scholarly journals AB0830 LIPID PROFILE IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS. FREQUENCY AND ASSOCIATION WITH DISEASE ACTIVITY.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1719.1-1720
Author(s):  
V. Savio ◽  
Y. Tissera ◽  
M. I. Quaglia ◽  
J. A. Albiero ◽  
C. G. Alonso ◽  
...  

Background:Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory disease associated with higher risk of cardiovascular events and metabolic syndrome. The inflammation not only accelerates atherosclerosis, but also may influence cardiovascular (CV) risk factors such as lipid profile, blood pressure and insulin resistance. Lipid profile has previously been studied in PsA, however this association is still controversial.Objectives:To study the frequency of altered lipid profile in patients with PsA and its association with disease activity.Methods:We studied all the patients with diagnosis of PsA who consecutively attended to Rheumatology Unit at Cordoba Hospital from July 2018 to December 2019. PsA was diagnosed according CASPAR criteria. Clinical and laboratory data were collected. The activity of the disease was evaluated by PASI, MDA and DAPSA. Quantitative variables will be expressed in median and 1st and 3rd interquartile; qualitative variables expressed in frequency and percentage. Correlation analysis was calculated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:42 PsA patients were included. Mean age was 56 years old (47.25-62.75) and 54.76% were female (n=23). 92.86% (n=39) of the patients had plaque Psoriasis and 87.8% (n=36) had peripheral joint involvement.Frequency of comorbidities in PsA are shown in Graphic 1. 31 (73.8%) of the patients were treated with topical therapy, 3 (7.14%) with phototherapy, 31 (73.8%) with Methotrexate and 17 (41.46%) with biologics and JAK inhibitor. Activity Disease Index and Lipid profile are shown in Table 1 and 2.There was not association between Apo B/Apo A coefficient with DAPSA (rho=0.013; p=0.940) and MDA (rho=-0.029; p=0.867).Conclusion:In spite of the presence of cardiovascular factors in the majority of PsA patients, lipid profile is not correlated with disease activity in this population.References:[1]Ahlehoff O, Gislason GH, Charlot M, et al. Psoriasis is associated with clinically significant cardiovascular risk: A Danish nationwide cohort study. J Intern Med 2011;270:147-57.[2]Mallbris, L., Ritchlin, C.T., Ståhle, M. “Metabolic disorders in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.” Curr RheumatolRep.8(5): 355–363. 2006[3]Ng CY, Tzeng I-S, Liu S-H, Chang Y-C, Huang Y-H. Metabolic parameters in psoriatic patients treated with interleukin-12/23 blockade (Ustekinumab). J Dermatol 2018; 45:309–313[4]Kaur S, Kingo K, Zilmer M. Psoriasis and cardiovascular risk – do promising new biomarkers have clinical impact? Mediators Inflamm 2017; 2017: 7279818[5]Gentile M, Peluso R, Di Minno MN, et al. Association between small dense LDL and sub-clinical atherosclerosis in patients with psoriatic arthritis. ClinRheumatol 2016; 35: 2023-9.Graphic 1.Comorbidities in PsATable. 1.Activity Disease Index in PsAACTIVITY INDEXn=42DAPSA14.45 (9.72-23.92)DAPSA≤4 REMISSION3>4 y ≤14 low disease activity16>14 y ≤28 moderate disease activity17>28 high disease activity3cDAPSA14.00 (8.00-23.00)/41*MDA9 (25)/36PASI2.20 (0.20-6.80)/41**Expressed in median and interquartiles.Qualitative variables expressed in frequency and percentage.Table. 2.Lipid Profile in PsA patients.Cholesterol (mg/dl)194.5 (164.8-218.2)HDL (mg/dl)48.00 (37.00-57.00)LDL (mg/dl)114.5 (78.5-140.8)TG (mg/dl)139.50 (89.25-191.20)Expressed in median and interquartiles.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

