scholarly journals Performance of risk scores for coronary artery disease: a retrospective cohort study of patients with chest pain in urgent primary care

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e045387
Author(s):  
Michelle Kleton ◽  
Amy Manten ◽  
Iris Smits ◽  
Remco Rietveld ◽  
Wim A M Lucassen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Care Facility ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Initial Contact ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Coronary Syndrome

ObjectiveTo evaluate the diagnostic performance of the Marburg Heart Score (MHS), INTERCHEST, Gencer rule, Bruins Slot rule and compare these with unaided clinical judgement in patients with chest pain in urgent primary care.DesignRetrospective, cohort study.SettingRegional primary care facility responsible for out-of-hours primary care for a quarter-million people in the Netherlands.ParticipantsConsecutive patients aged ≥18 years who were evaluated for chest pain.Main outcome measuresDiscriminatory ability (C-statistic), sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV). The reference standard involved a composite endpoint of the occurrence of death, acute coronary syndrome or coronary revascularisation (=major adverse cardiac events; MACE) up to 6 weeks after initial contact.ResultsA total of 664 patients were included, of whom 4.8% (n=32) had a MACE event. C-statistics for MHS, INTERCHEST, Gencer and Bruins Slot rule were: 0.77 (95% CI 0.69 to 0.84), 0.85 (95% CI 0.78 to 0.92), 0.72 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.81) and 0.72 (95% CI 0.63 to 0.81), respectively. Optimal diagnostic accuracy was found for MHS ≥2 (sensitivity=81.3%, specificity=67.1%, PPV=11.1%, NPV=98.6%), INTERCHEST ≥2 (sensitivity=87.5%, specificity=78.8%, PPV=17.3%, NPV=99.1%), Gencer ≥2 (sensitivity=84.4%, specificity=37.8%, PPV=6.4%, NPV=98.0%) and Bruins Slot≥2 (sensitivity=90.6%, specificity=40.8%, PPV=7.2%, NPV=98.9%). Physicians referred 157 patients (23.6%) and missed 6 out of 32 MACEs (sensitivity=81.3%, specificity=79.3%, PPV=16.6%, NPV=98.8%). Using INTERCHEST with a referral threshold of ≥2 points, 4 MACEs would have been missed and 162 patients (24.4%) referred. The other risk scores resulted in far higher referral rates.ConclusionWhile available risk scores have reasonable to good discriminatory properties, they do not outperform unaided clinical judgment for evaluating chest pain in urgent primary care. Only the INTERCHEST score may slightly improve risk stratification.

scholarly journals Relationship between Braden Scale scores and acute kidney injury among patients with acute coronary syndrome: a multicentre retrospective cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2022 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. e049102
Author(s):  
Zhichao Li ◽  
Bofu Liu ◽  
Dongze Li ◽  
Yu Jia ◽  
Lei Ye ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Kidney Injury ◽  
Acute Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Chest Pain ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Coronary Syndrome ◽  
Braden Scale ◽  
The Impact

ObjectivesTo evaluate the impact of pressure ulcer events assessed by the Braden Scale (BS) on acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).DesignA multicentre retrospective cohort study.SettingChest pain centres from seven tertiary hospitals in China.ParticipantsWe analysed 3185 patients with ACS from the Retrospective Evaluation of Acute Chest Pain study. The patients were divided into three groups (B1, B2 and B3) according to their BS scores (≤12 vs 13–14 vs ≥15, respectively) at admission.Outcome measuresAKI was defined according to the criteria of the 2012 Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between the BS score and AKI.ResultsThere were 461 patients (14.5%) with ACS who had the complication of AKI. Patients with a lower score on the BS had a higher incidence of AKI (p<0.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that adjusted ORs of the BS score for AKI were 2.242 (B1 vs B3: 95% CI: 1.643 to 3.060, p<0.001) and 1.566 (B2 vs B3: 95% CI: 1.186 to 2.069, p=0.002). The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of the BS score was 0.719 (95% CI: 0.702 to 0.736; p<0.001) for AKI.ConclusionsThe BS score was independently associated with AKI. It may be a useful tool to identify those who may benefit from further prediction and prevention of AKI in patients with ACS.Trail registration numberChiCTR1900024657 (http://www.chictr.org.cn/). The satge rekates to results.

