FRI0068 LIPID PROFILE AND BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS: IS THERE AN ADDED RISK OF OSTEOPOROSIS?

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 610.1-611
Author(s):  
B. Touil ◽  
H. Azzouzi ◽  
O. Lamkhanat ◽  
F. Chennouf ◽  
I. Linda
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Lipid Profile ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
High Tc ◽  
High Concentrations

Background:Bone is a target in many inflammatory rheumatic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA). It has been supposed that an atherogenic lipid profile could be associated with lower bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebral fractures (VF).Objectives:We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the lipid profile, BMD and the presence of VF in RA patients.Methods:A cross sectional study was conducted in a population of 169 established RA. In each subject we evaluated the body mass index (BMI), tobacco use, alcohol consumption, presence of diabetes and high blood pression, lipid profile (total cholesterol (TC), High density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDLc), low density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc), triglycerides (TG), and VF. RA characteristics were also assessed (disease duration, disease activity score (DAS), auto antibodies, corticosteroid intake, and secondary sjogren’s syndrome). BMD was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in lumbar spine and femoral neck. Logistic and linear regression were performed with SPSS 20, both BMD and VF were assessed as dependent variables.Results:The mean age was 55.5±11.9 years, with a female predominance (152 women). The average BMI was 26.79 ± 5.36. We had 24.3 % of hypertensive patients and 16.6 % of diabetics. The average lipid concentrations were 4.39±1 mmol/L for TC, 1.293±0.36 mmol/L for HDLc, 2.74±0.80 mmol/L for LDLc and 1.25±0.62 mmol/L for TG. At the linear regression there was no correlation between plasma lipid concentrations and BMD, whether at the lumbar spine or the femoral neck. However we found a significant correlation between VF and high TC concentrations (p=0.043, OR: 2.864, 95% IC [1.036-7.922]). At the multivariate regression, high TC levels were still associated with VF, adjusted in BMI, age and the duration of corticosteroid use (p=0.006, OR: 6.07, 95% CI[1.69- 21.77]). The same finding was observed between high concentrations of HDLc and the prevalence of VF adjusted in the same variables (p=0.006, OR: 197.01, 95% CI [4.64-8363.51]).Conclusion:Although there was no relation between lipid plasma levels and BMD in our population. There was a significant association between high concentrations of TC, HDLc and the prevalence of VF.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Changes in bone mineral density over 10 years in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis

RMD Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. e001142
Author(s):  
Lisa Theander ◽  
Minna Willim ◽  
Jan Åke Nilsson ◽  
Magnus Karlsson ◽  
Kristina E Åkesson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Z Score ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Early Ra ◽  
Z Scores ◽  
The Mean

ObjectivesTo investigate changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA) over a 10-year period.MethodsConsecutive patients with early RA (symptom duration <12 months) were followed according to a structured programme and examined with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at inclusion and after 2, 5 and 10 years. Mean Z-scores over the study period were estimated using mixed linear effect models. Changes in Z-scores between follow-up visits were analysed using paired T-tests.ResultsAt inclusion, 220 patients were examined with DXA. At the femoral neck, the mean Z-score over 10 years was −0.33 (95 % CI −0.57 to −0.08) in men and −0.07 (−0.22 to 0.08) in women. Men had significantly lower BMD at the femoral neck than expected by age at inclusion (intercept Z-score value −0.35; 95 % CI −0.61 to −0.09), whereas there was no such difference in women. At the lumbar spine, the mean Z-score over the study period for men was −0.05 (−0.29 to 0.19) and for women 0.06 (−0.10 to 0.21). In paired comparisons of BMD at different follow-up visits, femoral neck Z-scores for men decreased significantly from inclusion to the 5-year follow-up. After 5 years, no further reduction was seen.ConclusionsIn this observational study of a limited sample, men with early RA had reduced femoral neck BMD at diagnosis, with a further significant but marginal decline during the first 5 years. Lumbar spine BMD Z-scores were not reduced in men or women with early RA. Data on 10-year follow-up were limited.

