scholarly journals Kinase Domain Mutants of Bcr-Abl Exhibit Altered Transformation Potency, Kinase Activity, and Substrate Utilization, Irrespective of Sensitivity to Imatinib

2006 ◽  
Vol 26 (16) ◽  
pp. 6082-6093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian J. Griswold ◽  
Mary MacPartlin ◽  
Thomas Bumm ◽  
Valerie L. Goss ◽  
Thomas O'Hare ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Atp Binding ◽  
Loss Of Function ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Major Mechanism ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
Binding Loop

ABSTRACT Kinase domain (KD) mutations of Bcr-Abl interfering with imatinib binding are the major mechanism of acquired imatinib resistance in patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive leukemia. Mutations of the ATP binding loop (p-loop) have been associated with a poor prognosis. We compared the transformation potency of five common KD mutants in various biological assays. Relative to unmutated (native) Bcr-Abl, the ATP binding loop mutants Y253F and E255K exhibited increased transformation potency, M351T and H396P were less potent, and the performance of T315I was assay dependent. The transformation potency of Y253F and M351T correlated with intrinsic Bcr-Abl kinase activity, whereas the kinase activity of E255K, H396P, and T315I did not correlate with transforming capabilities, suggesting that additional factors influence transformation potency. Analysis of the phosphotyrosine proteome by mass spectroscopy showed differential phosphorylation among the mutants, a finding consistent with altered substrate specificity and pathway activation. Mutations in the KD of Bcr-Abl influence kinase activity and signaling in a complex fashion, leading to gain- or loss-of-function variants. The drug resistance and transformation potency of mutants may determine the outcome of patients on therapy with Abl kinase inhibitors.

BCR-ABL P-Loop Deletion Detected in Imatinib-Resistant CML Patients Corresponds to Splice Variant Associated with L248V Point Mutation, Retains BCR-ABL Kinase Activity, and Responds to Dasatinib Treatment.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2168-2168
Author(s):  
Nikolas von Bubnoff ◽  
Philipp Erben ◽  
Martin Müller ◽  
Tanja Lahaye ◽  
Susanne Schnittger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Splice Variant ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
Imatinib Resistant ◽  
Exon 4

Abstract Clonal selection of cells harboring point mutations of the BCR-ABL kinase domain are considered a major cause of resistance to imatinib. More than 40 different point mutations have been described that cause a variable degree of imatinib resistance, and display a differential response to alternative kinase inhibitors, like dasatinib or nilotinib. Here, we describe three cases (2 m, 1 f) with imatinib resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) associated with a specific deletion of 81 bp of ABL exon 4. Patients were diagnosed with chronic phase (CP) CML at the age of 52, 54, and 68 years. After initial interferon alpha based therapies for 32, 60, and 71 mo, imatinib therapy was initiated at dosages between 400–800 mg per day. After 18, 24, and 29 mo patients lost hematologic response in CP CML (n=2) or progressed to lymphoid blast crisis (BC, n=1). Molecular analysis of the ABL kinase domain revealed a deletion of a 81 bp fragment associated with a loss of amino acids 248–274 in all cases. In one patient, an additional M351T mutation was found. In the two cases with CP CML, dasatinib was commenced for imatinib resistance, resulting in a partial hematologic and minor cytogenetic response (60 and 70% Ph+ metaphases, respectively) after 14 mo of therapy. The patient with lymphoid BC was treated with vincristine and prednisone and died 24 mo after appearance of imatinib resistance. In two cases, sequencing of genomic DNA revealed an underlying CTG/GTG mutation associated with a L248V amino acid switch. The point mutation activated a cryptic splice site within ABL exon 4 leading to an in-frame splice variant characterized by the loss of a 81 bp 3′ portion of exon 4. We sought to evaluate the BCR-ABL kinase activity of the splice variant and the response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in vitro. The 81 bp deletion of p210 BCR-ABL was cloned using cDNA from one of the patients. Using this construct, retrovirally transduced Ba/F3 cells were transformed upon growth factor withdrawal. These cells expressed BCR-ABL at the transcript and protein levels. Presence of the 81 bp deletion was confirmed by sequencing. Despite the presence of the corresponding 27 amino acid P-loop deletion (Δ248–274), Western blot indicated strong autophosphorylation of BCR-ABL, which decreased in the presence of imatinib to non-detectable levels at concentrations of 1.25μM and above. In the presence of imatinib/nilotinib/dasatinib, the growth of BCR-ABL expressing Ba/F3 cells was shifted from an IC50 of 125/30/0.5nM for wild-type BCR-ABL to 470/185/1.9nM for Δ248–274 cells. Thus, in vitro data demonstrate that deletion of almost the entire P-loop does not abrogate BCR-ABL kinase activity and results in only marginal resistance towards ABL kinase inhibitors. We conclude that deletions of BCR-ABL may be the result of alternative splicing generated by point mutations associated with resistance to imatinib. The Δ248–274 splice variant retains BCR-ABL kinase activity and sensitivity to imatinib, nilotinib, and dasatinib.

