scholarly journals OP0163 2019 UPDATE OF THE JOINT EUROPEAN LEAGUE AGAINST RHEUMATISM AND EUROPEAN RENAL ASSOCIATION–EUROPEAN DIALYSIS AND TRANSPLANT ASSOCIATION (EULAR/ERA-EDTA) RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF LUPUS NEPHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 102.1-103
Author(s):  
A. Fanouriakis ◽  
M. Kostopoulou ◽  
K. Cheema ◽  
H. J. Anders ◽  
M. Aringer ◽  
...  

Background:Up to 40% of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients develop kidney disease, which represents a major cause of morbidity.Objectives:To update the 2012 EULAR/ERA-EDTA recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis (LN).Methods:We followed the EULAR standardised operating procedures for the publication of treatment recommendations. Delphi-based methodology led to 15 questions for systematic literature review (SLR), which was undertaken by three fellows.Results:The changes include recommendations for treatment targets, use of glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNI), and management of end-stage-kidney-disease (ESKD). The target of therapy is complete response (proteinuria <0.5-0.7gr/24h with [near-]normal glomerular filtration rate) by 12 months, but this can be extended in patients with baseline nephrotic-range proteinuria. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended with regular ophthalmological monitoring. In active proliferative LN, initial (induction) treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF 2-3g/day, or mycophenolic acid at equivalent dose) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY; 500mg x6 biweekly doses), both combined with glucocorticoids (pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone, then oral prednisone 0.3-0.5mg/kg/day) is recommended. MMF/CNI (especially tacrolimus) combination and high-dose CY are alternatives, for patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria and adverse prognostic factors. Subsequent long-term maintenance treatment with MMF or azathioprine should follow, with no or low-dose (<7.5 mg/day) glucocorticoids. The choice of agent depends on the initial regimen and plans for pregnancy. In non-responding disease, switch of induction regimens or rituximab are recommended. In pure membranous LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria or proteinuria >1g/24h despite renin-angiotensin-aldosterone blockade, MMF in combination with glucocorticoids is preferred. Assessment for kidney and extra-renal disease activity, and management of comorbidities is lifelong with repeat kidney biopsy in cases of incomplete response or nephritic flares. In ESKD, transplantation is the preferred kidney replacement option with immunosuppression guided by transplant protocols and/or extra-renal manifestations.Conclusion:The updated recommendations intend to inform rheumatologists, nephrologists, patients, national professional societies, hospital officials, social security agencies and regulators about the treatment of LN based on most recent evidence.Disclosure of Interests:Antonis Fanouriakis Paid instructor for: Paid instructor for Enorasis, Amgen, Speakers bureau: Paid speaker for Roche, Genesis Pharma, Mylan, Myrto Kostopoulou: None declared, Kim Cheema: None declared, Hans-Joachim Anders: None declared, Martin Aringer Consultant of: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Speakers bureau: Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Ingeborg Bajema Consultant of: GSK, John N. Boletis Grant/research support from: GSK, Pfizer, Paid instructor for: GSK, Abbvie, UCB, Enorasis, Eleni Frangou: None declared, Frederic Houssiau Grant/research support from: UCB, Consultant of: GSK, Jane Hollis: None declared, Alexandre Karras: None declared, Francesca Marchiori: None declared, Stephen Marks: None declared, Gabriela Moroni: None declared, Marta Mosca: None declared, Ioannis Parodis: None declared, Manuel Praga: None declared, Matthias Schneider Grant/research support from: GSK, UCB, Abbvie, Consultant of: Abbvie, Alexion, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Gilead, Lilly, Sanofi, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Astra Zeneca, BMS, Chugai, GSK, Lilly, Pfizer, Sanofi, Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Vladimir Tesar: None declared, Maria Trachana: None declared, Ronald van Vollenhoven Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Arthrogen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Lilly, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Crescendo Bioscience, GSK, Janssen, Lilly, Medac, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB and Vertex, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Biotest, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Crescendo Bioscience, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB, Vertex, Alexandre Voskuyl: None declared, Y.K. Onno Teng Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: GSK, Aurinia Pharmaceuticals, Novartis, Bernadette van Leeuw: None declared, George Bertsias Grant/research support from: GSK, Consultant of: Novartis, David Jayne Grant/research support from: ChemoCentryx, GSK, Roche/Genentech, Sanofi-Genzyme, Consultant of: Astra-Zeneca, ChemoCentryx, GSK, InflaRx, Takeda, Insmed, Chugai, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Dimitrios Boumpas: None declared

