scholarly journals MicroRNA-Independent Modulation of DICER1 Expression by hAgo2

2020 ◽  
Vol 40 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chee-Hing Yang ◽  
Hui-Chun Li ◽  
Tzu-Shan Ku ◽  
Cheng-Hao Wu ◽  
Kei-Choon Sim ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Many proteins, including DICER1 and hAgo2, are involved in the biogenesis of microRNAs (miRNAs). Whether hAgo2 regulates DICER1 expression is unknown. Exogenously overexpressed hAgo2 suppressed DICER1 expression at the levels of both protein and mRNA, and the reduction in hAgo2 expression enhanced DICER1 expression. Precursor miRNA processing mediated by DICER1 was also modulated by hAgo2. However, hAgo2 protein did not suppress DICER1 promoter activity. Therefore, hAgo2 protein probably regulates DICER1 expression at the posttranscriptional level. Indeed, hAgo2 protein inhibited the reporter assay of the DICER1 mRNA 3′ untranslated region (3′-UTR). Previous reports have demonstrated that miRNAs (e.g., let-7 and miR-103/107) inhibited DICER1 expression posttranscriptionally. However, hAgo2 still suppressed DICER1 expression in the cells depleted of these miRNAs. Moreover, the reporter activities of the DICER1 mRNA 3′-UTR without these miRNA binding sites were still suppressed by hAgo2. Therefore, in addition to an miRNA-dependent pathway, hAgo2 can also modulate DICER1 expression through an miRNA-independent mechanism. Downregulation of DICER1 expression was further proven to be dependent on both hAgo2 and AUF1 proteins. Interactions of hAgo2 and AUF1 proteins were demonstrated by the coimmunoprecipitation assay. As expected, hAgo2 could not suppress the DICER1 mRNA 3′-UTR reporter with a mutation in the potential AUF1-binding site. Thus, downregulation of DICER1 expression through the 3′-UTR requires both hAgo2 and AUF1.

2015 ◽  
Vol 89 (12) ◽  
pp. 6294-6311 ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia A. Thibault ◽  
Adam Huys ◽  
Yalena Amador-Cañizares ◽  
Julie E. Gailius ◽  
Dayna E. Pinel ◽  
...  

ABSTRACTmiR-122 is a liver-specific microRNA (miRNA) that binds to two sites (S1 and S2) on the 5′ untranslated region (UTR) of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) genome and promotes the viral life cycle. It positively affects viral RNA stability, translation, and replication, but the mechanism is not well understood. To unravel the roles of miR-122 binding at each site alone or in combination, we employed miR-122 binding site mutant viral RNAs, Hep3B cells (which lack detectable miR-122), and complementation with wild-type miR-122, an miR-122 with the matching mutation, or both. We found that miR-122 binding at either site alone increased replication equally, while binding at both sites had a cooperative effect. Xrn1 depletion rescued miR-122-unbound full-length RNA replication to detectable levels but not to miR-122-bound levels, confirming that miR-122 protects HCV RNA from Xrn1, a cytoplasmic 5′-to-3′ exoribonuclease, but also has additional functions. In cells depleted of Xrn1, replication levels of S1-bound HCV RNA were slightly higher than S2-bound RNA levels, suggesting that both sites contribute, but their contributions may be unequal when the need for protection from Xrn1 is reduced. miR-122 binding at S1 or S2 also increased translation equally, but the effect was abolished by Xrn1 knockdown, suggesting that the influence of miR-122 on HCV translation reflects protection from Xrn1 degradation. Our results show that occupation of each miR-122 binding site contributes equally and cooperatively to HCV replication but suggest somewhat unequal contributions of each site to Xrn1 protection and additional functions of miR-122.IMPORTANCEThe functions of miR-122 in the promotion of the HCV life cycle are not fully understood. Here, we show that binding of miR-122 to each of the two binding sites in the HCV 5′ UTR contributes equally to HCV replication and that binding to both sites can function cooperatively. This suggests that active Ago2–miR-122 complexes assemble at each site and can cooperatively promote the association and/or function of adjacent complexes, similar to what has been proposed for translation suppression by adjacent miRNA binding sites. We also confirm a role for miR-122 in protection from Xrn1 and provide evidence that miR-122 has additional functions in the HCV life cycle unrelated to Xrn1. Finally, we show that each binding site may contribute unequally to Xrn1 protection and other miR-122 functions.