RMD Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e001149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philip S Helliwell ◽  
Dafna D Gladman ◽  
Soumya D Chakravarty ◽  
Shelly Kafka ◽  
Chetan S Karyekar ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe interleukin-12/23p40-subunit-inhibitor ustekinumab significantly improved spondylitis-related symptoms through Week 24 in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients with peripheral arthritis and physician-reported spondylitis (PA-PRS) in PSUMMIT-1&2. We further evaluated ustekinumab’s effect on spondylitis-related endpoints in PSUMMIT-1&2 tumour necrosis factor-inhibitor (TNFi)-naïve patients with PA-PRS.MethodsPatients with active PsA (≥5 swollen and ≥5 tender joints, C-reactive-protein ≥ 3.0 mg/L) despite conventional (PSUMMIT-1&2) and/or prior TNFi (PSUMMIT-2) therapy received subcutaneous ustekinumab 45 mg, 90 mg or placebo (Week 0, Week 4, Week 16). Changes in Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) neck/back/hip pain question (#2) and modified BASDAI (mBASDAI, excluding PA) scores and Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score (ASDAS) responses were assessed at Weeks 12 and 24.ResultsThe pooled PSUMMIT-1&2, TNFi-naïve (n=747), PA-PRS (n=223) subset (158 with human-leucocyte-antigen (HLA)-B27 results) presented with moderate-to-severe spondylitis-related symptoms (mean BASDAI-neck/back/hip pain-6.51, mBASDAI-6.54, BASDAI-6.51, ASDAS-3.81). Mean Week 24 changes were larger among ustekinumab than placebo-treated patients for both neck/back/hip pain (−1.99 vs −0.18) and mBASDAI (−2.09 vs −0.59). Improvements in neck/back/hip pain and fatigue appeared numerically greater in HLA-B27+ than HLA-B27– patients; those for other domains were generally consistent. Greater proportions of ustekinumab versus placebo-treated patients achieved ASDAS clinically important improvement at Week 24 (decrease ≥ 1.1; 49.6% vs 12.7%; nominal p<0.05).ConclusionsImprovements in BASDAI neck/back/hip pain and mBASDAI among ustekinumab-treated, TNFi-naïve, PsA patients with PA-PRS were clinically meaningful and consistent across assessment tools. Numerically greater improvements in neck/back/hip pain in HLA-B27+ than HLA-B27– patients, noted in the context of similar overall mBASDAI improvements between the subgroups, suggest ustekinumab may improve disease activity in TNFi-naïve PsA patients likely to exhibit axial disease.Clinical trial registration numbersPSUMMIT 1, NCT01009086; PSUMMIT 2, NCT01077362.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1685.1-1686
Author(s):  
K. Bonek ◽  
E. Kuca-Warnawin ◽  
E. Kontny ◽  
P. Głuszko

Background:We have previously found that: (i) patients with spondyloarthritis (SpAs) have higher circulating levels of IL-18 and osteoprotegerin (OPG) than healthy controls (1), (ii) psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients present with more proatherogenic lipid profile and higher IL-18 levels than ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients (2)Objectives:To investigate the relationship between disease phenotype, i.e. peripheral arthritis (perPsA n=45), axial PsA (axPsA n=16) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS n=94), cardiovascular risk factors and serum concentrations of IL-18, IL-17.Methods:A group of 155 SpA patients (94 AS/61 PsA), of similar age (44.5 versus 44.9 years), disease duration (4.8 versus 6.8 years), and matched with high disease activity (AS ASDAS-CRP 3.62±0.94; PsA DAPSA 26.75±26.61) were included in the study. The lipid profile comprised triglycerides (TG), total cholesterol (tChol), low- and high-density lipoprotein (LDL and HDL, respectively) measurement. Ischemic Heart Disease (IHD) diagnosis was established from patient’s medical history. Serum concentrations of IL-17AF, IL-18 were measured by specific commercially available enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) and were expressed as medians (pg/ml). The Mann-Whitney test was applied for intergroup comparison, correlation was assessed using Spearman’s Rank tests (r value is shown) with linear regression model.Results:Patients with perPsA had higher rate of IHD than axPsA and AS patients (27% vs 0% vs 7.8%, respectively). perPsA patients had significantly higher diastolic blood pressure than AS patients (perPsA 131±13mmHg vs AS 121±14 mmHg), more severe cardiovascular burden than patients with axial disease, were characterised by higher occurrence of obesity (perPsA 42% vs axPsA o 18% vs 18% AS) and hypertriglyceridemia (perPsA 48% vs axPsA 14% vs 16%AS) as well as higher TG concentration (perPsA 165± 87 mg/dl vs axPsA 111± 63mg/dl vs 110± 57 AS mg/dl). Moreover, patients with perPsA had significantly higher serum concentrations of IL-18 than axPsA and AS groups (132.5pg/ml vs 79.2pg/ml vs 84.9pg/ml), but there were no differences between them in IL-17 concentrations. Interestingly, in patients with perPsA, but no other patients’ groups, statistically significant associations between IL-18 concentrations and proatherogenic risk factors were found, as IL-18 correlated positively with TC (r=0.31), TG (r=0.53) atherogenic index (r=0.6), and uric acid (r=0.3) concentrations, while negatively with HDL levels (r=-0.47). Although patients groups differ in cardiovascular risk profiles, there were no significant differences in CV risk estimation using SCORE scale (perPsA 2.3% vs 1.6% axPsA vs 2.1%AS)Conclusion:We conclude that in PsA peripheral joints inflammation is associated with more proatherogenic cardiovascular risk profile and higher IL-18 serum levels, that seem to be interrelated, while patient’s disease activity is associated with metabolic syndrome. Generally recommended SCORE scale is practically unable to indicate SpA patients with higher CV riskReferences:[1]Kontny E, et al. PAB0733 Associations of serum osteoprotegerin and IL-18 concentrations with cardiovascular risk in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis patientsAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases2017;76:1310-1311.[2]Bonek K et al. ESAT0310 The associations of serumIL-l18 and osteoprotegerin (OPG) levels with the lipid profile in psoriatic arthritis (PSA) patientsAnnals of the Rheumatic Diseases2018;77:1019-1020.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