High Sensitive Detection of Imatinib-Resistance Associated Mutations Based on ARMS-PCR.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 2943-2943
Author(s):  
Franz X.E. Gruber ◽  
Mikchail Soevershaev ◽  
Marita Olsen ◽  
Bjoern Skogen
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
High Sensitivity ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Single Step ◽  
Sensitive Detection ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
Loop Region ◽  
Highly Sensitive Detection

Abstract Background: Point mutations in the Abl kinase domain are associated with resistance against imatinib. Strategies to overcome resistance include dose escalation, combination treatment using imatinib with conventional or other developmental agents or, in the future, imatinib may be replaced by other tyrosine kinase inhibitors which work effectively against mutated clones. Mutational profiling of the BCR-ABL kinase domain will in this scenario become an important analysis as a supplement to BCR-ABL quantitation and may provide the rational basis for therapy, once resistance is diagnosed. Our group reported recently a sensitive, single step PCR assay for quantitation of mutated clones based on the ARMS principle. Aim: We describe an optimized, two step analysis for high sensitivity screening of mutated clones associated with resistance against imatinib targeting all P-Loop mutations, the T315I and M351T. Methods: In a first conventional PCR-reaction a cDNA-region spanning the BCR-ABL breakpoint is amplified resulting in an isolation of the BCR-ABL kinase domain for further analysis. An aliquot is then analysed in a second PCR step, conducted on the real time PCR Taqman platform. Selectivity for the mutated clone is conferred by the amplification refractoriness of non complementary primer 3′-ends (ARMS principle). By introducing potent nucleotide-mismatches in position n-2, selectivity of the assay could be further increased. Even in the P-Loop region, which is known to be a difficult PCR template, misannealing could be reduced to an acceptable level. Results: Assays targeting all P-Loop mutations inclusive the T315I and M351T were tested by analysis of patient samples diluted in normal cDNA and non-mutated BCR-ABL and plasmid dilutions, containing the targeted mutation in a background of wildtype plasmids. Generally a 1:1000 dilution of mutated templates could be detected (sensitivity 0.1%). For some mutations even higher sensitivity could be achieved (0.01%). The level of sensitivity is generally higher than reported for other methods described before. The first PCR step can be conducted in parallel to other PCR-based detection strategies. The second step can be run simultanously to Taqman based BCR-ABL quantitation. This makes the described assay the ideal supplement to general mutation detection approaches like D-HPLC or sequencing strategies. Compared to the single step assay we desribed before, the two step approach increases sensitivity with one or two log factors. Conclusion: The described assay may be suitable for highly sensitive detection of mutated clones in resistant CML patients as a supplement to less sensitive general screening approaches and BCR-ABL quantitation.

Optimal Treatment for Patients after Dasatinib or Nilotinib: Comparison of Preclinical Activities of Approved and Promising Investigational Kinase Inhibitors Against BCR-ABL Kinase Domain Mutations That Confer Clinical Resistance to Dasatinib or Nilotinib.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 4589-4589
Author(s):  
Corynn Kasap ◽  
Christopher Weier ◽  
Neil P. Shah
Keyword(s):  
Second Generation ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Inhibitor Therapy ◽  
Drug Resistant ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
Clinical Resistance ◽  
Kinase Domain Mutations

