410 Phase I interim study results of Nous-209, an off-the-shelf immunotherapy, with pembrolizumab, for the treatment of tumors with a deficiency in mismatch repair/microsatellite instability (dMMR/MSI)

BackgroundDefective DNA mismatch repair (dMMR) leads to high levels of microsatellite-instability (MSI-H) and insertions or deletions in coding regions, resulting in the generation of tumor-specific frameshift peptides (FSPs). We selected 209 shared FSPs among subjects with first- or second-line metastatic dMMR/MSI-H colorectal (CRC), gastric, and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancers, to develop an off-the-shelf vaccine for the treatment of dMMR/MSI-H tumors. Selected FSPs were cloned into four proprietary Great Apes Adenoviral (GAd) and four Modified Vaccinia Ankara (MVA) vectors to generate a polyvalent viral vectored vaccine called Nous-209 [Leoni G., et al., Cancer Res. 2020]MethodsThis phase 1 first in human (FIH) study (NCT04041310) was designed to evaluate safety and tolerability of two dose levels (one log difference for both GAd and MVA) of Nous-209 genetic polyvalent vaccine in combination with the programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1)-blocking antibody pembrolizumab, to assess immunogenicity of the combination and to detect preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. Nous-209 is administered intramuscularly, concomitantly with pembrolizumab (doses and schedule per approved label): one prime (GAd-209-FSP) at the 2nd pembrolizumab infusion and three booster (MVA-209-FSP) injections at subsequent infusions each 3 weeks apart. The study is composed of two sequential cohorts: dose escalation and dose expansionResultsTwelve evaluable subjects with first- or second-line metastatic dMMR/MSI-H cancers were evaluated as of May 28, 2021. Three subjects enrolled in dose level 1 (2 CRC and 1 GEJ cancer) demonstrated durable confirmed partial responses (PRs). In dose level 2 (6 CRC and 3 gastric cancers), 4 subjects had PRs, 2 had stable disease (SD) and 3 had progressive disease (PD). The median follow-up for subjects in dose level 1 is 17.9 months (range 15.3–20 months), and 8 months (range 3.8–12.5 months) for subjects in dose level 2 as of the above cut-off date. No dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed, and the treatment combination was determined to be safe and tolerable. Vaccine immunogenicity was demonstrated by ex-vivo interferon-gamma ELISpot assay in 67% of subjects in dose level 1, and 100% of patients with evaluable samples in dose level 2ConclusionsThe combination of the Nous-209 genetic polyvalent cancer vaccine and pembrolizumab has been demonstrated to be safe, immunogenic, and continues to show early signs of clinical efficacy, which may be attributed to the vaccine contributionReferenceLeoni G, et al. A genetic vaccine encoding shared cancer neoantigens to treat tumors with microsatellite instability. Cancer Res 2020 July 20;80(18):3972–3982.Ethics ApprovalThe study was approved by The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, IRB number 2019–0651_MOD001. The study was approved by Feinstein Institute for Medical Research Northwell Health, IRB number 19–1086. The study was approved by WCG The Trusted Partner in Ethical Review, IRB number 20200155. The study was approved by Johns Hopkins Medicine, IRB number IRB00220323/CIR00053809. The study was approved by City of Hope, IRB number 19277/176947. The study was approved by Advarra Advancing Better Research. The study was approved by Dana-Faber Cancer Institute. The study was approved by Weill Cornell IRB. The study was approved by Roswell Park IRB.

Download Full-text

Multicenter phase Ib/II study of second-line trastuzumab, ramucirumab, and paclitaxel in patients with HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer (HER-RAM study).

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.4063 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 4063-4063

Author(s):