2010 ◽  
Vol 37 (12) ◽  
pp. 2559-2565 ◽  
Author(s):  
DAFNA D. GLADMAN ◽  
BRIAN D.M. TOM ◽  
PHILIP J. MEASE ◽  
VERNON T. FAREWELL

Objective.To develop a recommended measure of response for use in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) clinical trials and observational cohort studies reflecting joint involvement.Methods.Previously, we used data from phase III randomized placebo-controlled trials of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents to determine models, based primarily on statistical considerations but with some clinical input when necessary, that best distinguish drug-treated from placebo-treated patients. For the same data, we examine response criteria currently used for PsA and logistic regression models based on the individual components of these response criteria. Comparison with our previously developed models, based primarily on statistical consideration, is made.Results.A simplified score, the PsA Joint Activity Index (PsAJAI), based on components of the ACR30, performed better than the ACR20 and PsARC, and comparable to our previously developed models. The PsAJAI is a weighted sum of 30% improvement in core measures with weights of 2 given to the joint count measure, the C-reactive protein laboratory measure, and the physician global assessment of disease activity measure. Weights of 1 should be given to the remaining 30% improvement measures including pain, patient global assessment of disease activity, and the Health Assessment Questionnaire.Conclusion.We recommend the PsAJAI be used as an outcome measure for assessing joint disease response in PsA clinical trials.


2021 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Roxana Coras ◽  
Arthur Kavanaugh ◽  
Angela Kluzniak ◽  
Dustina Holt ◽  
Amy Weilgosz ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Oxylipins are biological lipids that have been implicated in inflammation. We previously found that certain oxylipins correlated with clinical manifestations in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. Here, we compare oxylipin profiles in PsA patients and those with psoriasis (PsO) without inflammatory arthritis to identify oxylipins that associate with specific disease manifestations to better understand disease pathogenesis and identify new biomarkers. Methods Consecutive patients with PsA (who met the CASPAR classification criteria for PsA) and PsO were recruited from the Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic. A thorough clinical examination was performed, including entheseal (Leeds enthesitis index (LEI)) and joint involvement (SJC/TJC 66/68). Patients were evaluated for pain and global disease activity on a visual analog scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 100. This was followed by disease activity scores calculation: cDAPSA (Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis) and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Serum oxylipins were determined by mass spectrometry and their association with clinical characteristics (PASI/LEI and cDAPSA) was analyzed using Metaboanalyst 4.0 and R version 3.6.1. Results Twenty PsO (average age 52 [10.8], 55% males) and 19 PsA patients (average age 60.5 [11.4], 63.1% males) were included. PsO patients had an average body mass index (BMI) of 33.7 (6.84) and an average PASI of 3.8 (4.2). PsA patients had an average BMI of 31.9 (5.6), TJC of 9.3 (10.41), SJC of 3.7 (4.23), with an average cDAPSA of 23.3 (11.4). 63.1% of PsA patients had enthesitis (average LEI 2.2 [3]) and the same percentage had psoriasis (average PASI 3(5]). Sera were analyzed for oxylipin levels. PsO and PsA patients with higher PASI score (> 2.5) had significantly lower serum concentrations of pro-inflammatory oxylipins, most of them arachidonic acid derived (AA). Oxylipin profiling did not associate with cDAPSA. Interestingly, several AA-derived oxylipins (5,15 di-HETE (5S,15S-dihydroxy-6E,8Z,10Z,13E-eicosatetraenoic acid), 5-oxoETE (5-Oxo-eicosatetraenoic acid), PGE2 (prostaglandin E2), 11bPGE2 (11 beta prostaglandin D2), and LTB4 (leukotriene B4)) were significantly increased in PsA patients with enthesitis compared to those without. Conclusions The AA-derived proinflammatory oxylipins were lower in both PsO and PsA patients with higher skin scores. Joint disease activity was not associated with the concentrations of oxylipins. Yet, enthesitis was associated with an increase of AA-derived pro-inflammatory oxylipins in PsA patients. Further studies are needed to determine whether oxylipin profiling can be a good biomarker of enthesitis in PsA patients.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1704.1-1705
Author(s):  
L. Montolio-Chiva ◽  
A. V. Orenes Vera ◽  
M. Aguilar-Zamora ◽  
C. Vergara-Dangond ◽  
I. Vázquez-Gómez ◽  
...  

