POS0319 PERFORMANCE OF PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROs) IN SCLERODERMA PATIENTS WITH REDUCED LUNG FUNCTION IN AN OBSERVATIONAL COHORT

Background:Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) are used to capture disease impact on patients’ Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) and they have been increasingly used as endpoints in clinical trials for Systemic Sclerosis (SSc). The DeSScipher project within the EUSTAR group highlighted dyspnea as one of the factors more strongly related with the highest SHAQ scores (1). Nevertheless, the SENSCIS trial in SSc-ILD (2) showed the efficacy of Nintedanib in reducing the annual rate of FVC loss, as compared to placebo, without significant changes in the PROs used as secondary endpoints (St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire and the FACIT-Dyspnoea questionnaire). Since patient’s perspective is a crucial determinant to define the overall relevance of an intervention, the performance of PROs in reflecting different lung functional stages is a relevant issue in SSc.Objectives:To analyse in a prospective SSc cohort the inference of reduced lung function as measured by FVC on median PRO scores and the correlation among distinct commonly used PROs.Methods:A cross-sectional study was performed on data exported from the STRIKE database regarding SSc patients followed in Leeds Scleroderma Programme for SSc. Data included records of periodical visits with scores of different PROs commonly used in SSc (Scleroderma-Health Assessment Questionnaire (SHAQ), Cochin Hand Function Scale (CHFS) and Borg dyspnoea scale) and FVC%-predicted (%pFVC) and DLCO%-predicted (%pDLCO). SHAQ score was calculated as the mean value of HAQ (0-3) with the average of the 7-VAS scores divided by 3.33. The 7-VAS (score 1-10) were 1: pain, 2: general function, 3: arthritis, 4: gastro-intestinal, 5: dyspnoea, 6: Raynaud Phenomena; 7: digital ulcers. The correlation of FVC with distinct PROs, and the inter-PRO correlation, were analysed through the non-parametric Spearman test.Results:Complete data were available from 182 visits of 87 SSc patients (41 with diffuse and 46 with limited cutaneous involvement). Mean %pFVC was 95.16 ±24.93 (median 95) and mean %pDLCO was 59.31±16.51 (median 59). Overall, FVC and DLCO showed a moderate correlation with SHAQ (r=-0.36, p<0.001 and r=-0.24, p:0.001 respectively), while Borg score showed a stronger negative correlation with FVC and DLCO (r:-0.42 and r-0.38, p<0.001 for both). In a sub-analysis of patients grouped by FVC, patients with FVC 50-70% showed a significant correlation of FVC with SHAQ (r =-0.47, p:0.012), which was not present in patients with FVC 70-90% (r:-0.23, p:0.13). VAS-5 dyspnoea and Borg were not associated with FVC in these two subgroups of patients.Inter PROs analysis showed that CHFS score had a stronger correlation with SHAQ than Borg dyspnoea score in the overall population (r:0.86 vs. r:0.57, both p<0.001).Conclusion:The analysis of a single centre prospective cohort of SSc patients, suggests a small inference of lung function in the overall SHAQ. The stronger correlation of SHAQ with CHFS, than with Borg score, suggests a higher weight of hand function on SHAQ in this population with relatively conserved lung function. In patients with %pFVC <70%, the correlation with SHAQ was stronger than in patients with %pFVC >70%, suggesting that mild reductions in FVC might not be perceived by the patients, or at least they might not modify HrQoL as measured by SHAQ.References:[1]Jaeger VK, et al. Rheumatology 2017;57(3):441-50.[2]Distler O, et al. N Engl J Med 2019; 380:2518-2528.Disclosure of Interests:Maria Grazia Lazzaroni Grant/research support from: Boehringer-Ingelheim, Giuseppina Abignano: None declared, Michelle Wilson: None declared, Vishal Kakkar: None declared, Francesco Del Galdo Consultant of: Astra-Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Capella Biosciences, Kymab, Actelion, Grant/research support from: Astra-Zeneca, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Mitsubishi-Tanabe, Capella Biosciences, Kymab, Actelion

Download Full-text

SAT0321 CURRENT PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOMES (PROS) POORLY REFLECT CHANGES IN LUNG FUNCTION IN PATIENTS WITH SYSTEMIC SCLEROSIS

