scholarly journals The Mgs1/WRNIP1 ATPase is required to prevent a recombination salvage pathway at damaged replication forks

2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (15) ◽  
pp. eaaz3327 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Jiménez-Martín ◽  
Irene Saugar ◽  
Chinnu Rose Joseph ◽  
Alexandra Mayer ◽  
Carl P. Lehmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Template Switching ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Salvage Pathway ◽  
Dna Damage Tolerance ◽  
Alternative Mode ◽  
Free Mode ◽  
Template Switch

DNA damage tolerance (DDT) is crucial for genome integrity maintenance. DDT is mainly carried out by template switch recombination, an error-free mode of overcoming DNA lesions, or translesion DNA synthesis, which is error-prone. Here, we investigated the role of Mgs1/WRNIP1 in modulating DDT. Using budding yeast, we found that elimination of Mgs1 in cells lacking Rad5, an essential protein for DDT, activates an alternative mode of DNA damage bypass, driven by recombination, which allows chromosome replication and cell viability under stress conditions that block DNA replication forks. This salvage pathway is RAD52 and RAD59 dependent, requires the DNA polymerase δ and PCNA modification at K164, and is enabled by Esc2 and the PCNA unloader Elg1, being inhibited when Mgs1 is present. We propose that Mgs1 is necessary to prevent a potentially toxic recombination salvage pathway at sites of perturbed replication, which, in turn, favors Rad5-dependent template switching, thus helping to preserve genome stability.

scholarly journals Prevention of unwanted recombination at damaged replication forks

2020 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1045-1051 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carl P. Lehmann ◽  
Alberto Jiménez-Martín ◽  
Dana Branzei ◽  
José Antonio Tercero
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Chromosome Replication ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Template Switching ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Lesion Bypass ◽  
Alternative Mode ◽  
Replicative Stress ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

Abstract Homologous recombination is essential for the maintenance of genome integrity but must be strictly controlled to avoid dangerous outcomes that produce the opposite effect, genomic instability. During unperturbed chromosome replication, recombination is globally inhibited at ongoing DNA replication forks, which helps to prevent deleterious genomic rearrangements. This inhibition is carried out by Srs2, a helicase that binds to SUMOylated PCNA and has an anti-recombinogenic function at replication forks. However, at damaged stalled forks, Srs2 is counteracted and DNA lesion bypass can be achieved by recombination-mediated template switching. In budding yeast, template switching is dependent on Rad5. In the absence of this protein, replication forks stall in the presence of DNA lesions and cells die. Recently, we showed that in cells lacking Rad5 that are exposed to DNA damage or replicative stress, elimination of the conserved Mgs1/WRNIP1 ATPase allows an alternative mode of DNA damage bypass that is driven by recombination and facilitates completion of chromosome replication and cell viability. We have proposed that Mgs1 is important to prevent a potentially harmful salvage pathway of recombination at damaged stalled forks. In this review, we summarize our current understanding of how unwanted recombination is prevented at damaged stalled replication forks.

scholarly journals Monoubiquitylation of histone H2B contributes to the bypass of DNA damage during and after DNA replication

2017 ◽  
Vol 114 (11) ◽  
pp. E2205-E2214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shih-Hsun Hung ◽  
Ronald P. Wong ◽  
Helle D. Ulrich ◽  
Cheng-Fu Kao
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Replication Fork ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Template Switching ◽  
Lesion Bypass ◽  
Dna Damage Tolerance ◽  
Cytological Evidence ◽  
Histone H2b ◽  
Chromatin Dynamics ◽  
Dna Lesion

DNA lesion bypass is mediated by DNA damage tolerance (DDT) pathways and homologous recombination (HR). The DDT pathways, which involve translesion synthesis and template switching (TS), are activated by the ubiquitylation (ub) of PCNA through components of the RAD6-RAD18 pathway, whereas the HR pathway is independent of RAD18. However, it is unclear how these processes are coordinated within the context of chromatin. Here we show that Bre1, an ubiquitin ligase specific for histone H2B, is recruited to chromatin in a manner coupled to replication of damaged DNA. In the absence of Bre1 or H2Bub, cells exhibit accumulation of unrepaired DNA lesions. Consequently, the damaged forks become unstable and resistant to repair. We provide physical, genetic, and cytological evidence that H2Bub contributes toward both Rad18-dependent TS and replication fork repair by HR. Using an inducible system of DNA damage bypass, we further show that H2Bub is required for the regulation of DDT after genome duplication. We propose that Bre1-H2Bub facilitates fork recovery and gap-filling repair by controlling chromatin dynamics in response to replicative DNA damage.

