Reynolds-Stress Model

2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Gerolymos ◽  
J. Neubauer ◽  
V. C. Sharma ◽  
I. Vallet
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Reynolds Stresses ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Flow Equations ◽  
Near Wall

In this paper an assessment of the improvement in the prediction of complex turbomachinery flows using a new near-wall Reynolds-stress model is attempted. The turbulence closure used is a near-wall low-turbulence-Reynolds-number Reynolds-stress model, that is independent of the distance-from-the-wall and of the normal-to-the-wall direction. The model takes into account the Coriolis redistribution effect on the Reynolds-stresses. The 5 mean flow equations and the 7 turbulence model equations are solved using an implicit coupled O(Δx3) upwind-biased solver. Results are compared with experimental data for 3 turbomachinery configurations: the ntua high subsonic annular cascade, the nasa_37 rotor, and the rwth 1½ stage turbine. A detailed analysis of the flowfield is given. It is seen that the new model that takes into account the Reynolds-stress anisotropy substantially improves the agreement with experimental data, particularly for flows with large separation, while being only 30% more expensive than the k – ε model (thanks to an efficient implicit implementation). It is believed that further work on advanced turbulence models will substantially enhance the predictive capability of complex turbulent flows in turbomachinery.

scholarly journals Performance of Turbulence Models and Near-Wall Treatments in Discrete Jet Film Cooling Simulations

1998 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeffrey D. Ferguson ◽  
Dibbon K. Walters ◽  
James H. Leylek
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Film Cooling ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Viscous Sublayer ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Quality Data ◽  
Wall Functions ◽  
First Time ◽  
Near Wall ◽  
Non Equilibrium

For the first time in the open literature, code validation quality data and a well-tested, highly reliable computational methodology are employed to isolate the true performance of seven turbulence treatments in discrete jet film cooling. The present research examines both computational and high quality experimental data for two length-to-diameter ratios of a row of streamwise injected, cylindrical film holes. These two cases are used to document the performance of the following turbulence treatments: 1) standard k-ε model with generalized wall functions; 2) standard k-ε model with non-equilibrium wall functions: 3) Renormalization Group k-ε (RNG) model with generalized wall functions; 4) RNG model with non-equilibrium wall functions: 51 standard k-ε model with two-layer turbulence wall treatment; 6) Reynolds Stress Model (RSM) with generalized wall functions; and 7) RSM with non-equilibrium wall functions. Overall, the standard k-ε turbulence model with the two-layer near-wall treatment, which resolves the viscous sublayer, produces results that are more consistent with experimental data.

scholarly journals Rotating Flow and Heat Transfer in Cylindrical Cavities With Radial Inflow

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
B. G. Vinod Kumar ◽  
John W. Chew ◽  
Nicholas J. Hills
Keyword(s):  
Heat Transfer ◽  
Experimental Data ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Integral Method ◽  
Eddy Viscosity ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Rotating Disc ◽  
Flow And Heat Transfer ◽  
Viscosity Models

Design and optimization of an efficient internal air system of a gas turbine requires thorough understanding of the flow and heat transfer in rotating disc cavities. The present study is devoted to numerical modelling of flow and heat transfer in a cylindrical cavity with radial inflow and comparison with the available experimental data. The simulations are carried out with axi-symmetric and 3-D sector models for various inlet swirl and rotational Reynolds numbers upto 2.1×106. The pressure coefficients and Nusselt numbers are compared with the available experimental data and integral method solutions. Two popular eddy viscosity models, the Spalart-Allmaras and the k-ε, and a Reynolds stress model have been used. For cases with particularly strong vortex behaviour the eddy viscosity models show some shortcomings with the Spalart-Allmaras model giving slightly better results than the k-ε model. Use of the Reynolds stress model improved the agreement with measurements for such cases. The integral method results are also found to agree well with the measurements.

