Rationale and design for Lowering-hyperUricaemia treatment on cardiovascular outcoMes In peritoNeal diAlysis patients: a prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial (LUMINA)

IntroductionThe prevalence of hyperuricaemia in peritoneal dialysis patients is quite high. Studies have demonstrated a correlation between hyperuricaemia and cardiovascular disease and treatment of hyperuricaemia reportedly reduces cardiovascular risk in patients with chronic kidney disease. However, whether hyperuricaemia treatment benefits cardiovascular outcomes in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD) patients is not yet known.Methods and analysesThis prospective, multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial was designed to evaluate the effects of hyperuricaemia treatment on cardiovascular event risk in CAPD patients. Based on a power of 80%, with type I error α=0.05, two-sided test and 1:1 parallel control study, considering a dropout rate of 20%, a total of 548 eligible patients are expected to be randomly assigned to either the hyperuricaemia treatment group (febuxostat) or control group (placebo).Ethics and disseminationThis study has been approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University and the ethics committees of other participating institutions. Written informed consent will be obtained from potential trial participants or authorised surrogates.The findings of the study will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals, and presentations at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberNCT03200210. 25 June 2017. The trial was started on 13 July 2017, and is expected to end by 31 December 2022. Till 20 Jan 2020, a total of 548 patients have been recruited.Protocol versionThe protocol version number and date are YLT-1604-V2.0 and 15 December 2016.

Download Full-text

Protocol for a randomised, open-label, parallel group, multicentre controlled study to evaluate the clinical performance and safety of Stay Safe Link compared with Stay Safe in patients with end-stage kidney disease on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024589 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (3) ◽

pp. e024589

Author(s):

Wen Yao Mak ◽

Loke Meng Ong ◽

Bak Leong Goh ◽

Sunita Bavanandan ◽

Lily Mushahar ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Peritoneal Dialysis ◽

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Intervention Group ◽

Controlled Study ◽

Control Group ◽

Open Label ◽

Randomised Controlled ◽

End Stage

IntroductionPeritonitis is a major complication of continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPD), the risk of which is significantly influenced by the type of PD transfer system. Although the Y-disconnect and double-bag system is more efficient in preventing peritonitis compared with the spike system, little information is available to differentiate risks between different brands of the Y-disconnect double-bag system. A randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of a newly introduced system is needed to provide the necessary clinical evidence to guide policy decision-making.Methods and analysisThe study is an open-label randomised controlled trial. A total of 434 patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing CAPD will be enrolled and randomised to either the intervention group, Stay Safe Link, or the control group, Stay Safe. All study subjects will be followed up and monitored for 1 year. The primary safety outcome is the rate of peritonitis while the primary efficacy outcomes are the delivered dialysis dose and ultrafiltration volume.Ethics and disseminationThe study was approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee, National Institute of Health Malaysia. A written informed consent will be obtained from all participating subjects prior to any trial-related procedure and the study conduct will adhere strictly to Good Clinical Practice. The findings will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal.Trial registration numberNCT03177031; Pre-results.

Download Full-text

Comparing docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) concomitant with neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone in the treatment of breast cancer (DHA WIN): protocol of a double-blind, phase II, randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030502 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 9 (9) ◽

pp. e030502 ◽

Cited By ~ 3

Author(s):

Marnie Newell ◽

John R Mackey ◽

Gilbert Bigras ◽

Mirey Alvarez-Camacho ◽

Susan Goruk ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Breast Cancer ◽

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Docosahexaenoic Acid ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Dropout Rate ◽

