scholarly journals Identifying patient characteristics associated with potentially redirectable paramedic transported emergency department visits in Ontario, Canada: a population-based cohort study

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (12) ◽  
pp. e054625
Author(s):  
Ryan P Strum ◽  
Walter Tavares ◽  
Andrew Worster ◽  
Lauren E Griffith ◽  
Andrew P Costa
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
General Practice ◽  
Delphi Study ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Main Diagnosis ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Main Intervention

ObjectiveParamedic redirection from emergency department (ED) to subacute centres may be more beneficial for some patients, though little is known about which patients are potentially appropriate. We examined whether patient characteristics were associated with ED visits when the main intervention was suitable to be performed in a subacute centre.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective observational study using the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System from 2014 to 2018 in Ontario, Canada. We included all adult patients transported by paramedics and had a main physician intervention recorded. We used results of a RAND/UCLA modified Delphi study to categorise patients into either ED or a subacute care (urgent care and/or general practice centre) based on their main intervention. An independent logistic regression model was analysed for each subacute centre.ResultsA total of 2 394 072 ED visits were included; 59% of ED interventions were categorised as ‘urgent care’, 27% ‘ED only’, 9% either ‘urgent care’ or ‘general practice’ and 5% had an intervention not previously classified. ED visits suitable for ‘general practice’ had the highest percentage of patients discharged, while ‘ED only’ had the lowest. Lower medical acuity, younger age, time of triage in evening and overnight, and discharged from ED were independently associated with both subacute centres. ‘Urgent care’ visits/interventions were associated with an ED main diagnosis of the respiratory system (OR 3.49), while ‘general practice’ visits were associated with mental health disorders (OR 9.85) and injury/poison/consequences of external causes (OR 3.38).ConclusionsThe majority of ED visits had a main intervention that could have potentially been conducted in a subacute centre. We identified characteristics and diagnostic patterns associated with ED visits when the main intervention was categorised as a subacute centre intervention. This study contributes knowledge to inform which patients are potentially appropriate for paramedic redirection.

scholarly journals Adjacent Primary Care May Reduce Less Urgent Pediatric Emergency Department Visits

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 215013272092627
Author(s):  
Julia Ellbrant ◽  
Jonas Åkeson ◽  
Helena Sletten ◽  
Jenny Eckner ◽  
Pia Karlsland Åkeson
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Pediatric Emergency Department ◽  
Hospital Data ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Ed Visits

Aims: Pediatric emergency department (ED) overcrowding is a challenge. This study was designed to evaluate if a hospital-integrated primary care unit (HPCU) reduces less urgent visits at a pediatric ED. Methods: This retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out at a university hospital in Sweden, where the HPCU, open outside office hours, had been integrated next to the ED. Children seeking ED care during 4-week high- and low-load study periods before (2012) and after (2015) implementation of the HPCU were included. Information on patient characteristics, ED management, and length of ED stay was obtained from hospital data registers. Results: In total, 3216 and 3074 ED patient visits were recorded in 2012 and 2015, respectively. During opening hours of the HPCU, the proportions of pediatric ED visits (28% lower; P < .001), visits in the lowest triage group (36% lower; P < .001), patients presenting with fever ( P = .001) or ear pain ( P < .001), and nonadmitted ED patients ( P = .033), were significantly lower in 2015 than in 2012, whereas the proportion of infants ≤3 months was higher in 2015 ( P < .001). Conclusions: By enabling adjacent management of less urgent pediatric patients at adequate lower levels of medical care, implementation of a HPCU outside office hours may contribute to fewer and more appropriate pediatric ED visits.

Patterns and Results of Triage Advice Before Emergency Department Visits Made by Patients With Cancer

2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00617
Author(s):  
Arthur S. Hong ◽  
Hannah Chang ◽  
D. Mark Courtney ◽  
Hannah Fullington ◽  
Simon J. Craddock Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Telephone Triage ◽  
Patients With Cancer ◽  
Oncology Care ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The University

