scholarly journals DNA-binding specificity of Mcm1: operator mutations that alter DNA-bending and transcriptional activities by a MADS box protein.

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1881-1889 ◽  
Author(s):  
T B Acton ◽  
H Zhong ◽  
A K Vershon
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Affinity ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Dna Bending ◽  
Dimensional Structure ◽  
Mads Box ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Dna Binding Affinity

The yeast Mcm1 protein is a member of the MADS box family of transcriptional regulatory factors, a class of DNA-binding proteins found in such diverse organisms as yeast, plants, flies, and humans. To explore the protein-DNA interactions of Mcm1 in vivo and in vitro, we have introduced an extensive series of base pair substitutions into an Mcm1 operator site and examined their effects on Mcm1-mediated transcriptional regulation and DNA-binding affinity. Our results show that Mcm1 uses a mechanism to contact the DNA that has some significant differences from the one used by the human serum response factor (SRF), a closely related MADS box protein in which the three-dimensional structure has been determined. One major difference is that 5-bromouracil-mediated photo-cross-linking experiments indicate that Mcm1 is in close proximity to functional groups in the major groove at the center of the recognition site whereas the SRF protein did not exhibit this characteristic. A more significant difference is that mutations at a position outside of the conserved CC(A/T)6GG site significantly reduce Mcm1-dependent DNA bending, while these substitutions have no effect on DNA bending by SRF. This result shows that the DNA bending by Mcm1 is sequence dependent and that the base-specific requirements for bending differ between Mcm1 and SRF. Interestingly, although these substitutions have a large effect on DNA bending and transcriptional activation by Mcm1, they have a relatively small effect on the DNA-binding affinity of the protein. This result suggests that the degree of DNA bending is important for transcriptional activation by Mcm1.

scholarly journals Scanning Mutagenesis of Mcm1: Residues Required for DNA Binding, DNA Bending, and Transcriptional Activation by a MADS-Box Protein

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas B. Acton ◽  
Janet Mead ◽  
Andrew M. Steiner ◽  
Andrew K. Vershon
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Serum Response Factor ◽  
Essential Gene ◽  
Dna Bending ◽  
Mads Box ◽  
Dna Interactions ◽  
Protein Dna Interactions

ABSTRACT MCM1 is an essential gene in the yeastSaccharomyces cerevisiae and is a member of the MADS-box family of transcriptional regulatory factors. To understand the nature of the protein-DNA interactions of this class of proteins, we have made a series of alanine substitutions in the DNA-binding domain of Mcm1 and examined the effects of these mutations in vivo and in vitro. Our results indicate which residues of Mcm1 are important for viability, transcriptional activation, and DNA binding and bending. Substitution of residues in Mcm1 which are highly conserved among the MADS-box proteins are lethal to the cell and abolish DNA binding in vitro. These positions have almost identical interactions with DNA in both the serum response factor-DNA and α2-Mcm1-DNA crystal structures, suggesting that these residues make up a conserved core of protein-DNA interactions responsible for docking MADS-box proteins to DNA. Substitution of residues which are not as well conserved among members of the MADS-box family play important roles in contributing to the specificity of DNA binding. These results suggest a general model of how MADS-box proteins recognize and bind DNA. We also provide evidence that the N-terminal extension of Mcm1 may have considerable conformational freedom, possibly to allow binding to different DNA sites. Finally, we have identified two mutants at positions which are critical for Mcm1-mediated DNA bending that have a slow-growth phenotype. This finding is consistent with our earlier results, indicating that DNA bending may have a role in Mcm1 function in the cell.

DNMT1 Cxxc Domain Can Functionally Substitute In An MLL Fusion Protein

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 4193-4193
Author(s):  
Laurie E. Risner ◽  
Aravinda Kuntimaddi ◽  
John H. Bushweller ◽  
Nancy J. Zeleznik-Le
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Affinity ◽  
Fusion Proteins ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Cpg Dna ◽  
Domain Swap ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Affinity