Sun Young Rha ◽

Chang Gon Kim ◽

Minkyu Jung ◽

Hyo Song Kim ◽

Choong-kun Lee ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dose Level ◽

Gastroesophageal Junction ◽

Second Line ◽

Phase 2 ◽

Gi Bleeding ◽

Her2 Positive ◽

Phase 1B ◽

Her 2 ◽

Level 1 ◽

Grade 3

4063 Background: We evaluated the safety and efficacy of adding trastuzumab to ramucirumab and paclitaxel (TRP) as a second line treatment in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2)-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer progressed from trastuzumab containing chemotherapy. Methods: Patients with HER-2-positive advanced G/GEJ cancer who progressed after first-line chemotherapy with trastuzumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine and platinum were eligible. Trastuzumab (Herzuma[CT-P6], Celltrion Inc.) 4mg/kg on day 1 followed by 2mg/kg on days 8, 15, and 22, ramucirumab 8mg/kg on days 1 and 15, and paclitaxel (dose level 1: 80mg/m2, dose level -1: 70 mg/m2) on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle was tested. After safety analysis of lead-in safety cohort (phase 1b), phase 2 part was conducted to evaluate the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: At the phase 1b part, as there was no dose limiting toxicity in 3 patients at the dose level 1, dose level 1 with full dose combination was determined as recommended phase 2 dose. At the time of data lock on Jan. 31, 2021, 45 patients among enrolled 50 patients were evaluable for response and safety including 3 patients from phase 1b part. Median age was 59 years old (range 30-82) and most patients were male (37/45). At baseline, 33 patients had tumors with HER-2 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and 12 had those with HER-2 2+ by IHC with ERBB2 amplification by in situ hybridization. With median follow-up duration of 11.6 months, median PFS and OS were 7.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 6.0-8.5 months) and 13.6 months (95% CI: 10.3-16.9 months), respectively. ORR was 55.6% (25/45, complete response = 1, partial response = 24) and DCR was 95.6% (43/45), respectively. Most common hematologic adverse event (AE) was neutropenia (all grade: 64.4%, grade 3/4: 51.1%) with 1 case of febrile neutropenia (2.2%). Most common non-hematologic AE was peripheral sensory neuropathy (all grade: 33.3%, grade 3: 2.2%). Gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding occurred in 4 patients (grade 3 upper GI bleeding: 6.7%, grade 1 lower GI bleeding: 2.2%), whereas GI perforation was not observed. Hypertension occurred in 3 patients (all grade: 6.7%, grade 3: 4.4%). No new or unexpected AEs resulting in treatment cessation were observed with this combination regimen. Conclusions: The continuous use of trastuzumab beyond progression in combination with ramucirumab and paclitaxel showed promising activity and manageable safety profile in HER2 positive G/GEJ cancer patients who progressed after trastuzumab containing chemotherapy. Updated outcomes for ongoing patients will be presented.

Download Full-text

ACTR-63. PHASE I DOSE ESCALATION STUDY OF PROCASPASE ACTIVATING COMPOUND-1 (PAC-1) IN COMBINATION WITH TEMOZOLOMIDE IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT ANAPLASTIC ASTROCYTOMA OR GLIOBLASTOMA

Neuro-Oncology ◽

10.1093/neuonc/noz175.105 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽

pp. vi28-vi28

Author(s):

Matthias Holdhoff ◽

Martin Nicholas ◽

Richard Peterson ◽

Oana Danciu ◽

Stefania Maraka ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dose Level ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Anaplastic Astrocytoma ◽

Caspase 3 ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽

Pharmacokinetic Data ◽

Dose Escalation Study ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 2

Abstract BACKGROUND Procaspase activating compound -1 (PAC-1) is a small molecule that catalyzes conversion of procaspase-3 to caspase-3 which induces apoptosis in cancer cells. Glioblastoma (GBM) is among the tumors with high concentrations of procaspase-3 and low levels of caspase-3. PAC-1 crosses the blood brain barrier and has been shown to synergize with temozolomide (TMZ) in canine malignant glioma and meningioma that arise spontaneously. METHODS This is a multicenter phase 1 dose-escalation study to assess the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of PAC-1 administered days 1–21 in combination with TMZ days 8–12 at a dose of 150 mg/m2 of each 28 day cycle in subjects with recurrent anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) or GBM. A modified Fibonacci 3 + 3 design is used with up to 4 dose levels of PAC-1 (375, 500, 625 and 750 mg/day). Neurologic toxicity, including cognitive function, is closely monitored throughout the trial. INTERIM DATA: A total of 14 subjects have been enrolled to-date. Of these, 7 at dose level 1, PAC-1 375 mg/day (6 GBM, 1 AA; median age 58y, range 25–75) and 7 at dose level 2, PAC-1 500 mg/day (5 GBM, 2 AA; median age 51y, range 35–60). Best responses to-date were 2 subjects with a partial response and 2 with stable disease. Grade 3 (hepatotoxicity) and 4 (cerebral edema) was reported as possibly related to PAC-1 in 1 patient at dose level 1. The median number of cycles received was 4 (range, 1–12+) at dose level 1 and 2 (range, 1–3) at dose level 2. Enrollment to dose level 2 has been completed and data analysis is ongoing. Updated response and toxicity as well as pharmacokinetic data will be presented.

Download Full-text

Phase I Study of Clofarabine with Standard-Dose Infusional Cytarabine (Ara-C) as Intensive Induction Therapy for Newly-Diagnosed De Novo Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Adults Age ≥60 Years.