Abstract The optimal management of patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is increasingly reliant upon molecular studies. Loss of response to imatinib in CML is most commonly associated with selection for a limited number of BCR-ABL kinase domain mutations that impair the ability of imatinib to effectively bind to BCR-ABL Molecular understanding of imatinib resistance mechanisms has led to the development of effective “second generation” BCR-ABL kinase inhibitors, such as dasatinib and nilotinib, which have clinical activity against most, but not all, drug-resistant mutations. Analysis of the BCR-ABL kinase domain in patients who develop resistance to second-generation inhibitors has implicated further selection of drug-resistant BCR-ABL kinase domain mutants in nearly all cases reported to date. Encouragingly, the number of resistant mutations capable of conferring clinical resistance to the most clinically-advanced second-generation agents, dasatinib (approved by the US FDA and EMEA) and nilotinib (approved in Mexico and Switzerland), appears to be restricted to a relatively small number of amino acid substitutions. As clinical experience with dasatinib and nilotinib grows, an understanding of the relative sensitivities of dasatinib- and nilotinib-resistant BCR-ABL mutants to other kinase inhibitors, both approved and investigational, is critical to optimize clinical outcomes in patients with resistance to dasatinib or nilotinib. At the present time, kinase inhibitor therapy options for patients with resistance to one of these agents include the investigational options bosutinib and MK-0457 (VX-680), as well as dasatinib and nilotinib (for patients not yet exposed to one of these agents) and re-exposure imatinib. It is likely that the success of therapeutic intervention in these cases can be predicted based upon the preclinical sensitivity of the mutation(s) involved with the agent chosen. We have therefore conducted a thorough biochemical and biological cross-analysis of the activities of each of these clinically-useful kinase inhibitors against mutations that confer clinical resistance to dasatinib or nilotinib. These studies provide clinicians with a useful reference for choosing an appropriate kinase inhibitor based upon the identity of the resistant BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation(s) detected at the time of relapse when faced with a patient who has lost response to dasatinib or nilotinib. It is hoped that the application of such “personalized medicine” strategies to the clinical management of CML cases will further improve outcomes in patients treated with kinase inhibitor therapy.

scholarly journals BCR-ABL V280G Mutation, Potential Role in Imatinib Resistance: First Case Report

2017 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 117955491770287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana P Azevedo ◽  
Alice Reichert ◽  
Celina Afonso ◽  
Maria D Alberca ◽  
Purificação Tavares ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Case Report ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Prognostic Impact ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Abl Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
First Case ◽  
Kinase Domain Mutation

Introduction: The identification of BCR-ABL expression as the defining leukemogenic event in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and the introduction of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors in 2001 have revolutionized disease management, leading to a reduction in mortality rates and accordingly an increase in the estimated prevalence of CML. Case report: Based on medical records and clinical follow-up, the authors present the case of a Philadelphia chromosome–positive CML patient who developed resistance to imatinib. Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction testing revealed a V280G BCR-ABL mutation. Discussion and conclusions: This is the first report describing a new BCR-ABL kinase domain mutation—V280G—that might be associated with resistance to imatinib. Approximately 15% to 30% of patients treated with imatinib discontinue treatment due to resistance or intolerance. More than 90 BCR-ABL mutations were detected so far, conferring variable degrees of drug resistance, with consequent clinical, therapeutic, and prognostic impact.

Pathobiology of Lymphoid and Myeloid Blast Crisis and Management Issues

Hematology ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 2005 (1) ◽  
pp. 188-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Ilaria
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Clonal Evolution ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
Road Map ◽  
Blastic Phase

Abstract Despite recent improvements in the treatment of early-stage disease, the blastic phase of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) remains a therapeutic challenge. For imatinib-naïve patients, imatinib provided encouraging hematologic and cytogenetic benefits; however, the vast majority of CML blast crisis cases today arise in patients already on imatinib-based therapy. Clonal evolution and duplication of the Philadelphia chromosome continue to be associated with blastic phase transformation, but recent studies have identified BCR/ABL kinase domain mutations in 30%–40% of blast crisis patients. This implies that BCR-ABL–targeted therapy might have influenced the molecular road map to blastic transformation. In this review, we will examine the effect of imatinib on primitive CML progenitors and how this might influence the pathophysiology of blast crisis. A rational framework for deciding how best to integrate stem cell transplantation, traditional chemotherapy, imatinib, and other BCR-ABL kinase inhibitors in the care of blast crisis patients will also be discussed.