Phospholipid Content ◽

Double Blind ◽

Randomised Controlled

IntroductionNeoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer treatment is prescribed to facilitate surgery and provide confirmation of drug-sensitive disease, and the achievement of pathological complete response (pCR) predicts improved long-term outcomes. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) has been shown to reduce tumour growth in preclinical models when combined with chemotherapy and is known to beneficially modulate systemic immune function. The purpose of this trial is to investigate the benefit of DHA supplementation in combination with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer.Methods and analysisThis is a double-blind, phase II, randomised controlled trial of 52 women prescribed neoadjuvant chemotherapy to test if DHA supplementation enhances chemotherapy efficacy. The DHA supplementation group will take 4.4 g/day DHA orally, and the placebo group will take an equal fat supplement of vegetable oil. The primary outcome will be change in Ki67 labelling index from prechemotherapy core needle biopsy to definitive surgical specimen. The secondary endpoints include assessment of (1) DHA plasma phospholipid content; (2) systemic immune cell types, plasma cytokines and inflammatory markers; (3) tumour markers for apoptosis and tumour infiltrating lymphocytes; (4) rate of pCR in breast and in axillary nodes; (5) frequency of grade 3 and 4 chemotherapy-associated toxicities; and (6) patient-perceived quality of life. The trial has 81% power to detect a significant between-group difference in Ki67 index with a two-sided t-test of less than 0.0497, and accounts for 10% dropout rate.Ethics and disseminationThis study has full approval from the Health Research Ethics Board of Alberta - Cancer Committee (Protocol #: HREBA.CC-18-0381). We expect to present the findings of this study to the scientific community in peer-reviewed journals and at conferences. The results of this study will provide evidence for supplementing with DHA during neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment for breast cancer.Trial registration numberNCT03831178

Download Full-text

The effect of zinc supplementation on pregnancy outcomes: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial, Egypt

British Journal Of Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s000711451500166x ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 114 (2) ◽

pp. 274-285 ◽

Cited By ~ 10

Author(s):

Samia A. Nossier ◽

Noha E. Naeim ◽

Nawal A. El-Sayed ◽

Azza A. Abu Zeid

Keyword(s):

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Pregnant Women ◽

Pregnancy Outcomes ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Neonatal Morbidity ◽

Control Group ◽

Double Blind ◽

Serum Zn ◽

Randomised Controlled ◽

Low Serum

The present randomised controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to evaluate the effect of two regimens of Zn supplementation on pregnancy outcomes in Alexandria, Egypt. Healthy pregnant women aged 20–45 years and having low serum Zn level below the estimated median for the gestational age were eligible to participate in the trial. Of 1055 pregnant women assessed for the eligibility of low serum Zn level, 675 were eligible. These women were randomly assigned to one of the three groups: the Zn alone group (n 225) received a daily dose of 30 mg ZnSO4, the combined group (n 227) received 30 mg ZnSO4 plus multivitamins (B1, B6, D3, C and E) and the control group (n 223) received placebo (270 mg lactose). They were followed up from the time of recruitment till 1 week after delivery. Overall, there was no detectable difference in the mean birth weight between the three groups (mean 2929·12 (sd 330·28), 2922·22 (sd 324·05) and 2938·48 (sd 317·39) g for the placebo, Zn and Zn plus multivitamin groups, respectively, P= 0·88). Both the single and the combined Zn supplements were almost equally effective in reducing second- and third-stage complications (relative risk (RR) 0·43, 95 % CI 0·31, 0·60 for the Zn group and RR 0·54, 95 % CI 0·40, 0·73 for the combined group). Stillbirth and preterm delivery were significantly lower among the two supplemented groups than the placebo group (P= 0·001). Early neonatal morbidity was also significantly lower in the supplemented groups (RR 0·23, 95 % CI 0·15, 0·35 for the Zn group and RR 0·25, 95 % CI 0·16, 0·37 for the combined group). Collectively, Zn supplementation was effective in reducing pregnancy complications and early neonatal infection among the Zn-deficient women of the present trial.