2020 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2020-216924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonis Fanouriakis ◽  
Myrto Kostopoulou ◽  
Kim Cheema ◽  
Hans-Joachim Anders ◽  
Martin Aringer ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo update the 2012 EULAR/ERA–EDTA recommendations for the management of lupus nephritis (LN).MethodsFollowing the EULAR standardised operating procedures, a systematic literature review was performed. Members of a multidisciplinary Task Force voted independently on their level of agreeement with the formed statements.ResultsThe changes include recommendations for treatment targets, use of glucocorticoids and calcineurin inhibitors (CNIs) and management of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). The target of therapy is complete response (proteinuria <0.5–0.7 g/24 hours with (near-)normal glomerular filtration rate) by 12 months, but this can be extended in patients with baseline nephrotic-range proteinuria. Hydroxychloroquine is recommended with regular ophthalmological monitoring. In active proliferative LN, initial (induction) treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF 2–3 g/day or mycophenolic acid (MPA) at equivalent dose) or low-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide (CY; 500 mg × 6 biweekly doses), both combined with glucocorticoids (pulses of intravenous methylprednisolone, then oral prednisone 0.3–0.5 mg/kg/day) is recommended. MMF/CNI (especially tacrolimus) combination and high-dose CY are alternatives, for patients with nephrotic-range proteinuria and adverse prognostic factors. Subsequent long-term maintenance treatment with MMF or azathioprine should follow, with no or low-dose (<7.5 mg/day) glucocorticoids. The choice of agent depends on the initial regimen and plans for pregnancy. In non-responding disease, switch of induction regimens or rituximab are recommended. In pure membranous LN with nephrotic-range proteinuria or proteinuria >1 g/24 hours despite renin–angiotensin–aldosterone blockade, MMF in combination with glucocorticoids is preferred. Assessment for kidney and extra-renal disease activity, and management of comorbidities is lifelong with repeat kidney biopsy in cases of incomplete response or nephritic flares. In ESKD, transplantation is the preferred kidney replacement option with immunosuppression guided by transplant protocols and/or extra-renal manifestations. Treatment of LN in children follows the same principles as adult disease.ConclusionsWe have updated the EULAR recommendations for the management of LN to facilitate homogenization of patient care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1054.1-1055
Author(s):  
V. A. Pacucci ◽  
F. R. Spinelli ◽  
K. Giannakakis ◽  
S. Colafrancesco ◽  
S. Truglia ◽  
...  

Background:Lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in up to 60% of patients affected by Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE). The presence of inflammatory infiltrates in glomeruli and/or in tubulo-interstitium (TI) plays an important role in terms of prognosis (1). Ectopic lymphoid structures (ELSs) are clusters of organized lymphoid infiltrates forming at sites of chronic inflammation in non-lymphoid organs (2). Data on ELSs in kidneys of SLE patients are scant (3-5).Objectives:The aim of the study was to evaluate the tubule-interstitial infiltrates (TI-I) organization and to investigate the presence of ELSs.Methods:Kidney sections of SLE patients undergoing a renal biopsy for diagnostic purpose were studied; LN was diagnosed according to the 2003 International Society of Nephrology / Renal Pathology Society classification criteria. Clinical, laboratory and histological data were collected in a standardized, computerized and electronically filled form, including past medical history. The presence of lymphoid aggregates and ELS in the kidney sections were firstly evaluated by hematoxylin-eosin (HE). By using immunohistochemistry (IHC), we characterized the infiltrates by identification of T cells (CD3), B cells (CD20) and follicular dendritic cells (CD21).Results:By HE we evaluated 53 kidney samples from LN patients (F:M = 51:2, mean age at biopsy ± SD years 35±7.7; mean disease duration at date of biopsy ± SD 8±8.3 years). TI-I were found in 33 kidney specimens. By HE we identified a well-defined infiltrate pattern resembling ELS in 13 renal samples. In these samples, we confirmed the presence of organized infiltrates by IHC, with evidence of segregated T and B cells areas in most of them. In one sample, the CD21 staining was positive confirming the presence of ELS (Figure 1). Interestingly, this last patient, who failed ciclophosphamide and mycofenolate, responded to rituximab administration and is now in complete LN remission. Moreover TII was negatively correlated with renal remission after induction therapy (P=0.03) independent of the histological class and the induction treatment.Figure 1.Biopsy specimens showing tubulo-interstitial ELS by IHC (10x).Conclusion:Assessment and management of LN patients are greatly facilitated by information obtained by renal biopsy. In the present study the evaluation by HE of 53 kidney samples from patients with LN showed TI-I in 62% of the specimens and a well-defined infiltrate pattern with GC-like features in 39% of those specimens with TI-I, confirmed in IHC. The presence of TII was associated with a worse outcome in response to therapy. Our preliminary results obtained by IHC suggest that ELS could be considered as a biomarker of renal response to B-cell depleting therapy supporting the importance of TI disease.References:[1]Giannakakis K. & Faraggiana T. Histopathology of Lupus Nephritis. Clinic Rev Allerg Immunol 2011[2]Bombardieri M et al. Ectopic lymphoid neogenesis in rheumatic autoimmune diseases. Nat Rev Rheumatol 2017[3]Chang A et al. In situ B cell-mediated immune responses and tubulointerstitial inflammation in human lupus nephritis. J Immunol 2011[4]Shen Y et al. Association of intrarenal B-cell infiltrates with clinical outcome in lupus nephritis: a study of 192 cases. Clin Dev Immunol 2012[5]Neusser MA et al. Intrarenal production of B-cell survival factors in human lupus nephritis. Mod Pathol 2011Disclosure of Interests:viviana antonella pacucci: None declared, Francesca Romana Spinelli Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Speakers bureau: Lilly, BMS, Celgene, Konsantinos Giannakakis: None declared, Serena Colafrancesco: None declared, Simona Truglia: None declared, Fulvia Ceccarelli: None declared, Cristina Garufi: None declared, cristiano alessandri Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Fabrizio Conti Speakers bureau: BMS, Lilly, Abbvie, Pfizer, Sanofi


