scholarly journals Utility of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Nares Screening for Patients with a Diabetic Foot Infection

2020 ◽  
Vol 64 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kari A. Mergenhagen ◽  
Michael Croix ◽  
Kaitlyn E. Starr ◽  
John A. Sellick ◽  
Alan J. Lesse
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infection ◽  
Entire Cohort ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Classification Of Diseases

ABSTRACT Treatment of suspected methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a cornerstone of severe diabetic foot infections; however, antibiotics can be associated with toxicity. The objective of this study was to determine the negative predictive value (NPV) of MRSA nares screening in the determination of subsequent MRSA in patients with a diabetic foot infection. This was a retrospective cohort study across Veterans Affairs (VA) medical centers from 1 January 2007 to 1 January 2018. Data from patients with an International Classification of Diseases (ICD) code for a diabetic foot infection with MRSA nares screening, and subsequent cultures were evaluated for the presence of MRSA. NPVs were calculated for the entire cohort, as well as for a subgroup representing deep cultures. Additionally, the distribution of all pathogens isolated from diabetic foot infections was determined. A total of 8,163 episodes were included in the analysis for NPV. The NPV of MRSA nares screening for MRSA diabetic foot infection was 89.6%. For the deep cultures, the NPV was 89.2%. The NPV for cultures originating from the foot was 89.7%, and the NPV for those originating from the toe was 89.4%. There were 17,822 pathogens isolated from the diabetic foot cultures. MRSA was isolated in 7.5% of cultures, and methicillin-susceptible S. aureus was isolated in 24.8%. Enterococcus was identified in 14.7% of cultures, Proteus in 7.3%, and Pseudomonas in 6.8% of cultures. Given the high NPVs, the use of MRSA nares screening may be appropriate as a stewardship tool for deescalation and avoidance of empirical anti-MRSA therapy in patients who are not nasal carries of MRSA.

scholarly journals How Do Preoperative Antibiotics Affect Culture Yield in Diabetic Foot Infections?

2017 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather Young ◽  
Whitney Miller ◽  
Randy Burnham ◽  
Susan Heard ◽  
Chrystal Berg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Gram Negative ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infection ◽  
Negative Results ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Preoperative Antibiotics ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Culture Negative ◽  
Culture Yield

abstractThe impact of preoperative antibiotics on culture of diabetic foot infection samples has not been studied. We found that increasing exposure to preoperative antibiotics was associated with less frequent growth of streptococci and anaerobes and more culture-negative results. In contrast, the yield of Staphylococcus aureus and Gram-negative bacilli was unaffected.

scholarly journals Ceftaroline Activity against Bacterial Pathogens Frequently Isolated in U.S. Medical Centers: Results from Five Years of the AWARE Surveillance Program

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 2458-2461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Jennifer M. Streit ◽  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Ronald N. Jones
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Streptococcus Pneumoniae ◽  
Bacterial Pathogens ◽  
Surveillance Program ◽  
Broth Microdilution ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Content Type ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Resistant Strains

ABSTRACTA total of 84,704 isolates were collected from 191 medical centers in 2009 to 2013 and tested for susceptibility to ceftaroline and comparator agents by broth microdilution methods. Ceftaroline inhibited allStaphylococcus aureusisolates at ≤2 μg/ml and was very active against methicillin-resistant strains (MIC at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited [MIC90], 1 μg/ml; 97.6% susceptible). AmongStreptococcus pneumoniaeisolates, the highest ceftaroline MIC was 0.5 μg/ml, and ceftaroline activity against the most commonEnterobacteriaceaespecies (MIC50, 0.12 μg/ml; 78.9% susceptible) was similar to that of ceftriaxone (MIC50, ≤0.25 μg/ml; 86.8% susceptible).

scholarly journals Diabetic Foot Infections: Local Prevalence of and Case–Control Study of Risk Factors for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Justin J Kim ◽  
Alison Lydecker ◽  
Rohini Davé ◽  
Jacqueline T Bork ◽  
Mary-Claire Roghmann
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Pseudomonas Aeruginosa ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Case Control Study ◽  
Case Control ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Control Study

Abstract We identified deep diabetic foot infections by culture and conducted a case–control study examining the risk factors for moderate to severe methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PsA) diabetic foot infections. Our MRSA prevalence was lower than literature values; PsA was higher. Gangrene may be predictive of Pseudomonas infection.

