scholarly journals Polymyxin Susceptibility Testing and Interpretive Breakpoints: Recommendations from the United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (USCAST)

2019 ◽  
Vol 64 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason M. Pogue ◽  
Ronald N. Jones ◽  
John S. Bradley ◽  
David R. Andes ◽  
Sujata M. Bhavnani ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT The polymyxins are important agents for carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacilli. The United States Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing breakpoint recommendations for colistin and polymyxin B are that isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, and Enterobacteriaceae are considered susceptible at MIC values of ≤2 mg/liter. These recommendations are contingent upon dosing and testing strategies that are described in this commentary. Importantly, these recommendations are not applicable to lower respiratory tract infections, for which we recommend no breakpoints. Furthermore, there is no breakpoint recommendation for polymyxin B for lower urinary tract infections.

2016 ◽  
Vol 60 (10) ◽  
pp. 6418-6421 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nyssa Dixon ◽  
Randal C. Fowler ◽  
A. Yoshizumi ◽  
Tsukasa Horiyama ◽  
Y. Ishii ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTA novel metallo-β-lactamase gene,blaIMP-27, was identified in unrelatedProteus mirabilisisolates from two geographically distinct locations in the United States. Both isolates harborblaIMP-27as part of the first gene cassette in a class 2 integron. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing indicated susceptibility to aztreonam, piperacillin-tazobactam, and ceftazidime but resistance to ertapenem. However, hydrolysis assays indicated that ceftazidime was a substrate for IMP-27.


2019 ◽  
Vol 57 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Romney M. Humphries ◽  
Daniel A. Green ◽  
Audrey N. Schuetz ◽  
Yehudit Bergman ◽  
Shawna Lewis ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Susceptibility testing of the polymyxins (colistin and polymyxin B) is challenging for clinical laboratories. The Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing Subcommittee evaluated two methods to enable accurate testing of these agents. These methods were a colistin broth disk elution (CBDE) and a colistin agar test (CAT), the latter of which was evaluated using two inoculum volumes, 1 μl (CAT-1) and 10 μl (CAT-10). The methods were evaluated using a collection of 270 isolates of Enterobacterales, 122 Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates, and 106 Acinetobacter spp. isolates. Overall, 94.4% of CBDE results were in essential agreement and 97.9% in categorical agreement (CA) with reference broth microdilution MICs. Nine very major errors (VME; 3.2%) and 3 major errors (ME; 0.9%) were observed. With the CBDE, 98.6% CA was observed for Enterobacterales (2.5% VME, 0% ME), 99.3% CA was observed for P. aeruginosa (0% VME, 0.7% ME), and 93.1% CA was observed for Acinetobacter spp. (5.6% VME, 3.3% ME). Overall, CA was 94.9% with 6.8% VME using CAT-1 and improved to 98.3% with 3.9% VME using CAT-10. No ME were observed using either CAT-1 or CAT-10. Using the CAT-1/CAT-10, the CA observed was 99.4%/99.7% for Enterobacterales (1%/0.5% VME), 98.7%/100% for P. aeruginosa (8.3%/0% VME), and 88.5%/92.3% for Acinetobacter spp. (21.4%/14.3% VME). Based on these data, the CLSI antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) subcommittee endorsed the CBDE and CAT-10 methods for colistin testing of Enterobacterales and P. aeruginosa.


2020 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. e01649-20 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Paul Morris ◽  
Yehudit Bergman ◽  
Tsigedera Tekle ◽  
John A. Fissel ◽  
Pranita D. Tamma ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTAntimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of cefiderocol poses challenges because of its unique mechanism of action (i.e., requiring an iron-depleted state) and due to differences in interpretative criteria established by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). Our objective was to compare cefiderocol disk diffusion methods (DD) to broth microdilution (BMD) for AST of Gram-negative bacilli (GNB). Cefiderocol AST was performed on consecutive carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE; 58 isolates) and non-glucose-fermenting GNB (50 isolates) by BMD (lyophilized panels; Sensititre; Thermo Fisher) and DD (30 μg; research-use-only [RUO] MASTDISCS and FDA-cleared HardyDisks). Results were interpreted using FDA (prior to 28 September 2020 update), EUCAST, and investigational CLSI breakpoints (BPs). Categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (mE), major errors (ME), and very major errors (VME) were calculated for DD methods. The susceptibilities of all isolates by BMD were 72% (FDA), 75% (EUCAST) and 90% (CLSI). For DD methods, EUCAST BPs demonstrated lower susceptibility at 65% and 66%, compared to 74% and 72% (FDA) and 87% and 89% (CLSI) by HardyDisks and MASTDISCS, respectively. CA ranged from 75% to 90%, with 8 to 25% mE, 0 to 19% ME, and 0 to 20% VME and varied based on disk, GNB, and BPs evaluated. Both DD methods performed poorly for Acinetobacter baumannii complex. There is considerable variability when cefiderocol ASTs are interpreted using CLSI, FDA, and EUCAST breakpoints. DD offers a convenient alternative approach to BMD methods for cefiderocol AST, with the exception of A. baumannii complex isolates.


2013 ◽  
Vol 62 (8) ◽  
pp. 1184-1189 ◽  
Author(s):  
Djuli M. Hermes ◽  
Caroline Pormann Pitt ◽  
Larissa Lutz ◽  
Aline B. Teixeira ◽  
Vanessa B. Ribeiro ◽  
...  