Abstract Abstract 4193 The MLL gene encodes a multi-domain protein that is involved in the maintenance of Hox gene expression during development and hematopoiesis, and was first identified through its involvement in chromosome translocations that cause leukemia. The CXXC domain of MLL, which is retained in leukemic MLL fusion proteins, is a cysteine rich DNA binding domain, with specificity for binding nonmethylated CpG-containing DNA, and is essential for MLL fusion proteins' oncogenic properties. We performed domain swap experiments in which CXXC domains from other proteins were swapped in to replace MLL's CXXC domain in the context of an oncogenic MLL fusion. CXXC domains from DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1), CpG binding protein (CGBP), and methyl-CpG binding domain protein 1 (MBD1), as well as a methyl binding domain (MBD) from MBD1 were swapped into the MLL-AF9 fusion. These particular domains were chosen because their described CpG DNA binding capacity is either similar or different from that described for MLL. In vitro colony assays on isolated murine bone marrow progenitor cells infected with domain swapped or wild type MLL-AF9 fusion genes were performed in order to determine whether CpG binding domains from other proteins would affect the ability of MLL-AF9 to give an enhanced proliferative capacity to bone marrow progenitor cells. In vivo murine studies determined whether the different CpG binding domains alter the ability of MLL fusion proteins to cause leukemia. We predicted that the different CpG binding domains would change the strength or specificity of MLL binding to DNA, which would affect the ability of MLL-AF9 to cause leukemia. The results of both in vitro replating assays and in vivo leukemogenesis experiments have shown significant differences between the ability of various CpG DNA binding domains to function in the context of an MLL-AF9 fusion protein. MLL-AF9 containing the DNMT1 CXXC domain shows robust in vitro colony forming activity and in vivo leukemogenesis activity, similar to the oncogenic MLL-AF9 fusion. However, MLL-AF9 containing either the CXXC domain from CGBP or MBD1, or the MBD domain of MBD1 all show reduced colony forming ability and leukemogenicity in vivo. In vitro DNA binding experiments are currently being performed to directly measure and compare the DNA binding affinity of the CXXC domain from MLL to the other domain swap proteins. Preliminary data suggests that MLL CXXC has a stronger DNA binding affinity to non-methylated DNA compared to the other CXXC domains. Furthermore, the DNMT and CGBP CXXC domains both show lower affinity DNA binding compared to MLL CXXC, but they have different effects in MLL-AF9. This suggests that CXXC domain properties in addition to DNA binding affinity, perhaps including protein recruitment, also contribute to an MLL fusion protein's leukemogenic properties. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

scholarly journals The Yeast a1 and α2 Homeodomain Proteins Do Not Contribute Equally to Heterodimeric DNA Binding

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
pp. 585-593 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yisheng Jin ◽  
Hualin Zhong ◽  
Andrew K. Vershon
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Binding Affinity ◽  
Sequence Specificity ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Homeodomain Proteins ◽  
Cell Type Specific ◽  
Dna Binding Affinity ◽  
Diploid Cells

ABSTRACT In diploid cells of the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, the α2 and a1 homeodomain proteins bind cooperatively to sites in the promoters of haploid cell-type-specific genes (hsg) to repress their expression. Although both proteins bind to the DNA, in the α2 homeodomain substitutions of residues that are involved in contacting the DNA have little or no effect on repression in vivo or cooperative DNA binding with a1 protein in vitro. This result brings up the question of the contribution of each protein in the heterodimer complex to the DNA-binding affinity and specificity. To determine the requirements for the a1-α2 homeodomain DNA recognition, we systematically introduced single base-pair substitutions in an a1-α2 DNA-binding site and examined their effects on repression in vivo and DNA binding in vitro. Our results show that nearly all substitutions that significantly decrease repression and DNA-binding affinity are at positions which are specifically contacted by either the α2 or a1 protein. Interestingly, an α2 mutant lacking side chains that make base-specific contacts in the major groove is able to discriminate between the wild-type and mutant DNA sites with the same sequence specificity as the wild-type protein. These results suggest that the specificity of α2 DNA binding in complex with a1 does not rely solely on the residues that make base-specific contacts. We have also examined the contribution of the a1 homeodomain to the binding affinity and specificity of the complex. In contrast to the lack of a defective phenotype produced by mutations in the α2 homeodomain, many of the alanine substitutions of residues in the a1 homeodomain have large effects on a1-α2-mediated repression and DNA binding. This result shows that the two proteins do not make equal contributions to the DNA-binding affinity of the complex.

scholarly journals Functional Domains of the TOL Plasmid Transcription Factor XylS

2000 ◽  
Vol 182 (4) ◽  
pp. 1118-1126 ◽  
Author(s):  
Niilo Kaldalu ◽  
Urve Toots ◽  
Victor de Lorenzo ◽  
Mart Ustav
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Dependent Manner ◽  
Tol Plasmid ◽  
Terminal Fragment ◽  
Central Regions ◽  
Basic Features ◽  
Regulatory Functions