A Retrospective Cohort Study of SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Hypertenses Patients in a Primary Care Center

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esther Hernandez Castilla ◽  
Lucia Vallejo Serrano ◽  
Monica Saenz Ausejo ◽  
Beatriz Pax Sanchez ◽  
Katharina Ramrath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Care Center ◽  
Primary Care Center

scholarly journals Treatment of chronic noncancer pain in patients on opioid therapy in primary care: A retrospective cohort study

2019 ◽  
Vol 153 (1) ◽  
pp. 52-58
Author(s):  
Arden R. Barry ◽  
Chantal E. Chris
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Opioid Therapy ◽  
Opioid Agonist ◽  
Chronic Noncancer Pain ◽  
Opioid Dose ◽  
Noncancer Pain

Background: This study sought to characterize the real-world treatment of chronic noncancer pain (CNCP) in patients on opioid therapy in primary care. Methods: A retrospective cohort study from 2014-18 was conducted at a multidisciplinary primary care clinic in Chilliwack, British Columbia. Included were adults on daily opioid therapy for CNCP. Patients receiving palliative care or ≤1 visit were excluded. Outcomes of interest included use of opioid/nonopioid pharmacotherapy, number/frequency of visits and proportion of patients able to reduce/discontinue opioid therapy. Results: Seventy patients (mean age 53 years, 53% male, 51% back pain) were included. Median follow-up was 6 visits over 12 months. Sixty-two patients (89%) reduced their opioid dose, 6 patients had no change and 2 patients required a dose increase. Mean opioid dose was reduced from 183 to 70 mg morphine equivalents daily. Twenty-four patients (34%) discontinued opioid therapy, 6 patients (9%) transitioned to opioid agonist therapy and 6 patients (9%) breached their opioid treatment agreement. Nonopioid pharmacotherapy included nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (64%), gabapentinoids (63%), tricyclic antidepressants (56%) and nabilone (51%). Discussion: Over half of patients were no longer on opioid therapy by the end of the study. Most patients had a disorder (e.g., back pain) for which opioids are generally not recommended. Overall mean opioid dose was reduced from baseline by approximately 60% over 1 year. Lack of access to specialized pain treatments may have accounted for high nonopioid pharmacotherapy usage. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that treatment of CNCP and opioid tapering can successfully be achieved in a primary care setting. Can Pharm J (Ott) 2020;153:xx-xx.

scholarly journals Influence of weekday of admission and level of distress on length of hospital stay in patients with low back pain: a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Emanuel Brunner ◽  
André Meichtry ◽  
Davy Vancampfort ◽  
Reinhard Imoberdorf ◽  
David Gisi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Low Back Pain ◽  
Back Pain ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Length Of Hospital Stay ◽  
Binomial Model ◽  
Low Back

Abstract Background Low back pain (LBP) is often a complex problem requiring interdisciplinary management to address patients’ multidimensional needs. Providing inpatient care for patients with LBP in primary care hospitals is a challenge. In this setting, interdisciplinary LBP management is often unavailable during weekends. Delays in therapeutic procedures may result in a prolonged length of hospital stay (LoS). The impact of delays on LoS might be strongest in patients reporting high levels of psychological distress. Therefore, this study investigates the influence of weekday of admission and distress on LoS of inpatients with LBP. Methods This retrospective cohort study was conducted between 1 February 2019 and 31 January 2020. In part 1, a negative binomial model was fitted to LoS with weekday of admission as a predictor. In part 2, the same model included weekday of admission, distress level, and their interaction as covariates. Planned contrast was used in part 1 to estimate the difference in log-expected LoS between group 1 (admissions Friday/Saturday) and the reference group (admissions Sunday-Thursday). In part 2, the same contrast was used to estimate the corresponding difference in (per-unit) distress trends. Results We identified 173 patients with LBP. The mean LoS was 7.8 days (SD = 5.59). Patients admitted on Friday (mean LoS = 10.3) and Saturday (LoS = 10.6) had longer stays, but not those admitted on Sunday (LoS = 7.1). Analysis of the weekday effect and planned contrast showed that admission on Friday or Saturday was associated with a significant increase in LoS (log ratio = 0.42, 95% CI = 0.21 to 0.63). A total of 101 patients (58%) returned questionnaires, and complete data on distress were available from 86 patients (49%). According to the negative binomial model for LoS and the planned contrast, the distress effect on LoS was significantly influenced (difference in slopes = 0.816, 95% CI = 0.03 to 1.60) by dichotomic weekdays of admission (Friday/Saturday vs. Sunday-Thursday). Conclusions Delays in interdisciplinary LBP management over the weekend may prolong LoS. This may particularly affect patients reporting high levels of distress. Our study provides a platform to further explore whether interdisciplinary LBP management addressing patients’ multidimensional needs reduces LoS in primary care hospitals.