One hundred and twenty-four Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were selected for antimicrobial susceptibility testing with anti-pseudomonal agents, MIC determination for polymyxin B and metallo-beta-lactamase detection (genes bla SPM, bla VIM-1, bla NDM-1 and bla IMP). According to the imipenem and/or meropenem susceptibility profile, a set of randomly selected isolates (12 isolates carbapenem-susceptible and 12 isolates carbapenem-resistant) were evaluated for heteroresistance to polymyxin B. Heteroresistance testing was performed by plating the isolates onto increasing concentrations of polymyxin B (from 0 to 8.0 mg l–1). The population analysis profile (PAP) was defined as the ratio of the number of colony-forming units on the plate with the highest concentration of polymyxin B at which bacterial growth occurred against the number of colony-forming units on the plate without antibiotic. Isolates presenting subpopulations that exhibited growth at polymyxin B concentrations ≥2 mg l–1 were considered heteroresistant. Isolates containing subpopulations that grew at polymyxin B concentrations at least twice as high as the original MIC but <2 mg l–1 were considered heterogeneous. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing results indicated a variable degree of susceptibility: high levels of resistance to gentamicin (30.6 %) and imipenem (29.0 %); low levels of resistance to aztreonam (1.6 %) and ciprofloxacin (4.8 %). All isolates were susceptible to polymyxin B: MIC50 and MIC90 were 1 mg l–1 and 2 mg l–1, respectively. Thirty-seven isolates (30 %) were carbapenem-resistant. Four isolates resistant to carbapenems were positive for bla IMP. There were no heteroresistant subpopulations in the carbapenem-susceptible group, but three isolates presented heterogeneous subpopulations. The PAP frequency ranged from 2.1×10−4 to 6.9×10−8. In the carbapenem-resistant group, one isolate was heteroresistant. Six isolates in this group presented heterogeneous subpopulations. In the resistant population, the PAP frequency ranged from 2.1×10−7 to 2.6×10−4. In this study, polymyxin B heteroresistance in P. aeruginosa was uncommon and occurred in only one carbapenem-resistant isolate, despite the fact that several isolates presented heterogeneous subpopulations with increased polymyxin B MICs.


2017 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 669-675 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Dargatz ◽  
Matthew M. Erdman ◽  
Beth Harris

Antimicrobial resistance is a serious threat to animal and human health worldwide, requiring a collaborative, holistic approach. The U.S. Government has developed a national strategy to address antimicrobial resistance, with one component being to monitor antimicrobial resistance in agricultural settings. We developed a survey to collect information about antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) from the veterinary diagnostic laboratory community in the United States, assessing current practices and technologies and determining how AST information is shared. Of the 132 surveys administered, 52 (39%) were returned. Overall, responding laboratories conducted susceptibility tests on 98,788 bacterial isolates in 2014, with Escherichia coli being the most common pathogen tested across all animal species. The 2 most common AST methods employed were the disk diffusion method (71%) and the Sensititre platform broth microdilution system (59%). Laboratories primarily used the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) VET-01 standard (69%) and the automatically calculated interpretations provided by the commercial AST systems (61%) for interpreting their AST data. Only 22% of laboratories published AST data on a periodic basis, usually via annual reports published on the laboratory’s website or through peer-reviewed journals for specific pathogens. Our results confirm that disk diffusion and broth microdilution remain the standard AST methods employed by U.S. veterinary diagnostic laboratories, and that CLSI standards are commonly used for interpreting AST results. This information will help determine the most efficient standardized methodology for future surveillance. Furthermore, the current infrastructure within laboratories, once harmonized, will help provide a mechanism for conducting national surveillance programs.


2010 ◽  
Vol 54 (8) ◽  
pp. 3489-3492 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra O'Keefe ◽  
Tabitha A. Hutton ◽  
Dieter M. Schifferli ◽  
Shelley C. Rankin

ABSTRACT One hundred fifty canine and feline Escherichia coli isolates associated with urinary tract infections were screened for the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes. Out of 60 isolates suspected to be ESBL positive based on antimicrobial susceptibility testing, 11 ESBLs were identified, including one SHV-12 gene, one CTX-M-14 gene, and nine CTX-M-15 genes. This study provides the first report of CTX-M- and SHV-type ESBLs in dogs and cats in the United States.


2018 ◽  
Vol 56 (4) ◽  
pp. e01892-17
Author(s):  
Meredith A. Hackel ◽  
Joseph P. Iaconis ◽  
James A. Karlowsky ◽  
Daniel F. Sahm

ABSTRACT Ceftaroline fosamil was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration in 2010 and by the European Medicines Agency in 2012. As of April 2017, only one commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing device offered a Gram-negative panel that included ceftaroline. This circumstance is unfortunate, as many clinical microbiology laboratories rely solely on commercial devices to generate in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility testing results for common bacterial pathogens. In lieu of device-based testing of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, laboratories wishing to test ceftaroline must either opt for disk diffusion testing or use a gradient strip; however, both alternatives interrupt laboratory workflow and require additional labor and expense. Identification of a reliable surrogate β-lactam to predict in vitro susceptibility to ceftaroline may offer another interim solution as laboratories await availability of ceftaroline for testing on their commercial devices. We tested six β-lactams (aztreonam, ceftazidime, ceftriaxone, cefotaxime, cefoxitin, and cefpodoxime) as potential surrogates for ceftaroline against a collection of 543 clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae selected to approximate the distribution of ceftaroline MICs observed in AWARE global surveillance studies conducted in 2013. All six potential surrogates generated very major error rates of 16.3% to 56.6%, far exceeding the accepted limit of 1.5% set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Failure to identify a reliable surrogate to predict in vitro susceptibility and resistance to ceftaroline for clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae underscores the need for expedited addition of newer antimicrobial agents to commercial antimicrobial susceptibility testing devices.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document