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.6494 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 1106.1-1106

Author(s):

F. Danzo ◽

K. Gjeloshi ◽

G. Abignano ◽

A. M. Dean ◽

F. Masini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systemic Sclerosis ◽

Lung Function ◽

Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Digital Ulcers ◽

Strong Positive Correlation ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Assessment Questionnaire

Background:Lung involvement is very common is systemic sclerosis (SSc). Approximately one quarter of patients develops pulmonary problems within the first 3 years of diagnosis and still represents the leading cause of death in these patients. In a recent clinical trail, the reduction of FVC was not accompanied by a benefit with respect to health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).Objectives:To assess how the change in Pulmonary Function Test (PFTs) parameters correlates with the Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) in an observational cohort of patients with Systemic Sclerosis (SSc).Methods:We conducted a retrospective study of 330 clinic episodes from 121 unselected patients diagnosed with systemic sclerosis according to EULAR/ACR 2013 criteria, in annual follow-up (for a total of 165 patients/year) with PFTs, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (sHAQ), Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale (Borg) and Cochin Hand Function Score (CHFS). We assessed the correlation between the HAQ and the Visual Analogical Scale 1-7 at baseline (VAS1 pain, VAS2 disease severity, VAS3 arthritis activity, VAS4 intestinal problems, VAS5 dyspnea, VAS6 Raynaud’s phenomenon, VAS7 digital ulcers). We evaluated the correlation of PFTs with PROs at every time period and the correlation between the change of PFTs parameters (δFVC, δDLCO) with the change of the PROs over a year of follow-up. Following analysis of distribution, Spearman or Pearson Test were used to determine correlation coefficients, as appropiate (Prism 7).Results:The median disease duration was 5 years (IQR 3-10). The median of 12 months δFVC% and δDLCO% were 0 (IQR -5.81 to 3.28) and -2.439 (IQR -8.76 to 5.98), respectively. The analysis evidenced a strong positive correlation between VAS1-7 and HAQ. We observed also significant correlation between FVC%, DLCO% and HAQ-DI (r= - 0.355 and -0.266, respectively; p<0.0001 for both), Borg (r= -0.403 and -0.379, respectively; p<0.0001) and CHFS (r = -0.355 and -0.256, respectively; p<0.0001). Nevertheless, in longitudinal setting there was no significant correlation between δPROs and changes lung function, as continuous variables, neither there was any significant PROs difference in patients that did or did not lose more than 10% of FVC and DLCO over a year of follow-up.Conclusion:This analysis of a monocentric non-selected population evidenced that the current commonly used PROs in SSc while showing a good correlation with lung function are poorly sensitive to change or to reflect changes in lung function over 12 months. In this sense, prudent interpretation of the lack of correlation between FVC and patient-reported outcomes in studies of phase 3 is warranted.References:[1]Rahimi S., Nintedanib for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease, Lancet Respiratory Medicine (2020)Disclosure of Interests:None declared

Download Full-text

P159 Current patient reported outcomes (PROs) poorly reflect changes in lung function in patients with systemic sclerosis

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keaa111.154 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

Fiammetta Danzo ◽

Klodian Gjeloshi ◽

Giuseppina Abignano ◽

Anne-Maree Dean ◽

Francesco Masini ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systemic Sclerosis ◽

Lung Function ◽

Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Digital Ulcers ◽

Strong Positive Correlation ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Assessment Questionnaire