PURPOSE: Patients with cancer undergoing treatment frequently visit the emergency department (ED) for commonly anticipated complaints (eg, pain, nausea, and vomiting). Nearly all Medicare Oncology Care Model (OCM) participants prioritized ED use reduction, and the OCM requires that patients have 24-hour telephone access to a clinician, but actual reductions in ED visits have been mixed. Little is known about the use of telephone triage for acute care. METHODS: We identified adults aged 18+ years newly diagnosed with cancer, linked to ED visits from a single institution within 6 months after diagnosis, and then analyzed the telephone and secure electronic messages in the preceding 24 hours. We coded interactions to classify the reason for the call, the main ED referrer, and other attempted management. We compared the acuity of patient self-referred versus clinician-referred ED visits by modeling hospitalization and ED visit severity. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2018, 3,247 adults made 5,371 ED visits to the university hospital and self-referred to the ED 58.5% of the time. Clinicians referred to outpatient or oncology urgent care for 10.3% of calls but referred to the ED for 61.3%. Patient self-referred ED visits were likely to be hospitalized (adjusted Odds Ratio [aOR], 0.89, 95% CI, 0.64 to 1.22) and were not more severe (aOR, 0.75, 95% CI, 0.55 to 1.02) than clinician referred. CONCLUSION: Although patients self-referred for six of every 10 ED visits, self-referred visits were not more severe. When patients called for advice, clinicians regularly recommended the ED. More should be done to understand barriers that patients and clinicians experience when trying to access non-ED acute care.

scholarly journals The impact of COVID-19 on hospital admissions and emergency department visits: A population-based study

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (6) ◽  
pp. e0252441
Author(s):  
Elissa Rennert-May ◽  
Jenine Leal ◽  
Nguyen Xuan Thanh ◽  
Eddy Lang ◽  
Shawn Dowling ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Emergency Department ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
System Capacity ◽  
Population Based Study ◽  
Health Measures ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact

Background As a result of the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), there have been widespread changes in healthcare access. We conducted a retrospective population-based study in Alberta, Canada (population 4.4 million), where there have been approximately 1550 hospital admissions for COVID-19, to determine the impact of COVID-19 on hospital admissions and emergency department (ED visits), following initiation of a public health emergency act on March 15, 2020. Methods We used multivariable negative binomial regression models to compare daily numbers of medical/surgical hospital admissions via the ED between March 16-September 23, 2019 (pre COVID-19) and March 16-September 23, 2020 (post COVID-19 public health measures). We compared the most frequent diagnoses for hospital admissions pre/post COVID-19 public health measures. A similar analysis was completed for numbers of daily ED visits for any reason with a particular focus on ambulatory care sensitive conditions (ACSC). Findings There was a significant reduction in both daily medical (incident rate ratio (IRR) 0.86, p<0.001) and surgical (IRR 0.82, p<0.001) admissions through the ED in Alberta post COVID-19 public health measures. There was a significant decline in daily ED visits (IRR 0.65, p<0.001) including ACSC (IRR 0.75, p<0.001). The most common medical/surgical diagnoses for hospital admissions did not vary substantially pre and post COVID-19 public health measures, though there was a significant reduction in admissions for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and a significant increase in admissions for mental and behavioral disorders due to use of alcohol. Conclusions Despite a relatively low volume of COVID-19 hospital admissions in Alberta, there was an extensive impact on our healthcare system with fewer admissions to hospital and ED visits. This work generates hypotheses around causes for reduced hospital admissions and ED visits which warrant further investigation. As most publicly funded health systems struggle with health-system capacity routinely, understanding how these reductions can be safely sustained will be critical.

Abstract 32: Have Choosing Wisely Recommendations Changed Diagnostic Testing Patterns for Patients With Syncope?

2018 ◽  
Vol 11 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy Anderson ◽  
Robert L Thombley ◽  
Grace A Lin
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Brain Mri ◽  
Diagnostic Testing ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Choosing Wisely ◽  
Mixed Effect ◽  
Hospital Variation ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Cardiac Testing

Background: Syncope is a common reason for emergency department visits. Guidelines suggest minimal initial workup, including history, physical exam, and ECG testing. Additional cardiac testing is recommended in only high risk patients and neuroimaging is rarely indicated. Because of the low yield of neuroimaging, in 2012, the Choosing Wisely campaign recommended against its use for syncope. Our objective was to examine trends in cardiac testing and neuroimaging of patients presenting to the ED with syncope, before and after the Choosing Wisely recommendations and to describe hospital variation in testing rates. Methods: We linked State Inpatient and Emergency Department Databases to conduct a retrospective study of all ED visits in 2009 and 2013 for 8 states reporting procedure utilization. We calculated rates of ECG, advanced cardiac testing (echocardiogram, stress testing, diagnostic catheterization) and neuroimaging (head CT, brain MRI, carotid ultrasound) for all adults with a discharge diagnosis of syncope. Differences between years were estimated using mixed effect regression modeling adjusted for patient characteristics, comorbidities, and hospital random effects. Results: We identified 287,261 ED visits for syncope in 2009 and 315,221 ED visits in 2013 from 676 hospitals. Between 2009 and 2013, adjusted rates of ECG testing increased from 81.1% of discharges to 84.3% (p<.0001). Rates of advanced cardiac testing increased from 10.3% to 12.4% (p<.0001), driven primarily by a substantial increase in the use of echocardiograms (8.3% vs 11.3%, p<.0001). Rates of neuroimaging increased from 36.0% to 42.0% (p<.0001) with increased utilization of all tests. Rates of ECG, advanced cardiac testing and neuroimaging varied significantly between hospitals in both years (Figure). The median hospital-level change in testing between years was 1.6% (IQR -3.5 to 11.2) for ECG, 1.2% (IQR -1.8 to 5.9) for advanced cardiac imaging and 4.2% (IQR -5.3 to 18.4) for neuroimaging. Conclusions: Among patients presenting to the ED with syncope, rates of both high- and low-value diagnostic testing increased between 2009 and 2013, with substantial variation between hospitals. Thus, the 2012 Choosing Wisely recommendations do not appear to have had a significant effect on testing for patients presenting with syncope.