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v110.11.1831.1831 ◽

2007 ◽

Vol 110 (11) ◽

pp. 1831-1831 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

James Foran ◽

Angelina The ◽

Pam Dixon ◽

Marcel Devetten ◽

Mikkael Sekeres

Keyword(s):

Older Adults ◽

Dose Level ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

De Novo ◽

Standard Dose ◽

Clinical Activity ◽

Newly Diagnosed ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 2 ◽

Significant Clinical Activity

Abstract Background The median age of AML is approximately 70 years, and the survival of older adults age ≥60 years remains poor with standard therapy. Clofarabine (CLO) has significant single agent activity in AML, and in vitro studies demonstrate synergy with Ara-C. We therefore performed a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CLO with standard dose Ara-C (100mg/m2/day D1-7 by 24hr continuous infusion) as AML induction therapy. CLO was administered daily × 5 days beginning D2 to allow for pharmacokinetic (PK) & pharmacodynamic (PD) studies. Methods Enrollment was restricted to newly-diagnosed de novo AML patients age ≥60 years considered candidates for intensive therapy; those with prior MDS or hypoplastic AML (<20% bone marrow cellularity) were excluded. Pts were treated in cohorts of 3–6 to determine MTD of CLO with standard dose infusional Ara-C (100mg/m2 × 7). DLT was defined as grade III/IV non-hematologic toxicity occurring in >1 pt per cohort. The CLO starting dose was 30mg/m2/day ×5 (dose level 1), with the intention to increase to CLO 40mg/m2 if tolerated. However, CLO dose reductions of 25% (CLO 22.5 mg/m2/day × 5, dose level -1) & 50% (CLO 15mg/m2/day ×5, dose level -2) were allowed in the event of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). Pts achieving complete remission (CR) received 2 cycles consolidation with CLO ×5 & Ara-C 100mg/m2 × 5. Results A total of 13 pts (median age 69 yrs, range 61–77; 10 male) have been treated. DLT was observed at dose level 1 (Table 1), and the protocol was amended to mandate additional hydration with CLO, and antibiotic/antifungal prophylaxis. At dose level -1, 1 pt died from PE on D27 after hematologic recovery, considered treatment-related per protocol, mandating dose de-escalation to dose level -2. Pt 13 is in active induction therapy, and not yet evaluable for response, although DLT has not been encountered. Febrile neutropenia occurred in 11/13 pts. The MTD in this study is CLO 15mg/m2/day × 5 with standard infusional Ara-C (dose level -2). Significant clinical activity was observed, particularly at higher CLO doses, including CR in 2 pts with complex karyotype. In contrast, only 1/5 evaluable pts at dose level-2 achieved CR. PK & PD studies are in progress. Conclusions In contrast to prior reports using intermediate dose bolus Ara-C (1g/m2), the MTD of CLO combined with standard dose infusional Ara-C in older adults with AML is lower, and the toxicity profile appears different. Significant clinical activity was noted at higher CLO dose levels & with complex karyotype. Based on this observation an escalation to CLO 20mg/m2 is now planned. CLO & Standard Dose Infusional Ara-C: Toxicity & Efficacy Patient CLO Dose Level Age Cytogenetics Response (CR Duration) DLT Fail - failure to achieve CR 1 1 (30mg) 66 −7 Death Infection/Renal 2 1 61 −7, complex CR (15 mths) none 3 1 69 intermediate CR (2 mths) none 4 1 77 5q-, complex Death Infection/Renal/Vasc Leak 5 −1 (22.5mg) 75 +8 Death Pneumonia 6 −1 67 diploid CR (5 mths) none 7 −1 71 9q- Death Pulm Embolism Day 27 8 −2 (15mg) 74 5q-, complex Fail none 9 −2 64 diploid Fail none 10 −2 63 diploid Fail none 11 −2 73 complex CR (5 mths) none 12 −2 72 diploid Fail none 13 −2 63 diploid - -

Download Full-text

Oxaliplatin, Fludarabine, Cytarabine, and Rituximab Combination Therapy Induces High Response Rates in Agressive Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) and Richter's Syndrome (RS).

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v114.22.3443.3443 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 114 (22) ◽

pp. 3443-3443 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Apostolia-Maria Tsimberidou ◽

