scholarly journals Improving stroke care in Nova Scotia, Canada: a population-based project spanning 14 years

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. e001368
Author(s):  
Stephen James Phillips ◽  
Allison Stevens ◽  
Huiling Cao ◽  
Wendy Simpkin ◽  
Jennifer Payne ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nova Scotia ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Information Exchange ◽  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Success Factor ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Main Challenge ◽  
Stroke Unit Care

Stroke is a complex disorder that challenges healthcare systems. An audit of in-hospital stroke care in the province of Nova Scotia, Canada, in 2004–2005 indicated that many aspects of care delivery fell short of national best practice recommendations. Stroke care in Nova Scotia was reorganised using a combination of interventions to facilitate systems change and quality improvement. The focus was mainly on implementing evidence-based stroke unit care, augmenting thrombolytic therapy and enhancing dysphagia assessment. Key were the development of a provincial network to facilitate ongoing collaboration and structured information exchange, the creation of the stroke coordinator and stroke physician champion roles, and the implementation of a registry to capture information about adults hospitalised because of stroke or transient ischaemic attack. To evaluate the interventions, a longitudinal analysis compared the audit results with registry data for 2012, 2015 and 2019. The proportion of patients receiving multidisciplinary stroke unit care rose from 22.4% in 2005 to 74.0% in 2019. The proportion of patients who received alteplase increased steadily from 3.2% to 18.5%, and the median delay between hospital arrival and alteplase administration decreased from 102 min to 56 min, without an increase in intracranial haemorrhage. Dysphagia screening increased from 41.4% to 77.4%. More patients were transferred from acute care to a dedicated in-patient rehabilitation unit, and fewer were discharged to residential or long-term care. These enhancements did not prolong length-of-stay in acute care. The network was a critical success factor; competing priorities in the healthcare system were the main challenge to implementing change. A multidimensional, multiyear, improvement intervention yielded substantial and sustained improvements in the process and structure of stroke care in Nova Scotia.

Abstract T P259: What Should Really be Happening to Our Stroke Patients Post-Acute Care?: A System Best Practice Model for Inpatient Rehab

Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 45 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Shelley Sharp ◽  
Elizabeth Linkewich ◽  
Jacqueline Willems ◽  
Nicola Tahair ◽  
Charissa Levy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Care ◽  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Patient Flow ◽  
System Capacity ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Practice Model ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Stroke Unit Care ◽  
The Right

Background: A regional Stroke Report Card identified poor performance on system efficiency, effectiveness, and integration of stroke best practice. This engaged regional funders and 17 organizations (11 acute, 6 rehab) to collaborate in stroke system planning. The focus included stroke unit care and access to timely and appropriate rehabilitation, including increased access for severe stroke. Changes in acute care, including pre-hospital, have facilitated access to stroke unit care in the city. A model of patient flow from acute care was needed to understand other system capacity needs. Purpose: To use best practice and benchmarks to delineate post-acute patient flow and facilitate alignment of resources for inpatient rehabilitation. Methods: Administrative data from national reporting and local rehab referral system databases were used to review current system usage from acute care. A model of proportional distribution of cases from acute, specifically to inpatient rehab, was established using provincial benchmarks, evidence informed targets, and organization market share of total inpatient rehab system capacity. Iterative discussions were required to confirm the organizations’ commitment to stroke best practice. New volume and case mix changes were applied to determine capacity and resource planning needs across organizations. Results: The best practice model, approved by all stakeholders, proposes 40% of stroke patients discharged alive from acute care should access inpatient, 13% outpatient rehabilitation and 6% to Complex Continuing Care and Long Term Care. Current practice is 26%, <5% and 13% respectively. A projected volume increase of 278 patients is distributed across 5/6 rehab providers. This results in a total proportional system shift from 20% (n=160) to 41.5% (n =446) of severe patients receiving access to high intensity rehab. A reduction in the overall proportion of moderate and mild stroke patients from 65% (519) to 49.5% (n=534) and 15% (n=119) to 9% (n=96) respectively. Conclusion: Significant investment/redistribution of resources within the system is required to support patient flow and provide care in the right place at the right time. System funder support is critical to create a quality of care (best practice) system.