Background:Several studies have shown an inverse relationship between vitamin D levels (25OHD) and disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, the existing data in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA) are poor, and they use the DAS28 index as a peripheral joint activity marker by extrapolation with RA.Objectives:To analyze the relationship between 25OHD levels, disease activity and functional capacity in patients with PsA.Methods:Transversal, observational, descriptive study. We included PsA patients with peripheral joint involvement. We collected demographic variables (gender, age), clinical variables [follow-up, received treatments, TJC (68), SJC (68), VAS] and analytical variables (25OHD, CRP, ESR). We usedDisease activity in psoriatic arthritis(DAPSA) score to measure disease activity, and theHealth assessment questionnaire(HAQ) to determine functional capacity. Levels of 25 OHD <20 ng/ml and between 20-30 ng/ml were considered deficient and insufficient, respectively. Statistical analysis was made with SPSS 22.0. The descriptive analysis results were expressed as percentage and mean ± SD. We used Pearson’s correlation to assess the association between quantitative variables and T test to compare means between dichotomous variables.Results:125 patients were included, the majority women (60.8%), with an average age of 55.4 (SD 12.2) years. The average follow-up was 75.5 (SD 68.3) months. 97.6% of patients had received DMARDs and 40.8% biologics, and almost half of the patients (42.7%) took calcium and 25OHD supplements. The average value of 25OHD was 27.1 (SD 12.1) ng/ml, with 30% of patients having 25OHD deficit and 63.3% insufficiency. The majority of patients had an acceptable disease control, with a mean DAPSA of 10.5 (SD 7,9); and mean of CRP, ESR, TJC and SJC was 6.1 (SD 3.7) mg/l, 10.2 (SD 9.9) mm/h, 1.3 (SD 2.5) and 0.7 (SD 2.1), respectively. The average value of HAQ was 0.6 (SD 0.7). We observed an inverse correlation between 25OHD levels and joint counts, TJC (p=0.02) and SJC (p=0.03). On the other hand, patients with hypovitaminosis D presented a tendency to get higher scores in DAPSA index (P=0.07). We do not observe any relationship between 25OHD and HAQ.Conclusion:As can be seen in our sample, low values of 25OHD are related to increased disease activity in patients with PsA.Disclosure of Interests:L Montolio-Chiva: None declared, Ana V Orenes Vera: None declared, Marta Aguilar-Zamora: None declared, C Vergara-Dangond: None declared, I Vázquez-Gómez: None declared, Eduardo Flores: None declared, A Sendra-García: None declared, À Martínez-Ferrer: None declared, Elia Valls-Pascual Grant/research support from: Roche, Novartis, and AbbVie, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Lilly, Pfizer, MSD, Novartis, Janssen, Bristol Myers Squibb, UCB Pharma, D Ybáñez-García Speakers bureau: Lilly, Roche, Sanofi, V Núñez-Monje: None declared, I Torner-Hernández: None declared, Juanjo J Alegre-Sancho Consultant of: UCB, Roche, Sanofi, Boehringer, Celltrion, Paid instructor for: GSK, Speakers bureau: MSD, GSK, Lilly, Sanofi, Roche, UCB, Actelion, Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis


2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Chiara Ditto ◽  
Simone Parisi ◽  
Marta Priora ◽  
Silvia Sanna ◽  
Clara Lisa Peroni ◽  
...  

