scholarly journals Topoisomerase III Acts Upstream of Rad53p in the S-Phase DNA Damage Checkpoint

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (21) ◽  
pp. 7150-7162 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronjon K. Chakraverty ◽  
Jonathan M. Kearsey ◽  
Thomas J. Oakley ◽  
Muriel Grenon ◽  
Maria-Angeles de la Torre Ruiz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Damaging Agents ◽  
Topoisomerase Iii ◽  
Rad53 Kinase ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT Deletion of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae TOP3gene, encoding Top3p, leads to a slow-growth phenotype characterized by an accumulation of cells with a late S/G2content of DNA (S. Gangloff, J. P. McDonald, C. Bendixen, L. Arthur, and R. Rothstein, Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:8391–8398, 1994). We have investigated the function of TOP3 during cell cycle progression and the molecular basis for the cell cycle delay seen in top3Δ strains. We show that top3Δ mutants exhibit a RAD24-dependent delay in the G2 phase, suggesting a possible role for Top3p in the resolution of abnormal DNA structures or DNA damage arising during S phase. Consistent with this notion,top3Δ strains are sensitive to killing by a variety of DNA-damaging agents, including UV light and the alkylating agent methyl methanesulfonate, and are partially defective in the intra-S-phase checkpoint that slows the rate of S-phase progression following exposure to DNA-damaging agents. This S-phase checkpoint defect is associated with a defect in phosphorylation of Rad53p, indicating that, in the absence of Top3p, the efficiency of sensing the existence of DNA damage or signaling to the Rad53 kinase is impaired. Consistent with a role for Top3p specifically during S phase, top3Δ mutants are sensitive to the replication inhibitor hydroxyurea, expression of the TOP3 mRNA is activated in late G1 phase, and DNA damage checkpoints operating outside of S phase are unaffected by deletion of TOP3. All of these phenotypic consequences of loss of Top3p function are at least partially suppressed by deletion of SGS1, the yeast homologue of the human Bloom's and Werner's syndrome genes. These data implicate Top3p and, by inference, Sgs1p in an S-phase-specific role in the cellular response to DNA damage. A model proposing a role for these proteins in S phase is presented.

scholarly journals Promyelocytic leukemia nuclear bodies behave as DNA damage sensors whose response to DNA double-strand breaks is regulated by NBS1 and the kinases ATM, Chk2, and ATR

2006 ◽  
Vol 175 (1) ◽  
pp. 55-66 ◽  
Author(s):  
Graham Dellaire ◽  
Reagan W. Ching ◽  
Kashif Ahmed ◽  
Farid Jalali ◽  
Kenneth C.K. Tse ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cellular Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Nuclear Body ◽  
Promyelocytic Leukemia ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Nuclear Bodies ◽  
Structural Basis ◽  
Loss Of Function

The promyelocytic leukemia (PML) nuclear body (NB) is a dynamic subnuclear compartment that is implicated in tumor suppression, as well as in the transcription, replication, and repair of DNA. PML NB number can change during the cell cycle, increasing in S phase and in response to cellular stress, including DNA damage. Although topological changes in chromatin after DNA damage may affect the integrity of PML NBs, the molecular or structural basis for an increase in PML NB number has not been elucidated. We demonstrate that after DNA double-strand break induction, the increase in PML NB number is based on a biophysical process, as well as ongoing cell cycle progression and DNA repair. PML NBs increase in number by a supramolecular fission mechanism similar to that observed in S-phase cells, and which is delayed or inhibited by the loss of function of NBS1, ATM, Chk2, and ATR kinase. Therefore, an increase in PML NB number is an intrinsic element of the cellular response to DNA damage.

scholarly journals Checkpoint inhibition of origin firing prevents inappropriate replication outside of S-phase

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark C. Johnson ◽  
Geylani Can ◽  
Miguel Santos ◽  
Diana Alexander ◽  
Philip Zegerman
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Replication Initiation ◽  
Origin Firing ◽  
Initiation Factors ◽  
Dependent Inhibition ◽  
Rad53 Kinase ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

AbstractAcross eukaryotes, checkpoints maintain the order of cell cycle events in the face of DNA damage or incomplete replication. Although a wide array of DNA lesions activates the checkpoint kinases, whether and how this response differs in different phases of the cell cycle remains poorly understood. The S-phase checkpoint for example results in the slowing of replication, which in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is caused by Rad53 kinase-dependent inhibition of the initiation factors Sld3 and Dbf4. Despite this, we show here that Rad53 phosphorylates both of these substrates throughout the cell cycle at the same sites as in S-phase, suggesting roles for this pathway beyond S-phase. Indeed we show that Rad53-dependent inhibition of Sld3 and Dbf4 limits re-replication in G2/M phase, preventing inappropriate gene amplification events. In addition we show that inhibition of Sld3 and Dbf4 after DNA damage in G1 phase prevents premature replication initiation at all origins at the G1/S transition. This study redefines the scope and specificity of the ‘S-phase checkpoint’ with implications for understanding the roles of this checkpoint in the majority of cancers that lack proper cell cycle controls.