Endocrinology ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 141 (8) ◽  
pp. 2895-2903 ◽  
Author(s):  
Teruo Sugawara ◽  
Masaki Saito ◽  
Seiichiro Fujimoto

Steroidogenic acute regulatory (StAR) protein plays a critical role in the movement of cholesterol from the outer to the inner mitochondrial membrane. Steroidogenic factor 1 (SF-1) controls basal and cAMP-stimulated transcription of the StAR gene. The 1.3-kb StAR promoter has three SF-1 binding sites, and two consensus transcription factor Sp1 binding sequences near the two most distal SF-1 binding sites. Sp1 mediates cAMP-dependent transcription of steroidogenic P450 enzyme genes, raising the possibility of Sp1 involvement in cAMP regulation of the StAR gene. However, the mechanism of Sp1-mediated, cAMP-stimulated responsiveness is not known. In this study, we elucidated the roles of Sp1 and SF-1 in the regulation of the human StAR gene promoter. We found that there was negligible promoter activity in a pGL2 StAR construct (−235 to +39) in which Sp1 and SF-1 binding sites were mutated in Y-1 adrenal tumor cells. An Sp1 binding site mutation (pGL2Sp1M) did not support promoter activity, suggesting that Sp1 cooperates with SF-1 in regulating StAR promoter function. In gel shift assays, the SF-1 binding site formed a complex with an SF-1-GST fusion protein and Sp1. Coimmunoprecipitation cross-linking experiments indicated that SF-1 physically interacts with Sp1 in vitro. Finally, a mammalian two-hybrid system was employed to demonstrate that Sp1 and SF-1 associate in vivo. In conclusion, our data indicate that Sp1 and SF-1 physically interact and cooperate in the regulation of human StAR promoter activity.


2004 ◽  
Vol 286 (6) ◽  
pp. F1107-F1115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Pan ◽  
Craig A. Jones ◽  
Sean T. Glenn ◽  
Kenneth W. Gross

An enhancer at −2.6 kb and a HOX·PBX-binding site at −60 bp have been demonstrated to be critical to expression of the mouse renin gene ( Ren-1 c) in As4.1 cells. In this report, we show that a region (−197 to −70) immediately 5′ to the HOX·PBX-binding site is also critical for Ren-1 c expression. Deletion of this region in a construct containing 4.1 kb of the Ren-1 c 5′-flanking sequence resulted in a 99% reduction in Ren-1 c promoter activity in As4.1 cells, suggesting the pivotal role for the region in the regulation of the mouse renin gene. Electrophoretic mobility shift and supershift assays have identified two nuclear factor I-binding sites and a Sp1/Sp3-binding site within the distal portion of the region (−197 to −103). Mutation of these three sites caused a 90% decrease in Ren-1 c promoter activity. Mutational analysis and electrophoretic mobility shift assays have also identified three additional transcription factor-binding sites within the region from −103 to −69, each of which contributes to high-level expression of Ren-1 c in As4.1 cells. Finally, we have shown that the Ren-1 c enhancer is the target for endothelin-1 (ET-1)-induced inhibition of Ren-1 c expression and the transcription factor-binding sites in the proximal promoter are required for the maximal ET-1 inhibitory effect.


1995 ◽  
Vol 41 (9) ◽  
pp. 849-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. M. P. Passaglia ◽  
A. Schrank ◽  
I. S. Schrank