scholarly journals Characteristics of Emergency Department Visits and Select Predictors of Hospitalization for Adults With Newly Diagnosed Cancer in a Safety-Net Health System

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. e490-e500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Arthur S. Hong ◽  
Navid Sadeghi ◽  
Valorie Harvey ◽  
Simon Craddock Lee ◽  
Ethan A. Halm
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health System ◽  
Safety Net ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Medication Refill ◽  
Urban Safety ◽  
Ed Visits

PURPOSE: There is little description of emergency department (ED) visits and subsequent hospitalizations among a safety-net cancer population. We characterized patterns of ED visits and explored nonclinical predictors of subsequent hospitalization, including time of ED arrival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with cancer (excluding leukemia and nonmelanoma skin cancer) between 2012 and 2016 at a large county urban safety-net health system. We identified ED visits occurring within 180 days after a cancer diagnosis, along with subsequent hospitalizations (observation stay or inpatient admission). We used mixed-effects multivariable logistic regression to model hospitalization at ED disposition, accounting for variability across patients and emergency physicians. RESULTS: The 9,050 adults with cancer were 77.2% nonwhite and 55.0% female. Nearly one-quarter (24.7%) of patients had advanced-stage cancer at diagnosis, and 9.7% died within 180 days of diagnosis. These patients accrued 11,282 ED visits within 180 days of diagnosis. Most patients had at least one ED visit (57.7%); half (49.9%) occurred during business hours (Monday through Friday, 8:00 am to 4:59 pm), and half (50.4%) resulted in hospitalization. More than half (57.5%) of ED visits were for complaints that included: pain/headache, nausea/vomiting/dehydration, fever, swelling, shortness of breath/cough, and medication refill. Patients were most often discharged home when they arrived between 8:00 am and 11:59 am (adjusted odds ratio for hospitalization, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.84). CONCLUSION: ED visits are common among safety-net patients with newly diagnosed cancer, and hospitalizations may be influenced by nonclinical factors. The majority of ED visits made by adults with newly diagnosed cancer in a safety-net health system could potentially be routed to an alternate site of care, such as a cancer urgent care clinic.

scholarly journals Pediatric emergency department visits during the COVID-19 pandemic: a large retrospective population-based study

2021 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudio Barbiellini Amidei ◽  
Alessandra Buja ◽  
Andrea Bardin ◽  
Filippo Bonaldi ◽  
Matteo Paganini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Pediatric Emergency ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Medical Support ◽  
Included Patient ◽  
Clinical Presentations ◽  
Disease Risks ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Pandemic Wave

Abstract Background COVID-19 pandemic has stretched healthcare system capacities worldwide and deterred people from seeking medical support at Emergency Departments (ED). Nevertheless, population-based studies examining the consequences on children are lacking. Methods All ED visits from 2019 to 2020 in Veneto, Italy (4.9 million residents) were collected. Anonymized records of pediatric (≤14 years) ED visits included patient characteristics, arrival mode, triage code, clinical presentation, and discharge mode. Year-on-year variation of the main ED visit characteristics, and descriptive trends throughout the study period have been examined. Results Overall, 425,875 ED presentations were collected, 279,481 in 2019, and 146,394 in 2020 (− 48%), with a peak (− 79%) in March–April (first pandemic wave), and a second peak (below − 60%) in November–December (second pandemic wave). Burn or trauma, and fever were the two most common clinical presentations. Visits for nonurgent conditions underwent the strongest reduction during both pandemic waves, while urgent conditions reduced less sharply. ED arrival by ambulance was more common in 2020 (4.5%) than 2019 (3.5%), with a higher proportion of red triage codes (0.5%, and 0.4% respectively), and hospitalizations following ED discharge (9.1%, and 5.9% respectively). Conclusion Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, pediatric ED presentations underwent a steeper reduction than that observed for adults. Lockdown and fear of contagion in hospital-based services likely deterred parents from seeking medical support for their children. Given COVID-19 could become endemic, it is imperative that public health experts guarantee unhindered access to medical support for urgent, and less urgent health conditions, while minimizing infectious disease risks, to prevent children from suffering direct and indirect consequences of the pandemic.