2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 305.2-306
Author(s):  
F. Faustini ◽  
H. Idborg ◽  
E. Svenungsson ◽  
S. Poetzsch ◽  
S. Okitsu ◽  
...  

Background:Lupus nephritis (LN) represents a serious manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) which requires timely diagnosis, treatment and monitoring. Kidney biopsy is the gold standard of diagnosis and is instrumental to treatment decisions, however it is not generally performed for monitoring and evaluation of response to treatment. To such purposes, accessible biomarkers, for instance urinary, might be highly advantageous.Objectives:To evaluate urine-Galectin 3 binding protein (uGAL3BP) as a novel biomarker in biopsy-proven active lupus nephritis (A-LN) in comparison to active non-renal SLE (ANR-SLE), inactive SLE (I-SLE), and in population-based controls (HC). Furthermore, we compared uGAL3BP with known markers of renal pathology including neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), osteopontin (OPN), kidney injury molecule 1 (KIM-1), and galectin 3 (GAL3).Methods:Urine samples from A-LN (n=86), ANR-SLE (n=63), I-SLE (n=73) and HC (n=48) were included. uGAL3BP was measured using a commercial ELISA kit and values, adjusted for u-creatinine levels, were expressed as ng/mmol. Other markers analyzed according to clinical routine at the Department of Clinical Chemistry at Uppsala University Hospital were also adjusted for u-creatinine levels. Renal biopsies were graded according to the ISN/RPS classification(1) and evaluated for activity and chronicity index. Ten A-LN patients were evaluated before and after induction treatment.Results:In the A-LN group, median (IQR) levels of u-GAL3BP were 15.8 (6.8-24.6) ng/mmol, while in ANR-SLE, I-SLE, HC were significantly lower 4.4 (2.0-9.0), 2.8 (1.7-4.7), 2.0 (0.9-4.8) respectively (Kruskal-Wallis p<0.0001). Similarly, u-NGAL was found at higher levels in A-LN patients, 3.3 (2.0-5.7) μg/mmol, with respect to the ANR-SLE 2.0 (0.9-4.5), I-SLE 1.6 (0.8-3.2), and HC 2.4 (1.2-5.3), (p=0.008). The highest levels of OPN were found in the group of I-SLE (190.6 (85.1-299.9) μg/mmol, compared to A-LN 72.98 (37.6-118.1), ANR-SLE 92.3 (58.5-129.7) and HC 76.5 (58.2-120.3), (p<0.0001). KIM-1 levels differed among groups with higher levels in the A-LN group (188.9 (113.7-309.7) ng/mmol), in comparison to ANR-SLE 131.4 (92.2-186.1), I-SLE 123.8 (70.3-200.2), and HC 78.2 (68.8-115.1), (p<0.0001). GAL3 showed comparable levels across groups.When exploring the biomarkers across histologic subgroups of LN, u-GAL3BP could discriminate between proliferative and mesangial forms (17.7(9.6-32.5) vs 6.7(5.1-16.1) ng/mmol, p=0.027), while it did not discriminate against membranous LN. U-NGAL was higher in proliferative LN 3.7(2.4-5.8) µg/mmol with respect to membranous 2.4 (1.1-3.8) (p=0.01), while mesangial LN showed comparable levels. OPN, KIM-1 and GAL3 were comparable across groups.In the ten patients with available samples after induction therapy (mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in 4, rituximab (RTX) in one, cyclophosphamide in 5 (one combined with MMF and one with RTX), u-GAL3BP showed a significant decrease of median levels from 218.8 to 41.5 ng/mmol (Wilcoxon p=0.03). u-GAL3BP associated with renal activity in class III/IV LN (R=0.42, p=0.004).Conclusion:Among the tested markers, high uGal3BP adjusted for creatinine was found to be a promising marker of renal involvement in SLE patients and associated with renal activity in patients with proliferative forms (class III/IV) of LN. A decrease was further seen following therapy, suggesting that u GAL3-BP could be used to monitor renal activity.References:[1]Weening JJ, D’Agati VD, Schwartz MM, Seshan SV, Alpers CE, Appel GB, et al. The classification of glomerulonephritis in systemic lupus erythematosus revisited. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2004;15(2):241-50.[2]Houssiau FA, Vasconcelos C, D’Cruz D, Sebastiani GD, Garrido Ed Ede R, Danieli MG, et al. Immunosuppressive therapy in lupus nephritis: the Euro-Lupus Nephritis Trial, a randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose intravenous cyclophosphamide. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46(8):2121-31.Disclosure of Interests:Francesca Faustini Speakers bureau: I have received speaking fees, last time more than two years ago, Helena Idborg: None declared, Elisabet Svenungsson: None declared, Sven Poetzsch Employee of: Merck Serono, Shinji Okitsu Employee of: Merck Serono, Anders Larsson: None declared, Iva Gunnarsson: None declared