The Azospirillum brasilense nifH promoter is positively controlled by the NifA protein bound to the upstream activator sequences (UASs). Two overlapping UASs located at −191 and −182 were identified with the consensus TGT-N10-ACA motif. The role of the two UASs of Azospirillum brasilense nifH promoter was examined by introducing base substitutions in the NifA binding sites. Both the promoter down phenotype of a mutation in UAS2 and increased activation when UAS1 was mutated reveal that the integrity of the UAS2 is required for the efficient activation of nifH promoter. This atypical NifA-binding site may represent a region interacting with two NifA dimers.Key words: Azospirillum brasilense, nif promoters, upstream activator sequence mutagenesis, NifA binding.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (22) ◽  
pp. 3647-3647
Author(s):  
Ping Xiang ◽  
Chaoyu Lo ◽  
Bob Argiropoulos ◽  
C. Benjamin Lai ◽  
Arefeh Rouhi ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 3647 Poster Board III-583 MEIS1 is a Hox cofactor known to be a key regulator of normal hematopoietic and leukemic stem cell function. Overexpression of Meis1 is a potent collaborating event in leukemias associated with multiple Hox, NUP98-HOX and MLL fusion genes. The transcriptional regulation of MEIS1 expression however remains poorly understood. To identify potential transcriptional regulators, we searched for candidate cis-regulatory elements within and beyond the 140 kb MEIS1 genomic locus through a combination of in silico conservation analysis, DNase I hypersensitivity analysis and histone H3 acetylation profiling in several human leukemic cell lines. To date, we have identified more than eight critical cis regulatory regions in the human MEIS1 genomic locus. In the current study, we focused on the region between -500 bp to +20 bp of the annotated human MEIS1 transcriptional start site (AHTSS), the putative promoter of this gene. This region contains a CpG island which is highly conserved throughout evolution with more than 70% identity between human and zebrafish in the region between 267 bp to 403 bp upstream of AHTSS. This region also displays DNase I hypersensitivity, significant enrichment of histone H3 acetylation and DNA hypomethylation in MEIS1 expressing cell lines such as K562. To better define the regions necessary for MEIS1 promoter activity we tested a deletion series spanning the -500 bp to +20 bp relative to AHTSS region in the pGL3 luciferase reporter vector in K562 cells. Truncation of the region 305 bp to 268 bp resulted in a strong decrease (∼6-fold) in promoter activity. Within this 38 bp region we identified several predicted transcription factor binding sites, including sites for Serum response factor, RUNX1 and ETS family member. Mutations or deletions of the predicted ETS family member binding site resulted in a decrease of promoter activity to almost basal levels whereas mutations of the other predicted binding sites did not significantly alter promoter activity. We next tested the involvement of three ETS family members in MEIS1 regulation: ELF1, FLI1 and GABPa. Both ELF1 and GABPa, but not FLI1, bound to the predicted ETS family member binding site as assessed by electrophoretic mobility shift assay conducted with nuclear extracts from cells with or without detectable MEIS1 expression, K562 and HL60, respectively. However, chromatin immunoprecipitation assay revealed occupancy of ELF1, but not GABPa or FLI1, to the MEIS1 promoter only in MEIS1 expressing K562 cells. Moreover, siRNA knockdown of ELF1 in K562 cells was associated with decreased MEIS1 expression. Together, these findings implicate the ETS family member ELF1 as a key regulator of MEIS1 expression. The absence of MEIS1 expression in HL60 cells expressing ELF1 argues that additional regulators remain to be identified. Studies of additional candidate cis-regulatory regions in the MEIS1 locus which contribute to the overall chromatin status and the expression of this critical leukemogenic gene are now in progress. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (27) ◽  
pp. 5557-5566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Enjing Jin ◽  
Ju Liu ◽  
Jun-ichi Suehiro ◽  
Lei Yuan ◽  
Yoshiaki Okada ◽  
...  

Abstract Vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 1 (VEGFR1) is a marker for endothelial-specific gene expression. We previously reported that the human VEGFR1 promoter (between −748 and +284) contains information for expression in the intact endothelium of transgenic mice. The objective of this study was to dissect the cis-regulatory elements underlying VEGFR1 promoter activity in vitro and in vivo. In primary endothelial cells, binding sites for E74-like factor 1 (ELF-1; between −49 and −52), cyclic adenosine monophosphate response element binding (CREB; between −74 and −81), and early growth response factor 1/3 (EGR-1/3; between −16 to −25) were shown to play a positive role in gene transcription, whereas a putative E26 transformation-specificsequence (ETS) motif between −36 and −39 had a net negative effect on promoter activity. When targeted to the Hprt locus of mice, mutations of the ELF-1 binding site and the CRE element reduced promoter activity in the embryonic vasculature and resulted in a virtual loss of expression in adult endothelium. Postnatally, the EGR binding site mutant displayed significantly reduced promoter activity in a subset of vascular beds. In contrast, mutation of the −39 ETS site resulted in increased LacZ staining in multiple vascular beds. Together, these results provide new insights into the transcriptional regulatory mechanisms of VEGFR1.