A solution to reducing avoidable emergency department visits: Implementation of an outpatient oncology acute care clinic.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13517-e13517
Author(s):  
Sadaf Charania ◽  
Judy Devlin ◽  
Edie Brucker ◽  
Shayna Simon ◽  
Christine Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Cancer Treatment ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Urgent Care ◽  
Outpatient Basis ◽  
Oncology Patients ◽  
Care Clinic ◽  
Ed Visits

e13517 Background: Emergency Department (ED) utilization by oncology patients accounts for more than 4.5 million visits in the United States annually, leading to hospitalization four times the rate of the general population.1,2 Many ED visits are the result of symptoms related to cancer or cancer treatment that can be managed on an outpatient basis. Unnecessary admissions lead to possible delays in cancer treatment and increased burden on healthcare resources.3 Simmons Acute Care (SAC), an advanced practice provider (APP)-led clinic, was established in August 2020 to provide an alternative model of oncology care to address these issues. Methods: A multidisciplinary team of key stakeholders was formed to develop an action plan. Institutional data was reviewed to identify the timing and volume of ED visits by oncology patients. Clinic hours were set Monday through Friday, 7:00am – 7:00pm, and referrals were made from primary oncology providers. Evidence-based clinical pathways were developed to standardize patient management, and a data collection plan was implemented to measure outcomes. Internal communications to patients and presentations at staff and faculty meetings occurred to inform patients and clinical staff/providers. Results: From August to December 2020, 165 patient visits were completed in SAC, 141 patients discharged home, 14 patients directly admitted to the hospital, and 10 patients transferred to the ED for a higher level of care. Based on data from 2020, the average cost of an ED visit for an oncology patient was $5,500 and increased to $28,500 if the patient is admitted. Patients with hematologic and gastrointestinal malignancies represented approximately 30% of all visits. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the most frequent presenting chief complaint. Conclusions: Supporting oncology patients in the ambulatory setting provided a reduction in admissions and unnecessary ED visits, leading to cost savings/avoidance to the patient and health system. Based on internal cost analyses, there are potential savings of over $2 million to the organization during this 5-month period. Additional studies are underway to assess patient satisfaction, as well as the economic impact for patients. 1. Rui PKK. National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2015 emergency department summary tables. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhamcs/web_tables/2015_ed_web_tables.pdf 2. Hong AS, Froehlich T, Clayton Hobbs S, Lee SJC, Halm EA. Impact of a Cancer Urgent Care Clinic on Regional Emergency Department Visits. J Oncol Pract. 2019;15(6):e501-e509. doi:10.1200/JOP.18.00743 3. Roy M, Halbert B, Devlin S, Chiu D, Graue R, Zerillo JA. From metrics to practice: identifying preventable emergency department visits for patients with cancer. Support Care Cancer Off J Multinatl Assoc Support Care Cancer. Published online November 7, 2020. doi:10.1007/s00520-020-05874-3

scholarly journals The impact of rotavirus vaccination on emergency department visits and hospital admissions for acute diarrhea in children under 5 years

2016 ◽  
Vol 62 (6) ◽  
pp. 506-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rodrigo Locatelli Pedro Paulo ◽  
André Broggin Dutra Rodrigues ◽  
Beatriz Marcondes Machado ◽  
Alfredo Elias Gilio
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Acute Diarrhea ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
Reduction Rate ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Main Diagnosis ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Children Under 5

