scholarly journals Amiodarone infusion in the treatment of acute atrial fibrillation or flutter: high versus low dose treatment

Heart ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 91 (7) ◽  
pp. 964-965 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Tuseth
Nutrients ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 1427
Author(s):  
Junhui Zhang ◽  
Fengqin Feng ◽  
Minjie Zhao

Glycerol monocaprylate (GMC) is a glycerol derivative of medium-chain fatty acids (MCFAs) and is widely used as a preservative in food processing. However, GMC and its hydrolytic acid (octylic acid) have antibacterial properties that may affect the physiology and intestinal microecology of the human body. Therefore, in this study, the effects of two different dosages of GMC (150 and 1600 mg kg−1) on glucose, lipid metabolism, inflammation, and intestinal microecology of normal diet-fed C57BL/6 mice were comprehensively investigated. The obtained results showed that the level of triglycerides (TGs) in the low-dose group down-regulated significantly, and the anti-inflammatory cytokine interleukin 10 (IL-10) significantly increased, while the pro-inflammatory cytokines monocyte chemotactic protein 1 (MCP-1) and interleukin 1beta (IL-1β) in the high-dose group were significantly decreased. Importantly, GMC promoted the α-diversity of gut microbiota in normal-diet-fed mice, regardless of dosages. Additionally, it was found that the low-dose treatment of GMC significantly increased the abundance of Lactobacillus, while the high-dose treatment of GMC significantly increased the abundance of SCFA-producers such as Clostridiales, Lachnospiraceae, and Ruminococcus. Moreover, the content of short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) was significantly increased by GMC supplementation. Thus, our research provides a novel insight into the effects of GMC on gut microbiota and physiological characteristics.


2021 ◽  
Vol 77 (18) ◽  
pp. 241
Author(s):  
Usman Chaudhry ◽  
Usman Chaudhry ◽  
Michael Ezekowitz ◽  
Edward Gracely ◽  
Winson T. George ◽  
...  

Circulation ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 137 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Inmaculada Hernandez ◽  
Yuting Zhang ◽  
Samir Saba

Background: Recent research has shown strong provider-level variation in oral anticoagulation (OAC) use in atrial fibrillation (AF). The objective of the present study was to examine predictors of prescribing OAC to newly diagnosed AF patients, with special attention to prescribing low-dose direct oral anticoagulant agents (DOACs) to patients with no diagnosis of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Methods: Using 2013-2014 Medicare claims data, we identified patients newly diagnosed with AF who had CHA2DS2-VASc score≥2. Our sample included 19,390 patients who did not initiate OAC, and 22,299 OAC initiators, among whom 12,786 initiated warfarin, 5,984 high-dose DOACs and 3,529 low-dose DOACs. We constructed logistic regression models to estimate the effect of patient demographics, clinical characteristics, provider specialty, and insurance factors on OAC initiation and likelihood of prescribing low dose DOAC in patients with no CKD. Results: As shown in the table, age, gender, heart failure, and a history of bleeding affected the initiation of OAC as well as DOAC dosing. White patients were more likely to initiate OAC, but race did not affect DOAC dosing. Use of antiplatelet agents decreased the odds of OAC initiation by 27% (95%CI, 23%-31%), but did not impact DOAC dosing. The odds of OAC initiation decreased by 10% (95%CI, 6%-15%) for each point increase in the Geographic Practice Cost Index for malpractice. The odds of initiating low-dose DOACs were 30% (95%CI, 11%-38%) lower for patients seen by cardiologists than for those seen by internists or family practitioners. Conclusions: In addition to demographics and clinical characteristics, provider and insurance factors have a strong impact on initiation and dosing of OAC.


Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 123 (15) ◽  
pp. 2308-2316 ◽  
Author(s):  
David H. McDermott ◽  
Qian Liu ◽  
Daniel Velez ◽  
Lizbeeth Lopez ◽  
Sandra Anaya-O’Brien ◽  
...  

Key Points Plerixafor can be given safely to WHIM syndrome patients twice daily for a 6-month period and appears promising as a treatment.


Author(s):  
John D Rozich ◽  

The use of amiodarone in clinical practice continues to be widespread in the setting of nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Use of amiodarone continues especially in the elderly where the drug’s favorable characteristics and outcomes in the setting of chronic kidney disease coupled to its low inherent proarrhythmic profile has ensured its continued use. The present work focuses on the information that clinicians should tell their patients regarding requisite toxicity screening during daily treatment with amiodarone when it is maintained at a low dose of 200 mgs per day or less. Several questions need be answered in pursuit of the fundamental query as to whether routine testing for toxicity should still be advised. Most importantly, has ongoing screening shown to be of any proven value?


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document