scholarly journals LDL-cholesterol change and goal attainment following statin intensity titration among Asians in primary care: a retrospective cohort study

2021 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hao Sen Andrew Fang ◽  
Qiao Gao ◽  
Mong Li Lee ◽  
Wynne Hsu ◽  
Ngiap Chuan Tan
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Real World ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Goal Attainment ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
World Data ◽  
Asian Patients

Abstract Background Clinical trials have demonstrated that either initiating or up-titrating a statin dose substantially reduce Low-Density Lipoprotein-Cholesterol (LDL-C) levels. However, statin adherence in actual practice tends to be suboptimal, leading to diminished effectiveness. This study aims to use real-world data to determine the effect on LDL-C levels and LDL-C goal attainment rates, when selected statins are titrated in Asian patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study over a 5-year period, from April 2014 to March 2019 was conducted on a cohort of multi-ethnic adult Asian patients with clinical diagnosis of Dyslipidaemia in a primary care clinic in Singapore. The statins were classified into low-intensity (LI), moderate-intensity (MI) and high-intensity (HI) groups according to the 2018 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Blood Cholesterol Guidelines. Patients were grouped into “No statin”, “Non-titrators” and “Titrators” cohorts based on prescribing patterns. For the “Titrators” cohort, the mean percentage change in LDL-C and absolute change in LDL-C goal attainment rates were computed for each permutation of statin intensity titration. Results Among the cohort of 11,499 patients, with a total of 266,762 visits, there were 1962 pairs of LDL-C values associated with a statin titration. Initiation of LI, MI and HI statin resulted in a lowering of LDL-C by 21.6% (95%CI = 18.9–24.3%), 28.9% (95%CI = 25.0–32.7%) and 25.2% (95%CI = 12.8–37.7%) respectively. These were comparatively lower than results from clinical trials (30 to 63%). The change of LDL-C levels due to up-titration, down-titration, and discontinuation were − 12.4% to − 28.9%, + 13.2% to + 24.6%, and + 18.1% to + 32.1% respectively. The improvement in LDL-C goal attainment ranged from 26.5% to 47.1% when statin intensity was up-titrated. Conclusion In this study based on real-world data of Asian patients in primary care, it was shown that although statin titration substantially affected LDL-C levels and LDL-C goal attainment rates, the magnitude was lower than results reported from clinical trials. These results should be taken into consideration and provide further insight to clinicians when making statin adjustment recommendations in order to achieve LDL-C targets in clinical practice, particularly for Asian populations.

scholarly journals Prescribing and testing by primary care providers to assess adherence to the Choosing Wisely Canada recommendations: a retrospective cohort study

CMAJ Open ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (4) ◽  
pp. E603-E610
Author(s):  
Alexander Singer ◽  
Leanne Kosowan ◽  
Alan Katz ◽  
Kheira Jolin-Dahel ◽  
Karen Appel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Primary Care Providers ◽  
Choosing Wisely ◽  
Care Providers

scholarly journals CA125 test result, test-to-diagnosis interval, and stage in ovarian cancer at diagnosis: a retrospective cohort study using electronic health records