Abstract AntiTNF-α biosimilars are broadly available for the treatment of inflammatory arthritis. There are a lot of data concerning the maintenance of clinical efficacy after switching from originators to biosimilars; therefore, such a transition is increasingly encouraged both in the US and Europe. However, there are reports about flares and adverse events (AE) as a non-medical switch remains controversial due to ethical and clinical implications (efficacy, safety, tolerability). The aim of our work was to evaluate the disease activity trend after switching from etanercept originator (oETA-Enbrel) to its biosimilar (bETA-SP4/Benepali) in a cohort of patients in Turin, Piedmont, Italy. In this area, the switch to biosimilars is stalwartly encouraged. We switched 87 patients who were in a clinical state of stability from oETA to bETA: 48 patients were affected by Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA),26 by Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) and 13 by Ankylosing Spondylitis (AS).We evaluated VAS-pain, Global-Health, CRP, number of swollen and tender joints, Disease Activity Score on 28 joints (DAS28) for RA, Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) for PsA, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and Health Assessment Questionnaire for the spondyloarthropathies (HAQ-S),Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) for AS patients. 11/85 patients (12.6%) stopped treatment after switching to biosimilar etanercept. No difference was found between oETA and bETA in terms of efficacy. However, some arthritis flare and AE were reported. Our data regarding maintenance of efficacy and percentage of discontinuation were in line with the existing literature.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1699.1-1700
Author(s):  
F. Masini ◽  
K. Gjeloshi ◽  
E. Pinotti ◽  
F. Danzo ◽  
F. Guarino ◽  
...  

Background:The association between hyperuricemia and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is actually generally accepted. Previous studies have demonstrated that uric acid suppress 25(OH)D metabolism [1]. More evidence is required to demonstrate the immune modulatory effects in psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis and other autoimmune diseases. In particular, the potential association between 25-hydroxyvitamin D serum levels and PsA still remains unknown.Objectives:To assess a clinical association between uric acid/25(OH)D serum levels ratio related to PASI, BASDAI and DAPSA, if any, in patients with psoriatic arthritis.Methods:We retrospectively observed 61 patients with psoriatic arthritis referred to our outpatients clinic, independently from already being on therapy or naïve. All selected patients underwent only conventional non-biological therapy at baseline and none received vitamin D supplementation and either allopurinol or febuxostat previously. Blood samples were drawn from all participants for assessment of 25-hydroxyvitamin D and uric acid serum levels. Disease activity of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis were assessed by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), the Disease Activity Index for Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI). We assessed the covariates of interest by the Wilcoxon non parametric test, through the SPSS 24 Software.Results:We observed 61 patients, mainly females (83.6%). At the univariate analysis, the uric acid/25(OH)D serum levels ratio revealed significantly associated with DAPSA and BASDAI indexes (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively), whilst no significant association emerged with the PASI index (p=0.462).Conclusion:Data in the literature about these associations in the context of psoriatic arthritis are really poor. As a consequence, our findings, though preliminary, suggest us to hypothesize a potential role of uric acid/25(OH)D serum levels ratio as potential inflammation marker in order to better assess the disease activity. However, future larger studies are needed to investigate more in depth this association.[1]Charoenngam N, Ponvilawan B, Ungprasert P. Vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency are associated with a higher level of serum uric acid: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mod Rheumatol. 2019 Mar 4:1-6.Disclosure of Interests:None declared


RMD Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. e000765 ◽  
Author(s):  
Silva Pukšić ◽  
Pernille Bolton-King ◽  
Joseph Sexton ◽  
Brigitte Michelsen ◽  
Tore K Kvien ◽  
...  

ObjectivesDisease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) (sum score 68/66 tender/swollen joint counts (68TJC/66SJC), patient’s global assessment, pain and C-reactive protein (CRP)) is recommended for clinical assessment of disease activity in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Ultrasound (US) (grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD)) detects inflammation in joints and extra-articular structures. The present objectives were to explore the longitudinal relationships between DAPSA, clinical assessment as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with US in patients with PsA initiating biological DMARDs and the associations between DAPSA and US remission.Methods47 patients with PsA were examined at baseline and after 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. Assessments included 68TJC/66SJC, examiner’s global assessment (EGA), PROMs, CRP, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and US GS and PD (48 joints, 10 flexor tendons, 14 entheses, 4 bursae). Clinical composite scores and PD sum scores (0=remission) were calculated. Longitudinal associations were explored by generalised estimating equations with linear and logistic regression.ResultsDAPSA was not longitudinally associated to PD. 66SJC, ESR, 28-joint Disease Activity Score, EGA and CRP were longitudinally associated with PD (p<0.001–0.03), whereas the pain-related components of DAPSA (68TJC and pain) as well as PROMs were not associated. At 6–12 months, remission was achieved in 29%–33 % of the patients for DAPSA and 59%–70 % for PD. The association between DAPSA and PD remission was not significant (p=0.33).ConclusionsDAPSA was not associated with US inflammatory findings which indicates that DAPSA and US may assess different aspects of PsA activity.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 778-779
Author(s):  
J. S. Smolen ◽  
S. Siebert ◽  
T. Korotaeva ◽  
P. Bergmans ◽  
K. De Vlam ◽  
...  