scholarly journals SAT0470 FRAX AND DXA-BASED APPROACHES IN DIAGNOSTICS OF OSTEOPOROSIS RISK IN POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1192.3-1192
Author(s):  
N. Grygorieva ◽  
V. Povoroznyuk ◽  
N. Dzerovych ◽  
M. Bystrytska
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Postmenopausal Women ◽  
Osteoporotic Fractures ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
T Score ◽  
Total Body

Background:Nowadays, the bone mineral density (BMD) measured by DXA and FRAX®are the most important methods for fracture risk assessment. Rheumatoid arthritis is a crucial disease for bone loss and osteoporosis development [1] which is included into FRAX algorithm. Ukrainian version of FRAX [2] is а new one and its value should also be assessed in patients with RA.Objectives:Our study was aimed to assess the parameters of BMD and FRAX in postmenopausal women with RA.Methods:We have examined 635 postmenopausal females aged 50-89 years old which were divided into 2 groups: 1st(control, n=313) – without any factors which have influence on bone metabolism, 2d(n=322) – patients with RA. The 10-year probabilities of hip fracture and major osteoporotic fractures were calculated without BMD parameter using the Ukrainian FRAX model [2]. The DXA was used to measure the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total body BMDs; the T-score was calculated (DISCOVERY Wi, Hologic, Inc., USA).Results:FRAX indexes for major osteoporotic and hip fractures were significantly higher in patients with RA (Me [25-75Q]): 9.7 [6.8-15.0] and 3.1 [1.5-6.2] % compared to 6.0 [3.8-8.5] and 1.2 [0.6-2.4] % in females from the control group (p<0.001). 45.3 % of women with RA required antiosteoporotic treatment according to Ukrainian FRAX threshold ratio without measure of BMD compared to 12.1% of subjects from control group. Only 3.4% of patients with RA had FRAX indexes which were less than low threshold (requirement of additional DEXA measurement) compared to 31.3 % of females from control group.BMD of femoral neck and distal radius were reliably lower in subjects with RA and consisted 0.65±0.13 and 0.69±0.12 g/cm in 1stand 2dgroups, accordingly (p<0.001) and 0.56±0.10 and 0.58±0.09 g/cm (p=0.02) without any significant differences at lumbar spine and total body BMDs. 16.6 % of subjects from the control group and 31.6 % of females with RA had osteoporosis according to DXA parameters (T-score ≤-2.5 SD).Conclusion:FRAX should be used more widely in clinical practice for detection of risk of osteoporotic fractures in subjects with RA.References:[1]Povoroznyuk V.V., Grygorieva N.V., Karasevska T.A., Dzerovich N.I. Bone Mineral Density and Trabecular Bone Score Indices in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis According to the Age and Use of Glucocorticoids. SM Rheumatol. 2017; 1(1): 1002.[2]Povoroznyuk V, Grygorieva N, Kanis JA, Johansson H, McCloskey EV. Ukrainian FRAX: criteria for diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis // Pain. Joint. Spine.-2019.-9(4).-7-16.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals AB0252 ASSOCIATION OF FAT MASS AND ITS DISTRIBUTION WITH BONE MINERAL DENSITY FOR RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS.

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1425.3-1426
Author(s):  
O. Lamkhanat ◽  
H. Azzouzi ◽  
B. Touil ◽  
I. Linda
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Linear Regression ◽  
Body Mass ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Fat Mass ◽  
Lean Mass ◽  
Body Fat Mass ◽  
Mineral Density