Abstract Background In a recent clinical trail the reduction of FVC was not accompanied by a benefit with respect to health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). The aim of this study is to assess how the change in Pulmonary Function Test (PFTs) parameters correlates with the patient reported outcomes (PROs) in an observational cohort of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 330 clinic episodes from 121 unselected patients diagnosed with systemic sclerosis according to EULAR/ACR 2013 criteria, in annual follow-up (for a total of 165 patients/year) with PFTs, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (sHAQ), Modified Borg Dyspnea Scale (Borg) and Cochin Hand Function Score (CHFS). We assessed the correlation between the HAQ and the Visual Analogical Scale 1-7 at baseline (VAS1 pain, VAS2 disease severity, VAS3 arthritis activity, VAS4 intestinal problems, VAS5 dyspnea, VAS6 Raynaud’s phenomenon, VAS7 digital ulcers). We evaluated the correlation of PFTs with PROs at every time period and the correlation between the change of PFTs parameters (δFVC, δDLCO) with the change of the PROs over a year of follow-up. Following analysis of distribution, Spearman or Pearson Test were used to determine correlation coefficients, as appropriate (Prism 7). Results The median disease duration was 5 years (IQR 3-10). The median of 12 months δFVC% and δDLCO% were 0 (IQR -5.81 to 3.28) and -2.439 (IQR -8.76 to 5.98), respectively. The analysis evidenced a strong positive correlation between VAS1-7 and HAQ. We observed also significant correlation between FVC%, DLCO% and HAQ-DI (r= -0.355 and -0.266, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both), Borg (r= -0.403 and -0.379, respectively; p < 0.0001) and CHFS (r = -0.355 and -0.256, respectively; p < 0.0001). Nevertheless, in longitudinal setting there was no significant correlation between δPROs and changes lung function, as continuous variables, neither there was any significant PROs difference in patients that did or did not lose more than 10% of FVC and DLCO over a year of follow-up. Conclusion This analysis of a monocentric non-selected population evidenced that the current commonly used PROs in SSc while showing a good correlation with lung function are poorly sensitive to change or to reflect changes in lung function over 12 months. In this sense, prudent interpretation of the lack of correlation between FVC and patient-reported outcomes in studies of phase 3 is warranted. Disclosures F. Danzo: None. K. Gjeloshi: None. G. Abignano: None. A. Dean: None. F. Masini: None. G. Cuomo: None. F. del Galdo: None.

Download Full-text

Full, partial and modified permutations of the Mayo Score: Characterizing clinical and patient-reported outcomes in ulcerative colitis patients

Crohn's & Colitis 360 ◽

10.1093/crocol/otab007 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

April N Naegeli ◽

Theresa Hunter ◽

Yan Dong ◽

Ben Hoskin ◽

Chloe Middleton-Dalby ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Ulcerative Colitis ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Cross Sectional Study ◽

Sectional Study ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Assessment Scores ◽

Mayo Score ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Practice Trials ◽

Highly Correlated

Abstract Background Understanding ulcerative colitis (UC) disease activity assessed via the full, modified or partial Mayo Score may help clinicians apply results from clinical trials to practice and facilitate interpretation of recent and older studies. Methods Mayo Score variables were assessed in a cross-sectional study of 2608 UC patients. Results Permutations of Mayo Scores were highly correlated, and models predicting the omitted variable from each permutation demonstrated significant agreement between predicted and observed values. Conclusions Partial/modified Mayo Scores may be used to predict endoscopic and Physician's Global Assessment scores, and serve as proxies for the full Mayo Score in clinical practice/trials.

Download Full-text

FRI0048 NUMBER NEEDED TO TREAT TO ACHIEVE MINIMUM CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES IN PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS TREATED WITH BARICITINIB

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1440 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 599.1-600

Author(s):

V. Strand ◽

L. Sun ◽

J. Ross Terres ◽

C. L. Kannowski

Keyword(s):

Physical Function ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Bodily Pain ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Number Needed To Treat ◽

Chronic Illness Therapy ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Assessment Questionnaire ◽