scholarly journals Characterization of mec1Kinase-Deficient Mutants and of New Hypomorphic mec1Alleles Impairing Subsets of the DNA Damage Response Pathway

2001 ◽  
Vol 21 (12) ◽  
pp. 3913-3925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Paciotti ◽  
Michela Clerici ◽  
Maddalena Scotti ◽  
Giovanna Lucchini ◽  
Maria Pia Longhese
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Damage Response ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
Protein A ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Specific Cell ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints ◽  
Damage Response

ABSTRACT DNA damage checkpoints lead to the inhibition of cell cycle progression following DNA damage. The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Mec1 checkpoint protein, a phosphatidylinositol kinase-related protein, is required for transient cell cycle arrest in response to DNA damage or DNA replication defects. We show thatmec1 kinase-deficient (mec1kd) mutants are indistinguishable from mec1Δ cells, indicating that the Mec1 conserved kinase domain is required for all known Mec1 functions, including cell viability and proper DNA damage response. Mec1kd variants maintain the ability to physically interact with both Ddc2 and wild-type Mec1 and cause dominant checkpoint defects when overproduced in MEC1 cells, impairing the ability of cells to slow down S phase entry and progression after DNA damage in G1 or during S phase. Conversely, an excess of Mec1kd inMEC1 cells does not abrogate the G2/M checkpoint, suggesting that Mec1 functions required for response to aberrant DNA structures during specific cell cycle stages can be separable. In agreement with this hypothesis, we describe two new hypomorphic mec1 mutants that are completely defective in the G1/S and intra-S DNA damage checkpoints but properly delay nuclear division after UV irradiation in G2. The finding that these mutants, although indistinguishable frommec1Δ cells with respect to the ability to replicate a damaged DNA template, do not lose viability after UV light and methyl methanesulfonate treatment suggests that checkpoint impairments do not necessarily result in hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents.

scholarly journals Critical Role for Mouse Hus1 in an S-Phase DNA Damage Cell Cycle Checkpoint

2003 ◽  
Vol 23 (3) ◽  
pp. 791-803 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert S. Weiss ◽  
Philip Leder ◽  
Cyrus Vaziri
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Synthesis ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Null Mouse ◽  
Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT Mouse Hus1 encodes an evolutionarily conserved DNA damage response protein. In this study we examined how targeted deletion of Hus1 affects cell cycle checkpoint responses to genotoxic stress. Unlike hus1− fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) cells, which are defective for the G2/M DNA damage checkpoint, Hus1-null mouse cells did not inappropriately enter mitosis following genotoxin treatment. However, Hus1-deficient cells displayed a striking S-phase DNA damage checkpoint defect. Whereas wild-type cells transiently repressed DNA replication in response to benzo(a)pyrene dihydrodiol epoxide (BPDE), a genotoxin that causes bulky DNA adducts, Hus1-null cells maintained relatively high levels of DNA synthesis following treatment with this agent. However, when treated with DNA strand break-inducing agents such as ionizing radiation (IR), Hus1-deficient cells showed intact S-phase checkpoint responses. Conversely, checkpoint-mediated inhibition of DNA synthesis in response to BPDE did not require NBS1, a component of the IR-responsive S-phase checkpoint pathway. Taken together, these results demonstrate that Hus1 is required specifically for one of two separable mammalian checkpoint pathways that respond to distinct forms of genome damage during S phase.

scholarly journals A Fission Yeast Gene,him1+/dfp1+, Encoding a Regulatory Subunit for Hsk1 Kinase, Plays Essential Roles in S-Phase Initiation as Well as in S-Phase Checkpoint Control and Recovery from DNA Damage

1999 ◽  
Vol 19 (8) ◽  
pp. 5535-5547 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadayuki Takeda ◽  
Keiko Ogino ◽  
Etsuko Matsui ◽  
Min Kwan Cho ◽  
Hiroyuki Kumagai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Kinase Activity ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Regulatory Subunit ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Regulatory Subunits ◽  
Hydroxyurea Treatment ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