2021 ◽  
pp. BJGP.2020.0859
Author(s):  
Garth Funston ◽  
Luke TA Mounce ◽  
Sarah Price ◽  
Brian Rous ◽  
Emma J Crosbie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Cancer Antigen 125 ◽  
Early Stage Disease ◽  
Cancer Registry Data ◽  
Test Result

BackgroundIn the UK, the cancer antigen 125 (CA125) test is recommended as a first-line investigation in women with symptoms of possible ovarian cancer.AimTo compare time between initial primary care CA125 test and diagnosis, tumour morphology, and stage in women with normal (<35 U/ml) and abnormal (≥35 U/ml) CA125 levels prior to ovarian cancer diagnosis.Design and settingRetrospective cohort study using English primary care and cancer registry data.MethodAssociations between CA125 test results and test-to-diagnosis interval, stage, and ovarian cancer morphology were examined.ResultsIn total, 456 women were diagnosed with ovarian cancer in the 12 months after having a CA125 test. Of these, 351 (77%) had an abnormal, and 105 (23%) had a normal, CA125 test result. The median test-to-diagnosis interval was 35 days (interquartile range [IQR] 21–53) for those with abnormal CA125 levels, and 64 days (IQR 42–127) for normal CA125 levels. Tumour morphology differed by CA125 result: indolent borderline tumours were less common in those with abnormal CA125 levels (n = 47, 13%) than those with normal CA125 levels (n = 51, 49%) (P<0.001). Staging data were available for 304 women with abnormal, and 77 with normal, CA125 levels. Of those with abnormal CA125 levels, 35% (n = 106) were diagnosed at an early stage, compared to 86% (n = 66) of women with normal levels. The odds of being diagnosed with early-stage disease were higher in women with normal as opposed to abnormal CA125 levels (odds ratio 12.2, 95% confidence interval = 5.8 to 25.1, P<0.001).ConclusionDespite longer intervals between testing and diagnosis, women with normal, compared with abnormal, CA125 levels more frequently had indolent tumours and were more commonly diagnosed at an early stage in the course of the disease. Although testing approaches that have greater sensitivity might expedite diagnosis for some women, it is not known if this would translate to earlier-stage diagnosis.

scholarly journals Oxygen Saturation Index in Neonates with a Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Neonatology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Emily J.J. Horn-Oudshoorn ◽  
Marijn J. Vermeulen ◽  
Kelly J. Crossley ◽  
Suzan C.M. Cochius-den Otter ◽  
J. Marco Schnater ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Oxygen Saturation ◽  
Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia ◽  
Diaphragmatic Hernia ◽  
Retrospective Cohort Study ◽  
Retrospective Cohort ◽  
Saturation Index ◽  
Neonatal Outcomes ◽  
Predictive Values ◽  
Adverse Neonatal Outcomes

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> The oxygenation index (OI) is a marker for respiratory disease severity and adverse neonatal outcomes. The oxygen saturation index (OSI) is an alternative that allows for continuous noninvasive monitoring, but evidence for clinical use in critically ill neonates is scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate the OSI as compared to the OI in term neonates with a congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH). <b><i>Methods:</i></b> A single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted including all live-born infants with an isolated CDH between June 2017 and December 2020. Paired values of the OI and OSI in the first 24 h after birth were collected. The relation between OI and OSI measurements was assessed, taking into account arterial pH, body temperature, and preductal versus postductal location of oxygen saturation measurement or arterial blood sampling. The predictive values for pulmonary hypertension, need for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy, and survival at discharge were evaluated. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 33 subjects included, 398 paired values of the OI (median 5.8 [3.3–17.2]) and OSI (median 7.3 [3.6–14.4]) were collected. The OI and OSI correlated strongly (<i>r</i> = 0.77, <i>p</i> &#x3c; 0.001). The OSI values corresponding to the clinically relevant OI values (10, 15, 20, and 40) were 8.9, 10.9, 12.9, and 20.9, respectively. The predictive values of the OI and OSI were comparable for all adverse neonatal outcomes. No difference was found in the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves for the OI and the OSI for adverse neonatal outcomes. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> The OSI could replace the OI in clinical practice in infants with a CDH.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document