Philadelphia-positive patients who already harbor imatinib-resistant Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutations have a higher likelihood of developing additional mutations associated with resistance to second- or third-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (10) ◽  
pp. 2168-2171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simona Soverini ◽  
Alessandra Gnani ◽  
Sabrina Colarossi ◽  
Fausto Castagnetti ◽  
Elisabetta Abruzzese ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Sequential Therapy ◽  
Initial Response ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
Imatinib Resistant

Abstract Dasatinib and nilotinib are tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) developed to overcome imatinib resistance in Philadelphia-positive leukemias. To assess how Bcr-Abl kinase domain mutation status evolves during sequential therapy with these TKIs and which mutations may further develop and impair their efficacy, we monitored the mutation status of 95 imatinib-resistant patients before and during treatment with dasatinib and/or nilotinib as second or third TKI. We found that 83% of cases of relapse after an initial response are associated with emergence of newly acquired mutations. However, the spectra of mutants conferring resistance to dasatinib or nilotinib are small and nonoverlapping, except for T315I. Patients already harboring mutations had higher likelihood of relapse associated with development of further mutations compared with patients who did not harbor mutations (23 of 51 vs 8 of 44, respectively, for patients who relapsed on second TKI; 13 of 20 vs 1 of 6, respectively, for patients who relapsed on third TKI).

A Cell-Based Screening Method for Resistance of Bcr-Abl Positive Leukemia Identifies the Mutation Pattern for an Alternative Abl Kinase Inhibitor.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 558-558
Author(s):  
Nikolas von Bubnoff ◽  
Darren R. Veach ◽  
Heiko van der Kuip ◽  
Walter E. Aulitzky ◽  
Jana Saenger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Screening Strategy ◽  
Culture Conditions ◽  
Cross Resistance ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
A Cell

Abstract The increasing impact of targeted cancer treatment demands strategies to identify and evaluate resistance mechanisms toward kinase inhibitors prior to their therapeutic application. Point mutations within the Bcr-Abl kinase domain constitute the major mechanism of resistance toward imatinib mesylate in Philadelphia-positive (Ph+) leukemia. Using Bcr-Abl-transformed Ba/F3 cells, we established a cell-based screening strategy for the prediction of specific kinase mutations that cause resistance toward kinase inhibitors. With imatinib at clinically relevant concentrations, we generated 368 resistant Ba/F3 sublines that were derived from resistant colonies. Thirty-two different single point mutations within the kinase domain of Bcr-Abl were identified in twenty-five per cent (liquid culture conditions) and seventy-two per cent (solid culture conditions) of these lines at known and novel positions. Using imatinib, the pattern and relative frequency of mutations reflected matters observed in patients with imatinib resistance. We then applied this screen to the pyrido-pyrimidine PD166326 (PD16), an investigational Abl kinase inihibitor. Compared to imatinib, we observed a five to seven times lower frequency of resistant colonies with equipotent concentrations of PD16. In addition, PD16 produced a distinct pattern of Bcr-Abl mutations. P-loop, A-loop and the known imatinib contact site T315 were affected with both inhibitors, whereas C-helix and SH2 contact sites were affected in imatinib resistant colonies exclusively. In contrast to imatinib, where kinase domain mutations were still widely distributed over the kinase domain even at at 4μM, mutations observed with PD16 at a concentration of 100nM narrowed to the exchange at position T315 to iseulicine. We did not detect mutations outside the kinase domain. Some resistant sublines displayed increased Bcr-Abl activity. Mutations that were derived from the screen were cloned and examined for the extent of cross-resistance to both inhibitors. The majority of mutations were effectively suppressed by PD16 at 50–500nM. In contrast, only few mutations were inhibited by imatinib at 5–10μM. However, exchanges at position F317 mediated resistance toward PD16, but were inhibited by standard concentrations of imatinib. Since this cell-based system produced results that are clinically significant, it may be used to predict resistance mutations in Bcr-Abl and other oncogenic kinases like cKit, EGFR, FIP1L1-PDGFRalpha or FLT3 towards clinically applicated and investigational drugs. Thus, this robust and simple screening strategy provides a rational basis for combinatorial and sequential treatment strategies.

Mutations in the BCR/ABL Kinase Encoding the Resistance to Imatinib Mesylate Do Not Modify the Sensitivity to Genotoxic Treatment.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 2194-2194
Author(s):  
Milene Bargaoanu ◽  
Tomasz Skorski
Keyword(s):  
Imatinib Mesylate ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Leukemia Cells ◽  
Activation Loop ◽  
Γ Irradiation ◽  
Abl Kinase

