scholarly journals Association between ischaemic bowel syndromes and androgen deprivation therapy in patients with prostate cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 7 (2) ◽  
pp. e012950
Author(s):  
I-Ni Chiang ◽  
Chao-Yuan Huang ◽  
Yeong-Shiau Pu ◽  
Chao-Hsiang Chang ◽  
Chih-Hsin Muo ◽  
...  
BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e045797
Author(s):  
Mingaile Drevinskaite ◽  
Ausvydas Patasius ◽  
Marius Kincius ◽  
Vincas Urbonas ◽  
Giedre Smailyte

ObjectivesTo examine the risk of type 2 diabetes in patients with prostate cancer and its association with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).Design and participantsWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer in the Lithuanian male population between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2012 who were identified through the Lithuanian Cancer registry. All prostate cancer cases were linked to the National Health Insurance Fund database to obtain information regarding the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and information on prescriptions of antiandrogens and gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists. Patients with prostate cancer were followed up until the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, or 31 December 2017, or date of death, whichever came first. Cox proportional hazard models were used to estimate the risk of type 2 diabetes in patients with prostate cancer with or without ADT exposure.Results27 580 men were diagnosed with prostate cancer, out of whom 14 502 (52.6%) did not receive ADT and 13 078 (47.4%) were treated with ADT. The incidence of type 2 diabetes for all patients with prostate cancer was 7.4/1000 person-years, for men on GnRH agonists 9.0/1000 person-years and 5.8/1000 person-years for men on antiandrogens. There was an increased risk of developing type 2 diabetes comparing ADT users and non-users (HR=1.49, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.66).ConclusionThis study showed an increased risk of diabetes in patients with prostate cancer treated with ADT in comparison to ADT-free patient cohort. GnRH agonist users showed higher susceptibility, while the group on antiandrogen monotherapy showed no such increase.


BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e025161
Author(s):  
Mark Rezk ◽  
Ashish Chandra ◽  
Daniel Addis ◽  
Henrik Møller ◽  
Mina Youssef ◽  
...  

ObjectivesTo determine whetherETS-related gene(ERG) expression can be used as a biomarker to predict biochemical recurrence and prostate cancer-specific death in patients with high Gleason grade prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) as monotherapy.MethodsA multicentre retrospective cohort study identifying 149 patients treated with primary ADT for metastatic or non-metastatic prostate cancer with Gleason score 8–10 between 1999 and 2006. Patients planned for adjuvant radiotherapy at diagnosis were excluded. Age at diagnosis, ethnicity, prostate-specific antigen and Charlson-comorbidity score were recorded. Prostatic tissue acquired at biopsy or transurethral resection surgery was assessed for immunohistochemical expression ofERG. Failure of ADT defined as prostate specific antigen nadir +2. Vital status and death certification data determined using the UK National Cancer Registry. Primary outcome measures were overall survival (OS) and prostate cancer specific survival (CSS). Secondary outcome was biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS).ResultsThe median OS of our cohort was 60.2 months (CI 52.0 to 68.3).ERGexpression observed in 51/149 cases (34%). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis showed no significant association betweenERGexpression and OS (p=0.41), CSS (p=0.92) and BRFS (p=0.31). Cox regression analysis showed Gleason score (p=0.003) and metastatic status (p<1×10-5) to be the only significant predictors of prostate CSS.ConclusionsNo significant association was found betweenERGstatus and any of our outcome measures. Despite a limited sample size, our results suggest thatERGdoes not appear to be a useful biomarker in predicting response to ADT in patients with high risk prostate cancer.


2010 ◽  
Vol 184 (3) ◽  
pp. 918-924 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shabbir M.H. Alibhai ◽  
Minh Duong-Hua ◽  
Angela M. Cheung ◽  
Rinku Sutradhar ◽  
Padraig Warde ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document