scholarly journals Cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with enoxaparin plus warfarin for the treatment of hospitalised acute deep vein thrombosis in China

BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. e038433
Author(s):  
Li Yang ◽  
Jingjing Wu
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cost Saving ◽  
Transition Probabilities ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Life Years ◽  
Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
The Impact

ObjectiveLimited economic evaluation data for rivaroxaban compared with standard of care (SoC) exists in China. The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of rivaroxaban compared with current SoC (enoxaparin overlapped with warfarin) for the treatment of acute deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in China.MethodsA Markov model was adapted from a payer’s perspective to evaluate the costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of patients with DVT treated with rivaroxaban or enoxaparin/warfarin. Clinical data from the EINSTEIN-DVT trial were obtained to estimate the transition probabilities. Data on Chinese health resource use, unit costs and utility parameters were collected from previously published literature and used to estimate the total costs and QALYs. The time horizon was set at 5 years and a 3-month cycle length was used in the model. A 5% discount rate was applied to the projected costs. One-way sensitivity analyses and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess the impact of uncertainty on results.ResultsRivaroxaban therapy resulted in an increase of 0.008 QALYs and was associated with lower total costs compared with enoxaparin/warfarin (US$4744.4 vs US$5572.4, respectively), demonstrating it to be a cost-saving treatment strategy. The results were mainly sensitive to length of hospitalisation due to DVT on enoxaparin/warfarin, cost per day of hospitalisation and the difference in length of stay of rivaroxaban-treated and enoxaparin/warfarin-treated patients.ConclusionRivaroxaban therapy resulted in a cost saving compared with enoxaparin/warfarin for the anticoagulation treatment of patients with hospitalised acute DVT in China.Trial registration numberNCT00440193; Post-results.

Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis Treated with Porcine Plasmin

1974 ◽  
Vol 32 (02/03) ◽  
pp. 468-482 ◽  
Author(s):  
O Storm ◽  
P Ollendorff ◽  
E Drewsen ◽  
P Tang
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Initial Dose ◽  
Treated Group ◽  
Allergic Reactions ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Thrombolytic Effect ◽  
Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

SummaryThe thrombolytic effect of pig plasmin was tested in a double blind trial on patients with deep venous thrombosis in the lower limb. Only patients with not more than three days old thrombi were selected for this study. The diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis was made clinically and confirmed by phlebography. Lysofibrin Novo (porcine plasmin) or placebo (porcine plasminogen) was administered intravenously to the patients. The enzyme and the placebo were delivered as lyophilized powder in labelled bottles - the contents of the bottles were unknown to the doctor in charge of the clinical administration of the trial. An initial dose of plasmin/plasminogen of 30 unit per kg body weight given slowly intravenously (1-1% hours infusion) was followed by a maintenance dosis of 15 per cent the initial dose per hour for the following 5-7 hours. In most cases a similar maintenance dosis was given the next day. In all patients heparin was administered after ending the plasmin/plasminogen infusion. The results of the treatment was evaluated clinically as well as by control phlebo- grams the following days.A statistically significant improvement was found in the plasmin treated group compared with the placebo (plasminogen) treated group. Thrombolysis was obtained clinically and phlebographically in 65 per cent of the plasmin treated group, but only in 15 per cent of the control patients were improvements found.This study has thus demonstrated that plasmin treatment according to a standard scheme was able to induce thrombolysis. There were only a few and insignificant side effects. Allergic reactions have not been seen and only very simple tests are required.

Performance of the Wells score in predicting deep vein thrombosis in medical and surgical hospitalized patients with or without thromboprophylaxis: The R-WITT study

2021 ◽  
pp. 1358863X2199467
Author(s):  
Jean-Eudes Trihan ◽  
Michael Adam ◽  
Sara Jidal ◽  
Isabelle Aichoun ◽  
Sarah Coudray ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Hospitalized Patients ◽  
Operating Characteristics ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Ultrasound Study ◽  
Wells Score ◽  
Deep Vein ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Test Probability

The Wells score had shown weak performance to determine pre-test probability of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) for inpatients. So, we evaluated the impact of thromboprophylaxis on the utility of the Wells score for risk stratification of inpatients with suspected DVT. This bicentric cross-sectional study from February 1, 2018 to January 31, 2019 included consecutive medical and surgical inpatients who underwent lower limb ultrasound study for suspected DVT. Wells score clinical predictors were assessed by both ordering and vascular physicians within 24 h after clinical suspicion of DVT. Primary outcome was the Wells score’s accuracy for pre-test risk stratification of suspected DVT, accounting for anticoagulation (AC) treatment (thromboprophylaxis for ⩾ 72 hours or long-term anticoagulation). We compared prevalence of proximal DVT among the low, moderate and high pre-test probability groups. The discrimination accuracy was defined as area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve. Of the 415 included patients, 30 (7.2%) had proximal DVT. Prevalence of proximal DVT was lower than expected in all pre-test probability groups. The prevalence in low, moderate and high pre-test probability groups was 0.0%, 3.1% and 8.2% ( p = 0.22) and 1.7%, 4.2% and 25.8% ( p < 0.001) for inpatients with or without AC, respectively. Area under ROC curves for discriminatory accuracy of the Wells score, for risk of proximal DVT with or without AC, was 0.72 and 0.88, respectively. The Wells score performed poorly for discrimination of risk for proximal DVT in hospitalized patients with AC but performed reasonably well among patients without AC; and showed low inter-rater reliability between physicians. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03784937.

scholarly journals The Predictive Value of the aCL and Anti-β2GPI at the Time of Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis—A Two-Year Prospective Study

Biomedicines ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (8) ◽  
pp. 901
Author(s):  
Katja Perdan-Pirkmajer ◽  
Polona Žigon ◽  
Anja Boc ◽  
Eva Podovšovnik ◽  
Saša Čučnik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Anticoagulant Therapy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Anticoagulation Therapy ◽  
Time Frame ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Therapeutic Decisions ◽  
Acute Deep Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an important cause of deep vein thrombosis (DVT). According to current APS classification criteria, APS cannot be confirmed until 24 weeks after DVT. This time frame results in frequent discontinuation of anticoagulant treatment before APS is diagnosed. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the potential predictive value of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2glycoprotein I (anti-β2GPI) before discontinuation of anticoagulation therapy. Patients with newly diagnosed DVT were included into a 24-month prospective study. All patients received anticoagulant therapy. aCL and anti-β2GPI were determined at inclusion and every four weeks for the first 24 weeks and then one and two years after inclusion. APS was confirmed in 24/221 (10.9%) patients. At the time of acute DVT 20/24 (83.3%), APS patients had positive aCL and/or anti-β2GPI. Two patients had low aCL levels and two were negative at the time of acute DVT but later met APS criteria due to lupus anticoagulant (LA). Our data indicate that negative aCL and/or anti-β2GPI at the time of acute DVT make further aPL testing unnecessary; however, LA should be determined after discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy. Positive aCL and/or anti-β2GPI at the time of acute DVT have a strong positive predictive value for APS and may support therapeutic decisions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document