Reynolds Stress Model in the Prediction of Confined Turbulent Swirling Flows

2006 ◽  
Vol 128 (6) ◽  
pp. 1377-1382 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali M. Jawarneh ◽  
Georgios H. Vatistas
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Pressure Drop ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Tangential Velocity ◽  
Radial Pressure ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Swirling Flows ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Swirl Number ◽  
Pressure Profiles

Strongly swirling vortex chamber flows are examined experimentally and numerically using the Reynolds stress model (RSM). The predictions are compared against the experimental data in terms of the pressure drop across the chamber, the axial and tangential velocity components, and the radial pressure profiles. The overall agreement between the measurements and the predictions is reasonable. The predictions provided by the numerical model show clearly the forced and free vortex modes of the tangential velocity profile. The reverse flow (or back flow) inside the core and near the outlet, known from experiments, is captured by the numerical simulations. The swirl number has been found to have a measurable impact on the flow features. The vortex core size is shown to contract with the swirl number which leads to higher pressure drop, higher peak tangential velocity, and deeper radial pressure profiles near the axis of rotation. The adequate agreement between the experimental data and the simulations using RSM turbulence model provides a valid tool to study further these industrially important swirling flows.

Investigation of an Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model for Simulation of Wall-Bounded Turbulent Flows With and Without Buoyancy Effects

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tausif Jamal ◽  
D. Keith Walters
Keyword(s):  
Heat Flux ◽  
Turbulent Flows ◽  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Nuclear Reactor ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Reynolds Analogy ◽  
Suitable Alternative ◽  
Rans Models ◽  
Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model

Abstract Complex turbulent flows such as those encountered in nuclear reactor cooling systems pose considerable challenges for computational fluid dynamics (CFD) simulation using traditional Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes (RANS) models based on the linear eddy-viscosity modeling (LEVM) framework. One particular difficulty is the use of low Prandtl number (Pr) fluids such as liquid metal coolants, which considerably alters the fluctuating thermal field and violates the Reynolds analogy upon which turbulent heat flux modeling in LEVMs is based. Although previous studies have shown that Reynolds Stress Models (RSM) offer some improvements over traditional LEVMs for flows containing complex inter-component interaction and Reynolds stress anisotropy, the added complexity, increased computational requirements, and the lack of robustness introduced by traditional RSMs do not always result in an overall improvement. This study evaluates the performance of a newly proposed Algebraic Reynolds Stress Model (ARSM) including an Algebraic Heat Flux Model (AHFM) against two industry standard RANS models, standard k-ε and realizable k-ε model, for a set of canonical test cases relevant to nuclear reactor cooling applications. Numerical simulations using the spectral element code Nek5000 are performed for fully developed channel flows with varying values of Reynolds number (Re) and Pr, both with and without the effects of buoyancy. Results are compared to Direct Numerical Simulation (DNS) data in terms of the velocity and thermal statistics. For all cases investigated, the ARSM model consistently outperforms the other RANS models in this study and it is concluded that the new ARSM model can be a suitable alternative to traditional LEVMs for complex turbulent flows without significant penalty to efficiency and robustness that are commonly associated with traditional RSMs.

Robust Implicit Multigrid Reynolds-Stress Model Computation of 3-D Turbomachinery Flows

2006 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. A. Gerolymos ◽  
I. Vallet
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Time Integration ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Finite Volume Scheme ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Mean Flow ◽  
Approximate Factorization ◽  
Flow Equations

The purpose of this paper is to present a numerical methodology for the computation of complex 3-D turbomachinery flows using advanced multiequation turbulence closures, including full 7-equation Reynolds-stress transport models. A general frame-work describing the turbulence models and possible future improvements is presented. The flow equations are discretized on structured multiblock grids, using an upwind biased (O[Δx3] MUSCL reconstruction) finite-volume scheme. Time-integration uses a local-dual-time-stepping implicit procedure, with internal subiterations. Computational efficiency is achieved by a specific approximate factorization of the implicit subiterations, designed to minimize the computational cost of the turbulence-transport-equations. Convergence is still accelerated using a mean-flow-multigrid full-approximation-scheme method, where multigrid is applied on the mean-flow-variables only. Speed-ups of a factor 3 are obtained using 3 levels of multigrid (fine + 2 coarser grids). Computational examples are presented using several Reynolds-stress model variants (and also a baseline k–ε model), for various turbomachinery configurations, and compared with available experimental measurements.