Questionnaire Disability

Background:Baricitinib (BARI) provided rapid and sustained improvements in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) in patients (pts) with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and inadequate responses (IR) to methotrexate (MTX) (RA-BEAM;NCT01710358)1,2and biologic DMARDs (bDMARD-IR; RA-BEACON;NCT01721044)3,4.Objectives:To determine the number needed to treat (NNT) to report improvements ≥minimum clinically important differences (MCIDs) in multiple PROs at Week (Wk) 12 after treatment with BARI 4-mg in RA-BEAM and BARI 2-mg or BARI 4-mg in RA-BEACON. NNTs ≤10 vs placebo (PBO) are considered clinically meaningful.Methods:Evaluated PROs with respective MCID definitions included Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity (PtGA, 0-100 mm visual analog scale [VAS], MCID ≥10 mm), pain (0-100 mm VAS, MCID ≥10 mm), physical function (Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, MCID ≥0.22 points), fatigue (Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue [FACIT-F], MCID≥4.0), and health-related quality of life (SF-36 physical component summary [PCS: MCID ≥2.5] and domain scores: physical function [PF], role physical [RP], bodily pain [BP], general health [GH], vitality [VT], social functioning [SF], role emotional [RE], mental health [MH], MCID ≥5.0).5The percentages of pts reporting improvements ≥MCID were determined at Wk 12. NNTs were calculated as 1/difference in response rates between BARI 2-mg or 4-mg and PBO.Results:At Wk 12, percentages of pts reporting clinically meaningful improvements were greater and statistically different from PBO (p<0.01) with BARI 2-mg and 4-mg across most PROs in both RCTs. Most NNTs were ≤10. (Figure)Conclusion:Across different populations, MTX-IR and bDMARD-IR pts with active RA reported clinically meaningful improvements in PROs after BARI treatment. The NNTs in these analyses indicate that <10 pts need to be treated with BARI 2- or 4-mg to report a clinically meaningful benefit.References:[1]Taylor et al. NEJM, 2017;376: 652-62[2]Keystone et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2017;76:1853-61[3]Genovese et al. NEJM, 2016; 374: 1243-52[4]Smolen et al. Ann Rheum Dis, 2017; 76: 694-700[5]Strand et al. J Rheumatol, 2011; 38: 1720-27Figure.Percentages of patients reporting improvements ≥MCID with baricitinib vs placebo and associated NNTs for baricitinib in RA-BEAM and RA-BEACON. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. Abbreviations: BP, bodily pain; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; GH, general health; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index; MCID, minimum clinically important difference; MH, mental health; NA, not applicable (ie, difference between treatment and placebo is not statistically significant, confidence interval of NNT is not calculated); NNT, numbers needed to treat; Pain, Patient’s assessment of pain; PCS, physical component score; PF, physical function; PtGA, Patient’s Global Assessment of Disease Activity; RE, role emotional; RP, role physical; SF-36, Short Form-36; SF, social functioning; VT, vitalityDisclosure of Interests:Vibeke Strand Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celltrion, Consortium of Rheumatology Researchers of North America, Crescendo Bioscience, Eli Lilly, Genentech/Roche, GlaxoSmithKline, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi, UCB, Luna Sun Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Jorge Ross Terres Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company, Carol L. Kannowski Shareholder of: Eli Lilly and Company, Employee of: Eli Lilly and Company

Download Full-text

Objective and Subjective Outcomes in Patients with Hearing Aids: A Cross-Sectional, Comparative, Associational Study

Audiology and Neurotology ◽

10.1159/000516623 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 1-9

Author(s):

Xunyi Wang ◽

Yun Zheng ◽

Gang Li ◽

Jingzhe Lu ◽

Yan Yin

Keyword(s):

Hearing Aids ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Objective Tests ◽

The Difference ◽

Potential Factors ◽

Positive Correlations ◽

The Relationship ◽

Subjective Outcomes

Introduction: Outcome assessment for hearing aids (HAs) is an essential part of HA fitting and validation. There is no consensus about the best or standard approach for evaluating HA outcomes. And, the relationship between objective and subjective measures is ambiguous. This study aimed to determine the outcomes after HA fitting, explore correlations between subjective benefit and acoustic gain improvement as well as objective audiologic tests, and investigate several variables that may improve patients’ perceived benefits. Methods: Eighty adults with bilateral symmetrical hearing loss using HAs for at least 1 month were included in this study. All subjects completed the pure tone average (PTA) threshold and word recognition score (WRS) tests in unaided and aided conditions. We also administered the Chinese version of International Outcome Inventory for Hearing Aids (IOI-HA), to measure participants’ subjective benefits. Objective HA benefit (acoustic gain improvement) was defined as the difference in thresholds or scores between aided and unaided conditions indicated with ΔPTA and ΔWRS. Thus, patients’ baseline hearing levels were taken into account. Correlations were assessed among objective audiologic tests (PTA and WRS), acoustic gain improvement (ΔPTA and ΔWRS), multiple potential factors, and IOI-HA overall scores. Results: PTA decreased significantly, but WRS did not increase when aided listening was compared to unaided listening. Negative correlations between PTAs and IOI-HA scores were significant but weak (r = −0.370 and r = −0.393, all p < 0.05). Significant weak positive correlations were found between WRSs and IOI-HA (r = 0.386 and r = 0.309, all p < 0.05). However, there was no correlation among ΔPTA, ΔWRS, and IOI-HA (r = 0.056 and r = −0.086, all p > 0.05). Moreover, 2 nonaudiological factors (age and daily use time) were significantly correlated with IOI-HA (r = −0.269 and r = 0.242, all p < 0.05). Conclusions: Correlations among objective audiologic tests, acoustic gain, and subjective patient-reported outcomes were weak or absent. Subjective questionnaires and objective tests do not reflect the same hearing capability. Therefore, it is advisable to evaluate both objective and subjective outcomes when analyzing HA benefits on a regular basis and pay equal attention to nonaudiological and audiological factors.