Blood ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 118 (21) ◽  
pp. 3163-3163
Author(s):  
Caryn S Gonsalves ◽  
Scott C Crable ◽  
Sharat Chandra ◽  
Clinton H. Joiner

Abstract Abstract 3163 The KCl co-transporter (KCC) family of proteins catalyzes the electroneutral, coupled movement of K+ and Cl− ions across the plasma membrane, thereby mediating transepithelial ion transport and regulating cell volume. These proteins play an important role in disease states such as cancer, numerous neurological conditions as well as sickle cell disease (SCD). KCC activity is increased in sickle red blood cells and contributes to their dehydration, which potentiates sickling. The mechanisms of increased KCC activity and its abnormal regulation are not understood. Of the four mammalian KCC isoforms, KCC 1, 3 and 4 are expressed in erythroid cells (Crable et al. Exp Hematol. 2005; 33:624). Hiki et. al. showed that the angiogenic factor vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) increased KCC 3a expression in HUVEC cells (J.B.C. 274, 10661–10667, 1999). As levels of VEGF and related family member, placenta growth factor (PlGF) are elevated in sickle cell patients, we hypothesized that VEGF and PlGF may influence KCC expression in erythroid cells. RT-PCR revealed that erythroid K562 cells expressed the VEGF receptor-1 (VEGF-R1, or Flt-1) but not VEGF receptor-2, (VEGF-R2 or Flk-1). Additionally, flow cytometric analysis of WT C57Bl6 mouse bone marrow showed the presence of the Flt-1 receptor, but not Flk-1 or Flk-3 in erythroid progenitors and expression decreased with maturation. VEGF treatment (50 ng/ml) of K562 cells increased KCC 1, 3a, 3b and 4 mRNA levels; PlGF treatment increased KCC 1, 3a and 4 mRNA levels but not KCC 3b. The VEGF receptor inhibitor, SU5416, ablated the effect of VEGF. VEGF-stimulated KCC 4 expression was blocked by pharmacological inhibitors that implicated PI3 kinase, p38 MAP kinase, mTOR, JNK kinase and the transcription factor hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α), as with other VEGF effects. Analysis of the KCC 4 promoter showed that the −875 and −90 bp promoter luciferase constructs exhibited similar levels of activity as the −1200 bp promoter construct, when compared to the promoterless reporter plasmid. Deleted constructs corresponding to −65 bp from transcription start site showed ∼90% reduced promoter activity. In silico analysis of the −90 bp region of the KCC 4 promoter showed potential binding sites for transcription factor SP-1 and HIF-1α. Binding sites for transcription factor SP-1 at positions −35 to −44 bp and −56 to −64 bp were shown to be active by site directed mutagenesis. Mutation of the HIF-1α binding site at −73 to −76 bp significantly inhibited promoter activity, whereas mutation of the HIF-1α binding site at position −21 bp to −18 bp did not have any effect on activity. Similar analysis of the KCC 3a promoter indicate potential binding sites for SP-1 at positions −8 to −4 bp and a HIF-1α binding site at position −23 to −20 bp, and the KCC 3b promoter has binding sites for HIF-1α at –9 to −6 bp and −49 to −46 bp and an AP-1 binding site at position −13 to −10 bp. Luciferase assays with KCC 3b promoter constructs indicated that the −190 bp promoter region containing HIF-1α sites at –9 to −6 bp and −49 to −46 bp and an AP-1 binding site at −13 to −10 bp contained minimal promoter required for transcription activity. Mutations within both HIF-1α binding sites attenuated promoter activity indicating a role for HIF-1α in regulating KCC 3b activity, as well. EMSA and ChIP assays with the KCC 4 promoter demonstrated that VEGF treatment of K562 cells increased HIF-1α binding to the HIF-1α sites, which was abrogated by mutating these sites. Similar results were obtained for the KCC 3a and 3b promoters.These results suggest that activation of VEGF-R1 by VEGF, and presumably its other ligand, PlGF, leads to non-hypoxic activation of HIF-1α and SP-1-mediated up-regulation of KCC3a, 3b and 4 expressions in erythroid K562 cells via its canonical signaling pathways. Variation in KCC gene expression and its modulation by cytokines and growth factors may be a source of inter-individual variation in SS RBC volume regulation and thus of phenotypic variability of SCD. Identifying the factors that modulate transcriptional control of KCC expression is important to understanding volume regulation in reticulocytes and its dysregulation in SS RBC. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2001 ◽  
Vol 183 (10) ◽  
pp. 3237-3246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salbi Paul ◽  
Xiaohui Zhang ◽  
F. Marion Hulett

