scholarly journals Antimicrobial Activity of Ceftaroline-Avibactam Tested against Clinical Isolates Collected from U.S. Medical Centers in 2010-2011

2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (4) ◽  
pp. 1982-1988 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Ronald N. Jones

ABSTRACTCeftaroline-avibactam and comparator agents were tested by the broth microdilution method against 20,089 isolates consecutively collected in 2010 and 2011 from 75 U.S. medical centers. Ceftaroline-avibactam was active againstEnterobacteriaceae(4,908 strains; MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml; highest MIC, 4 μg/ml), including meropenem-nonsusceptibleKlebsiellaspp. and ceftazidime-nonsusceptibleEnterobacter cloacaestrains (MIC90, 1 μg/ml for both). Ceftaroline-avibactam was also active against ceftriaxone-nonsusceptibleStreptococcus pneumoniae(MIC90, 0.25 μg/ml) and methicillin-resistantStaphylococcus aureus(MIC90, 1 μg/ml).

2015 ◽  
Vol 59 (4) ◽  
pp. 2458-2461 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Jennifer M. Streit ◽  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Ronald N. Jones

ABSTRACTA total of 84,704 isolates were collected from 191 medical centers in 2009 to 2013 and tested for susceptibility to ceftaroline and comparator agents by broth microdilution methods. Ceftaroline inhibited allStaphylococcus aureusisolates at ≤2 μg/ml and was very active against methicillin-resistant strains (MIC at which 90% of the isolates tested are inhibited [MIC90], 1 μg/ml; 97.6% susceptible). AmongStreptococcus pneumoniaeisolates, the highest ceftaroline MIC was 0.5 μg/ml, and ceftaroline activity against the most commonEnterobacteriaceaespecies (MIC50, 0.12 μg/ml; 78.9% susceptible) was similar to that of ceftriaxone (MIC50, ≤0.25 μg/ml; 86.8% susceptible).


2019 ◽  
Vol 63 (10) ◽  
Author(s):  
Aubrey Watson ◽  
Jun Taek Oh ◽  
Karen Sauve ◽  
Patricia A. Bradford ◽  
Cara Cassino ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Exebacase, a recombinantly produced lysin (cell wall hydrolase), and comparator antibiotics were tested by the broth microdilution method against strain sets of Staphylococcus and Streptococcus spp., which are the most common causes of infective endocarditis in humans. Exebacase was active against all Staphylococcus spp. tested, including S. aureus and coagulase-negative staphylococci (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml). Activity against Streptococcus spp. was variable, with S. pyogenes, S. agalactiae, and S. dysgalactiae (MIC50/90, 1/2 μg/ml) among the most susceptible.


2014 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 702-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo E. Mendes ◽  
David J. Farrell ◽  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Ronald N. Jones

ABSTRACTTelavancin had MIC50and MIC90values of 0.03 and 0.06 μg/ml (100.0% susceptible), respectively, against methicillin-resistant and -susceptibleStaphylococcus aureus. Telavancin was active against vancomycin-susceptibleEnterococcus faecalis(MIC50/90, 0.12/0.12 μg/ml; 100% susceptible) andEnterococcus faecium(MIC50/90, 0.03/0.06 μg/ml), while higher MIC values were obtained against vancomycin-resistantE. faecium(MIC50/90, 1/2 μg/ml) andE. faecalis(MIC50/90, >2/>2 μg/ml). Streptococci showed telavancin modal MIC results of ≤0.015 μg/ml, except againstStreptococcus agalactiae(i.e., 0.03 μg/ml). This study reestablishes the telavancin spectrum of activity against isolates recovered from the United States (2011-2012) using the revised broth microdilution method.


2018 ◽  
Vol 62 (7) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Glenn E. Dale ◽  
Paul R. Rhomberg ◽  
Robert K. Flamm

ABSTRACT Murepavadin (formerly POL7080), a 14-amino-acid cyclic peptide, and comparators were tested by the broth microdilution method against 1,219 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from 112 medical centers. Murepavadin (MIC 50/90 , 0.12/0.12 mg/liter) was 4- to 8-fold more active than colistin (MIC 50/90 , 1/1 mg/liter) and polymyxin B (MIC 50/90 , 0.5/1 mg/liter) and inhibited 99.1% of isolates at ≤0.5 mg/liter. Only 4 isolates (0.3%) exhibited murepavadin MICs of >2 mg/liter. Murepavadin was equally active against isolates from Europe, the United States, and China.