ABSTRACT The alkylbenzoate degradation genes of Pseudomonas putida TOL plasmid are positively regulated by XylS, an AraC family protein, in a benzoate-dependent manner. In this study, we used deletion mutants and hybrid proteins to identify which parts of XylS are responsible for the DNA binding, transcriptional activation, and benzoate inducibility. We found that a 112-residue C-terminal fragment of XylS binds specifically to the Pm operator in vitro, protects this sequence from DNase I digestion identically to the wild-type (wt) protein, and activates the Pm promoter in vivo. When overexpressed, that C-terminal fragment could activate transcription as efficiently as wt XylS. All the truncations, which incorporated these 112 C-terminal residues, were able to activate transcription at least to some extent when overproduced. Intactness of the 210-residue N-terminal portion was found to be necessary for benzoate responsiveness of XylS. Deletions in the N-terminal and central regions seriously reduced the activity of XylS and caused the loss of effector control, whereas insertions into the putative interdomain region did not change the basic features of the XylS protein. Our results confirm that XylS consists of two parts which probably interact with each other. The C-terminal domain carries DNA-binding and transcriptional activation abilities, while the N-terminal region carries effector-binding and regulatory functions.

Reconstitution of transcriptional activation domains by reiteration of short peptide segments reveals the modular organization of a glutamine-rich activation domain

1994 ◽  
Vol 14 (9) ◽  
pp. 6056-6067
Author(s):  
M Tanaka ◽  
W Herr
Keyword(s):  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Domain ◽  
Dna Binding Domain ◽  
Activation Domain ◽  
Activation Domains ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain ◽  
Pou Domain

The POU domain activator Oct-2 contains an N-terminal glutamine-rich transcriptional activation domain. An 18-amino-acid segment (Q18III) from this region reconstituted a fully functional activation domain when tandemly reiterated and fused to either the Oct-2 or GAL4 DNA-binding domain. A minimal transcriptional activation domain likely requires three tandem Q18III segments, because one or two tandem Q18III segments displayed little activity, whereas three to five tandem segments were active and displayed increasing activity with increasing copy number. As with natural Oct-2 activation domains, in our assay a reiterated activation domain required a second homologous or heterologous activation domain to stimulate transcription effectively when fused to the Oct-2 POU domain. These results suggest that there are different levels of synergy within and among activation domains. Analysis of reiterated activation domains containing mutated Q18III segments revealed that leucines and glutamines, but not serines or threonines, are critical for activity in vivo. Curiously, several reiterated activation domains that were inactive in vivo were active in vitro, suggesting that there are significant functional differences in our in vivo and in vitro assays. Reiteration of a second 18-amino-acid segment from the Oct-2 glutamine-rich activation domain (Q18II) was also active, but its activity was DNA-binding domain specific, because it was active when fused to the GAL4 than to the Oct-2 DNA-binding domain. The ability of separate short peptide segments derived from a single transcriptional activation domain to activate transcription after tandem reiteration emphasizes the flexible and modular nature of a transcriptional activation domain.

scholarly journals Regulation of the DNA-binding and transcriptional activities of Xenopus laevis NFI-X by a novel C-terminal domain.

1995 ◽  
Vol 15 (10) ◽  
pp. 5552-5562 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Roulet ◽  
M T Armentero ◽  
G Krey ◽  
B Corthésy ◽  
C Dreyer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Replication ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Xenopus Laevis ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Binding Activity ◽  
New Members ◽  
Binding Domains ◽  
Dna Binding Activity

The nuclear factor I (NFI) family consists of sequence-specific DNA-binding proteins that activate both transcription and adenovirus DNA replication. We have characterized three new members of the NFI family that belong to the Xenopus laevis NFI-X subtype and differ in their C-termini. We show that these polypeptides can activate transcription in HeLa and Drosophila Schneider line 2 cells, using an activation domain that is subdivided into adjacent variable and subtype-specific domains each having independent activation properties in chimeric proteins. Together, these two domains constitute the full NFI-X transactivation potential. In addition, we find that the X. laevis NFI-X proteins are capable of activating adenovirus DNA replication through their conserved N-terminal DNA-binding domains. Surprisingly, their in vitro DNA-binding activities are specifically inhibited by a novel repressor domain contained within the C-terminal part, while the dimerization and replication functions per se are not affected. However, inhibition of DNA-binding activity in vitro is relieved within the cell, as transcriptional activation occurs irrespective of the presence of the repressor domain. Moreover, the region comprising the repressor domain participates in transactivation. Mechanisms that may allow the relief of DNA-binding inhibition in vivo and trigger transcriptional activation are discussed.

scholarly journals Yeast Coactivator MBF1 Mediates GCN4-Dependent Transcriptional Activation

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (9) ◽  
pp. 4971-4976 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ken-ichi Takemaru ◽  
Satoshi Harashima ◽  
Hitoshi Ueda ◽  
Susumu Hirose
Keyword(s):  
Gene Expression ◽  
Saccharomyces Cerevisiae ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Nuclear Receptor ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Crucial Role ◽  
Tata Binding Protein ◽  
Binding Region