Abstract Imatinib mesylate (IM), a selective inhibitor of ABL kinase activity, revolutionized the treatment of BCR/ABL-positive leukemias. Unfortunately, clinical and experimental observations reveal that resistance to IM is a rising problem, which obscures an otherwise very successful oncogene-targeted therapy. IM resistance can be achieved by point mutations in the kinase domain of BCR/ABL and have been detected in 50–90% of patients with acquired resistance to IM, including ~23% of the IM-naive patients. Strategies to enhance the effect of IM and eventually overcome the resistance are dose escalation, addition of a growth factor, and combinations with novel tyrosine kinase inhibitors like AMN107 and dasatinib, or with inhibitors targeting downstream BCR/ABL effectors, e.g. PI-3k. Unfortunately, resistance to other small molecule inhibitors is likely to appear, as well. Therefore, we tested the sensitivity of leukemia cells expressing IM-resistant BCR/ABL mutants to genotoxic agents. Baf3 cells expressing similar levels of p210BCR/ABL wild-type (WT) and Y253F, Y253H, E255K, E255V, T315I, M351T, and H396P mutants were established. These mutants were selected since they represent several functionally distinct ABL kinase domain regions, including P-loop (Y253F/H and E255K/V), the site of a hydrogen bond with IM (T315I), the activation loop hinge (M351T), and the activation loop (H396P). In addition, they exhibit altered transformation potency, kinase activity, and substrate utilization, irrespective of sensitivity to IM. Western analysis demonstrated similarity, but also differences in the patterns of tyrosine phosphorylated proteins in total cell lysates. As expected, these clones displayed different level of sensitivity to IM: T315I>Y253H>E255V>E255K=Y253F>M251T=H396P>WT. However, leukemia cells expressing the WT and IM-resistant BCR/ABL kinase mutants demonstrated similar sensitivity to cytotoxic drugs such as hydroxyurea (HU), mitomycin C (MMC), and N-Methyl N’-nitro-N-nitrosoguanidine (MNNG). Surprisingly, clones expressing IM-resistant BCR/ABL kinase mutants were more sensitive to γ-irradiation than their WT counterparts. γ-H2AX (histone H2AX phosphorylated on S139) nuclear foci, which serve as marker of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), the most lethal DNA lesions, were detected by immunofluorescence. Leukemia cells expressing WT and IM-resistant p210BCR/ABL proteins accumulated similar numbers of DSBs after MMC treatment and γ-irradiation. This observation suggests that leukemia cells expressing IM-resistant p210BCR/ABL mutants may be eliminated by genotoxic treatment, especially γ-irradiation. In addition, IM-resistant BCR/ABL kinase mutants, in contrast to the WT kinase may not be able to modulate the mechanisms protecting from apoptosis induced by γ-irradiation.

Kinase Domain Point Mutations in Ph+ Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Lymphoid Blast Crisis of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) and Their Emergence Following Therapy with Bcr-Abl Kinase Inhibitors.

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 1831-1831
Author(s):  
Dan Jones ◽  
Rayjalakshmi Luthra ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Megan Breeden ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Direct Sequencing ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Blast Crisis ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Point Mutations ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Current Therapy ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
T315i Mutation

Abstract Bcr-Abl kinase domain (KD) point mutations are detected in the dominant clone(s) in approximately 45% of CML at the time of disease resistance, developing after an average of 20–35 months of imatinib therapy. However, low numbers of Philadelphia chromosome (Ph)+ tumor cells with KD mutations could be present at earlier timepoints providing a pool of potential resistant subclones. Since current therapy of Ph+ ALL relies on imatinib maintenance therapy, the pattern of Bcr-Abl KD mutations in this tumor is an important and understudied phenomenon. We assessed the frequency and levels of Bcr-Abl KD mutations at different points in ALL, including at diagnosis, upon relapse and following salvage therapy with kinase inhibitors. We performed Bcr-Abl KD mutational analysis by direct sequencing in 25 cases of Ph+ ALL at the time of diagnosis and 25 cases upon disease persistence/relapse. For comparison, we analyzed 22 cases of lymphoid blast crisis of CML (LyBC), most of which transformed following long-term imatinib monotherapy. To track the emergence of mutated clones, we also performed more sensitive analysis for the T315I mutation by pyrosequencing (5% sensitivity) and allele-specific oligonucleotide probe (ASO) PCR (1:500 sensitivity). KD mutations were not seen by direct sequencing in ALL cases at diagnosis. The T315I mutation was also not detected by pyrosequencing (n =25) or ASO-PCR (n = 10) in newly diagnosed ALL. In contrast, Bcr-Abl KD mutations (Y253H in 3, Q252H, T315I, F317L, E355Q, H396R in 1 each) were seen in 8 of 25 (32%) relapsed/persistent ALL, occurring in patients who had been receiving imatinib for a median of 14 months (range 2–26). An additional 3 patients treated with dasatinib or nilotinib for relapse subsequently developed KD mutations (T315I and Y253H, and F317L) after 1, 4 and 9 months of second therapy. KD mutations were seen in 16 of 22 (73%) patients with lymphoid blast crisis, including T315I in 7, E255K and M244V in 2 each, and Y253H, V299L, F311I, E355G, F359V in 1 each. All KD mutations in LyBC developed following imatinib or nilotinib therapy. As with CML, kinase inhibitor therapy particularly in the relapse/salvage setting is the primary risk factor for emergence of Bcr-Abl KD mutations in Ph+ ALL. There is a high frequency of Bcr-Abl KD mutations associated the lymphoid transformation of CML. However, Bcr-Abl KD mutations develop more rapidly in persistent or relapsed Ph+ ALL than in CML and there is a higher frequency of Y253H mutations noted. These findings will likely have consequences for the timing and dosages of imatinib and other kinase inhibitors in maintenance and relapsed ALL regimens.