Hospitalization of paediatric patients for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft-tissue infection, 1998–2006

2009 ◽  
Vol 138 (5) ◽  
pp. 677-682 ◽  
Author(s):  
K. D. SIRCAR ◽  
E. BANCROFT ◽  
D. M. NGUYEN ◽  
L. MASCOLA
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Los Angeles ◽  
Soft Tissue Infection ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Incidence Rates ◽  
Tissue Infection ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Classification Of Diseases

SUMMARYHospital discharge reports have provided data for studies of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) skin and soft-tissue infection (SSTI) studies. This analysis determined the sensitivity and positive predictive value of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) code combinations to calculate hospitalization incidence rates, representativeness of a set of three ICD-9-CM codes to define MRSA SSTI, and hospitalization incidence rate trends for paediatric MRSA SSTIs in Los Angeles County (LAC). Using 133 cases from 31 hospitals, we found that the set of three ICD-9-CM codes used to define laboratory-confirmed cases had one of the highest positive predictive values (49%). There was no difference in age and race between those categorized using three codes vs. other code combinations. A dramatic increase in paediatric MRSA SSTI cases occurred in LAC during 1998–2006. We conclude that this combination of codes may be used to determine the rise of MRSA SSTIs in paediatric populations.

Daptomycin for Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Diabetic Foot Infections

2014 ◽  
Vol 104 (2) ◽  
pp. 159-168 ◽  
Author(s):  
Warren S. Joseph ◽  
Thomas Quast ◽  
Alberto Cogo ◽  
Monica G. Crompton ◽  
Min Jung Yoon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Clinical Success ◽  
Initial Therapy ◽  
Antibiotic Agent ◽  
Negative Effects ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Antibiotic Drug

Background Diabetic foot infection (DFI) is a serious, difficult-to-treat infection, especially when caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Vancomycin has been the standard treatment for MRSA infection, but lower response rates in MRSA skin infections have been reported. This analysis assessed the outcome and safety of daptomycin therapy in patients with a DFI caused by MRSA. Methods Using the Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience and the European Cubicin Outcomes Registry and Experience (2006–2009), 79 patients with MRSA DFI were identified and included in this analysis. Results In the 74 evaluable patients, daptomycin was administered at a median dose of 4.8 mg/kg primarily every 24 hours (85.1%) and for a median of 15.0 days. Overall, 77.0% of the patients (57 of 74) received initial therapy with activity against MRSA; however, of patients receiving daptomycin as second-line therapy (n = 31), only 45.2% were treated with an antibiotic agent active against MRSA. The overall clinical success and treatment failure rates were 89.2% and 10.8%, respectively. Success with daptomycin therapy was higher in patients who had surgery and in those whose initial therapy was daptomycin. Eleven patients had 14 adverse events, two of which were possibly related to daptomycin use and led to discontinuation. Conclusions In a large real-world cohort of patients with MRSA DFI, daptomycin therapy was shown to be generally well tolerated and effective. The use of an anti-MRSA antibiotic agent should be considered when implementing first-line antibiotic drug therapy for DFI in countries where MRSA is common to avoid inappropriate empirical treatment and potential negative effects on outcomes.

