scholarly journals Dactylitis is an indicator of a more severe phenotype independently associated with greater SJC, CRP, ultrasound synovitis and erosive damage in DMARD-naive early psoriatic arthritis

2021 ◽  
pp. annrheumdis-2021-220964
Author(s):  
Sayam Dubash ◽  
Oras A Alabas ◽  
Xabier Michelena ◽  
Leticia Garcia-Montoya ◽  
Richard J Wakefield ◽  
...  

ObjectiveTo characterise the impact of dactylitis in disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive early psoriatic arthritis (PsA).MethodsPatients with early PsA meeting the classification criteria for PsA (CASPAR) were recruited. Clinical outcomes were recorded, and ultrasonography was conducted to assess grey scale (GS) and power Doppler (PD) synovitis, periarticular cortical bone erosions and enthesitis. The cohort was dichotomised by the presence or absence of dactylitis.ResultsOf 177 patients with PsA, those with dactylitis (dactylitic PsA (81/177, 46%)) had higher tender joint count (p<0.01), swollen joint count (SJC) (p<0.001) and C reactive protein (CRP) (p<0.01) than non-dactylitic PsA. Dactylitis was more prevalent in toes (146/214 (68.2%)) than fingers (68/214 (31.8%)); ‘hot’ dactylitis was more prevalent than ‘cold’ (83.6% vs 16.4%). Ultrasound (US) synovitis and erosions were significantly more prevalent in dactylitic PsA (p<0.001 and p<0.001, respectively). Exclusion of dactylitis in dactylitic PsA confirmed significantly greater SJC (3 vs 1, p=0.002), US synovitis (GS ≥2: 20.6% vs 16.1%, p<0.001, or PD ≥1: 5.1% vs 3.3%, p<0.001) and erosions (1.1% vs 0.5% joints, p=0.008; 26.1% vs 12.8% patients, p=0.035%) than non-dactylitic PsA. Synovitis (GS ≥2 and/or PD ≥1) occurred in 53.7% of dactylitis. No substantial differences were observed for US enthesitis.ConclusionDactylitis signifies a more severe disease phenotype independently associated with an increased disease burden with greater SJC, CRP, US-detected synovitis and bone erosions in DMARD-naive early PsA and may be a useful discriminator for early risk stratification.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evangelia Passia ◽  
Marijn Vis ◽  
Laura Coates ◽  
Anuska Soni ◽  
Ilja Tchetverikov ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives:The prevalence of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA) is the same in men and women, however, the latter experience a higher burden of disease and are affected more frequently by polyarthritis. Here, we performed an early PsA cohort analysis to assess sex-related differences in demographics, disease characteristics and evolution over 1 year including applied treatment strategies. Methods:Our study is embedded in the Dutch south-west Early Psoriatic Arthritis cohoRt. We described patient characteristics and treatment decisions. For the comparison across sexes and baseline and 1 year follow up, appropriate tests depending on the distribution were used. Results:273 men and 294 women with no significant differences in age and ethnicity were included. Women reported significantly longer duration of symptoms before diagnosis and significantly higher tender joint count, a higher disease activity, higher levels of pain and lower functional capacity. Although minimal disease activity (MDA) rates increased over time for both sexes, MDA remained significantly more prevalent among men at one year (58.1% vs 35.7%, p<0.00). Initially, treatment strategies were similar in both sexes with Methotrexate being the most frequently used drug during the first year. Women received Methotrexate for a shorter period [196(93-364) vs 306(157-365), p<0.00] and therefore received a lower cumulative dose compared to men. Retention time was shorter for all DMARDs and women had a delayed start on b-DMARDs. Conclusion:After 1 year of standard-of-care treatment women didn’t surpass their baseline disadvantages. Despite the overall improvement, they still presented higher disease activity, higher levels of pain and lower functional capacity score than men. The nature of these findings may advocate a need for sex specific adjustment of treatment strategies and evaluation in early PsA patients.


Rheumatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L M Mulder ◽  
Tamara W van Hal ◽  
Frank H J van den Hoogen ◽  
Elke M  G  J   de Jong ◽  
Johanna E Vriezekolk ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives We aimed to investigate the disease activity and overall disease burden of (subgroups of) patients with PsA using the Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) in an already tightly monitored cohort. Methods This is a cross-sectional study evaluating data from the first visit of 855 PsA patients after implementation of the PASDAS in our tightly monitored cohort [e.g. DAS 28 (DAS28) was provided as an anchor]. Differences in clinical outcomes between subgroups of patients using established cut-offs for disease activity status [i.e. very low (VLDA), low (LDA), moderate (MDA), and high disease activity (HDA)] were examined. Results Based on the PASDAS, 53.1% of patients were in VLDA/LDA. 29.5% of patients had ≥1 swollen joint, 20.6% had ≥1 enthesitis index point and 3.0% had active dactylitis. Based on DAS28, 77.5% of the patients were in VLDA/LDA. Patients reaching both DAS28 VLDA/LDA status and PASDAS VLDA/LDA status [N = 445 (52.0%)] were compared with patients reaching only DAS28 VLDA/LDA status [N = 218 (25.5%)]. For these latter patients, significantly worse scores on separate parameters were found in measures used for PASDAS/DAS28 calculation (e.g. swollen and tender joint count and patient’s visual analogue scale global disease activity) as well as other disease measures (e.g. function and inflammatory back pain). This result remained, even when the stricter VLDA cut-off was used for the DAS28. Conclusion PASDAS implementation uncovered relevant residual disease activity in a quarter of patients previously assessed as being in DAS28 VLDA/LDA, underscoring the potential value of PASDAS measurements in PsA clinical care.


2020 ◽  
Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 1162.2-1163
Author(s):  
E. Gubar ◽  
T. Korotaeva ◽  
Y. Korsakova ◽  
E. Loginova ◽  
S. Glukhova ◽  
...  

Background:Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogeneous disease with multiple manifestations and choosing among treatments can be a complex decision. Patients (pts) with axial involvement and pts having dactylitis are more likely to develop a severe disease (1, 2). Tofacitinib (TOFA), an oral Janus kinase inhibitor, showed efficacy in treating PsA pts with dactylitis (3). However, its efficacy in treating PsA pts with activesacroiliitis(SI) and dactylitis has not been studied.Objectives:To study the effect of TOFA therapy in PsA pts having active SI on MRI (MRI-SI) and dactylitis.Methods:40 pts (M/F – 23/17) with active PsA fulfilling the CASPAR criteria were examined. Median (Me) age 41.0 [35.0; 50.0] yrs, Me PsA duration 6.0 [3.0; 10.0] yrs. A standard clinical examination of PsA activity was performed: Me tender joint count 19 [12; 24], swollen joint count 11 [8; 16], patient’s global disease activity measured by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) 70 [50; 80], patient’s pain VAS 65 [50; 75], Me activity indexes: DAPSA 44.2 [37.8; 55.3], BASDAI 6.0 [4.2; 7.0], ASDAS 3.8 [2.8; 4.4]. CRP 21.3 [3.2; 72.3] mg/L, ESR 28 [12; 52] mm/h. Enthesitis was observed in 65.9% of pts with Me LEI index 1 [0; 1], dactylitis in 53.7% of pts, Me digits with dactylitis 1 [0; 2]. Apart from a standard clinical examination, MRI of sacroiliac joints (SIJs) was performed in all 40 pts using MRI scanner Siemens General Electric 1.5 TESLA. Bone marrow edema/osteitis on MRI (STIR) considered active MRI sacroiliitis (MRI-SI), was evaluated by 2 independent readers (radiologist and rheumatologist). TOFA was given in 5 mg tablets bds over a period of 6 months, after which 35 patients underwent SIJ MRI. Me [Q25; Q75], Pierson-χ2tests were performed. All p<0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.Results:Prior to TOFA therapy, MRI-SI was detected in 14 of 40 (35.0%) pts. At the end of 6 months therapy, MRI-SI was detected in 4 of 35 (11.4%) pts: in 3 pts with baseline SI; 1 pt showed negative dynamics, that is, development of active SI (absent at baseline). The decrease in number of active MRI-SI pts is statistically significant (p=0.017; Pearson-χ2). Significant differences between baseline symptoms in patients with MRI-SI (n=14) and without it (n=26) were definedby number of digits with dactylitis:2 [0; 4] and 0 [0; 2] (p=0.047),by ESR: 47 [26; 76] and 20 [6; 37] mm/h (p=0.025), and byWPAI overall work impairment due to health index:80 [60; 84]% and 20 [0; 60]% (р=0.033), respectively; these parameters were higher in MRI-SI subgroup. After 6 months of therapy number of digits with dactylitis, ESR and WPAI indexes were significantly lower as compared with the baseline ones (Table 1).After 6 months of TOFA therapy, no differences were found between groups of pts with and without MRI-SI in the number of digits with dactylitis (p=0.47), in ESR (p=0.79) and in WPAI (p=0.93).Conclusion:In PsA pts significant association of active MRI-SI was found with dactylitis, high ESR level and WPAI. Use of TOFA in pts with both active MRI-SI and dactylitis demonstrated its high efficacy in reduction of SI inflammation and dactylitis; it also significantly improved pts’ work productivity. These findings are important for personalized approach to treatment of PsA.References:[1]Brockbank JE et al. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(2):188-90[2]Mease PJ et al. J Rheumatol 2018;45:1389-96[3]Gladman DD et al. N Engl J Med 2017;377:1525-36Disclosure of Interests:ELENA GUBAR: None declared, Tatiana Korotaeva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Yulia Korsakova: None declared, Elena Loginova Speakers bureau: Janssen, Svetlana Glukhova: None declared, Polina Karpova: None declared