ABSTRACT The Bacillus subtilis ResDE two-component system plays a positive role in global regulation of genes involved in aerobic and anaerobic respiration. ctaA is one of the several genes involved in aerobic respiration that requires ResD for in vivo expression. The ctaAB-divergent promoter regulatory region has three ResD binding sites; A1, A2, and A3. The A2 site is essential for in vivo promoter activity, while binding sites A2 and A3 are required for full ctaA promoter activity. In this study, we demonstrate the role of ResD∼P in the activation of thectaA promoter using an in vitro transcription system. The results indicate that the ctaA promoter (binding sites A2 and A3) has two transcriptional start sites. Binding site A2 was sufficient for weak transcription of the upstream promoter (Pv) by EςA, transcription which was enhanced approximately 1.5-fold by ResD and 5-fold by ResD∼P. The downstream promoter (Ps) required both binding sites A2 and A3 and was not transcribed by EςA with or without ResD∼P. RNA polymerase (RNAP) isolated from B. subtilis when cells were at the end of exponential growth (T0) or 3, 4, or 5 h into the stationary phase (T3, T4, or T 5, respectively) was used in in vitro transcription assays. Maximal transcription from Ps required T4 RNAP plus ResD∼P. RNAP isolated from a spo0A or a sigE mutant strain was not capable of Ps transcription. Comparison of the Ps promoter sequence with the SigE binding consensus suggests that thectaA Ps promoter may be a SigE promoter. The collective data from ResD footprinting, in vivo promoter deletion analysis, and in vitro transcription assays suggest that ctaA is transcribed during late exponential to early stationary phases of growth from the Pv promoter, which requires ResD binding site A2, EςA, and ResD∼P, and during later stationary phase from Ps, which requires binding sites A2 and A3, ResD∼P, and EςE or a sigma factor whose transcription is dependent on SigE.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Olp ◽  
Daniel Sprague ◽  
Stefan Kathman ◽  
Ziyang Xu ◽  
Alexandar Statsyuk ◽  
...  

<p>Brd4, a member of the bromodomain and extraterminal domain (BET) family, has emerged as a promising epigenetic target in cancer and inflammatory disorders. All reported BET family ligands bind within the bromodomain acetyl-lysine binding sites and competitively inhibit BET protein interaction with acetylated chromatin. Alternative chemical probes that act orthogonally to the highly-conserved acetyl-lysine binding sites may exhibit selectivity within the BET family and avoid recently reported toxicity in clinical trials of BET bromodomain inhibitors. Here, we report the first identification of a ligandable site on a bromodomain outside the acetyl-lysine binding site. Inspired by our computational prediction of hotspots adjacent to non-homologous cysteine residues within the <i>C</i>-terminal Brd4 bromodomain (Brd4-BD2), we performed a mid-throughput mass spectrometry screen to identify cysteine-reactive fragments that covalently and selectively modify Brd4. Subsequent mass spectrometry, NMR and computational docking analyses of electrophilic fragment hits revealed a novel ligandable site near Cys356 that is unique to Brd4 among all human bromodomains. This site is orthogonal to the Brd4-BD2 acetyl-lysine binding site as Cys356 modification did not impact binding of the pan-BET bromodomain inhibitor JQ1 in fluorescence polarization assays. Finally, we tethered covalent fragments to JQ1 and performed NanoBRET assays to provide proof of principle that this orthogonal site can be covalently targeted in intact human cells. Overall, we demonstrate the potential of targeting sites orthogonal to bromodomain acetyl-lysine binding sites to develop bivalent and covalent inhibitors that displace Brd4 from chromatin.</p>


1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (1) ◽  
pp. 47-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Imad Al-Bala'a ◽  
Richard D. Bates

The role of more than one binding site on a nitroxide free radical in magnetic resonance determinations of the properties of the complex formed with a hydrogen donor is examined. The expression that relates observed hyperfine couplings in EPR spectra to complex formation constants and concentrations of each species in solution becomes much more complex when multiple binding sites are present, but reduces to a simpler form when binding at the two sites occurs independently and the binding at the non-nitroxide site does not produce significant differences in the hyperfine coupling constant in the complexed radical. Effects on studies of hydrogen bonding between multiple binding site nitroxides and hydrogen donor solvent molecules by other magnetic resonance methods are potentially more extreme.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document