ABSTRACT Transcriptional coactivators play a crucial role in gene expression by communicating between regulatory factors and the basal transcription machinery. The coactivator multiprotein bridging factor 1 (MBF1) was originally identified as a bridging molecule that connects theDrosophila nuclear receptor FTZ-F1 and TATA-binding protein (TBP). The MBF1 sequence is highly conserved across species fromSaccharomyces cerevisiae to human. Here we provide evidence acquired in vitro and in vivo that yeast MBF1 mediates GCN4-dependent transcriptional activation by bridging the DNA-binding region of GCN4 and TBP. These findings indicate that the coactivator MBF1 functions by recruiting TBP to promoters where DNA-binding regulators are bound.

scholarly journals Residue R113 Is Essential for PhoP Dimerization and Function: a Residue Buried in the Asymmetric PhoP Dimer Interface Determined in the PhoPN Three-Dimensional Crystal Structure

2003 ◽  
Vol 185 (1) ◽  
pp. 262-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yinghua Chen ◽  
Catherine Birck ◽  
Jean-Pierre Samama ◽  
F. Marion Hulett
Keyword(s):  
Crystal Structure ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Salt Bridge ◽  
Pho Regulon ◽  
Dimer Interface ◽  
And Function ◽  
Negative Phenotype

ABSTRACT Bacillus subtilis PhoP is a member of the OmpR/PhoB family of response regulators that is directly required for transcriptional activation or repression of Pho regulon genes in conditions under which Pi is growth limiting. Characterization of the PhoP protein has established that phosphorylation of the protein is not essential for PhoP dimerization or DNA binding but is essential for transcriptional regulation of Pho regulon genes. DNA footprinting studies of PhoP-regulated promoters showed that there was cooperative binding between PhoP dimers at PhoP-activated promoters and/or extensive PhoP oligomerization 3′ of PhoP-binding consensus repeats in PhoP-repressed promoters. The crystal structure of PhoPN described in the accompanying paper revealed that the dimer interface between two PhoP monomers involves nonidentical surfaces such that each monomer in a dimer retains a second surface that is available for further oligomerization. A salt bridge between R113 on one monomer and D60 on another monomer was judged to be of major importance in the protein-protein interaction. We describe the consequences of mutation of the PhoP R113 codon to a glutamate or alanine codon and mutation of the PhoP D60 codon to a lysine codon. In vivo expression of either PhoPR113E, PhoPR113A, or PhoPD60K resulted in a Pho-negative phenotype. In vitro analysis showed that PhoPR113E was phosphorylated by PhoR (the cognate histidine kinase) but was unable to dimerize. Monomeric PhoPR113E∼P was deficient in DNA binding, contributing to the PhoPR113E in vivo Pho-negative phenotype. While previous studies emphasized that phosphorylation was essential for PhoP function, data reported here indicate that phosphorylation is not sufficient as PhoP dimerization or oligomerization is also essential. Our data support the physiological relevance of the residues of the asymmetric dimer interface in PhoP dimerization and function.

scholarly journals Synergistic transcriptional activation by CTF/NF-I and the estrogen receptor involves stabilized interactions with a limiting target factor.

1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 2937-2945 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Martinez ◽  
Y Dusserre ◽  
W Wahli ◽  
N Mermod
Keyword(s):  
Estrogen Receptor ◽  
Dna Binding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation ◽  
Transcription Initiation ◽  
Limiting Factor ◽  
Gene Promoters ◽  
Protein Coding ◽  
Transcriptional Activation Domain

Transcription initiation at eukaryotic protein-coding gene promoters is regulated by a complex interplay of site-specific DNA-binding proteins acting synergistically or antagonistically. Here, we have analyzed the mechanisms of synergistic transcriptional activation between members of the CCAAT-binding transcription factor/nuclear factor I (CTF/NF-I) family and the estrogen receptor. By using cotransfection experiments with HeLa cells, we show that the proline-rich transcriptional activation domain of CTF-1, when fused to the GAL4 DNA-binding domain, synergizes with each of the two estrogen receptor-activating regions. Cooperative DNA binding between the GAL4-CTF-1 fusion and the estrogen receptor does not occur in vitro, and in vivo competition experiments demonstrate that both activators can be specifically inhibited by the overexpression of a proline-rich competitor, indicating that a common limiting factor is mediating their transcriptional activation functions. Furthermore, the two activators functioning synergistically are much more resistant to competition than either factor alone, suggesting that synergism between CTF-1 and the estrogen receptor is the result of a stronger tethering of the limiting target factor(s) to the two promoter-bound activators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document