William Wierda ◽

William Plunkett ◽

Susan O'Brien ◽

Thomas J. Kipps ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Phase Ii ◽

Research Funding ◽

Response Rates ◽

Off Label ◽

Level 3 ◽

Level 1 ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Level 2

Abstract Abstract 3443 Poster Board III-331 Introduction The first Phase I-II clinical trial of oxaliplatin, fluradabine, cytarabine (Ara-C), and rituximab (OFAR1) demonstrated significant activity in refractory CLL and RS (Tsimberidou et al, J Clin Oncol, 2008;26:196). To enhance the response rate and decrease myelosuppression, the dose of oxaliplatin was increased to 30mg daily, the dose of Ara-C was decreased to 0.5g/m2 daily and the optimal number of days of fluradabine and Ara-C administration was explored (OFAR2). Methods In a Phase I-II study of OFAR2, patients were treated with oxaliplatin 30mg/m2, D1-4; fludarabine 30mg/m2, Ara-C 0.5g/m2; rituximab 375mg/m2, D3; and pelfigrastim 6mg, D6. Fludarabine and Ara-C were given on D2-3 (dose level 1) D2-4 (dose level 2) or D2-5 (dose level 3); courses were repeated every 4 weeks. Patients received prophylaxis for tumor lysis, DNA viruses, and PCP. A “3+3” design was used and the planned number of patients in the Phase II was 90 (CLL, 60; RS, 30). Results Ninety-one patients (CLL, 67; RS, 24) have been treated to date: Phase I, 12 patients (by dose level: 1, n=3; 2, n=6; and 3, n=3). DLTs were noted in 2 of 3 patients on dose level 3 (G4 diarrhea, 1; G4 neutropenic sepsis, 1); thus, dose level 2 was the MTD. Seventy-nine patients (relapsed CLL, 58; RS, 19) have been treated in the Phase II portion of the study. Patient characteristics were as follows: age > 60 years, 65%; 17p deletion, 38%; 11q deletion, 13%; 13q deletion, 16%; trisomy 12, 21%; no findings, 12%; unmutated IgVH, 80%; ZAP70-positive, 75%; and CD38 ≥30%, 58%. Response in patients treated in the Phase II recommended dose is shown in Table (evaluable, 67). The overall response rates in patients with 17p and 11q deletions were 48% and 55%, respectively. The median survival duration was 21 months (CLL, 21 months; RS, 9.5 months). At 18 months, the survival rates in patients with 17p and 11q deletions were 66% and 76%, respectively. Twelve patients underwent stem cell transplantation after OFAR2 (as post-remission therapy, n=10; as salvage, n=2). Overall, 196 cycles were administered. Grade 3-4 neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and anemia were noted in 63%, 72%, and 39% of patients and in 57%, 70%, and 25% of cycles and Grade 3-4 infections in 19% of patients. Conclusion Preliminary results demonstrated that OFAR2 induced response in 40% of patients with RS and 63% of patients with relapsed/refractory CLL. OFAR2 had antileukemic activity in patients with 17p deletion. Clinical outcomes appeared to be superior to those of OFAR1 in refractory CLL, whereas results of OFAR1 appeared to be superior to those of OFAR2 in RS. Accrual is ongoing. Disclosures Tsimberidou: ASCO: ASCO Career Development Award; Sanofi: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Oxaliplatin is used off-label. Wierda:Genentech: Honoraria; Bayer, Sanofi-Aventis, Abbott, GSK: Research Funding; GSK, Trubion, Ligand, Genentech, Medimmune, Abbot: Consultancy; Celgene: Speakers Bureau. Plunkett:Sanofi-Aventis: Research Funding. O'Brien:Genentech: Research Funding; Sanofi: Consultancy. Kipps:NCI: Grant P01CA-81534.

Download Full-text

Final Report of a Phase I Study of Clofarabine Plus High Dose Melphalan as a Conditioning Regimen for Allogeneic Transplantation

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v116.21.528.528 ◽

2010 ◽

Vol 116 (21) ◽

pp. 528-528

Author(s):