2022 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Passia ◽  
M. Vis ◽  
L. C. Coates ◽  
A. Soni ◽  
I. Tchetverikov ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives The prevalence of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is the same in men and women; however, the latter experience a higher burden of disease and are affected more frequently by polyarthritis. Here, we performed an early PsA cohort analysis to assess sex-related differences in demographics, disease characteristics, and evolution over 1 year including applied treatment strategies. Methods Our study is embedded in the Dutch south-west Early Psoriatic Arthritis cohoRt. We described patient characteristics and treatment decisions. For the comparison across sexes and baseline and 1 year follow-up, appropriate tests depending on the distribution were used. Results Two hundred seventy-three men and 294 women with no significant differences in age and ethnicity were included. Women reported significantly longer duration of symptoms before diagnosis and significantly higher tender joint count, a higher disease activity, higher levels of pain, and lower functional capacity. Although minimal disease activity (MDA) rates increased over time for both sexes, MDA remained significantly more prevalent among men at 1 year (58.1% vs 35.7%, p < 0.00). Initially, treatment strategies were similar in both sexes with methotrexate being the most frequently used drug during the first year. Women received methotrexate for a shorter period [196 (93–364) vs 306 (157–365), p < 0.00] and therefore received a lower cumulative dose compared to men. Retention time was shorter for all DMARDs, and women had a delayed start on b-DMARDs. Conclusion After 1 year of standard-of-care treatment, women did not surpass their baseline disadvantages. Despite the overall improvement, they still presented higher disease activity, higher levels of pain, and lower functional capacity score than men. The nature of these findings may advocate a need for sex specific adjustment of treatment strategies and evaluation in early PsA patients.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Israel Júnior Borges do Nascimento ◽  
Dónal P. O’Mathúna ◽  
Thilo Caspar von Groote ◽  
Hebatullah Mohamed Abdulazeem ◽  
Ishanka Weerasekara ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Navigating the rapidly growing body of scientific literature on the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic is challenging, and ongoing critical appraisal of this output is essential. We aimed to summarize and critically appraise systematic reviews of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in humans that were available at the beginning of the pandemic. Methods Nine databases (Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, Web of Sciences, PDQ-Evidence, WHO’s Global Research, LILACS, and Epistemonikos) were searched from December 1, 2019, to March 24, 2020. Systematic reviews analyzing primary studies of COVID-19 were included. Two authors independently undertook screening, selection, extraction (data on clinical symptoms, prevalence, pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, diagnostic test assessment, laboratory, and radiological findings), and quality assessment (AMSTAR 2). A meta-analysis was performed of the prevalence of clinical outcomes. Results Eighteen systematic reviews were included; one was empty (did not identify any relevant study). Using AMSTAR 2, confidence in the results of all 18 reviews was rated as “critically low”. Identified symptoms of COVID-19 were (range values of point estimates): fever (82–95%), cough with or without sputum (58–72%), dyspnea (26–59%), myalgia or muscle fatigue (29–51%), sore throat (10–13%), headache (8–12%) and gastrointestinal complaints (5–9%). Severe symptoms were more common in men. Elevated C-reactive protein and lactate dehydrogenase, and slightly elevated aspartate and alanine aminotransferase, were commonly described. Thrombocytopenia and elevated levels of procalcitonin and cardiac troponin I were associated with severe disease. A frequent finding on chest imaging was uni- or bilateral multilobar ground-glass opacity. A single review investigated the impact of medication (chloroquine) but found no verifiable clinical data. All-cause mortality ranged from 0.3 to 13.9%. Conclusions In this overview of systematic reviews, we analyzed evidence from the first 18 systematic reviews that were published after the emergence of COVID-19. However, confidence in the results of all reviews was “critically low”. Thus, systematic reviews that were published early on in the pandemic were of questionable usefulness. Even during public health emergencies, studies and systematic reviews should adhere to established methodological standards.