2002 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 783-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Virginia D. Shortridge ◽  
Ping Zhong ◽  
Zhensheng Cao ◽  
Jill M. Beyer ◽  
Laurel S. Almer ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The activity of a new ketolide, ABT-773, was compared to the activity of the ketolide telithromycin (HMR-3647) against over 600 gram-positive clinical isolates, including 356 Streptococcus pneumoniae, 167 Staphylococcus aureus, and 136 Streptococcus pyogenes isolates. Macrolide-susceptible isolates as well as macrolide-resistant isolates with ribosomal methylase (Erm), macrolide efflux (Mef), and ribosomal mutations were tested using the NCCLS reference broth microdilution method. Both compounds were extremely active against macrolide-susceptible isolates, with the minimum inhibitory concentrations at which 90% of the isolates tested were inhibited (MIC90s) for susceptible streptococci and staphylococci ranging from 0.002 to 0.03 μg/ml for ABT-773 and 0.008 to 0.06 μg/ml for telithromycin. ABT-773 had increased activities against macrolide-resistant S. pneumoniae (Erm MIC90, 0.015 μg/ml; Mef MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml) compared to those of telithromycin (Erm MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml; Mef MIC90, 1 μg/ml). Both compounds were active against strains with rRNA or ribosomal protein mutations (MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml). ABT-773 was also more active against macrolide-resistant S. pyogenes (ABT-773 Erm MIC90, 0.5 μg/ml; ABT-773 Mef MIC90, 0.12 μg/ml; telithromycin Erm MIC90, >8 μg/ml; telithromycin Mef MIC90, 1.0 μg/ml). Both compounds lacked activity against constitutive macrolide-resistant Staphylococcus aureus but had good activities against inducibly resistant Staphylococcus aureus (ABT-773 MIC90, 0.06 μg/ml; telithromycin MIC90, 0.5 μg/ml). ABT-773 has superior activity against macrolide-resistant streptococci compared to that of telithromycin.


2013 ◽  
Vol 57 (7) ◽  
pp. 3178-3181 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Robert K. Flamm ◽  
Ronald N. Jones

ABSTRACTVancomycin, linezolid, and daptomycin are very active against staphylococci, but isolates with decreased susceptibility to these antimicrobial agents are isolated sporadically. A total of 19,350Staphylococcus aureusisolates (51% methicillin resistant [MRSA]) and 3,270 coagulase-negative staphylococci (CoNS) were collected consecutively from 82 U.S. medical centers from January 2008 to December 2011 and tested for susceptibility against ceftaroline and comparator agents by the reference broth microdilution method. AmongS. aureusstrains, 14 isolates (0.07%) exhibited decreased susceptibility to linezolid (MIC, ≥8 μg/ml), 18 (0.09%) to daptomycin (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml), and 369 (1.9%) to vancomycin (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml; 368 isolates at 2 μg/ml and 1 at 4 μg/ml). Fifty-one (1.6%) CoNS were linezolid resistant (MIC, ≥8 μg/ml), and four (0.12%) were daptomycin nonsusceptible (MIC, ≥2 μg/ml). Ceftaroline was very active againstS. aureusoverall (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 98.5% susceptible), including MRSA (MIC50/90, 0.5/1 μg/ml; 97.2% susceptible). All daptomycin-nonsusceptible and 85.7% of linezolid-resistantS. aureusisolates were susceptible to ceftaroline. AgainstS. aureusisolates with a vancomycin MIC of ≥2 μg/ml, 91.9, 96.2, and 98.9% were susceptible to ceftaroline, daptomycin, and linezolid, respectively. CoNS strains were susceptible to ceftaroline (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml; 99.1% inhibited at ≤1 μg/ml), including methicillin-resistant (MIC50/90, 0.25/0.5 μg/ml), linezolid-resistant (MIC50/90, 0.5/0.5 μg/ml), and daptomycin-nonsusceptible (4 isolates; MIC range, 0.03 to 0.12 μg/ml) strains. In conclusion, ceftaroline demonstrated potentin vitroactivity against staphylococci with reduced susceptibility to linezolid, daptomycin, or vancomycin, and it may represent a valuable treatment option for infections caused by these multidrug-resistant staphylococci.


2017 ◽  
Vol 61 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Helio S. Sader ◽  
Rodrigo E. Mendes ◽  
Jennifer M. Streit ◽  
Robert K. Flamm

ABSTRACT We evaluated trends in Staphylococcus aureus antimicrobial susceptibility in U.S. hospitals in the 2010–2016 period. A total of 21,056 clinical isolates from 42 medical centers were tested for susceptibility by broth microdilution methods. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) rates decreased from 50.0% (in 2010) to 42.2% (in 2016). Susceptibility to erythromycin, levofloxacin, and clindamycin increased slightly, whereas susceptibility to ceftaroline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and tetracycline remained stable. Ceftaroline retained potent activity against methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA) and MRSA (97.2% susceptible) with no marked variations.


2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1934578X1801300 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marina Milenković ◽  
Jelena Stošović ◽  
Violeta Slavkovska

The subject of the study was the investigation of the chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of the essential oils (EOs) isolated from Calamintha sylvatica, C. vardarensis, C. nepeta and C. glandulosa, as well as their antibacterial activity in combination with antibiotics. The quantitative and qualitative analysis of EOs was performed using the GC/FID and GC/MS methods. The antimicrobial activity of EOs against six standard bacterial strains and one strain of yeast was tested using the broth microdilution method, while the antimicrobial activity of a combination of essential oils and gentamicin/ciprofloxacin was tested by the checkerboard method. The dominant components (> 10%) of the essential oils were: cis-piperitone epoxide and menthone ( C. sylvatica), pulegone and menthone ( C. vardarensis), pulegone and piperitenone ( C. nepeta), pulegone, piperitenone, menthone and piperitone ( C. glandulosa). EOs did not exhibit significant antimicrobial activity except the essential oil of C. vardarensis which was selectively active against Staphylococcus aureus (MIC - 21.25 μg/mL). The overall effect of essential oil-antibiotic combinations varied from synergistic (FICI ≤ 0.5) to antagonistic (FICI ≥ 2) depending on the bacterial strain tested.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document