scholarly journals Antimicrobial Susceptibility Trends among Staphylococcus aureus Isolates from U.S. Hospitals: Results from 7 Years of the Ceftaroline (AWARE) Surveillance Program, 2010 to 2016

2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Rodrigo E. Mendes ◽  
Jennifer M. Streit ◽  
Robert K. Flamm

ABSTRACT We evaluated trends in Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial susceptibility in U.S. hospitals in the 2010–2016 period. A total of 21,056 clinical isolates from 42 medical centers were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) rates decreased from 50.0% (in 2010) to 42.2% (in 2016). Susceptibility to erythromycin, levofloxacin, and clindamycin increased slightly, whereas susceptibility to ceftaroline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline remained stable. Ceftaroline retained potent activity against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA (97.2% susceptible) with no marked variations.

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 2458-2461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Jennifer M. Streit ◽  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Ronald N. Jones

ABSTRACTA total of 84,704 isolates were collected from 191 medical centers in 2009 to 2013 and tested for susceptibility to ceftaroline and comparator agents by broth microdilution methods. Ceftaroline inhibited allStaphylococcus aureusisolates at ≤2 μg/ml and was very active against methicillin-resistant strains (MIC at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited [MIC90], 1 μg/ml; 97.6% susceptible). AmongStreptococcus pneumoniaeisolates, the highest ceftaroline MIC was 0.5 μg/ml, and ceftaroline activity against the most commonEnterobacteriaceaespecies (MIC50, 0.12 μg/ml; 78.9% susceptible) was similar to that of ceftriaxone (MIC50, ≤0.25 μg/ml; 86.8% susceptible).


2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (4) ◽  
pp. 2558-2563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Rodrigo E. Mendes ◽  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Ronald N. Jones

ABSTRACTWe evaluated the antimicrobial susceptibility of 1,454 organisms consecutively collected from patients with bacteremia associated with skin and skin structure infections. The most common organisms obtained wereStaphylococcus aureus(670 organisms [46.1%]),Escherichia coli(200 organisms [13.8%]), β-hemolytic streptococci (βHS) (138 organisms [9.5%]), andKlebsiella pneumoniae(109 organisms [7.5%]). The susceptibility rates for ceftaroline were 97.9% forS. aureus(95.9% among methicillin-resistantS. aureus[MRSA]), 100.0% for βHS, 86.5% forE. coli, and 89.0% forK. pneumoniae. Ceftaroline and tigecycline provided the best overall coverage.


2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 1982-1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Ronald N. Jones

ABSTRACTCeftaroline-avibactam and comparator agents were tested by the broth microdilution method against 20,089 isolates consecutively collected in 2010 and 2011 from 75 U.S. medical centers. Ceftaroline-avibactam was active againstEnterobacteriaceae(4,908 strains; MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml; highest MIC, 4 μg/ml), including meropenem-nonsusceptibleKlebsiellaspp. and ceftazidime-nonsusceptibleEnterobacter cloacaestrains (MIC90, 1 μg/ml for both). Ceftaroline-avibactam was also active against ceftriaxone-nonsusceptibleStreptococcus pneumoniae(MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml) and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MIC90, 1 μg/ml).


2017 ◽  
Vol 55 (4) ◽  
pp. 1025-1031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kunatum Prasidthrathsint ◽  
Mark A. Fisher

ABSTRACTAntimicrobial susceptibility patterns from 599A. defectiva,G. adiacens, andG. elegansclinical isolates were determined by broth microdilution. We observed significant differences in susceptibility across species, particularly to penicillin and ceftriaxone, and across geographical regions.A. defectivawas the least susceptible species overall to penicillin. All isolates were susceptible to vancomycin and >90% were susceptible to levofloxacin.