Addressing the Health Care Delivery Needs in the Acute Care Setting by Developing a Postmaster’s Acute Care Certification Program

2016 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 124-127
Author(s):  
Helen Miley ◽  
Courtney Reinisch
Keyword(s):  
Primary Care ◽  
New Jersey ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The State ◽  
Inpatient Setting ◽  
Acute Care Setting ◽  
Term Care

The state of New Jersey certifies nurse practitioners and clinical nurse specialists from all specialties as advanced practice nurses (APNs). There are more than 4,000 certified APNs in the state in 17 specialty areas. APNs in the state have the privilege of practicing in various settings such as ambulatory, inpatient, and long-term care. The state does not limit the setting where an APN chooses to practice. A trend is emerging in the state to address the concern of primary care–educated APNs to prepare them for the delivery of care in the acute care setting. Some institutions within the state of New Jersey are requiring their primary care educated and certified adult primary care APNs working in an inpatient setting to obtain an acute care certification. Recognizing the needs of these adult primary care APNs, Dr. Helen Miley developed a postmaster’s certificate program which has been approved by Rutgers School of Nursing faculty. Although the first cohort has not yet been admitted to the program, it will be implemented in the near future. Because it is important to address the educational needs of adult primary care APNs, this article describes the needs assessment and development plan used for this program.

scholarly journals Delayed Comprehensive Stroke Unit Care Attributable to the Evolution of Infection Protection Measures across Two Consecutive Waves of the COVID-19 Pandemic

Life ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. 710
Author(s):  
Annahita Sedghi ◽  
Timo Siepmann ◽  
Lars-Peder Pallesen ◽  
Heinz Reichmann ◽  
Volker Puetz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Stroke ◽  
Performance Indicators ◽  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Tertiary Care ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Clinical Severity ◽  
Care Hospital ◽  
Discharge Disposition ◽  
Stroke Unit Care

We aimed to assess how evidence-based stroke care changed over the two waves of the COVID-19 pandemic. We analyzed acute stroke patients admitted to a tertiary care hospital in Germany during the first (2 March 2020–9 June 2020) and second (23 September 2020–31 December 2020, 100 days each) infection waves. Stroke care performance indicators were compared among waves. A 25.2% decline of acute stroke admissions was noted during the second (n = 249) compared with the first (n = 333) wave of the pandemic. Patients were more frequently tested SARS-CoV-2 positive during the second than the first wave (11 (4.4%) vs. 0; p < 0.001). There were no differences in rates of reperfusion therapies (37% vs. 36.5%; p = 1.0) or treatment process times (p > 0.05). However, stroke unit access was more frequently delayed (17 (6.8%) vs. 5 (1.5%); p = 0.001), and hospitalization until inpatient rehabilitation was longer (20 (1, 27) vs. 12 (8, 17) days; p < 0.0001) during the second compared with the first pandemic wave. Clinical severity, stroke etiology, appropriate secondary prevention medication, and discharge disposition were comparable among both waves. Infection control measures may adversely affect access to stroke unit care and extend hospitalization, while performance indicators of hyperacute stroke care seem to be untainted.

Preferences, barriers and facilitators for establishing comprehensive stroke units: a multidisciplinary survey

2013 ◽  
Vol 37 (3) ◽  
pp. 318 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fintan O'Rourke ◽  
Daniel K.Y. Chan ◽  
Daniel L. Chan ◽  
Xiao Man Ding
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Allied Health ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Perceived Barriers ◽  
Stroke Units ◽  
Rehabilitation Care ◽  
Unit Model ◽  
Stroke Team ◽  
Stroke Unit Care ◽  
Optimum Model