Download Full-text

Clinical evaluation of pulmonary hypertension using patient-reported outcomes: a cross-sectional study

BMC Pulmonary Medicine ◽

10.1186/s12890-021-01416-7 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 21 (1) ◽

Author(s):

Miguel Ángel Amor-García ◽

Sara Ibáñez-García ◽

Xandra García-González ◽

Teresa Mombiela ◽

Cristina Villanueva-Bueno ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Pulmonary Hypertension ◽

Clinical Evaluation ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Specific Treatment ◽

Tertiary Hospital ◽

Functional Class ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Patient Reported

Abstract Background Patients with pulmonary hypertension (PH) have progressive and disabling symptoms, as well as a burden of treatments and a difficult clinical evaluation that make health-related quality of life a particularly relevant endpoint in this disease. The objective of the study was to evaluate patient-reported outcomes of patients receiving specific treatment for PH in a tertiary hospital using a specific questionnaire (Cambridge Pulmonary Hypertension Outcome Review-CAMPHOR) in the pharmacy consultation. Methods A cross-sectional, observational, descriptive study was conducted. It included all patients receiving specific treatment for PH in a tertiary hospital in Madrid, Spain. The inclusion period comprised between August to December 2019. CAMPHOR questionnaires containing three domains: symptoms, activities and quality of life were completed by the patients at the pharmacy consultation. Demographic and clinical variables, including WHO Functional Class (WHO FC), PH-specific tests and hemodynamic parameters, were recorded. Non-parametric analyses to assess relations between variables and CAMPHOR domains were performed. Results Thirty-six patients consented to participate in the study and completed the questionnaire. Median scores for symptoms, activities, and quality of life domains were 5.5 (2.5–10), 8.0 (4.5–10.5) and 3.5 (1–7.5), respectively. Statistically significant differences were found in the three domains when comparing by WHO FC, in the activities domain for 6-m walking test and in the quality of life domain for patients who had emergency visits or hospitalizations in the last year. Conclusions The CAMPHOR questionnaire could be useful as a complementary test to achieve an integrated evaluation of PH patients, who could complete it easily during their routine pharmacy visits.

Download Full-text

P158 Severity of hand vascular involvement as assessed by MRI Digital Artery Volume Index (DAVIX©) predicts worsening of clinical parameters and patient reported outcomes in scleroderma

Rheumatology ◽

10.1093/rheumatology/keaa111.153 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 59 (Supplement_2) ◽

Author(s):

Fiammetta Danzo ◽

Klodian Gjeloshi ◽

Giovanni Lettieri ◽

Giuseppina Abignano ◽

Mark Hinton ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Disease Activity ◽

Health Assessment Questionnaire ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Volume Index ◽

Vascular Involvement ◽

Clinical Parameters ◽

Digital Artery ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Assessment Questionnaire