Lupus ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 28 (13) ◽  
pp. 1598-1603 ◽  
Author(s):  
S H Koubar ◽  
J Kort ◽  
S Kawtharani ◽  
M Chaaya ◽  
M Makki ◽  
...  

Introduction Systemic lupus erythematosus affects 4.8–78.5 people per 100,000 worldwide, 90% of whom are females. Geography and ethnicity have been shown to significantly affect the prevalence and natural history of the disease. Lupus nephritis affects around half of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Data about systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis in the Middle East are still scarce. In this study, we aimed to describe the characteristics of systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis at a tertiary care center in Lebanon. Methods This is a retrospective chart review of all biopsy-proven lupus nephritis patients admitted to the American University of Beirut medical center between January 2000 and December 2018. Patients above 12 years of age who had any International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society (ISN/RPS) class of lupus nephritis on their renal biopsy were included in the study. Results The study included 55 patients with lupus nephritis. Upon presentation of systemic lupus erythematosus, the most common clinical feature was arthritis, seen in 83% of patients, followed by anemia (82%) and malar rash (48%). In total 93% had positive ANA, 89% had positive anti-dsDNA and 98% of patients had proteinuria. The most common ISN/RPS class of lupus nephritis in our series was IV (49%). At the time of the biopsy 15% of patients underwent dialysis. At 6 months, 11/27 had complete remission, 6/27 had partial remission and 10/27 had no remission. At 1 year, 8/23 had complete remission, 4/23 had partial remission and 11/23 had no remission. During the study period, 15 out of 35 patients available for analysis had chronic kidney disease (CKD) and six out of 34 patients developed end-stage kidney disease requiring renal replacement therapy. In comparison to other series in the region, our series had more males affected, higher creatinine at the time of biopsy and greater degree of proteinuria. Conclusion Our study provided insight on the demographics, characteristics, and outcomes of lupus nephritis in Lebanon. Interestingly, male gender was present in a quarter of patients. This warrants further investigation and confirmation. We are hoping to expand this experience into a national prospective registry to further characterize this entity in our region.