Objectives. To determine the preferences of multidisciplinary stroke clinicians for models of inpatient stroke unit care and perceived barriers to establishing a comprehensive stroke unit (CSU) model (acute and rehabilitation care in the same ward). Methods. Written questionnaires distributed and completed at multidisciplinary stroke unit case conferences in NSW, Australia. Results. Twenty hospitals with 22 stroke units were surveyed, 13 acute stroke units, 7 rehabilitation stroke units, 2 CSUs. Two hundred and twenty-eight respondents: 99 (43.4%) allied health, 72 (31.6%) nurses and 57 (25.0%) doctors. One hundred and fifty-one respondents (67.0%) thought CSU to be the best model. Seventy-three % of doctors and 79% of allied health preferred CSU v. 57% of nurses (P = 0.041). Of doctors, rehabilitation specialists were most likely to favour comprehensive model (84.2%) and neurologists least (57.0%). The main perceived advantages of CSU were reduced cost and improved functional outcomes; perceived disadvantages were increased workload and unwell patients unable to participate in rehabilitation. Main perceived barriers to establishing CSU were lack of space, money, staffing and time. Conclusion. Although most current stroke unit care in NSW is based on the traditional model of acute and rehabilitation components in separate wards or hospitals, the majority of multidisciplinary stroke team clinicians believe CSU is the optimum model. What is known about the topic? Stroke unit care is known to improve survival and dependency but the optimum model of care is unproven, despite some small studies suggesting that the CSU model may result in better outcomes. What does this paper add? This paper is the first to survey stroke clinicians from various disciplines and types of unit, to determine their preferences for stroke unit model. What are the implications for practitioners? A majority of clinicians expressed a preference for the CSU model, suggesting that most would be comfortable caring for patients in both acute and rehabilitation phases of stroke care if further such units are established.

Pay-for-Performance and Long-Term Care

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Li ◽  
Edward C. Norton
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Long Term Care ◽  
Pay For Performance ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
The United States ◽  
Future Research ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Term Care

Pay-for-performance programs have become a prominent supply-side intervention to improve quality and decrease spending in health care, touching upon long-term care, acute care, and outpatient care. Pay-for-performance directly targets long-term care, with programs in nursing homes and home health. Indirectly, pay-for-performance programs targeting acute care settings affect clinical practice for long-term care providers through incentives for collaboration across settings. As a whole, pay-for-performance programs entail the identification of problems it seeks to solve, measurement of the dimensions it seeks to incentivize, methods to combine and translate performance to incentives, and application of the incentives to reward performance. For the long-term care population, pay-for-performance programs must also heed the unique challenges specific to the sector, such as patients with complex health needs and distinct health trajectories, and be structured to recognize the challenges of incentivizing performance improvement when there are multiple providers and payers involved in the care delivery. Although empirical results indicate modest effectiveness of pay-for-performance in long-term care on improving targeted measures, some research has provided more clarity on the role of pay-for-performance design on the output of the programs, highlighting room for future research. Further, because health care is interconnected, the indirect effects of pay-for-performance programs on long-term care is an underexplored topic. As the scope of pay-for-performance in long-term care expands, both within the United States and internationally, pay-for-performance offers ample opportunities for future research.

Stroke units: research in practice

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalit Kalra
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Multidisciplinary Teams ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Stroke Units ◽  
Key Points ◽  
Stroke Unit Care ◽  
Rehabilitation Needs ◽  
Therapy Sessions

Key points• Stroke units are the cornerstone of quality stroke care.• The benefits of stroke unit care are supported by a very strong evidence base• In 2007 the National Stroke Strategy mandated that all stroke patients should have prompt access to stroke unit care.• Despite policy and guidelines, only 62% stroke patients were treated on specialist stroke units in 2010.• Patients spend long periods of inactivity on stroke units; multidisciplinary teams need to encourage rehabilitation activities outside therapy sessions.• Rehabilitation needs to be family- and carer-oriented to prepare patients for life after discharge.