ABSTRACT Saccharomyces cerevisiae CDC7 encodes a serine/threonine kinase required for G1/S transition, and its related kinases are present in fission yeast as well as in higher eukaryotes, including humans. Kinase activity of Cdc7 protein depends on the regulatory subunit, Dbf4, which also interacts with replication origins. We have identified him1+ from two-hybrid screening with Hsk1, a fission yeast homologue of Cdc7 kinase, and showed that it encodes a regulatory subunit of Hsk1. Him1, identical to Dfp1, previously identified as an associated molecule of Hsk1, binds to Hsk1 and stimulates its kinase activity, which phosphorylates both catalytic and regulatory subunits as well as recombinant MCM2 protein in vitro. him1+ is essential for DNA replication in fission yeast cells, and its transcription is cell cycle regulated, increasing at middle M to late G1. The protein level is low at START in G1, increases at the G1/S boundary, and is maintained at a high level throughout S phase. Him1 protein is hyperphosphorylated at G1/S through S during the cell cycle as well as in response to early S-phase arrest induced by nucleotide deprivation. Deletion of one of the motifs conserved in regulatory subunits for Cdc7-related kinases as well as alanine substitution of three serine and threonine residues present in the same motif resulted in a defect in checkpoint regulation normally induced by hydroxyurea treatment. The alanine mutant also showed growth retardation after UV irradiation and the addition of methylmethane sulfonate. In keeping with this result, a database search indicates that him1+ is identical to rad35+ . Our results reveal a novel function of the Cdc7/Dbf4-related kinase complex in S-phase checkpoint control as well as in growth recovery from DNA damage in addition to its predicted essential function in S-phase initiation.

scholarly journals DNA damage checkpoint dynamics drive cell cycle phase transitions

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hui Xiao Chao ◽  
Cere E. Poovey ◽  
Ashley A. Privette ◽  
Gavin D. Grant ◽  
Hui Yan Chao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Phase Transitions ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Phase ◽  
Cycle Phase ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoint ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Dna Damage Checkpoints

ABSTRACTDNA damage checkpoints are cellular mechanisms that protect the integrity of the genome during cell cycle progression. In response to genotoxic stress, these checkpoints halt cell cycle progression until the damage is repaired, allowing cells enough time to recover from damage before resuming normal proliferation. Here, we investigate the temporal dynamics of DNA damage checkpoints in individual proliferating cells by observing cell cycle phase transitions following acute DNA damage. We find that in gap phases (G1 and G2), DNA damage triggers an abrupt halt to cell cycle progression in which the duration of arrest correlates with the severity of damage. However, cells that have already progressed beyond a proposed “commitment point” within a given cell cycle phase readily transition to the next phase, revealing a relaxation of checkpoint stringency during later stages of certain cell cycle phases. In contrast to G1 and G2, cell cycle progression in S phase is significantly less sensitive to DNA damage. Instead of exhibiting a complete halt, we find that increasing DNA damage doses leads to decreased rates of S-phase progression followed by arrest in the subsequent G2. Moreover, these phase-specific differences in DNA damage checkpoint dynamics are associated with corresponding differences in the proportions of irreversibly arrested cells. Thus, the precise timing of DNA damage determines the sensitivity, rate of cell cycle progression, and functional outcomes for damaged cells. These findings should inform our understanding of cell fate decisions after treatment with common cancer therapeutics such as genotoxins or spindle poisons, which often target cells in a specific cell cycle phase.

scholarly journals Surviving chromosome replication: the many roles of the S-phase checkpoint pathway

2011 ◽  
Vol 366 (1584) ◽  
pp. 3554-3561 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karim Labib ◽  
Giacomo De Piccoli
Keyword(s):  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Reductase Activity ◽  
Critical Role ◽  
Chromosome Replication ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Replication Forks ◽  
Checkpoint Pathway ◽  
S Phase Checkpoint

Checkpoints were originally identified as signalling pathways that delay mitosis in response to DNA damage or defects in chromosome replication, allowing time for DNA repair to occur. The ATR (ataxia- and rad-related) and ATM (ataxia-mutated) protein kinases are recruited to defective replication forks or to sites of DNA damage, and are thought to initiate the DNA damage response in all eukaryotes. In addition to delaying cell cycle progression, however, the S-phase checkpoint pathway also controls chromosome replication and DNA repair pathways in a highly complex fashion, in order to preserve genome integrity. Much of our understanding of this regulation has come from studies of yeasts, in which the best-characterized targets are the stimulation of ribonucleotide reductase activity by multiple mechanisms, and the inhibition of new initiation events at later origins of DNA replication. In addition, however, the S-phase checkpoint also plays a more enigmatic and apparently critical role in preserving the functional integrity of defective replication forks, by mechanisms that are still understood poorly. This review considers some of the key experiments that have led to our current understanding of this highly complex pathway.