Dynamics of BCR-ABL Kinase Domain Mutations in Patients with Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML) after Treatment with One, Two or Three Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI).

Blood ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 108 (11) ◽  
pp. 750-750 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elias Jabbour ◽  
Dan Jones ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Susan O’Brien ◽  
Guillermo Garcia-Manero ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tyrosine Kinase ◽  
Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitors ◽  
Kinase Domain ◽  
Imatinib Resistance ◽  
Mutation Status ◽  
Abl Kinase ◽  
Kinase Domain Mutations ◽  
New Mutations

Abstract Dasatinib (D) and nilotinib (N) are potent tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with activity against many imatinib (IM) resistant BCR-ABL kinase domain mutants, except T315I. In vitro mutant models have selected specific mutations occurring after incubation with IM, D and N. Therapy with these new TKI may select for patients with T315I or other mutations relatively insensitive to them. We assessed the change in mutation status of the bcr-abl kinase domain (codons 220 to 500) in 113 patients (pts) with CML who received therapy with D and/or N after imatinib failure. Median age was 60 years (range, 21 to 82 years). Seventy-one (63%) pts received prior interferon (IFN). Median time on imatinib was 28 months (range, 2 to 78 months). At the time of imatinib failure, mutations were detected in 46 of 85 (54%) pts who had DNA sequencing. The evolution of mutations after a second TKI was as follows (Table 1). Twenty pts received a third TKI after failing IM and a second TKI. The evolution of mutations in this cohort was as follows (Table 2). Overall, 19 of 101 evaluable pts (19%), cases had new mutations emerge following TKI switch 17 after a 2nd TKI (12 nilotinib, 5 dasatinib), and 2 after a 3rd TKI (2 dasatinib). We analyzed whether these N- and D-associated new mutations were at sites that have been detected following D and N treatment in vitro (Burgess et al, PNAS 2005; Bradeen et al, Blood 2006; Von Bubnoff et al, Blood 2006). Only 14/46 (30%) kinase domain mutations that developed after D (7) or N (7) corresponded with an in vitro-identified site. Only 5 of 134 (4%) mutations identified were T315I (3 after dasatinib, 2 after nilotinib), but the mutation status of these patients was unknown after IM. We conclude that the spectrum of mutations that develops in vivo after TKI switch is broader and includes common imatinib-resistance sites as well. There appears to no marked increase in the incidence of T315I mutation after TKI switch. Table 1. Dynamics of mutations after 2nd TKI Post IM mutation No. Post-2nd TKI Mutation (New + Same + Lost) *1 pt acquired new mutation with persistence of pre-existing mutation, 1 lost 3 mutations and acquired 1, and 1 pt lost 2 mutations. Nilotinib Dasatinib Absent 39 8+NA+NA/21 3+NA+NA/18 Present 46 3+20+3/26 2+16+2*/20 Unknown 28 8/9 13/19 Table 2. Dynamics of mutations after 3rd TKI Post IM mutation No. Post-3nd TKI Mutation (compared to status after 2nd TKI) (New + Same + Lost) Nilotinib Dasatinib Absent 5 0/1 1+NA+NA/4 Present 12 0+1+0/1 2+6+3/11 Unknown 3 1/3 NA

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document