Background:Bone mineral density (BMD) and body mass are closely associated. lean mass(LM) and fat mass(FM) account for approximately 95% of body mass[1].Objectives:We aimed to study the association between body fat mass and its distribution with femoral and lumbar bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients.Methods:The present RA population-based cross sectionnel study done on 2019 was part of our rhumatology departement. Clinical data, femoral and lumbar BMD, body fat mass (BFM), android fat mass(AFM), gynoid fat mass (GFM), visceral fat mass (VFM) measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA: Hologic®) and results of laboratory tests were collected. Our statistical analysis was based on descriptive study and linear regression with SPSS20.Results:We included 73 RA patients witch mean age of 52.7+/-11.7, their mean of body mass index was 26.6+/5.8, mean of disease activity score was 2.6+/-0.94 and the mean health assessment questionnaire was 1.14+/0.78. In univariable linear regression, we found a significant association between femoral BMD and (BFM) (p=0.001, béta=0.36, IC:[0.000003-0.00001]), (AFM) (p=0.01, béta=0.29, IC:[0.00001, 0.00008]) and (GFM) (p=0.001, béta= 0.38, IC=[0.000005-0.000088]). There wasn’t any association between (VFM) and femoral BMD. Also we have found a significant association between lumbar spine BMD and BFM (p=0.0002, béta=0.41, IC[0.000003-0.000011]), AFM(p=0.001, béta=0.38, IC[0.000025-0.000094]), GFM(p=0.000018, béta=0.47, IC[0.00003-0.00007] and VFM (p=0.01, béta=0.28, IC[0.000027, 0.000251]). Adjusted on BFM, GFM, AFM and VFM in multiple regression analysis, it seems that the association between GFM, femoral BMD (p=0.02, béta= 0.38, IC[0.000005, 0.000088]. and lumbar spine BMD(p=0.01, béta=0.85, IC[0.000022, 0.000168]), was more significant.Conclusion:The finding of this study confirmed previous studies partly, that genoid fat mass has a positive effect of lumbar and femoral BMD.References:[1]S. Yang et al.Association between fat mass, lean mass, and bone loss: the Dubbo osteoporosis epidemiology study. International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2014, osteoporosis int. 2015; 26(4): 1381-6.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals P129 Predictors of low bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Malika A Swar ◽  
Marwan Bukhari
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Factors ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Family History ◽  
Bone Loss ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Fragility Fracture ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
History Of

Abstract Background/Aims  Osteoporosis (OP) is an extra-articular manifestation of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) that leads to increased fracture susceptibility due to a variety of reasons including immobility and cytokine driven bone loss. Bone loss in other populations has well documented risk factors. It is unknown whether bone loss in RA predominantly affects the femoral neck or the spine. This study aimed to identify independent predictors of low bone mineral density (BMD) in patients RA at the lumbar spine and the femoral neck. Methods  This was a retrospective observational cohort study using patients with Rheumatoid arthritis attending for a regional dual X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan at the Royal Lancaster Infirmary between 2004 and 2014. BMD in L1-L4 in the spine and in the femoral neck were recorded. The risk factors investigated were steroid use, family history of osteoporosis, smoking, alcohol abuse, BMI, gender, previous fragility fracture, number of FRAX(tm) risk factors and age. Univariate and Multivariate regression analysis models were fitted to explore bone loss at these sites using BMD in g/cm2 as a dependant variable. . Results  1,527 patients were included in the analysis, 1,207 (79%) were female. Mean age was 64.34 years (SD11.6). mean BMI was 27.32kg/cm2 (SD 5.570) 858 (56.2%) had some steroid exposure . 169(11.1%) had family history of osteoporosis. fragility fracture history found in 406 (26.6%). 621 (40.7%) were current or ex smokers . There was a median of 3 OP risk factors (IQR 1,3) The performance of the models is shown in table one below. Different risk factors appeared to influence the BMD at different sites and the cumulative risk factors influenced BMD in the spine. None of the traditional risk factors predicted poor bone loss well in this cohort. P129 Table 1:result of the regression modelsCharacteristicB femoral neck95% CIpB spine95%CIpAge at scan-0.004-0.005,-0.003&lt;0.01-0.0005-0.002,0.00050.292Sex-0.094-0.113,-0.075&lt;0.01-0.101-0.129,-0.072&lt;0.01BMI (mg/m2)0.0080.008,0.0101&lt;0.010.01130.019,0.013&lt;0.01Fragility fracture-0.024-0.055,0.0060.12-0.0138-0.060,0.0320.559Smoking0.007-0.022,0.0350.650.0286-0.015,0.0720.20Alcohol0.011-0.033,0.0 5560.620.0544-0.013,0.1120.11Family history of OP0.012-0.021,0.0450.470.0158-0.034,0.0650.53Number of risk factors-0.015-0.039,0.0080.21-0.039-0.075,-0.0030.03steroids0.004-0.023,0.0320.030.027-0.015,0.0690.21 Conclusion  This study has shown that predictors of low BMD in the spine and hip are different and less influential than expected in this cohort with RA . As the FRAX(tm) tool only uses the femoral neck, this might underestimate the fracture risk in this population. Further work looking at individual areas is ongoing. Disclosure  M.A. Swar: None. M. Bukhari: None.