scholarly journals Non-Recombinogenic Functions of Rad51, BRCA2, and Rad52 in DNA Damage Tolerance

Genes ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (10) ◽  
pp. 1550
Author(s):  
Félix Prado
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Homologous Recombination ◽  
Damage Tolerance ◽  
Molecular Switches ◽  
Strand Exchange ◽  
Template Switching ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Lesion Bypass ◽  
Dna Damage Tolerance ◽  
Exchange Activity

The DNA damage tolerance (DDT) response is aimed to timely and safely complete DNA replication by facilitating the advance of replication forks through blocking lesions. This process is associated with an accumulation of single-strand DNA (ssDNA), both at the fork and behind the fork. Lesion bypass and ssDNA filling can be performed by translation synthesis (TLS) and template switching mechanisms. TLS uses low-fidelity polymerases to incorporate a dNTP opposite the blocking lesion, whereas template switching uses a Rad51/ssDNA nucleofilament and the sister chromatid to bypass the lesion. Rad51 is loaded at this nucleofilament by two mediator proteins, BRCA2 and Rad52, and these three factors are critical for homologous recombination (HR). Here, we review recent advances showing that Rad51, BRCA2, and Rad52 perform some of these functions through mechanisms that do not require the strand exchange activity of Rad51: the formation and protection of reversed fork structures aimed to bypass blocking lesions, and the promotion of TLS. These findings point to the central HR proteins as potential molecular switches in the choice of the mechanism of DDT.

scholarly journals DNA damage tolerance in stem cells, ageing, mutagenesis, disease and cancer therapy

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (14) ◽  
pp. 7163-7181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bas Pilzecker ◽  
Olimpia Alessandra Buoninfante ◽  
Heinz Jacobs
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Damage Tolerance ◽  
Essential Feature ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Template Switching ◽  
Dna Damage Tolerance ◽  
Response Network ◽  
Damage Response ◽  
Fork Stalling

AbstractThe DNA damage response network guards the stability of the genome from a plethora of exogenous and endogenous insults. An essential feature of the DNA damage response network is its capacity to tolerate DNA damage and structural impediments during DNA synthesis. This capacity, referred to as DNA damage tolerance (DDT), contributes to replication fork progression and stability in the presence of blocking structures or DNA lesions. Defective DDT can lead to a prolonged fork arrest and eventually cumulate in a fork collapse that involves the formation of DNA double strand breaks. Four principal modes of DDT have been distinguished: translesion synthesis, fork reversal, template switching and repriming. All DDT modes warrant continuation of replication through bypassing the fork stalling impediment or repriming downstream of the impediment in combination with filling of the single-stranded DNA gaps. In this way, DDT prevents secondary DNA damage and critically contributes to genome stability and cellular fitness. DDT plays a key role in mutagenesis, stem cell maintenance, ageing and the prevention of cancer. This review provides an overview of the role of DDT in these aspects.

scholarly journals PCNA Ubiquitylation: Instructive or Permissive to DNA Damage Tolerance Pathways?

Biomolecules ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1543
Author(s):  
Jun Che ◽  
Xin Hong ◽  
Hai Rao
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Damage Tolerance ◽  
Translesion Synthesis ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Template Switching ◽  
Dna Damage Tolerance ◽  
Future Studies ◽  
Dna Lesion ◽  
Replicative Polymerases

DNA lesions escaping from repair often block the DNA replicative polymerases required for DNA replication and are handled during the S/G2 phases by the DNA damage tolerance (DDT) mechanisms, which include the error-prone translesion synthesis (TLS) and the error-free template switching (TS) pathways. Where the mono-ubiquitylation of PCNA K164 is critical for TLS, the poly-ubiquitylation of the same residue is obligatory for TS. However, it is not known how cells divide the labor between TLS and TS. Due to the fact that the type of DNA lesion significantly influences the TLS and TS choice, we propose that, instead of altering the ratio between the mono- and poly-Ub forms of PCNA, the competition between TLS and TS would automatically determine the selection between the two pathways. Future studies, especially the single integrated lesion “i-Damage” system, would elucidate detailed mechanisms governing the choices of specific DDT pathways.