Download Full-text

Predicting treatment outcomes for bilinguals with aphasia using computational modeling: Study protocol for the PROCoM randomised controlled trial

BMJ Open ◽

10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040495 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 10 (11) ◽

pp. e040495

Author(s):

Claudia Peñaloza ◽

Maria Dekhtyar ◽

Michael Scimeca ◽

Erin Carpenter ◽

Nishaat Mukadam ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Treatment Outcomes ◽

Lexical Access ◽

Repeated Measures ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Target Language ◽

Control Group ◽

Double Blind ◽

Mixed Effect ◽

Randomised Controlled

IntroductionBilinguals with aphasia (BWA) present varying degrees of lexical access impairment and recovery across their two languages. Because both languages may benefit from therapy, identifying the optimal target language for treatment is a current challenge for research and clinical practice. Prior research has demonstrated that the BiLex computational model can accurately simulate lexical access in healthy bilinguals, and language impairment and treatment response in bilingual aphasia. Here, we aim to determine whether BiLex can predict treatment outcomes in BWA in the treated and the untreated language and compare these outcome predictions to determine the optimal language for rehabilitation.Methods and analysisThe study involves a prospective parallel-group, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Forty-eight Spanish–English BWA will receive 20 sessions of semantic treatment for lexical retrieval deficits in one of their languages and will complete assessments in both languages prior and after treatment. Participants will be randomly assigned to an experimental group receiving treatment in the optimal language determined by the model or a control group receiving treatment in the language opposite to the model’s recommendation. Primary treatment outcomes include naming probes while secondary treatment outcomes include tests tapping additional language domains. Treatment outcomes will be compared across the two groups using 2×2 mixed effect models for repeated measures Analysis of variance (ANOVA) on metrics of treatment effects commonly employed in rehabilitation studies (ie, effect size and percentage change).Ethics and disseminationAll procedures included in this protocol (protocol number 29, issue date: 19 March 2019) were approved by the Boston University Charles River Campus Institutional Review Board at Boston, Massachusetts (reference number: 4492E). The results of this study will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals and will be presented at national and international conferences.Trial registration numberNCT02916524.

Download Full-text

Effect of Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 in fermented milk on abdominal adiposity in adults in a randomised controlled trial

British Journal Of Nutrition ◽

10.1017/s0007114513001037 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 110 (9) ◽

pp. 1696-1703 ◽

Cited By ~ 110

Author(s):

Yukio Kadooka ◽

Masao Sato ◽

Akihiro Ogawa ◽

Masaya Miyoshi ◽

Hiroshi Uenishi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Randomised Controlled Trial ◽

Visceral Fat ◽

Dose Group ◽

Controlled Trial ◽

Fermented Milk ◽

Control Group ◽

Abdominal Adiposity ◽

Double Blind ◽

Lactobacillus Gasseri ◽

Randomised Controlled

Consumption of fermented milk (FM) containing a probiotic, Lactobacillus gasseri SBT2055 (LG2055), previously showed a reduction in abdominal adiposity in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) using FM with 108 colony-forming units (cfu) of LG2055/g. However, whether the effectiveness is observed at lower concentrations, the recommended minimum or intermediate levels of probiotics (106 or 107cfu/g, respectively), remains to be examined. A multi-centre, double-blind, parallel-group RCT was conducted using 210 healthy Japanese adults with large visceral fat areas (80·2–187·8 cm2). They were balanced for their baseline characteristics and randomly assigned to three groups receiving FM containing 107, 106 or 0 (control) cfu LG2055/g of FM, and were asked to consume 200 g FM/d for 12 weeks. Abdominal visceral fat areas, which were determined by computed tomography, at week 12, changed from baseline by an average of − 8·5 % (95 % CI − 11·9, − 5·1; P< 0·01) in the 107 dose group, and by − 8·2 % (95 % CI − 10·8, − 5·7; P< 0·01) in the 106 dose group. Other measures including BMI, waist and hip circumferences, and body fat mass were also significantly decreased from baseline at week 12 in both groups; interestingly, the cessation of taking FM for 4 weeks attenuated these effects. In the control group, none of these parameters significantly decreased from baseline. These findings demonstrate that consumption of LG2055 at doses as low as the order of 108cfu/d exhibited a significant lowering effect on abdominal adiposity, and suggest that constant consumption might be needed to maintain the effect.

Download Full-text