Mark Kirschbaum ◽

Anthony Selwyn Stein ◽

Paul Frankel ◽

Leslie Popplewell ◽

Robert w Chen ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Stem Cells ◽

Stem Cell ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Chronic Gvhd ◽

Conditioning Regimen ◽

Level 3 ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 2 ◽

Reduced Intensity

Abstract Abstract 528 Background: Allogeneic Stem Cell transplantation remains the only curative treatment modality for hematologic malignancies such as AML, ALL, and MDS. Reduced intensity regimens were designed which replaced the alkylating agent cyclophosphamide with the purine nucleoside antimetabolite, fludarabine, a potent immunosuppressive with a substantially milder toxicity profile. Clofarabine is a purine nucleoside analogue designed to exploit a double halogen strategy which confers resistance to adenosine deaminase, increases stability and bioavailability and makes the drug more efficient than fludarabine at inhibiting ribonucleotide reductase (RNR) and disrupting mitochondrial function, leading to apoptosis. Clofarabine is potentially a superior antileukemic agent as compared with fludarabine, thus enhancing the activity of the conditioning regimen. Aims: To evaluate a novel clofarabine containing regimen as conditioning for adult fully matched allogeneic stem cell transplant. Methods: phase I dose escalation: clofarabine (dose level 1 = 30 mg/m2, dose level 2 and 3 =40 mg/m2) IV daily days –7 to day –3 infused over 30 minutes IV, plus Melphalan (dose level 1 and 2, 100mg/m2, dose level 3, 140 mg/m2) administered over 30 minutes IV on day –2. Related or unrelated allogeneic stem cells were infused on day 0. GVHD prophylaxis: initially cyclosporine plus mycophenolate, then tacrolimus plus sirolimus was adopted as per City of Hope standard of care. Patients (pts) age ≥ 18 years with AML, ALL, MDS in either CR1, CR2 or in relapse (up to 50% marrow blasts), not deemed eligible for standard transplant regimens by the attending physician, or at high risk for relapse, are eligible. Results: 16 eligible pts, all with AML, have been treated thus far, 7,males, 9 females, with a median age of 63 years (30 – 66). Seven pts were in CR1, 2 pts were in CR2, 4 pts where induction failures, and 3 pts were in first relapse. Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicities included elevation of transaminases, diarrhea, and hyponatremia. No dose limiting toxicities (DLT) were seen in the 3 pts treated at dose level 1. One patient in dose level 2 died prior to engraftment due to hepatic, renal, and infectious toxicities; that dose level has been expanded to 12 patients and no further DLTs were seen. The first patient treated at dose level 3 developed multiorgan failure and died prior to engraftment. Given the excellent results seen in the two previous cohorts we opted not to dose escalate any further patients beyond clofarabine 40 mg/m2 and melphalan 100 mg/m2. Three patients with primary induction failure received an unrelated donor graft and had complete engraftment and obtained remission. The median time to ANC recovery is 14 days and to platelet recovery is 16 days (see table). Mild acute skin graft versus host disease (GvHD) was seen in five patients, mild chronic GvHD in four patients, one patient developed severe chronic GVHD of the liver and died at day 201 from CNS bleed due to tacrolimus-sirolimus related TTP-HUS. Of the 14 patients that successfully completed transplant (no DLT or engraftment difficulty), only one patient has relapsed, with median follow-up of 10.5 months (range 4–24). Conclusion: The combination of clofarabine and melphalan is a well tolerated reduced intensity conditioning regimen with enhanced anti-leukemia activity leading to complete engraftment of related and unrelated fully matched allogeneic stem cells. Complete engraftment with prolonged disease free survival was seen at both dose levels 1 and 2. Disclosures: Off Label Use: clofarabine as a component of the conditioning regimen for allogeneic transplant.

Download Full-text

Cyclosporine Modulation of Multidrug Resistance in Combination with Pravastatin, Mitoxantrone, and Etoposide for Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): A Phase 1/2 Study

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v120.21.4343.4343 ◽

2012 ◽

Vol 120 (21) ◽

pp. 4343-4343

Author(s):

Tara L Chen ◽

Elihu H. Estey ◽

Megan Othus ◽

Kelda M. Gardner ◽

Lauren Markle ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Acute Kidney Injury ◽

Multidrug Resistance ◽

Dose Level ◽

Phase 1 ◽

Kidney Injury ◽

Adult Patients ◽

Hematologic Toxicity ◽

Heavily Pretreated ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 2

Abstract Abstract 4343 Background: Outcomes in relapsed/refractory AML are dismal. Given the high prevalence of multidrug resistance (MDR), many clinical studies have tested whether MDR reversal agents such as cyclosporine (CSA) could increase the efficacy of conventional chemotherapeutics but results have been inconsistent. More recently, HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors (e.g. pravastatin) have been investigated after demonstration that cholesterol synthesis inhibition can restore chemosensitivity of AML cells in vitro. As studies further suggested the HMG-CoA inhibitors could downregulate MDR function, we attempted to improve the efficacy of mitoxantrone and etoposide in patients with relapsed/persistent AML by combining CSA and pravastatin in a single-arm, open-label phase 1/2 trial. Patients and Methods: Adult patients with relapsed/refractory non-APL AML and a treatment-related mortality score of <9.2 (Walter et al. J Clin Oncol 2011) were eligible if they had an ECOG performance status (PS) ≤3 and adequate organ function. Prior hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) was permissible if relapse occurred >180 days post-HCT. Planned treatment included induction and consolidation therapy with pravastatin, CSA, and increasing doses of mitoxantrone and etoposide. All patients received pravastatin 320mg PO every 6 hours on days 1–10. The starting dose level (level 1) used etoposide 60mg/m2/day and mitoxantrone 5mg/m2/day via continuous infusion on days 5–9. CSA started 6 hours before the first doses of mitoxantrone/etoposide; after loading with 6mg/kg over 2 hours and 4mg/kg over 6 hours, CSA was infused at 18mg/kg/day on days 5–9. CSA levels were monitored on Day 6 and 8 to maintain levels <2,400ng/mL (by LCMS-MS). At dose level 2, identical doses of pravastatin and CSA were combined with etoposide (80mg/m2/day) and mitoxantrone (6mg/m2/day). Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) were defined as: 1) any Grade 3 non-hematologic toxicity lasting >48 hours except of febrile neutropenia (FN), infection, or hyperbilirubinemia; and 2) any Grade ≥4 non-hematologic toxicity except FN/infection, constitutional symptoms if recovery to Grade ≤2 within 14 days, and hyperbilirubinemia. An “adaptive” Bayesian phase 1–2 design that monitored both toxicity and response was used. The maximal acceptable rate of toxicity was 30%, the minimum acceptable rate of efficacy 20% (historical rate of 15% in this population), stopping when posterior probability >90%. A maximum of 45 patients would be treated in cohorts of 3. Results: Between October 2010 and February 2012, 10 patients (median age 52 [range 40–58] years) were treated, including 4 patients (all at dose level 1) who received therapy off protocol. Two patients had secondary AML, and 6 had complex cytogenetics. PS was 1 (7 patients) or 2 (3 patients). Average TRM score was 4.32 for on-study patients. All patients had received at least 2 prior regimens, and 7 received 3 prior therapies. One patient had undergone HCT. The average CSA level on Day 6 was 1,366.3ng/mL (range 713–2,082ng/mL) and 1,199.8ng/mL on Day 8 (range 526–1,593ng/mL). Efficacy (CR or CRi)/DLTs for on-study patients were: level 1 (n=3): 0/1 (grade 4 acute kidney injury); level 2 (n=3): 0/2 (grade 4 acute kidney injury; sepsis/multiorgan failure). Among the 7 patients treated at level 1, other toxicities included septic shock (n=1), FN (4), mucositis (2), and decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (1). One off-study patient achieved CR after 1 course and received 1 cycle of consolidation with pravastatin, etoposide, and mitoxantrone but experienced CNS relapse after CR duration of only 46 days. Based on the results of the on-study patients, the statistical monitoring mandated early study closure for lack of efficacy & excessive toxicity. Conclusion: In the targeted, heavily pretreated patient population, the study regimen was excessively toxic and failed to achieve acceptable efficacy. Further clinical testing, if any, should be limited to less heavily pretreated, otherwise “fit” patients with AML. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01342887. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