Modeling of Cube Array Roughness: RANS, LES, and DNS

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samuel Altland ◽  
Haosen H. A. Xu ◽  
Xiang I. A. Yang ◽  
Robert Kunz
Keyword(s):  
Reynolds Stress ◽  
Significant Degree ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Mean Velocity ◽  
Flow Features ◽  
Drag Partition ◽  
Flow Phenomena ◽  
Rans Models ◽  
Packing Densities

Abstract Flow over arrays of cubes is an extensively studied model problem for rough wall turbulent boundary layers. While considerable research has been performed in computationally investigating these topologies using DNS and LES, the ability of sublayer-resolved RANS to predict the bulk flow phenomena of these systems is relatively unexplored, especially at low and high packing densities. Here, RANS simulations are conducted on six different packing densities of cubes in aligned and staggered configurations. The packing densities investigated span from what would classically be defined as isolated, up to those in the d-type roughness regime, filling in the gap in the present literature. Three different sublayer-resolved turbulence closure models were tested for each case; a low Reynolds number k-ε model, the Menter k-ω SST model, and a full Reynolds stress model. Comparisons of the velocity fields, secondary flow features, and drag coefficients are made between the RANS results and existing LES and DNS results. There is a significant degree of variability in the performance of the various RANS models across all comparison metrics. However, the Reynolds stress model demonstrated the best accuracy in terms of the mean velocity profile as well as drag partition across the range of packing densities.

Flow Analysis of a High Flowrate Centrifugal Compressor Stage and Comparison With Test Rig Data

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anton Weber ◽  
Christian Morsbach ◽  
Edmund Kügeler ◽  
Christoph Rube ◽  
Matthias Wedeking
Keyword(s):  
Experimental Data ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Centrifugal Compressor ◽  
Total Pressure ◽  
Pressure Ratio ◽  
Turbulence Models ◽  
Reynolds Stress Model ◽  
Stress Model ◽  
Test Rig ◽  
Total Pressure Ratio

The flow field inside a single-stage centrifugal compressor characterized by a high flowrate of Φ = 0.15 and a design total pressure ratio of approximately 1.4 is analysed numerically. The stage geometry consists of a radially oriented inlet duct with uniform inflow without swirl, a 90 deg inlet bend in front of the impeller, the shrouded impeller itself followed by a large radial vaneless diffuser, a 180 deg U-turn, a radially oriented turning vane, a subsequent 90 deg bend, and as the last item a long axial exit duct. The impeller blades have large fillets at hub and tip and thick blunt trailing edges. Due to the rotating shroud, a labyrinth seal is placed above the impeller with 5 seal tips. The complete leakage region is also included in the CFD analysis. The blade numbers for the impeller and vane are 15 and 14, respectively. The test rig has recently been built at the Institute of Propulsion and Turbomachinery at RWTH Aachen University (Germany). The first part of the CFD work presented was carried out before the first experimental data were available. Using the k-ω turbulence model of Wilcox (1988), a number of principal steady RANS calculations were performed to investigate the following: Impact of near wall grid resolution and turbulence model wall boundary condition treatment, impact of impeller fillets, and the influence of leakage flow. This part is completed by a comparison of steady RANS simulations with the time-mean results of unsteady RANS analyses of one blade passage. For the calculations presented in the second part, experimental data are available at the inflow and outflow planes. At these planes overall mean values were deduced. Additionally, 3- and 5-hole probe data are available at spanwise traverse planes located at the zenith of the U-turn and in the exit plane. For part two a finer grid with y+ values of approximately unity for all solid walls was used. In addition to the Wilcox k-ω model and the Menter SST k-ω model, two higher level turbulence models — the explicit algebraic Reynolds stress model Hellsten EARSM k-ω and the differential Reynolds stress model SSG/LRR-ω — have been tested and compared with the experiments. The agreement in terms of overall performance (total pressure ratio, isentropic efficiency) is satisfactory for all turbulence models used, but there are some differences: the k-ω model is shown to be the most stable one towards stall. On the other hand, it is shown that details of the flow field in terms of the two spanwise traverses can be better represented by the more advanced turbulence models. All CFD simulations have been performed at 100% shaft speed.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document