1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (7) ◽  
pp. 1199-1204
Author(s):  
N Stankeviciute ◽  
W Jao ◽  
A Bakir ◽  
J P Lash

Patients with mesangial proliferative lupus glomerulonephritis (World Health Organization class II) are generally believed to have only mild to moderate proteinuria and normal renal function. However, there have been several reports of patients with mesangial lupus with nephrotic-range proteinuria. In this report, we present two additional cases and review the literature. Of seven reported cases, persistent nephrotic syndrome was observed in four, morphologic transformation occurred in three, and all but one presented with varying degrees of azotemia. These cases reinforce the concept that in systemic lupus erythematosus, laboratory findings may not correlate well with the underlying glomerular lesion, and therefore, the renal biopsy is an essential clinical tool in the approach to lupus nephritis.


2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (12) ◽  
pp. 1965-1973 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noortje Groot ◽  
Nienke de Graeff ◽  
Stephen D Marks ◽  
Paul Brogan ◽  
Tadej Avcin ◽  
...  

Lupus nephritis (LN) occurs in 50%–60% of patients with childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE), leading to significant morbidity. Timely recognition of renal involvement and appropriate treatment are essential to prevent renal damage. The Single Hub and Access point for paediatric Rheumatology in Europe (SHARE) initiative aimed to generate diagnostic and management regimens for children and adolescents with rheumatic diseases including cSLE. Here, we provide evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of childhood LN. Recommendations were developed using the European League Against Rheumatism standard operating procedures. A European-wide expert committee including paediatric nephrology representation formulated recommendations using a nominal group technique. Six recommendations regarding diagnosis and 20 recommendations covering treatment choices and goals were accepted, including each class of LN, described in the International Society of Nephrology/Renal Pathology Society 2003 classification system. Treatment goal should be complete renal response. Treatment of class I LN should mainly be guided by other symptoms. Class II LN should be treated initially with low-dose prednisone, only adding a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug after 3 months of persistent proteinuria or prednisone dependency. Induction treatment of class III/IV LN should be mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) or intravenous cyclophosphamide combined with corticosteroids; maintenance treatment should be MMF or azathioprine for at least 3 years. In pure class V LN, MMF with low-dose prednisone can be used as induction and MMF as maintenance treatment. The SHARE recommendations for diagnosis and treatment of LN have been generated to support uniform and high-quality care for all children with SLE.


Lupus ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 1564-1570 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Momtaz ◽  
A Fayed ◽  
M Wadie ◽  
S M Gamal ◽  
S A Ghoniem ◽  
...  

Aim We aim to describe the pattern of response to treatment in a cohort of Egyptian lupus nephritis (LN) patients and to define variable prognostic factors. Methods We retrospectively analyzed records of 928 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients (898 females, 30 males) with biopsy-confirmed LN seen between 2006 and 2012 at Cairo University hospitals. Results Our study involved 928 SLE patients with a mean age of 26.25 ± 6.487 years, mean LN duration at time of renal biopsy 6.48 ± 4.27 months, mean SLEDAI 28.22 ± 11.7, and mean follow-up duration of 44.14 ± 17.34 months. Induction treatment achieved remission in 683 patients. Remission was achieved in all 32 patients with class II LN, compared to 651/896 (72.7%) patients in classes III, IV, and V. Induction by intravenous (IV) cyclophosphamide achieved response in 435/575 (75.7%) patients, while induction by mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) resulted in response in 216/321 (67.3%) patients ( p = 0.0068). Nephritic flares were least observed when MMF was used for maintenance (30/239 (12.6%) patients), compared to 71/365 patients (19.5%) ( p = 0.0266) when azathioprine (AZA) was used, and 22/79 patients (27.8%) ( p = 0.002) with IV cyclophosphamide. Class IV LN, high chronicity index, presence of crescents, and interstitial fibrosis in biopsies were all associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD) development eventually ( p < 0.001, p = 0.005, p = 0.012, and p = 0.031, respectively). By the end of the study duration, 305 (32.7%) patients had CKD. Logistic regression detected that high baseline serum creatinine, failure to achieve remission, hypertension, and nephritic flare were the main risk factors for poor renal outcome ( p < 0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.004, and p < 0.001, respectively). The 5 years’ mortality was 69 (7.4%) patients with sepsis being the main cause of death. Conclusion IV cyclophosphamide superseded as induction treatment, while MMF was the best maintenance treatment. High serum creatinine, hypertension, and nephritic flare were the main risk factors for poor renal outcome.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document