Abstract Background Neointima proliferation is a key pathologic feature of systemic sclerosis (SSc), causing arterial vessel narrowing and being the recognised culprit pathological lesion in digital ulcers (DUs), pulmonary artery hypertension and renal crisis. Nevertheless, there are no validated imaging techniques to assess the severity of vascular involvement in SSc. We have previously shown digital artery volume index (DAVIX©) assessed with time of right MRI angiography, is a reliable measure of neointima proliferation in the hands. The purpose of our study was to identify the value of DAVIX© in predicting worsening of patient reported outcomes (PROs) and clinical parameters in SSc. Methods Cross-sectional data were available for 91 patients and complete 12 months follow-up data for 68 patients. Data collected included: modfied Rodnan skin score (mRSS), pulmonary function tests (PFTs), echocardiography, nailfold capillaroscopy, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI), and Scleroderma Health Assessment Questionnaire (sHAQ). DAVIX© of the dominant hand was calculated as the % mean of the 4 fingers, employing MeVisLab software. Following analysis of distribution, Spearman or Pearson test were used to determine correlation coefficients, as appropriate (Prism 7). Results 56/68 were female and median of disease duration was 4 years (IQR 1.91-9). As previously reported DAVIX© correlated with the presence of DUs (p = 0.0093). Considering all patients, DAVIX© correlated with mRSS (r=-0.258, p = 0.017), DLCO% (r = 0.338, p = 0.008) and the pattern of capillaroscopy (r=-0.388, p = 0.001). In patients with DUs, DAVIX© showed a stronger correlation with DLCO% (r = 0.786, p = 0.048). Most importantly, DAVIX© predicted the worsening of HAQ-DI (r=-0.295, p = 0.029), sHAQ (r =-0.333, p = 0.029) and VAS pain (r=-0.269, p = 0.038) independently of the presence of DUs. Conclusion The quantitative assessment of neointima proliferation in the hand by DAVIX© is a useful imaging biomarker of vascular disease activity. The value of DAVIX© in predicting the worsening of PROs and clinical parameters in overall patients, may offer insights on the role of vascular disease activity in the global progression of SSc. The validation of our data in an independent cohort and the sensitivity to change over time of DAVIX© may aid to the implementation of hand MRI as imaging outcome measure of vascular severity in SSc. Disclosures F. Danzo None. K. Gjeloshi None. G. Lettieri None. G. Abignano None. M. Hinton None. A. Dean None. G. Cuomo None. O. Kubassova None. F. del Galdo None.

Download Full-text

POS0919 BIMEKIZUMAB SHOWS SUSTAINED LONG-TERM IMPROVEMENTS IN PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOMES AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN ANKYLOSING SPONDYLITIS: 3-YEAR RESULTS FROM A PHASE 2B STUDY

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.1840 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 720.2-721

Author(s):