scholarly journals AB0910 SARCOPENIA AND BONE MINERAL DENSITY IN MEN WITH CORONARY HEART DISEASE

2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1757.2-1757
Author(s):  
T. Raskina ◽  
I. Grigoreva ◽  
J. Averkieva ◽  
A. Kokov ◽  
V. Masenko
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Coronary Heart Disease ◽  
Heart Disease ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Muscle Mass ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2

Objectives:To examine bone mineral density (BMD) in men with coronary heart disease (CHD), depending on the state of the muscle mass, strength and function.Methods:79 men aged over 50 years with verified CHD were examined (mean age 63 (57; 66) years).The BMD and T-criterion (standart deviation, SD) of the femoral neck and lumbar spine (L1-L4) were evaluated using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) on the Lunar Prodigy Primo bone densitometer (USA). The following reference intervals were used: normal BMD values (T-criterion ≥-1), osteopenia (OPe) (T-criterion from -1 to -2.5), and osteoporosis (OP) (T-criterion <-2.5).To assess muscle mass, the total area (cm2) of the lumbar muscles of the axial section at the level of the 3rd lumbar vertebra (L3) was determined using multispiral computed tomography on a 64-slice computer tomograph “Somatom Sensation 64” (Siemens AG Medical Solution, Germany). The ratio of the obtained index of the area of skeletal muscle to the square of the patient’s growth index determined the “ skeletalmuscular index L3” (SMI). The media considered the threshold value to be 52.4 cm2/m2.Results:The femoral neck BMD in the examined patients was 0.96 (0.89; 1.03) g/cm2, which corresponds to -0.50 (-1.00; 0) SD according to the T-criterion, in the lumbar spine -1.23 (1.11; 1.32) g/cm2and 0.4 (-0.50; 1.20) SD according to the T-criterion.In accordance with the recommendations of the European working group on sarcopenia in Older people (EWGSOP, 2010, 2018), the patients were divided into 3 groups: 31 patients without sarcopenia (group 1), 21 patients with isolated muscle loss (presarcopenia) (group 2) and 27 patients with sarcopenia (group 3).BMD in the femoral neck in the group of patients without sarcopenia was 0.96 (0.72; 1.26) g/cm2, which corresponds to -0.50 (-0.8; 0.2) SD according to the T-criterion, in the lumbar spine – 1.19 (1.10; 1.275) g/cm2and 0.1 (-0.6; 0.8) SD according to the T-criterion. BMD in the femoral neck in the group of patients with presarcopenia (group 2) – 0.995 (0.94; 1.04) g/cm2and -0.3 (-0.70; 0) SD according to the T-criterion, in the lumbar spine – 1.32 (1.24; 1.40) g/cm2and 1.20 (0.50; 1.90) SD according to the T-criterion. In patients with established sarcopenia (group 3), the following indicators of BMD and T-criterion were recorded: 0.95 (0.845; 0.98) g/cm2and -0.60 (-1.40; -0.40) SD and 1.23 (0.085; 1.31) g/cm2and 0.4 (-0.8; 1.1) SD in the femoral neck and lumbar spine, respectively.A comparative analysis of the results of the DXA found that patients with sarcopenia had a significant decrease in the BMD and T-criterion in the femoral neck compared to patients with presarcopenia (p=0.039 and p=0.040, respectively). There were no differences between the groups of patients without sarcopenia and with sarcopenia and presarcopenia (p>0.05).It was found that patients with sarcopenia had significantly lower BMD and T-criterion in the lumbar spine compared to patients with presarcopenia (p=0.017 and p=0.0165, respectively). The values of the BMD and T-criterion in the groups of patients without sarcopenia and with presarcopenia and sarcopenia in the lumbar spine were comparable (p>0.05).Conclusion:The presence of sarcopenia is associated with loss of BMD in the femoral neck and in the lumbar spine. The results obtained confirm the high probability of common pathogenetic links between OP and sarcopenia.Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals POS1112 COMPARISON OF TWO APPROACHES IN FRACTURES RISK ASSESSMENT IN WOMEN WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND GLUCOCORTICOID USE