2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari A. Mergenhagen ◽  
Michael Croix ◽  
Kaitlyn E. Starr ◽  
John A. Sellick ◽  
Alan J. Lesse

ABSTRACT Treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a cornerstone of severe diabetic foot infections; however, antibiotics can be associated with toxicity. The objective of this study was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA nares screening in the determination of subsequent MRSA in patients with a diabetic foot infection. This was a retrospective cohort study across Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers from 1 January 2007 to 1 January 2018. Data from patients with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for a diabetic foot infection with MRSA nares screening, and subsequent cultures were evaluated for the presence of MRSA. NPVs were calculated for the entire cohort, as well as for a subgroup representing deep cultures. Additionally, the distribution of all pathogens isolated from diabetic foot infections was determined. A total of 8,163 episodes were included in the analysis for NPV. The NPV of MRSA nares screening for MRSA diabetic foot infection was 89.6%. For the deep cultures, the NPV was 89.2%. The NPV for cultures originating from the foot was 89.7%, and the NPV for those originating from the toe was 89.4%. There were 17,822 pathogens isolated from the diabetic foot cultures. MRSA was isolated in 7.5% of cultures, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus was isolated in 24.8%. Enterococcus was identified in 14.7% of cultures, Proteus in 7.3%, and Pseudomonas in 6.8% of cultures. Given the high NPVs, the use of MRSA nares screening may be appropriate as a stewardship tool for deescalation and avoidance of empirical anti-MRSA therapy in patients who are not nasal carries of MRSA.


2011 ◽  
Vol 55 (9) ◽  
pp. 4154-4160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra S. Richter ◽  
Kristopher P. Heilmann ◽  
Cassie L. Dohrn ◽  
Fathollah Riahi ◽  
Andrew J. Costello ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAStaphylococcus aureussurveillance program was initiated in the United States to examine thein vitroactivity of ceftaroline and epidemiologic trends. Susceptibility testing by Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute broth microdilution was performed on 4,210 clinically significant isolates collected in 2009 from 43 medical centers. All isolates were screened formecAby PCR and evaluated by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Methicillin-resistantS. aureus(MRSA) were analyzed for Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL) genes and the staphylococcal cassette chromosomemec(SCCmec) type. All isolates had ceftaroline MICs of ≤2 μg/ml with an MIC50of 0.5 and an MIC90of 1 μg/ml. The overall resistance rates, expressed as the percentages of isolates that were intermediate and resistant (or nonsusceptible), were as follows: ceftaroline, 1.0%; clindamycin, 30.2% (17.4% MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml; 12.8% inducible); daptomycin, 0.2%; erythromycin, 65.5%; levofloxacin, 39.9%; linezolid, 0.02%; oxacillin, 53.4%; tetracycline, 4.4%; tigecycline, 0%; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 1.6%; vancomycin, 0%; and high-level mupirocin, 2.2%. ThemecAPCR was positive for 53.4% of the isolates. The ceftaroline MIC90s were 0.25 μg/ml for methicillin-susceptibleS. aureusand 1 μg/ml for MRSA. Among the 2,247 MRSA isolates, 51% were USA300 (96.9% PVL positive, 99.7% SCCmectype IV) and 17% were USA100 (93.4% SCCmectype II). The resistance rates for the 1,137 USA300 MRSA isolates were as follows: erythromycin, 90.9%; levofloxacin, 49.1%; clindamycin, 7.6% (6.2% MIC ≥ 4 μg/ml; 1.4% inducible); tetracycline, 3.3%; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 0.8%; high-level mupirocin, 2.7%; daptomycin, 0.4%; and ceftaroline and linezolid, 0%. USA300 is the dominant clone causing MRSA infections in the United States. Ceftaroline demonstrated potentin vitroactivity against recentS. aureusclinical isolates, including MRSA, daptomycin-nonsusceptible, and linezolid-resistant strains.


2012 ◽  
Vol 56 (6) ◽  
pp. 2933-2940 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Ronald N. Jones

ABSTRACTTheAssessingWorldwideAntimicrobialResistanceEvaluation (AWARE) surveillance program is a sentinel resistance monitoring system designed to track the activity of ceftaroline and comparator agents. In the United States, a total of 8,434 isolates were collected during the 2010 surveillance program from 65 medical centers distributed across the nine census regions (5 to 10 medical centers per region). All organisms were isolated from documented infections, including 3,055 (36.2%) bloodstream infections, 2,282 (27.1%) respiratory tract infections, 1,965 (23.3%) acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections, 665 (7.9%) urinary tract infections, and 467 (5.5%) miscellaneous other infection sites. Ceftaroline was the most potent β-lactam agent tested against staphylococci. The MIC90values were 1 μg/ml for methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA; 98.4% susceptible) and 0.5 μg/ml for methicillin-resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS). Ceftaroline was 16- to 32-fold more potent than ceftriaxone against methicillin-susceptible staphylococcal strains. All staphylococcus isolates (S. aureusand CoNS) were inhibited at ceftaroline MIC values of ≤2 μg/ml. Ceftaroline also displayed potent activity against streptococci (MIC90, 0.015 μg/ml for beta-hemolytic streptococci; MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml for penicillin-resistantStreptococcus pneumoniae). Potent activity was also shown against Gram-negative pathogens (Haemophilus influenzae,Haemophilus parainfluenzae, andMoraxella catarrhalis). Furthermore, wild-type strains ofEnterobacteriaceae(non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase [ESBL]-producing strains and non-AmpC-hyperproducing strains) were often susceptible to ceftaroline. Continued monitoring through surveillance networks will allow for the assessment of the evolution of resistance as this new cephalosporin is used more broadly to provide clinicians with up-to-date information to assist in antibiotic stewardship and therapeutic decision making.