Correlation Between Patients With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Nares Colonization and MRSA Diabetic Foot Infections

2020 ◽  
pp. 153473462096357
Author(s):  
Jacquelyn Brondo ◽  
Kathleen Morneau ◽  
Teri Hopkins ◽  
Linda Yang ◽  
Jose Cadena-Zuluaga ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Empiric Therapy ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections ◽  
Prior Literature ◽  
Mrsa Infection

Infectious Diseases Society of America diabetic foot infection (DFI) guidelines indicate empiric methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) coverage for patients with a history of MRSA infection, when local prevalence of MRSA is high, or infection is clinically severe. These recommendations may lead to overutilization of empiric MRSA coverage, which can result in serious consequences. A strong negative predictive value (NPV) has been reported in literature for pneumonia, and recently, for all anatomical sites of infection. While these findings are promising, further validation is needed before clinicians may confidently use MRSA nares to guide empiric therapy for DFIs. A retrospective electronic medical record review was completed between October 1, 2013 and October 1, 2019. Patients met inclusion criteria if they were at least 18, admitted with a DFI, had MRSA nares test results, and DFI cultures. Patients were excluded if pregnant or MRSA infection within 1 year prior to index admission for DFI. A total of 200 patients met inclusion criteria. The majority of study participants were male with a mean age of 63. NPV of MRSA nares for MRSA DFIs was determined to be 94% and positive predictive value 58%. Sensitivity and specificity were 56% and 94%, respectively. Results of this study are consistent with prior literature supporting strong correlation of NPV for MRSA nares. The DFIs evaluated suggest a strong NPV of MRSA nares for MRSA DFIs, which may allow for faster de-escalation of empiric anti-MRSA antibiotic therapy and lower risk of adverse events associated with anti-MRSA therapy.

scholarly journals Risk factors for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in diabetic foot infections

2014 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 23575 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lawrence A. Lavery ◽  
Javier La Fontaine ◽  
Kavita Bhavan ◽  
Paul J. Kim ◽  
Jayme R. Williams ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Diabetic Foot ◽  
Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Diabetic Foot Infections

Evaluation of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification Codes for Reporting Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections at a Hospital in Illinois

2010 ◽  
Vol 31 (05) ◽  
pp. 463-468 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melissa K. Schaefer ◽  
Katherine Ellingson ◽  
Craig Conover ◽  
Alicia E. Genisca ◽  
Donna Currie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Staphylococcus Aureus ◽  
International Classification Of Diseases ◽  
International Classification ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Methicillin Resistant ◽  
Diagnosis Codes ◽  
Classification Of Diseases ◽  
Mrsa Infection ◽  
Healthcare Associated

Background. States, including Illinois, have passed legislation mandating the use of International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes for reporting healthcare-associated infections, such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Objective. To evaluate the sensitivity of ICD-9-CM code combinations for detection of MRSA infection and to understand implications for reporting. Methods. We reviewed discharge and microbiology databases from July through August of 2005, 2006, and 2007 for ICD-9-CM codes or microbiology results suggesting MRSA infection at a tertiary care hospital near Chicago, Illinois. Medical records were reviewed to confirm MRSA infection. Time from admission to first positive MRSA culture result was evaluated to identify hospital-onset MRSA (HO-MRSA) infections. The sensitivity of MRSA code combinations for detecting confirmed MRSA infections was calculated using all codes present in the discharge record (up to 15); the effect of reviewing only 9 diagnosis codes, the number reported to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, was also evaluated. The sensitivity of the combination of diagnosis codes for detection of HO-MRSA infections was compared with that for community-onset MRSA (CO-MRSA) infections. Results. We identified 571 potential MRSA infections with the use of screening criteria; 403 (71%) were confirmed MRSA infections, of which 61 (15%) were classified as HO-MRSA. The sensitivity of MRSA code combinations was 59% for all confirmed MRSA infections when 15 diagnoses were reviewed compared with 31% if only 9 diagnoses were reviewed (P < .001). The sensitivity of code combinations was 33% for HO-MRSA infections compared with 62% for CO-MRSA infections (P < .001). Conclusions. Limiting analysis to 9 diagnosis codes resulted in low sensitivity. Furthermore, code combinations were better at revealing CO-MRSA infections than HO-MRSA infections. These limitations could compromise the validity of ICD-9-CM codes for interfacility comparisons and for reporting of healthcare-associated MRSA infections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document