X. Baraliakos ◽

M. Dougados ◽

K. Gaffney ◽

R. Sengupta ◽

M. Magrey ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Ankylosing Spondylitis ◽

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Morning Stiffness ◽

Spinal Pain ◽

Research Support ◽

Sf 36 ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Full Analysis

Background:Bimekizumab (BKZ), a monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F, has demonstrated clinical efficacy and safety in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated over a period up to 96 weeks.1,2Objectives:To report 3-year interim patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in patients with active AS treated with BKZ in a phase 2b dose-ranging study (BE AGILE; NCT02963506) and its open-label extension (OLE; NCT03355573).Methods:BE AGILE study design has been described previously.1 Patients treated with BKZ 160 mg or 320 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) at Week 48 in BE AGILE were eligible for OLE entry. All OLE patients received BKZ 160 mg Q4W. Outcome measures are reported for the OLE full analysis set (patients who entered the OLE and had ≥1 dose of BKZ and ≥1 valid efficacy variable measurement in the OLE), and include: BASDAI, BASDAI50 responder rate, BASFI, fatigue (BASDAI Q1), morning stiffness (mean of BASDAI Q5 + 6), total spinal pain (numeric rating scale [NRS]), SF-36 PCS and MCS, and ASQoL. Missing data were imputed using multiple imputation (MI; based on the missing at random assumption) for continuous variables and non-responder imputation (NRI) for dichotomous variables.Results:262/303 (86%) patients randomised at BE AGILE study baseline (BL) completed Week 48 on BKZ 160 mg or 320 mg, of whom 255/262 (97%) entered the OLE (full analysis set: 254). From baseline to Week 48 in BE AGILE, BKZ-treated patients showed clinically relevant improvements in disease activity (BASDAI, BASDAI50), physical function (BASFI), fatigue, morning stiffness, spinal pain, and quality of life (SF-36 PCS and MCS, ASQoL) (Figure 1). Group-level improvements in all reported continuous efficacy measures exceeded published minimally important difference (MID), minimum clinically important improvement (MCII), and/or minimum clinically important difference (MCID) thresholds (Figure 1).3,4 Efficacy in all reported outcome measures was maintained or continued to improve from Week 48 to Week 144 or 156 (Figure 1).Conclusion:BKZ treatment was associated with sustained and consistent efficacy in patients with active AS over 3 years, including patient-reported disease activity, physical function, fatigue, morning stiffness, spinal pain, and quality of life.References:[1]van der Heijde D. Ann Rheum Dis 2020;79:595–604.[2]Baraliakos X. Arthritis Rheumatol 2020;72 (suppl 10).[3]Ogdie A. Arthritis Care Res 2020;72 (S10):47–71.[4]Maruish ME. User’s manual for the SF-36v2 Health Survey (3rd ed). 2011; Lincoln, RI: QualityMetric Incorporated.Acknowledgements:This study was funded by UCB Pharma. Editorial services were provided by Costello Medical.Disclosure of Interests:Xenofon Baraliakos Speakers bureau: AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Paid instructor for: AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Maxime Dougados Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma, Karl Gaffney Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Raj Sengupta Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Biogen, Celgene, MSD, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Biogen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, MSD, Novartis, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Celgene, UCB Pharma, Marina Magrey Consultant of: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, UCB Pharma, Natasha de Peyrecave Employee of: UCB Pharma, Marga Oortgiesen Employee of: UCB Pharma, Thomas Vaux Employee of: UCB Pharma, Carmen Fleurinck Employee of: UCB Pharma, Valerie Ciaravino Employee of: UCB Pharma, Atul Deodhar Speakers bureau: Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, GSK, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, GSK, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma

Download Full-text

FRI0020 CLINICAL TREATMENT RESPONSE STILL DOES NOT MATCH PATIENT REPORTED IMPROVEMENT, EVEN IN EARLY RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases ◽

10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2116 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 79 (Suppl 1) ◽

pp. 582.1-582

Author(s):