2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 1922-1930 ◽  
Author(s):  
William L. Kelley ◽  
Ambre Jousselin ◽  
Christine Barras ◽  
Emmanuelle Lelong ◽  
Adriana Renzoni

ABSTRACTThe development and maintenance of an arsenal of antibiotics is a major health care challenge. Ceftaroline is a new cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MRSA); however, no reports concerning MRSA ceftaroline susceptibility have been reported in Switzerland. We tested thein vitroactivity of ceftaroline against an archived set of 60 MRSA strains from the University Hospital of Geneva collected from 1994 to 2003. Our results surprisingly revealed ceftaroline-resistant strains (MIC, >1 μg/ml in 40/60 strains; EUCAST breakpoints, susceptible [S], ≤1 μg/ml; resistant [R], >1 μg/ml) were present from 1998 to 2003. The detected resistant strains predominantly belonged to sequence type 228 (ST228) (South German clonotype) but also to ST247 (Iberian clonotype). A sequence analysis of these strains revealed missense mutations in the penicillin-binding protein 2A (PBP2A) allosteric domain (N146K or E239K and N146K-E150K-G246E). The majority of our ST228 PBP2A mutations (N146K or E150K) were distinct from ST228 PBP2A allosteric domain mutations (primarily E239K) recently described for MRSA strains collected in Thailand and Spain during the 2010 Assessing Worldwide Antimicrobial Resistance Evaluation (AWARE) global surveillance program. We also found that similar allosteric domain PBP2A mutations (N146K) correlated with ceftaroline resistance in an independent external ST228 MRSA set obtained from the nearby University Hospital of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland, collected from 2003 to 2008. Thus, ceftaroline resistance was observed in our archived strains (including two examples of an MIC of 4 µg/ml for the Iberian ST247 clonotype with the triple mutation N146K/E150K/G246E), at least as far back as 1998, considerably predating the commercial introduction of ceftaroline. Our results reinforce the notion that unknown parameters can potentially exert selective pressure on PBP2A that can subsequently modulate ceftaroline resistance.


2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
pp. 5721-5726 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo E. Mendes ◽  
Myrna Mendoza ◽  
Kirnpal K. Banga Singh ◽  
Mariana Castanheira ◽  
Jan M. Bell ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTThe Regional Resistance Surveillance program monitored susceptibility rates and developing resistance by geographic region, including 12 Asia-Pacific (APAC) countries. Reference broth microdilution methods for susceptibility/interpretations were applied, processing 5,053 strains. AmongStaphylococcus aureusisolates (37% methicillin-resistantS. aureus[MRSA], highest in South Korea [73%]), linezolid (LZD), tigecycline (TIG), and vancomycin were 100% active, but 33 and 34% of strains were levofloxacin (LEV) or macrolide resistant, respectively.Streptococcus pneumoniaewas most resistant to β-lactams and macrolides (45%) but was LZD, LEV, and TIG susceptible (>98%). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) phenotype rates inEscherichia coliandKlebsiellaspp. were 48 and 47%, respectively, and were highest in Taiwan, at 75 to 91%. The best anti-ESBL-phenotype agents were amikacin (81 to 96% susceptible), colistin (COL; >98%), TIG (>98%), and carbapenems (81 to 97%).Pseudomonas aeruginosashowed ≥20% resistance to all drugs except COL (99% susceptible). In conclusion, endemic evolving antimicrobial resistances in APAC nations show compromised roles for many commonly used antimicrobials.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document