Background:Among treatment options for PsA, IL-12/23 inhibition with UST was the first new biologic mode of action after TNFi. Few real-world data comparing UST with TNFi are available.Objectives:Comparison of UST and TNFi treatment effectiveness within the prospectively followed PsABio cohort at 12-month (mo) follow-up.Methods:The PsABio study (NCT02627768) evaluates effectiveness, tolerability and persistence of 1st, 2nd or 3rd-line UST or TNFi in PsA. Proportions of patients (pts) reaching MDA/very low disease activity (VLDA) and clinical Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) LDA/remission are described. Comparison across UST and TNFi cohorts was done on last observation carried forward up to 12 (±3) mo, with non-response imputation for pts who had stopped/switched initial treatment. Logistic regression analysis was used, including propensity score (PS) analysis to adjust for imbalanced prognostic baseline (BL) covariates: country, age, sex, BMI, smoking (yes/no), comorbidities (cardiovascular/metabolic syndrome), PsA type (axial, polyarticular, oligoarticular), psoriasis body surface area (BSA), disease duration, cDAPSA, 12-item PsA Impact of Disease (PsAID-12), dactylitis, enthesitis, Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) score, line of biologic (b)DMARD, synthetic DMARD use, and steroid or NSAID use.Results:Of 929 eligible pts, 893 had evaluable data at BL and at follow-up; 438 (95.6%) were treated with UST and 455 (96.6%) with TNFi (including stoppers/switchers). UST and TNFi groups had BL differences in mean age (51.0 vs 48.5 years, respectively), concurrent comorbidities (68.7% vs 60.9%), time since diagnosis (7.5 vs 6.2 years), line of treatment (1st-line 45.0% vs 55.2%; 3rd-line 20.5% vs 12.1%), NSAID use (54.8% vs 68.8%), concomitant MTX use (29.9% vs 42.0%) and psoriasis skin involvement (BSA >10% in 26.6% vs 14.8%).In 714 pts with available data, mean (standard deviation) BL cDAPSA was 30.6 (20.2; n=358) for UST and 29.3 (18.6; n=356) for TNFi. Observed data showed differences in proportion of pts achieving MDA/VLDA and cDAPSA LDA/remission in favour of TNFi, but after PS adjustment for BL differences (such as line of therapy, skin psoriasis, concomitant conventional DMARD, etc.), odds ratios for reaching targets at 12 mo did not significantly differ between UST and TNFi groups (Fig. 1).Comparison of 6- and 12-mo unadjusted data showed sustained MDA/VLDA responses with both UST (21.8%) and TNFi (29.5%), with comparable proportions of additional pts achieving these targets between 6 and 12 mo (17.0% and 20.3%, respectively). Sustained efficacy became lower with successive lines of treatment (data not shown).Conclusion:Various factors, including patient characteristics such as comorbidities, influence the physician’s selection of treatment modality for patients needing a bDMARD. Our real-world results demonstrate differences in observed clinical effectiveness between UST and TNFi. However, after PS adjustment for a number of BL differences, clinical results at 12 mo were comparable between UST and TNFi groups. Data at 12 mo also show sustained response with both UST and TNFi treatment, as well as a similar rate of pts achieving targets after 6 to 12 mo of treatment.Acknowledgments:This study was funded by Janssen.Disclosure of Interests:Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Stefan Siebert Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Tatiana Korotaeva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Paul Bergmans Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen, Kurt de Vlam Consultant of: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau and honoraria, Elisa Gremese Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Wim Noel Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals NV, Michael T Nurmohamed Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Petros Sfikakis Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from Abvie, Novartis, MSD, Actelion, Amgen, Pfizer, Janssen Pharmaceutical, UCB, Elke Theander Employee of: Janssen-Cilag Sweden AB, Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document