scholarly journals RB-Dependent S-Phase Response to DNA Damage

2000 ◽  
Vol 20 (20) ◽  
pp. 7751-7763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen E. Knudsen ◽  
Dana Booth ◽  
Soheil Naderi ◽  
Zvjezdana Sever-Chroneos ◽  
Anne F. Fribourg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Genotoxic Stress ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Phase Response ◽  
Retinoblastoma Tumor Suppressor ◽  
Retinoblastoma Tumor ◽  
Inhibition Of Dna Synthesis

ABSTRACT The retinoblastoma tumor suppressor protein (RB) is a potent inhibitor of cell proliferation. RB is expressed throughout the cell cycle, but its antiproliferative activity is neutralized by phosphorylation during the G1/S transition. RB plays an essential role in the G1 arrest induced by a variety of growth inhibitory signals. In this report, RB is shown to also be required for an intra-S-phase response to DNA damage. Treatment with cisplatin, etoposide, or mitomycin C inhibited S-phase progression in Rb+/+ but not in Rb−/− mouse embryo fibroblasts. Dephosphorylation of RB in S-phase cells temporally preceded the inhibition of DNA synthesis. This S-phase dephosphorylation of RB and subsequent inhibition of DNA replication was observed in p21Cip1-deficient cells. The induction of the RB-dependent intra-S-phase arrest persisted for days and correlated with a protection against DNA damage-induced cell death. These results demonstrate that RB plays a protective role in response to genotoxic stress by inhibiting cell cycle progression in G1 and in S phase.

scholarly journals Fission Yeast rad12+Regulates Cell Cycle Checkpoint Control and Is Homologous to the Bloom’s Syndrome Disease Gene

1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 2721-2728 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Davey ◽  
Christine S. Han ◽  
Sarah A. Ramer ◽  
Jennifer C. Klassen ◽  
Adam Jacobson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Fission Yeast ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Uv Light ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cell Cycle Checkpoint ◽  
Checkpoint Control ◽  
Bloom's Syndrome ◽  
Synthesis Inhibitor ◽  
Bloom’S Syndrome

ABSTRACT The human BLM gene is a member of the Escherichia coli recQ helicase family, which includes the Saccharomyces cerevisiae SGS1 and human WRN genes. Defects inBLM are responsible for the human disease Bloom’s syndrome, which is characterized in part by genomic instability and a high incidence of cancer. Here we describe the cloning ofrad12 +, which is the fission yeast homolog ofBLM and is identical to the recently reportedrhq1 + gene. We showed that rad12null cells are sensitive to DNA damage induced by UV light and γ radiation, as well as to the DNA synthesis inhibitor hydroxyurea. Overexpression of the wild-type rad12 + gene also leads to sensitivity to these agents and to defects associated with the loss of the S-phase and G2-phase checkpoint control. We showed genetically and biochemically thatrad12 + acts upstream fromrad9 +, one of the fission yeast G2checkpoint control genes, in regulating exit from the S-phase checkpoint. The physical chromosome segregation defects seen inrad12 null cells combined with the checkpoint regulation defect seen in the rad12 + overproducer implicate rad12 + as a key coupler of chromosomal integrity with cell cycle progression.

scholarly journals The F-Box Protein Dia2 Regulates DNA Replication

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 1540-1548 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deanna M. Koepp ◽  
Andrew C. Kile ◽  
Swarna Swaminathan ◽  
Veronica Rodriguez-Rivera
Keyword(s):  
Cell Cycle ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Replication ◽  
Cell Cycle Progression ◽  
Protein Complexes ◽  
S Phase ◽  
Cycle Progression ◽  
Origin Binding Protein ◽  
Cold Sensitive ◽  
F Box Protein

Ubiquitin-mediated proteolysis plays a key role in many pathways inside the cell and is particularly important in regulating cell cycle transitions. SCF (Skp1/Cul1/F-box protein) complexes are modular ubiquitin ligases whose specificity is determined by a substrate-binding F-box protein. Dia2 is a Saccharomyces cerevisiae F-box protein previously described to play a role in invasive growth and pheromone response pathways. We find that deletion of DIA2 renders cells cold-sensitive and subject to defects in cell cycle progression, including premature S-phase entry. Consistent with a role in regulating DNA replication, the Dia2 protein binds replication origins. Furthermore, the dia2 mutant accumulates DNA damage in both S and G2/M phases of the cell cycle. These defects are likely a result of the absence of SCFDia2 activity, as a Dia2 ΔF-box mutant shows similar phenotypes. Interestingly, prolonging G1-phase in dia2 cells prevents the accumulation of DNA damage in S-phase. We propose that Dia2 is an origin-binding protein that plays a role in regulating DNA replication.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document