S. Pazmino ◽

A. Lovik ◽

A. Boonen ◽

D. De Cock ◽

V. Stouten ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Disease Activity ◽

Early Rheumatoid Arthritis ◽

Health Assessment ◽

Sustained Remission ◽

Research Support ◽

Early Ra ◽

Severity Scores ◽

Patient Reported ◽

Over Time

Background:Commonly used disease activity scores in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) include one patient reported outcome (PRO) -the patient’s global health assessment (PGA). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed on data from the 2 year Care in early Rheumatoid Arthritis (CareRA) trial to explain the evolution of disease burden extracting 3 factors.1Objectives:To assess the evolution and relative responsiveness over time of clinical, laboratory and patient assessments included in composite scores, together with other PROs like pain, fatigue and functionality in patients with early RA (≤1 year) treated to target (T2T) within the CareRA trial.Methods:DMARD naïve patients with early RA (n=379) were included, randomized to remission induction with COBRA-like treatment schemes (n=332) or MTX monotherapy (n=47) and T2T.Components of disease activity scores (swollen/tender joint count (S/TJC), C-reactive protein (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and physician (PhGH) or patient (PGA) global health assessment), pain and fatigue (both on 0-100 scale) and HAQ were recorded at every visit.Missing data was handled with multiple imputation (n=15). Clustering was removed with multiple outputation (n=1000), then each of the 15 000 datasets was analyzed by EFA with principal component extraction and oblimin rotation. The analyses were combined after re-ordering the factors by maximizing factor congruence. The 3 extracted factors and their individual components (with their loadings) were: 1. Patient containing PGA (0.87), pain (0.86), fatigue (0.90) and HAQ (0.5) 2.Clinical with SJC (0.92), TJC (0.89) and PhGH (0.76) and 3.Laboratory with CRP(0.87) and ESR (0.78).1(Pazmino, ACR 2019 abstract, Table 3)Afterwards, variables were first normalized to a 0-1 scale, then multiplied -weighted- by the factor loadings previously obtained.1For each Patient, Clinical and Laboratory severity score, the weighted variables belonging to each score were summed together and then re-scaled to 0-1 (higher values suggest more burden).The percentage (%) improvement from baseline to week 104 and the area under the curve (AUC) across time points were calculated per factor.Differences in % improvement and AUC were compared between patients not achieving and achieving early and sustained (week 16 to 104) disease activity score remission (DAS28CRP <2.6) with ANOVA. Bonferroni correction was used for multiple testing.Results:Severity scores of Patient, Clinical and Laboratory factors improved rapidly over time (Figure 1). In patients achieving sustained remission (n=122), Patient, Clinical and Laboratory scores improved 56%, 90% and 27% respectively. In patients not achieving sustained remission (n=257) the improvement was 32%, 78% and 9% respectively (p<0.001 only for clinical improvement).Patients in CareRA who achieved sustained remission had an AUC of 15.1, 3.4 and 4.7 in Patient, Clinical and Laboratory scores respectively, compared to 32.3, 10.0, and 7.2 in participants not achieving sustained remission (p<0.001 for all comparisons).Conclusion:Patient, Clinical and Laboratory severity scores improved rapidly over time in patients achieving rapid and sustained disease control. However, overall, Patient burden seemed not to improve to the same extent as Clinical burden. Patient’s unmet needs in terms of pain, fatigue, functionality and overall well-being should thus be given more attention, even in patients in sustained remission.References:[1]Pazmino S,et al.Including Pain, Fatigue and Functionality Regularly in the Assessment of Patients with Early Rheumatoid Arthritis Separately Adds to the Evaluation of Disease Status [abstract]. ACR. 2019.Disclosure of Interests:Sofia Pazmino: None declared, Anikó Lovik: None declared, Annelies Boonen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Consultant of: Galapagos, Lilly (all paid to the department), Diederik De Cock: None declared, Veerle Stouten: None declared, Johan Joly: None declared, Delphine Bertrand: None declared, Rene Westhovens Grant/research support from: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Consultant of: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Speakers bureau: Celltrion Inc, Galapagos, Gilead, Patrick Verschueren Grant/research support from: Pfizer unrestricted chair of early RA research, Speakers bureau: various companies

Download Full-text

Patient reported outcomes in patients with desmoid type fibromatosis.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.11574 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 11574-11574

Author(s):

VIKAS GARG ◽

Sameer Rastogi ◽

Adarsh Barwad ◽

Rambha Panday ◽

Sandeep Kumar Bhoriwal ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Patient Reported Outcomes ◽

Symptom Burden ◽

Benign Neoplasm ◽

Anxiety And Depression ◽

Appendicular Skeleton ◽

Healthy Controls ◽

Symptom Scale ◽

Cross Sectional ◽

Patient Reported ◽

The Impact

11574 Background: Desmoid type fibromatosis (DTF) is a rare benign neoplasm with infiltrative growth and high local recurrences. Due to long disease course, unpredictable growth pattern, and low mortality, using only survival outcomes may be inappropriate. In this study we assessed the impact of DTF on health related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods: This was a cross-sectional study done in patients with DTF. The study participants were asked to fill the EORTC QLQ-C30, GAD-7 and PHQ- 9 q uestionnaires to assess HRQoL, anxiety and depression . Outcomes were also compared with healthy controls. Results: 204 subjects (102 DTF patients and 102 healthy controls) were recruited. Study parameters have been summarized in Table. Appendicular skeleton (limbs + girdle) was most commonly involved in 59 % patients and abdominal wall or mesentery was involved in 22.5 %. Patients have received median of 2 lines of therapy. 54 % patients were currently on sorafenib and 41 % were under active surveillance. Mean global health status in DTF patient 65.58 ± 22.64, was significantly lower than healthy controls. Similarly, DTF patients scored low on all functional scales except cognitive functioning. Symptom scale showed significantly higher symptom burden of fatigue, pain, insomnia and financial difficulties. Anxiety & depression was observed in 39.22 % and 50 % of DTF patients respectively. DTF patients had higher rates of mild, moderate and severe anxiety and depression compared to healthy controls. No difference was observed based on site of disease. Conclusions: DTF patients have significant symptom burden, poor functioning, and heightened anxiety and depression. Patient reported outcomes should be routinely used to assess treatment efficacy in DTF patients.[Table: see text]

Download Full-text