scholarly journals Processes of Stroke Unit Care and Outcomes at Discharge in Vietnam: Findings from the Registry of Stroke Care Quality (RES-Q) in a Major Public Hospital

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 119-127
Author(s):  
Thang Huy Nguyen ◽  
Seana Gall ◽  
Dominique A. Cadilhac ◽  
Hoang Nguyen ◽  
Daniel Terry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Developing Countries ◽  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Care Quality ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Hospital Arrival ◽  
Stroke Unit Care ◽  
Evidence Based Care

Background: An essential strategy to reduce mortality and disability after stroke is to ensure access to evidence-based care. In developed countries, it has been shown that if hospitals improve the quality of care, the impact of stroke is attenuated. However, in developing countries, data on the processes of care and associated patient outcomes are scarce. We examined the care processes and outcomes among patients with acute stroke from a stroke unit in a major public hospital in Vietnam whereby there are approximately 15,000 hospital admissions for stroke per year. Methods: We included first-ever strokes admitted to the 115 People’s Hospital (June 2017-March 2018). Data were collected in the Registry of Stroke Care Quality which is used in >50 countries. Baseline characteristics, stroke-related factors (e.g., type and severity), processes of care (e.g., thrombolysis), and outcomes at discharge were examined including mortality and functional outcome, assessed as the walking ability without assistance. Results: Data were available for 6601 patients with first-ever stroke (44% women, 80% ischemic stroke [IS], median age: 62 years, interquartile range [IQR]: 53-72) who received stroke unit care. The median time from stroke onset to hospital arrival was 15.7 hours (IQR: 5.6-37.5). At admission, the median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score indicating stroke severity was 7 (IQR: 4-12). Among those with IS, 9% received intravenous thrombolysis. Over 90% of the participants received recommended process of care including dysphasia screening (99%), antihypertensive agents (92%), cholesterol-lowering medication (IS = 99%), and antithrombotic medication (IS = 98%). At discharge (median length of stay: 4 days, IQR: 3-6), 3% of all cases died and 46% were able to walk independently. Advanced age, stroke severity, and not receiving antihypertensive agent(s) were contributing factors to mortality and poorer functional outcome. Conclusion: There was a considerable delay in the time from stroke onset to hospital arrival. Evidence-based care at the stroke unit was consistently provided. It remains unclear whether other hospitals in Vietnam and other developing countries perform as well. Greater public awareness of stroke to reduce onset to arrival times and more stroke units are warranted to achieve the excellent outcomes in the major public hospital.

scholarly journals Point Prevalence Survey of Benzodiazepine and Sedative-Hypnotic Drug Use in Hospitalized Adult Patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 73 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Heather L Neville ◽  
Mia Losier ◽  
Jennifer Pitman ◽  
Melissa Gehrig ◽  
Jennifer E Isenor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nova Scotia ◽  
Acute Care ◽  
Addiction Treatment ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Point Prevalence ◽  
Adult Patients ◽  
Prevalence Survey ◽  
Term Care ◽  
Soins Intensifs ◽  
Point Prevalence Survey