A Phase I Study of Idarubicin Dose Escalation for Remission Induction Therapy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.1344.1344 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 1344-1344

Author(s):

Mark Lee ◽

Sung-Yong Kim

Keyword(s):

Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Platelet Count ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Induction Therapy ◽

Myeloid Leukemia ◽

Phase I Study ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 2 ◽

Acute Myeloid

Abstract The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of idarubicin has been acknowledged to be 12-15 mg/m2/day for 3 days for acute leukemias. Its MTD should be reevaluated in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in the era of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and better supportive care. We conducted a phase I study to investigate the safety of escalating doses of idarubicin in combination with cytarabine 100 mg/m2/day for 7 days for previously untreated AML. The starting dose of idarubicin was 12 mg/m2/day for 3 days with dose escalations by 3 mg/m2/day. Cohorts of three patients were treated at each dose level, and the idarubicin dose was escalated up to 18 mg/m2/day until at least two patients among a cohort of three to six patients experienced the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) (traditional 3+3 design for phase I clinical trials: J Natl Cancer Inst 2009;101:708). Hematologic DLTs were defined as the time to recovery of neutrophils {absolute neutrophil count (ANC) ≥500/μL} or platelets (platelet count ≥20,000/μL) exceeded 42 days after the start of induction therapy (J Clin Oncol 2004;22:4290). Non-hematologic DLTs were defined as grade 4 or 5 toxicities (Leukemia 1998;12:865). We adopted the NCI CTCAE v3.0 to grade the hematologic and non-hematologic toxicities. Thirteen adult patients were enrolled in the study, but two and two were excluded at level 1 and level 2, respectively, because they received reinduction therapy for resistant disease within 4 weeks after the start of the assigned induction therapy. Consequently, nine patients were evaluable for the phase I study. The median times to recovery of neutrophils (ANC ≥500/μL) after the start of induction therapy at level 1, level 2, and level 3 were day 20 (range, 19-22), day 19 (range, 17-20), and day 25 (range, 21-26), respectively. The median times to recovery of platelet (platelet count ≥20,000/μL) at each level were day 20 (range, 19-23), day 20 (range, 16-34), and day 24 (range, 20-35), respectively. Therefore, grade 4 hematologic toxicities were observed at all 3 levels; however, these hematologic toxicities did not meet the criteria of the hematologic DLTs as defined in this study. There was any instance of grade 4 non-hematologic toxicity at each dose level. No death associated with the induction treatment was observed in this trial. Hematologic and non-hematologic DLTs as defined above were not observed at all 3 dose levels; therefore, idarubicin 18 mg/m2/day for 3 days could be defined as the MTD for this trial. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Download Full-text

Preliminary Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Brentuximab Vedotin and Ipilimumab in Relapsed/Refractory Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4412)

Blood ◽

10.1182/blood.v126.23.585.585 ◽

2015 ◽

Vol 126 (23) ◽

pp. 585-585 ◽

Cited By ~ 23

Author(s):

Catherine S. Diefenbach ◽

Fangxin Hong ◽

Jonathon B. Cohen ◽

Michael J. Robertson ◽

Richard F. Ambinder ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dose Level ◽

