EP412 Fertility sparing surgery of >2 cm cervical cancer following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy: a 12-year experience in a single tertiary care center

Author(s):  
F Tesfai ◽  
J Kroep ◽  
R Nout ◽  
K Gaarenstroom ◽  
C de Kroon ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2020-002076
Author(s):  
Gabriel J. Rendón ◽  
Aldo Lopez Blanco ◽  
Alejandro Aragona ◽  
José Martín Saadi ◽  
Julian Di Guilmi ◽  
...  

ObjectiveThere is significant debate between up-front radical trachelectomy versus neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before fertility-sparing surgery in patients with tumors ≥2 cm. The aim of this study was to report on the oncological and obstetrical outcome of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery, in patients diagnosed with cervical cancer ≥2 cm.MethodsThis was a retrospective review of patients diagnosed with cervical cancer measuring ≥2 cm to ≤6 cm, who were scheduled to undergo neo-adjuvant chemotherapy before fertility-sparing surgery, at six institutions from four Latin American countries between February 2009 and February 2019. Data collected included: age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2009 stage, histology, tumor size, pre-treatment imaging work-up, chemotherapy agents and number of cycles, toxicity, clinical and imaging response rate, type of fertility-sparing surgery, pathology results, timing of lymphadenectomy, follow-up time, and obstetrical and oncological outcomes.ResultsA total of 25 patients were included, with a median age of 27 years (range 20–37): 17 patients had stage IB1, 7 had stage IB2 cervical cancer, and 1 patient had stage IIA1 (FIGO 2009); 23 patients had squamous cell carcinoma and 2 patients had adenocarcinoma. The median number of chemotherapy cycles was 3 (range 3–6) and no toxicity grade 3–4 was reported. Lymphadenectomy was performed before chemotherapy in 6 (24%) patients. After neo-adjuvant chemotherapy 20 patients were scheduled for radical trachelectomy (11 abdominal and 9 laparoscopic) and 5 patients for conization. After surgery, no residual disease was found in 11 patients (44%). Fertility was preserved in 23 patients (92%) and 10 patients became pregnant (43.5%). After a median follow-up time of 47 months (13–133), 3 patients had recurrent disease (3/23=13%), 2 were alive without disease, and 1 patient had disease at last contact.ConclusionNeo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by fertility-sparing surgery is feasible in well selected patients with cervical tumors ≥2 cm. Future studies should focus on the timing of lymphadenectomy and type of cervical surgery.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (5) ◽  
pp. 969-975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie Plante ◽  
Nienke van Trommel ◽  
Stephanie Lheureux ◽  
Amit M Oza ◽  
Lisa Wang ◽  
...  

BackgroundThere are limited data regarding the optimal management of pre-menopausal women with cervical lesions measuring 2–4 cm who desire to preserve fertility.Primary objectivesTo evaluate the feasibility of preserving fertility.Study hypothesisNeo-adjuvant chemotherapy will be effective in reducing the size of the tumor and will enable fertility-sparing surgery without compromising oncologic outcome.Trial designPre-menopausal women diagnosed with stage International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) IB2, 2–4 cm cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility will receive three cycles of platinum/paclitaxel chemotherapy. Patients with complete/partial response will undergo fertility-sparing surgery. Patients will be followed for 3 years to monitor outcome. Patients with suboptimal response (residual lesion ≥2 cm) will receive definitive radical hysterectomy and/or chemoradiation.Major eligibility criteriaPatients must have histologically confirmed invasive cervical cancer, 2–4 cm lesion, by clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), negative node, and pre-menopausal (≤40 years old). Following three cycles of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, patients must achieve a complete/partial response (residual lesion <2 cm). Exclusion criteria include high-risk histology, tumor extension to uterine corpus/isthmus (as per MRI), and suboptimal response/progression following neo-adjuvant chemotherapy.Primary endpointsAssess the rate of functional uterus defined as successful fertility-sparing surgery and no adjuvant therapy.Sample sizeA total of 90 evaluable patients will be needed to complete the study.Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting resultsExpected complete accrual in 2022 with presentation of results by 2025.Trial registration numberPending ethics submission.


2018 ◽  
Vol 150 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Davis ◽  
Kyle Strickland ◽  
Sarah Rae Easter ◽  
Michael Worley ◽  
Colleen Feltmate ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 58 (227) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ganesh Parajuli ◽  
Pravakar Dawadi ◽  
Sabina Khadka

Introduction: Cervical cancer is one of the most common cancer among the female population inNepal. The incidence and mortality rate due to cervical cancer is higher in developing countrieslike Nepal due to a lack of proper screening and early diagnosis. This study aims to find out theprevalence of cervical cancer among cervical biopsies in a tertiary care center. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted among the hospital records of cervicalbiopsies from the department of pathology of Shree Birendra Hospital from 1st May 2018 to 30thApril 2019. Ethical approval was taken from the Institutional Review Committee in February 2020.This study was conducted among 146 cervical biopsies by using convenience sampling method.Point estimate at 95% Confidence Interval was calculated along with frequency and proportion forbinary data. Data were analyzed using excel 2016 software. Results: The prevalence of cervical cancer among 146 cases included in our study is found to be6 (4.11%) at 95% Confidence Interval (0.90-7.32). Among those cases of cervical cancer, 4 (66.67%)were squamous cell carcinoma, 1 (16.67%) was adenocarcinoma, and 1 (16.67%) was of other type.Maximum cases of cervical cancer were prevalent among higher age groups. Conclusions: Cervical cancer-related morbidity and mortality are different in different parts ofthe world. It’s burden is primarily seen in developing countries where there is a lack of effectivescreening programs.


2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 243-244
Author(s):  
J. Kelley ◽  
C. McBride ◽  
M. DeSarno ◽  
E. Everett ◽  
C. Wong ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document