Summary Introduction: Acute diarrheal disease is the second cause of death in children under 5 years. In Brazil, from 2003 to 2009, acute diarrhea was responsible for nearly 100,000 hospital admissions per year and 4% of the deaths in children under 5 years. Rotavirus is the leading cause of severe acute diarrhea worldwide. In 2006, the rotavirus monovalent vaccine (RV1) was added to the Brazilian National Immunization Program. Objectives: To analyze the impact of the RV1 on emergency department (ED) visits and hospital admissions for acute diarrhea. Method: A retrospective ecologic study at the University Hospital, University of São Paulo. The study analyzed the pre-vaccine (2003–2005) and the post-vaccine (2007–2009) periods. We screened the main diagnosis of all ED attendances and hospital admissions of children under 5 years in an electronic registry system database and calculated the rates of ED visits and hospital admissions. The reduction rate was analyzed according to the following formula: reduction (%) = (1 - odds ratio) x 100. Results: The rates of ED visits for acute diarrhea was 85.8 and 80.9 per 1,000 total ED visits in the pre and post vaccination periods, respectively, resulting in 6% reduction (95CI 4 to 9%, p<0.001). The rates of hospital admissions for acute diarrhea was 40.8 per 1,000 in the pre-vaccine period and dropped to 24.9 per 1,000 hospitalizations, resulting in 40% reduction (95CI 22 to 54%, p<0.001). Conclusion: The introduction of the RV1 vaccine resulted in 6% reduction in the ED visits and 40% reduction in hospital admissions for acute diarrhea.

Emergency department visits during the 4/20 cannabis celebration

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-192
Author(s):  
John A Staples ◽  
Ketki Merchant ◽  
Shannon Erdelyi ◽  
Adam Lund ◽  
Jeffrey R Brubacher
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Negative Binomial ◽  
Care Service ◽  
Negative Binomial Regression ◽  
Fold Increase ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Service Planning ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Adjusted Relative Risk ◽  
Ed Visits

BackgroundAnnual ‘4/20’ cannabis festivals occur around the world on April 20 and often feature synchronised consumption of cannabis at 4:20 pm. The relationship between these events and demand for emergency medical services has not been systematically studied.MethodsWe conducted a population-based retrospective cohort study in Vancouver, Canada, using 10 consecutive years of data (2009–2018) from six regional hospitals. The number of emergency department (ED) visits between 4:20 pm and 11:59 pm on April 20 were compared with the number of visits during identical time intervals on control days 1 week earlier and 1 week later (ie, April 13 and April 27) using negative binomial regression.ResultsA total of 3468 ED visits occurred on April 20 and 6524 ED visits occurred on control days. A non-significant increase in all-cause ED visits was observed on April 20 (adjusted relative risk: 1.06; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.12). April 20 was associated with a significant increase in ED visits among prespecified subgroups including a 5-fold increase in visits for substance misuse and a 10-fold increase in visits for intoxication. The hospital closest to the festival site experienced a clinically and statistically significant 17% (95% CI 5.1% to 29.6%) relative increase in ED visits on April 20 compared with control days.InterpretationSubstance use at annual ‘4/20’ festivals may be associated with an increase in ED visits among key subgroups and at nearby hospitals. These findings may inform harm reduction initiatives and festival medical care service planning.

scholarly journals Resident loneliness, social isolation and unplanned emergency department visits from supportive living facilities: a population-based study in Alberta, Canada

2022 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Chamberlain ◽  
Susan E. Bronskill ◽  
Zoe Hsu ◽  
Erik Youngson ◽  
Andrea Gruneir
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Health Service ◽  
Social Isolation ◽  
Service Use ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Health Service Use ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Ed Visits ◽  
Socially Isolated

Abstract Background Supportive living (SL) facilities are intended to provide a residential care setting in a less restrictive and more cost-effective way than nursing homes (NH). SL residents with poor social relationships may be at risk for increased health service use. We describe the demographic and health service use patterns of lonely and socially isolated SL residents and to quantify associations between loneliness and social isolation on unplanned emergency department (ED) visits. Methods We conducted a retrospective cohort study using population-based linked health administrative data from Alberta, Canada. All SL residents aged 18 to 105 years who had at least one Resident Assessment Instrument-Home Care (RAI-HC) assessment between April 1, 2013 and March 31, 2018 were observed. Loneliness and social isolation were measured as a resident indicating that he/she feels lonely and if the resident had neither a primary nor secondary caregiver, respectively. Health service use in the 1 year following assessment included unplanned ED visits, hospital admissions, admission to higher levels of SL, admission to NH and death. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models examined the association between loneliness and social isolation on the time to first unplanned ED visit. Results We identified 18,191 individuals living in Alberta SL facilities. The prevalence of loneliness was 18% (n = 3238), social isolation was 4% (n = 713). Lonely residents had the greatest overall health service use. Risk of unplanned ED visit increased with loneliness (aHR = 1.10, 95% CI: 1.04–1.15) but did not increase with social isolation (aHR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.84–1.06). Conclusions Lonely residents had a different demographic profile (older, female, cognitively impaired) from socially isolated residents and were more likely to experience an unplanned ED visit. Our findings suggest the need to develop interventions to assist SL care providers with how to identify and address social factors to reduce risk of unplanned ED visits.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document