Dose Escalation ◽

Research Funding ◽

Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽

Sensory Neuropathy ◽

Peripheral Sensory Neuropathy ◽

Level 1 ◽

Grade 3 ◽

Peripheral Sensory ◽

Level 2

Abstract Background: Despite advances in chemotherapy, R/R HL remains a significant clinical problem with over 1,000 primarily young lives lost annually. HL is a unique tumor in which a small number of malignant Hodgkin Reed-Sternberg (HRS) cells propagate an immunosuppressive microenvironment that augments HRS growth and survival. We hypothesized that immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy could activate the tumor immune microenvironment, while the CD30 expressing HRS cells could be targeted by brentuximab vedotin (BV), thereby overcoming tumor cell resistance and deepening clinical responses. E4412 is a phase 1 ECOG-ACRIN sponsored study of the combination of BV and the checkpoint inhibitors ipilimumab (IPI) and nivolumab (NIVO) in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Here we report the data on the patients treated with BV + IPI, the first cohort of the study. Methods: Patients with biopsy proven R/R HL were treated with BV 1.8mg/kg and two escalating doses of IPI: 1 mg/kg or 3mg/kg. After safety was determined an expanded cohort was treated with BV 1.8mg/kg IV and IPI 3mg/kg IV. The schedule consisted of BV administered every 21 days for 16 cycles and IPI every 21 days x 4 doses and thereafter every 3 months for up to a year. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined for purposes of dose escalation within the first cycle of therapy. Patients are followed for toxicity up to 30 days beyond their last treatment. Results: As of 7/2015 19 of 23 planned patients have been treated with BV + IPI. We report the data on the full dose escalation population (13 patients: Dose level 1 (6), Dose level 2 (7)). The median age was 33 years (range: 20-49). Seven patients were male. Patients were heavily pretreated with a median of 4 prior therapies (2-13). Fourpatients had prior treatment with BV; 8 patients had prior SCT (7 autologous, 1 allogeneic). Safety: Overall the regimen of BV + IPI was extremely well tolerated with no DLTs noted during dose escalation. Toxicities considered at least possibly related to drug during any cycle of treatment are shown according to grade in Table 1. The most common treatment related adverse events were: diarrhea, rash, and peripheral sensory neuropathy. Other AEs of interest included: alopecia, transaminitis, and uveitis. Grade 3 and 4 treatment related adverse events (AEs) included: Dose level 1: one grade 3 infusion reaction, which led to a protocol amendment to include premedication, no further grade 3 infusion reactions were noted; Dose level 2: one each: grade 3 rash, vomiting, and peripheral sensory neuropathy, and one grade 4 thrombocytopenia in patient with pre-existing thrombocytopenia. Response: For the 12 evaluable patients, the overall response (ORR) for the combination of BV + IPI was 67% with a complete response (CR) rate of 42% (5 of 12 patients). An additional 2 patients had stable disease (SD) giving a clinical benefit rate of 83%. Three of 5 of the CRs occurred at dose level 1 (1mg dose of IPI). The median progression free survival (PFS) is 0.74 years with a median follow-up of 0.66 years. Conclusion: In this first reported study of the combination of checkpoint inhibitor and ADC, toxicity was low, primarily grades 1 and 2. In a heavily pretreated patient population, 33% of whom had had prior BV and 67% of whom were s/p ASCT, the ORR of 67% and CR rate of 42% suggests a potential deepening of response compared to monotherapy. More than half of these CRs occurred at 1mg of IPI suggesting that in combination with ADC, low doses of immune stimulation may be highly active. Optimization of this combination strategy is planned with ongoing accrual to cohorts receiving BV + NIVO, and BV + IPI + NIVO. Data will be updated to include the full BV + IPI cohort by the time of the annual meeting. Table 1. Common and Immune Toxicities Toxicity Type Dose Level 1 (n=6) Dose Level 2 (n=7) Grade Grade 1,2 3 4 5 1,2 3 4 5 (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) (n) Fatigue 5 - - - 3 - - - Fever 1 - - - 3 - - - Pain 2 - - - 3 - - - Alopecia 2 - - - 1 - - - Pruritus 1 - - - 2 - - - Rash maculo-papular 4 - - - 2 1 - - Diarrhea 4 - - - 4 - - - Dyspepsia 2 - - - 1 - - - Nausea 6 - - - 4 - - - Vomiting 3 - - - 2 1 - - Papulopustular rash 1 - - - 1 - - - Alanine aminotransferase increased 3 - - - 3 - - - Aspartate aminotransferase increased 3 - - - 2 - - - Platelet count decreased - - - - - - 1 - Anorexia 3 - - - - - - - Headache 2 - - - 2 - - - Peripheral sensory neuropathy 5 - - - 4 1 - - Dry eye 2 - - - - - - - Uveitis 1 - - - - - - - Cough 2 - - - 1 - - - Disclosures Diefenbach: Molecular Templates: Research Funding; Immunogen: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Idera: Consultancy; Jannsen Oncology: Consultancy; Gilead: Equity Ownership, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Incyte: Research Funding; Genentech: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Presentation will discuss the experimental use of the checkpoint inhibitor Ipilimumab in relapsed/refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.. Cohen:Celgene: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; BMS: Research Funding; Janssen: Research Funding. Robertson:Eli Lilly: Equity Ownership. Fenske:Pharmacyclics: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Millennium/Takeda: Research Funding; Celgene: Honoraria. Kahl:Roche/Genentech: Consultancy; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy; Millennium: Consultancy; Cell Therapeutics: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Infinity: Consultancy; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Juno: Consultancy. Ansell:Bristol-Myers Squibb: Research Funding; Celldex: Research Funding.