DNA-damage tolerance through PCNA ubiquitination and sumoylation

2020 ◽  
Vol 477 (14) ◽  
pp. 2655-2677
Author(s):  
Li Fan ◽  
Tonghui Bi ◽  
Linxiao Wang ◽  
Wei Xiao
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Posttranslational Modifications ◽  
Damage Tolerance ◽  
Nuclear Antigen ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Dna Damage Tolerance ◽  
Yeast Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Template Switch ◽  
Proliferating Cell

DNA-damage tolerance (DDT) is employed by eukaryotic cells to bypass replication-blocking lesions induced by DNA-damaging agents. In budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, DDT is mediated by RAD6 epistatic group genes and the central event for DDT is sequential ubiquitination of proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), a DNA clamp required for replication and DNA repair. DDT consists of two parallel pathways: error-prone DDT is mediated by PCNA monoubiquitination, which recruits translesion synthesis DNA polymerases to bypass lesions with decreased fidelity; and error-free DDT is mediated by K63-linked polyubiquitination of PCNA at the same residue of monoubiquitination, which facilitates homologous recombination-mediated template switch. Interestingly, the same PCNA residue is also subjected to sumoylation, which leads to inhibition of unwanted recombination at replication forks. All three types of PCNA posttranslational modifications require dedicated conjugating and ligation enzymes, and these enzymes are highly conserved in eukaryotes, from yeast to human.

scholarly journals The Chromatin-binding Protein Spn1 contributes to Genome Instability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alison K. Thurston ◽  
Catherine A. Radebaugh ◽  
Adam R. Almeida ◽  
Juan Lucas Argueso ◽  
Laurie A. Stargell
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Genome Stability ◽  
Damage Tolerance ◽  
Genome Instability ◽  
Chromatin Binding ◽  
Dna Damage Tolerance ◽  
Template Switch

AbstractCells expend a large amount of energy to maintain their DNA sequence. DNA repair pathways, cell cycle checkpoint activation, proofreading polymerases, and chromatin structure are ways in which the cell minimizes changes to the genome. During replication, the DNA damage tolerance pathway allows the replication forks to bypass damage on the template strand. This avoids prolonged replication fork stalling, which can contribute to genome instability. The DNA damage tolerance pathway includes two sub-pathways: translesion synthesis and template switch. Post-translational modification of PCNA and the histone tails, cell cycle phase, and local DNA structure have all been shown to influence sub-pathway choice. Chromatin architecture contributes to maintaining genome stability by providing physical protection of the DNA and by regulating DNA processing pathways. As such, chromatin-binding factors have been implicated in maintaining genome stability. Using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, we examined the role of Spn1, a chromatin binding and transcription elongation factor, in DNA damage tolerance. Expression of a mutant allele of SPN1 results in increased resistance to the DNA damaging agent methyl methanesulfonate, lower spontaneous and damage-induced mutation rates, along with increased chronological lifespan. We attribute these effects to an increased usage of the template switch branch of the DNA damage tolerance pathway in the spn1 strain. This provides evidence for a role of wild type Spn1 in promoting genome instability, as well as having ties to overcoming replication stress and contributing to chronological aging.

scholarly journals The Zn-finger of Saccharomyces cerevisiae Rad18 and its adjacent region mediate interaction with Rad5

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Orsolya Frittmann ◽  
Vamsi K Gali ◽  
Miklos Halmai ◽  
Robert Toth ◽  
Zsuzsanna Gyorfy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Ubiquitin Ligase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Template Switching ◽  
Adjacent Region ◽  
Yeast Two Hybrid ◽  
Replication Complex ◽  
Two Hybrid

Abstract DNA damages that hinder the movement of the replication complex can ultimately lead to cell death. To avoid that, cells possess several DNA damage bypass mechanisms. The Rad18 ubiquitin ligase controls error-free and mutagenic pathways that help the replication complex to bypass DNA lesions by monoubiquitylating PCNA at stalled replication forks. In Saccharomyces cerevisiae, two of the Rad18 governed pathways are activated by monoubiquitylated PCNA and they involve translesion synthesis polymerases, whereas a third pathway needs subsequent polyubiquitylation of the same PCNA residue by another ubiquitin ligase the Rad5 protein, and it employs template switching. The goal of this study was to dissect the regulatory role of the multidomain Rad18 in DNA damage bypass using a structure-function based approach. Investigating deletion and point mutant RAD18 variants in yeast genetic and yeast two-hybrid assays we show that the Zn-finger of Rad18 mediates its interaction with Rad5, and the N-terminal adjacent region is also necessary for Rad5 binding. Moreover, results of the yeast two-hybrid and in vivo ubiquitylation experiments raise the possibility that direct interaction between Rad18 and Rad5 might not be necessary for the function of the Rad5 dependent pathway. The presented data also reveal that yeast Rad18 uses different domains to mediate its association with itself and with Rad5. Our results contribute to better understanding of the complex machinery of DNA damage bypass pathways.