 ABSTRACTBackground: Benzodiazepines and sedative-hypnotic drugs (BZD/ SHDs), such as zopiclone and the antidepressant trazodone, pose risks such as falls, fractures, and confusion, especially for older adults. Use of these drugs in the acute care setting is poorly understood.Objectives: To determine the point prevalence and characteristics of use of BZD/SHDs in hospitals in Nova Scotia, Canada.Methods: A point prevalence survey was conducted for adults admitted to all hospitals with at least 30 acute care beds between May and August 2016. Drugs administered intravenously, patients in long-term care, and patients receiving mental health services, addiction treatment, or critical care were excluded. The proportion of included patients who had received a BZD/SHD within the 24 h before the start of the survey was determined. A descriptive statistical analysis was performed.Results: Overall BZD/SHD prevalence was 34.6% (487/1409) across the 16 eligible hospitals. The average age was 70.3 years, and 150 (30.8%) of the patients were 80 years or older. Among the 585 prescriptions for these patients, commonly used drugs were zopiclone (32.0%), lorazepam (21.9%), and trazodone (21.9%). The most common indications for use were bedtime/daytime sedation (60.0%) and anxiety (12.5%). More than half of the prescriptions (55.7%) had been initiated at home, 37.6% were started in hospital, and the place of initiation was unknown for 6.7%. Benzodiazepines were prescribed more frequently to patients under 65 years than those 80 years or older (41.3% versus 22.2%, p < 0.001) whereas trazodone was more frequently prescribed to the older of these 2 age groups (52.7% versus 14.3%, p < 0.001).Conclusions: BZD/SHDs were frequently used by hospitalized adult patients in Nova Scotia. Trazodone appears to have been substituted for benzodiazepines in the oldest age group. Pharmacists should direct their efforts toward preventing inappropriate initiation of BZD/SHDs in hospital, particularly for elderly patients.RÉSUMÉContexte : Les benzodiazépines et les médicaments sédatifs-hypnotiques (BZD/MSH), comme la zopiclone et l’antidépresseur trazodone, comportent des risques de chute, de fracture et de confusion, particulièrement chez les personnes âgées. Il existe une mauvaise compréhension de l’utilisation de ces médicaments dans un contexte de soins intensifs.Objectifs : Déterminer la prévalence ponctuelle et les caractéristiques de l’utilisation des BZD/MSH dans des hôpitaux en Nouvelle-Écosse, au Canada.Méthodes : Une enquête sur la prévalence ponctuelle a été menée entre mai et août 2016 auprès d’adultes admis dans les hôpitaux comptant au moins 30 lits en soins intensifs. Les patients recevant ces medicaments par voie intraveineuse, ceux en établissement de soins de longue durée, ceux recevant des services en santé mentale ou un traitement pour la toxicomanie ou encore ceux des soins intensifs ont été exclus de l’enquête. La détermination de la proportion des patients inclus dans l’étude portait sur ceux qui avaient reçu des BZD/MSH au cours des 24 h précédant le début de l’enquête, et elle a été suivie d’une analyse statistique descriptive.Résultats :De manière générale, l’usage des BZD/MSH s’élevait à 34,6 % (487/1409) dans les 16 hôpitaux participants. L’âge moyen des patients était de 70,3 ans et 150 (30,8 %) étaient âgés d’au moins 80 ans. Parmi les 585 prescriptions pour ces patients, les médicaments communément utilisés étaient la zopiclone (32,0 %), le lorazepam (21,9 %) et le trazodone (21,9 %). Les indications d’utilisation les plus répandues concernaient la sédation au coucher et en cours de journée (60 %) et l’anxiété (12,5 %). Plus de la moitié des prescriptions (55,7 %) ont commencé à domicile, 37,6 % ont commencé à l’hôpital, et le lieu du début de la prise de ces médicaments était inconnu dans 6,7 % des cas. La prescription des benzodiazépines s’adressait plus souvent aux patients de moins de 65 ans qu’à ceux d’au moins 80 ans (41,3 % par rapport à 22,2 %, p < 0,001), tandis que la prescription de trazodone s’adressait plus souvent aux personnes de la tranche d’âge plus avancée (52,7 % par rapport à 14,3 %, p < 0,001).Conclusions : Les BZD/MSH étaient fréquemment utilisés par les patients adultes hospitalisés en Nouvelle-Écosse. La trazodone semble avoir remplacé les benzodiazépines dans le groupe plus âgé. Les pharmaciens devraient orienter leurs efforts sur la prévention de la prise inappropriée des BZD/MSH en hôpital, particulièrement par les patients plus âgés.

From stroke unit care to stroke care unit

1999 ◽  
Vol 162 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geert Sulter ◽  
Jacques De Keyser
Keyword(s):  
Stroke Unit ◽  
Stroke Care ◽  
Stroke Unit Care
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document