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 836.1-836
Author(s):  
N. Grygorieva ◽  
V. Povoroznyuk
Keyword(s):  
Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽  
Risk Assessment ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Fracture Risk ◽  
Fracture Risk Assessment ◽  
Lifestyle Modifications ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Dxa Scan

Background:Nowadays, FRAX is the most useful tool for osteoporotic fracture risk assessment that is included in many guidelines. Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and glucocorticoid (CG) use are two crucial factors for osteoporotic fractures included in FRAX algorithm. According to the last ACR guidelines for the treatment of GC-induced osteoporosis [1], it was recommended to divide the patients into three groups of fracture risk (high, medium and low) that have a great impact on treatment decision. Recently, we received own Ukrainian thresholds [2] for the national version of FRAX that are age-dependent and now widely used in clinical practice.Objectives:Our study was aimed to compare two approaches (ACR-2017 and Ukrainian (2019) recommendations) in fracture risk assessment in women with RA and GC use.Methods:We examined 195 females with RA aged 40-89 years old who took GC (at dose ≥5 mg/d for ≥3 months) due to RA. The 10-year probabilities of major osteoporotic (MOFs) and hip fractures (HFs) were calculated with and without bone mineral density (BMD) using the Ukrainian FRAX model [3]. The DXA was used to measure the lumbar spine, femoral neck and total body BMDs; T and Z scores were calculated (DISCOVERY Wi, Hologic, Inc., USA).Results:FRAX indexes for MOFs and HFs without BMD in patients with RA and GC were (Me [25-75Q]) 12.0 [8.1-18.0] and 4.2 [1.7-7.2] %. The correspondent FRAX indexes with BMD were 13.5 [8.5-20.0] and 5.1 [1.8-8.7] %.50 % of examined women had previous fractures and 20 % had previous vertebral fractures. BMD of the femoral neck consisted of 0.62±0.13 and L1-L4 BMD was 0.85±0.15 g/cm2. 89 % of females had low BMD at the lumbar spine and / or femoral neck (49 % osteoporosis and 40 % osteopenia).61 % of women required antiosteoporotic treatment according to ACR-2017 guideline (17.4 % of them a hadhigh risk of MOF and 43.1 % moderate one) without BMD measurement and 64 % of subjects after DXA scan.According to Ukrainian national guideline, 57 % of patients required antiosteoporotic treatment without BMD measurement and 42 % – after additional DXA examination. After BMD measurement in subjects who required the DXA scan, 78.2 % of females with RA and GC use required antiosteoporotic treatment (additionally to calcium and vitamin D, lifestyle modifications).Conclusion:Approximately 60 % of subjects with RA and GC use required antiosteoporotic treatment without additional DXA measurement according to correspondent FRAX indexes from both guidelines. The proportion of women requiring treatment after DXA scan is slightly higher according to Ukrainian recommendations. It proves that both of them can be used effectively in daily clinical practice for fracture risk assessment in females with RA.References:[1]Buckley L, Guyatt G, Fink HA, Cannon M et al. 2017 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 2017;69(8), 1521–1537. DOI:10.1002/art.40137[2]Povoroznyuk V, Grygorieva N, Kanis JA et al. Ukrainian FRAX: criteria for diagnostics and treatment of osteoporosis. Pain. Joint. Spine. 2019;9(4):7-16. DOI: 10.22141/2224-1507.9.4.2019.191921[3]Povoroznyuk VV, Grygorieva NV, Kanis JA et al. Epidemiology of hip fracture and the development of FRAX in Ukraine. Arch Osteoporos. 2017;12(1):53. DOI: 10.1007/s11657-017-0343-2.Disclosure of Interests:Nataliia Grygorieva Consultant of: Servier, Redis, Vladyslav Povoroznyuk: None declared.