scholarly journals RuvAB and RecG Are Not Essential for the Recovery of DNA Synthesis Following UV-Induced DNA Damage in Escherichia coli

Genetics ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 166 (4) ◽  
pp. 1631-1640 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janet R Donaldson ◽  
Charmain T Courcelle ◽  
Justin Courcelle
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Replication Machinery ◽  
Dna Junctions ◽  
Fork Regression

Abstract Ultraviolet light induces DNA lesions that block the progression of the replication machinery. Several models speculate that the resumption of replication following disruption by UV-induced DNA damage requires regression of the nascent DNA or migration of the replication machinery away from the blocking lesion to allow repair or bypass of the lesion to occur. Both RuvAB and RecG catalyze branch migration of three- and four-stranded DNA junctions in vitro and are proposed to catalyze fork regression in vivo. To examine this possibility, we characterized the recovery of DNA synthesis in ruvAB and recG mutants. We found that in the absence of either RecG or RuvAB, arrested replication forks are maintained and DNA synthesis is resumed with kinetics that are similar to those in wild-type cells. The data presented here indicate that RecG- or RuvAB-catalyzed fork regression is not essential for DNA synthesis to resume following arrest by UV-induced DNA damage in vivo.

scholarly journals Interactions and Localization of Escherichia coli Error-Prone DNA Polymerase IV after DNA Damage

2015 ◽  
Vol 197 (17) ◽  
pp. 2792-2809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarita Mallik ◽  
Ellen M. Popodi ◽  
Andrew J. Hanson ◽  
Patricia L. Foster
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Dna Helicase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Pol Iv ◽  
Dna Polymerase Iv ◽  
Stalled Replication Forks

ABSTRACTEscherichia coli's DNA polymerase IV (Pol IV/DinB), a member of the Y family of error-prone polymerases, is induced during the SOS response to DNA damage and is responsible for translesion bypass and adaptive (stress-induced) mutation. In this study, the localization of Pol IV after DNA damage was followed using fluorescent fusions. After exposure ofE. colito DNA-damaging agents, fluorescently tagged Pol IV localized to the nucleoid as foci. Stepwise photobleaching indicated ∼60% of the foci consisted of three Pol IV molecules, while ∼40% consisted of six Pol IV molecules. Fluorescently tagged Rep, a replication accessory DNA helicase, was recruited to the Pol IV foci after DNA damage, suggesting that thein vitrointeraction between Rep and Pol IV reported previously also occursin vivo. Fluorescently tagged RecA also formed foci after DNA damage, and Pol IV localized to them. To investigate if Pol IV localizes to double-strand breaks (DSBs), an I-SceI endonuclease-mediated DSB was introduced close to a fluorescently labeled LacO array on the chromosome. After DSB induction, Pol IV localized to the DSB site in ∼70% of SOS-induced cells. RecA also formed foci at the DSB sites, and Pol IV localized to the RecA foci. These results suggest that Pol IV interacts with RecAin vivoand is recruited to sites of DSBs to aid in the restoration of DNA replication.IMPORTANCEDNA polymerase IV (Pol IV/DinB) is an error-prone DNA polymerase capable of bypassing DNA lesions and aiding in the restart of stalled replication forks. In this work, we demonstratein vivolocalization of fluorescently tagged Pol IV to the nucleoid after DNA damage and to DNA double-strand breaks. We show colocalization of Pol IV with two proteins: Rep DNA helicase, which participates in replication, and RecA, which catalyzes recombinational repair of stalled replication forks. Time course experiments suggest that Pol IV recruits Rep and that RecA recruits Pol IV. These findings providein vivoevidence that Pol IV aids in maintaining genomic stability not only by bypassing DNA lesions but also by participating in the restoration of stalled replication forks.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document