2010 ◽  
Vol 70 (3) ◽  
pp. 428-433 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pernille Bøyesen ◽  
Espen A Haavardsholm ◽  
Mikkel Østergaard ◽  
Désirée van der Heijde ◽  
Sølve Sesseng ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo determine whether MRI and conventional (clinical and laboratory) measures of inflammation can predict 3-year radiographic changes measured by the van der Heijde Sharp score in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA).Methods55 patients with RA with disease duration <1 year participated in this 3-year follow-up study. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 3, 6, 12 and 36 months by swollen and tender joint count, disease activity score based on 28-joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C reactive protein, MRI measures of synovitis, bone marrow oedema and tenosynovitis of the dominant wrist, as well as conventional x-rays of the hands and wrists.ResultsAll measures of inflammation decreased during the follow-up period. ESR, MRI synovitis and MRI bone marrow oedema were independent predictors of 3-year radiographic progression adjusted for age, sex and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies. The 1-year cumulative measures of MRI synovitis and bone marrow oedema provided an improved explanation of variation (adjusted R2) in radiographic change compared with the baseline MRI values (adjusted R2=0.32 and 0.20 vs 0.11 and 0.04, respectively).ConclusionsBoth baseline and 1-year cumulative measures of MRI synovitis and bone marrow oedema independently predicted 3-year radiographic progression. These results confirm that MRI synovitis and MRI bone marrow oedema precede radiographic progression in patients with early RA.


2016 ◽  
Vol 43 (9) ◽  
pp. 1724-1734 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maurizio Cutolo ◽  
Gary E. Myerson ◽  
Roy M. Fleischmann ◽  
Frédéric Lioté ◽  
Federico Díaz-González ◽  
...  

Objective.Apremilast, an oral phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, downregulates intracellular inflammatory mediator synthesis by elevating cyclic adenosine monophosphate levels. The PALACE 2 trial evaluated apremilast efficacy and safety in patients with active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) despite prior conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and/or biologic therapy.Methods.Eligible patients were randomized (1:1:1) to placebo, apremilast 20 mg BID, or apremilast 30 mg BID. At Week 16, patients with swollen and tender joint count improvement < 20% entered early escape, with placebo patients rerandomized (1:1) to apremilast 20 mg BID or 30 mg BID while apremilast patients continued on their initial apremilast dose. At Week 24, patients remaining on placebo were rerandomized to apremilast 20 mg BID or 30 mg BID. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving > 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20) at Week 16.Results.In the intent-to-treat population (N = 484), ACR20 at Week 16 was achieved by more patients receiving apremilast 20 mg BID [37.4% (p = 0.0002)] and 30 mg BID [32.1% (p = 0.0060)] versus placebo (18.9%). Clinically meaningful improvements in signs and symptoms of PsA, physical function, and psoriasis were observed with apremilast through Week 52. The most common adverse events were diarrhea, nausea, headache, and upper respiratory tract infection. Diarrhea and nausea generally occurred early and usually resolved spontaneously with continued treatment. Laboratory abnormalities were infrequent and transient.Conclusion.Apremilast demonstrated clinical improvements in PsA for up to 52 weeks, including signs and symptoms, physical function, and psoriasis. No new safety signals were observed. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01212757.


2012 ◽  
Vol 64 (10) ◽  
pp. 1617-1621 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Freeston ◽  
L. C. Coates ◽  
P. S. Helliwell ◽  
E. M. A. Hensor ◽  
R. J. Wakefield ◽  
...  

Rheumatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 60 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Chen-Xu ◽  
Dovenik Hyseni ◽  
Katerina Achilleos

Abstract Background/Aims  Musculoskeletal ultrasound (MSUS) has utility in optimising the use of conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) and biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) in patients with inflammatory arthritis. However, it is unclear whether this is useful among patients with concomitant chronic pain and/or fibromyalgia, who often have elevated disease activity scores. We aimed to evaluate the impact of MSUS on inflammatory arthritis patients with concomitant chronic pain and/or fibromyalgia who met criteria for treatment escalation in a district general rheumatology service. Methods  We conducted a retrospective audit of inflammatory arthritis patients with concomitant chronic pain and/or fibromyalgia who were eligible for DMARD escalation and underwent a MSUS since 2017. Scanning was performed by either a trained rheumatologist or musculoskeletal ultrasonographer. Synovitis was assessed following OMERACT guidelines. Results  43 patients with inflammatory arthritis and concomitant chronic pain and/or fibromyalgia who underwent MSUS were identified. The mean age was 57.0 years (SD 15.6), and 34 patients (79%) were female. Rheumatoid arthritis was the most frequent diagnosis with 32 patients (74%), with psoriatic arthritis in 5 (12%), undifferentiated inflammatory arthritis in 4 (9%) and axial spondylarthritis (axSpA) in 2 (5%). 20 patients (47%) had a concurrent diagnosis of fibromyalgia. The median tender joint count among non-axSpA patients was 10 (IQR 4-15) and 2 (IQR 0-4) for swollen joints. MSUS was requested for consideration of a bDMARD switch in 21 patients (49%), a new bDMARD in 15 (35%), and starting an adjunctive csDMARD among 7 (16%). 34 patients (79%) were already established on csDMARDs, with 15 patients (35%) being on one or more, and methotrexate being the most prescribed csDMARD in 26 (76%). 14 patients (33%) were already established on bDMARDs, 9 (21%) had been on them previously and 20 (47%) were bDMARD naïve. Among those on bDMARDs, anti-TNFs agents were the most prescribed (71%). Active synovitis was identified in 17 patients (40%). Greyscale synovitis, tenosynovitis and enthesitis were seen in 30 (70%), 10 (23%) and 2 patients (5%), respectively. Erosions were identified in 12 patients (28%), with 2 (17%) having new erosions. 27 patients (63%) had either a csDMARD started (n = 7, 33%), or a bDMARD started (n = 11, 31%) or switched (n = 9, 25%) after MSUS. Those with fibromyalgia were less likely to start or switch DMARDs (8/20 patients, 40%) than those without (19/23 patients, 82.6%), Pchi-squared = 0.004. Furthermore, active synovitis on MSUS was associated with DMARD escalation (14/17 patients [82.4%] with synovitis versus 13/26 patients [50%] without; Pchi-squared = 0.03). Conclusion  MSUS avoided unnecessary DMARD escalation in a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory arthritis and features of concomitant chronic pain and/or fibromyalgia (n = 26, 37%), potentially resulting in reduced patient exposure to harmful DMARD side effects, and cost savings for the service. Disclosure  M. Chen-Xu: None. D. Hyseni: None. K. Achilleos: None.


2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Henriëtte M. Y. de Jong ◽  
Leonieke J. J. van Mens ◽  
Michael T. Nurmohamed ◽  
Marc R. Kok ◽  
Arno W. R. van Kuijk ◽  
...  

Abstract Background If TNF inhibitors are initiated in the early stages of psoriatic arthritis, this could potentially modulate disease and therefore allow us to discontinue the TNF inhibitor after achieving remission. Objective To investigate whether remission induced by tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor (TNFi) and methotrexate in patients with early psoriatic arthritis is sustained after withdrawal of TNFi. Methods Open-label extension of a recently published double-blind, randomized placebo-controlled trial. Patients with psoriatic arthritis fulfilling the CASPAR criteria and with active disease at baseline (swollen and tender joint count ≥ 3) were randomized to either golimumab and methotrexate or matched placebo and methotrexate. Patients in Disease Activity Score (DAS) remission at week 22 continued in the open-label extension on methotrexate monotherapy. The primary end point was the percentage of patients in DAS-CRP remission (DAS < 1.6) at week 50. Results Eight patients from the original placebo group and 18 patients from the original TNFi group continued in the extension phase. At week 50, 6 out of 8 (75%) patients from the original MTX (methotrexate) group versus 10 out of 18 (56%) patients from the original MTX+TNFi group were in DAS-CRP remission (p = 0.347). Considering the total study population, 6 out of 24 (25%) of the original MTX group versus 10 out of 26 (38.5%) of the original MTX+TNFi group were in DAS remission at week 50 (p = 0.308). Conclusions Remission achieved by initial combination treatment with TNFi and methotrexate in early psoriatic arthritis is maintained on methotrexate monotherapy in approximately half of the patients. Trial registration Registered at Clinicaltrials.gov with number NCT01871649 on June 7, 2013.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document