scholarly journals Bone mineral density predictors in long-standing type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefana Catalina Bilha ◽  
Letitia Leustean ◽  
Cristina Preda ◽  
Dumitru D. Branisteanu ◽  
Laura Mihalache ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Background Despite the increased fracture risk, bone mineral density (BMD) is variable in type 1 (T1D) and type 2 (T2D) diabetes mellitus. We aimed at comparing independent BMD predictors in T1D, T2D and control subjects, respectively. Methods Cross-sectional case-control study enrolling 30 T1D, 39 T2D and 69 age, sex and body mass index (BMI) – matched controls that underwent clinical examination, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (BMD at the lumbar spine and femoral neck) and serum determination of HbA1c and parameters of calcium and phosphate metabolism. Results T2D patients had similar BMD compared to T1D individuals (after adjusting for age, BMI and disease duration) and to matched controls, respectively. In multiple regression analysis, diabetes duration – but not HbA1c- negatively predicted femoral neck BMD in T1D (β= -0.39, p = 0.014), while BMI was a positive predictor for lumbar spine (β = 0.46, p = 0.006) and femoral neck BMD (β = 0.44, p = 0.007) in T2D, besides gender influence. Age negatively predicted BMD in controls, but not in patients with diabetes. Conclusions Long-standing diabetes and female gender particularly increase the risk for low bone mass in T1D. An increased body weight partially hinders BMD loss in T2D. The impact of age appears to be surpassed by that of other bone regulating factors in both T1D and T2D patients.

scholarly journals Lack of Association between Pulse Steroid Therapy and Bone Mineral Density in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serap Zengin Karahan ◽  
Cavit Boz ◽  
Sevgi Kilic ◽  
Nuray Can Usta ◽  
Mehmet Ozmenoglu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Sclerosis ◽  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Steroid Therapy ◽  
Negative Relationship ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Factors Affecting

Multiple sclerosis (MS) has been associated with reduced bone mineral density (BMD). The purpose of this study was to determine the possible factors affecting BMD in patients with MS. We included consecutive 155 patients with MS and 90 age- and sex-matched control subjects. Patients with MS exhibited significantly lowerT-scores andZ-scores in the femoral neck and trochanter compared to the controls. Ninety-four (61%) patients had reduced bone mass in either the lumbar spine or the femoral neck; of these, 64 (41.3%) had osteopenia and 30 (19.4%) had osteoporosis. The main factors affecting BMD were disability, duration of MS, and smoking. There was a negative relationship between femoral BMD and EDSS and disease duration. No association with lumbar BMD was determined. There were no correlations between BMD at any anatomic region and cumulative corticosteroid dose. BMD is significantly lower in patients with MS than in healthy controls. Reduced BMD in MS is mainly associated with disability and duration of the disease. Short courses of high dose steroid therapy did not result in an obvious negative impact on BMD in the lumbar spine and femoral neck in patients with MS.

Estimation of Central Osteopenia in Children With Chronic Polyarthritis Treated With Glucocorticoids

PEDIATRICS ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 1127-1130
Author(s):  
Antero Kotaniemi ◽  
Anneli Savolainen ◽  
Hannu Kautiainen ◽  
Heikki Kröger
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Lumbar Spine ◽  
Femoral Neck ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Bone Size ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Volumetric Density ◽  
Chronic Polyarthritis ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Bone Volumetric Density

Study objective. To investigate the degree and determinants of osteopenia in juvenile chronic polyarthritis. Design. Retrospective case-control study of central bone mineral density. Setting. Rheumatism Foundation Hospital and Kuopio University Hospital, Finland. Subjects. A sample of 43 girls aged 7 to 19 with juvenile chronic polyarthritis treated with systemic glucocorticoids and a control sample of 44 healthy girls matched for age. Main outcome measures. Bone mineral density and bone size (width) measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and bone volumetric density calculated as an approximation of true bone density at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck. Results. The girls with juvenile chronic arthritis had reduced bone mineral density, bone size, and bone volumetric density at both the lumbar spine and femoral neck (statistically significant findings, P = .022 for the bone size of the femoral neck and P &lt; .001 for the other parameters). At the spine, the mean bone mineral density was 80%, the mean bone size 89%, and the mean bone volumetric density 89% of the values in the control group. At the femoral neck, the values were 78%, 93%, and 83%, respectively. The groups were matched for age, but the girls with arthritis were smaller and lighter. In the juvenile arthritis group, the femoral bone mineral density and bone volumetric density and the spinal bone width correlated negatively with the mean glucocorticoid dose. Conclusion. Axial bone mineral density is clearly reduced in severe juvenile polyarthritis and is mediated by both decreased bone volumetric density and diminished growth.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document