Download Full-text

Docetaxel and capecitabine for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2006.24.18_suppl.13579 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽

pp. 13579-13579

Author(s):

T. E. O’Brien ◽

E. Newton ◽

J. Trey ◽

E. Crum

Keyword(s):

Colorectal Cancer ◽

Phase I ◽

Dose Level ◽

Low Dose ◽

Metastatic Breast ◽

Human Colon Cancer ◽

Level 3 ◽

Previously Treated ◽

Level 1 ◽

Level 2

13579 Background: Docetaxel (D) induces human colon cancer cell lines to upregulate thymidine phosphorylase, an enzyme which activates capecitabine (C) to its cytotoxic form. This provided rationale for adding low dose D to C in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Although this combination has been established in metastatic breast cancer, it has not been evaluated in CRC. Because of concerns of toxicity in a pretreated population, we performed a phase I trial in patients with previously treated CRC. Methods: Eligibility: At least 1 prior treatment for metastatic disease; ECOG PS 0–1; adequate organ function. Design: Phase I, dose escalation. D, IV, days 1 & 8, and C, PO BID days 5–18, repeated q21days. Dose Level 1: D=15mg/m2, C=1000mg/m2; Level 2: D= 15 mg/m2, C= 1100 mg/m2; Level 3: D= 20 mg/m2, C= 1100 mg/m2; Level 4: D=20mg/m2, C=1250mg/m2. Results: 13 patients have thus far been treated. 11 are evaluable for toxicity and 10 for response (1 at dose level 4 was taken off study due to non-compliance before completion of cycle 1; another died of progressive cancer before completing cycle 1 at dose level 4; another is evaluable for toxicity but not yet for response). 9 with colon, 4 with rectal primary sites. Median follow-up= 5 mo (1–19 mo). Med age= 59 (30–75); #prior regimens for met disease 1–2, all of which were 5-FU based. Toxicities No dose limiting toxicities (DLT) until Dose Level 4. Dose Level 1: 1/3 developed grade 2 diarrhea and hand-foot syndrome and delayed grade 3 hand-foot; Dose Level 2: 2/3 developed grade 2 toxicities (hand-foot in one and diarrhea in the other); Dose Level 3: 1/3 developed delayed grade 2 hand-foot; Dose Level 4: 1 patient with delayed grade 2 hand-foot and grade 1 eye tearing; another developed DLT (grade 4 stomatitis/dehydration). Response 6/10 patients progressed after 2 cycles; 2 pts had stable disease, one lasting 4.6 mo; 2 patients had a partial response, one of which lasted 9 mo. The latter case had refractory disease to FOLFOX 4 but a 78% reduction in her liver metastases to D+C. Conclusions: The combination of low dose docetaxel, used as chemosensitizing agent, with capecitabine in this pretreated group of patients with metastatic CRC appears to be well tolerated, with no DLTs seen until Dose Level 4, and has modest activity. MTD determination awaits further accrual. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text

Phase I feasibility study of carboplatin plus capecitabine followed by maintenance capecitabine in patients (pts) with recurrent platinum-sensitive epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.5564 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 5564-5564

Author(s):

A. Montes ◽

S. K. Sandhu ◽

C. Rothermundt ◽

I. Coombes ◽

R. A'Hern ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Dose Level ◽

Objective Response ◽

Haematological Toxicity ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Ca 125 ◽

Platinum Sensitive ◽

Level 1 ◽

Third Line ◽

Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽

Level 2

5564 Background: In a previous study, we noted a response rate (RR) of 61% for the 3 drug combination of carboplatin, epirubicin and capecitabine in platinum-sensitive recurrent EOC. This combination however resulted in excessive grade (G) 3–4 haematological toxicity (55%) (BJC 2006; 94:74). The current trial therefore assessed the feasibility and efficacy of the 2 drugs, carboplatin and capecitabine as second- or third-line treatment. Methods: Pts were administered carboplatin (AUC5) day 1 and capecitabine at a starting dose of 750 mg/m2 bd, days 1–21, q21 (dose level 1). The capecitabine dose was deescalated to 625 mg/m2 (dose level -1) and 500 mg/m2 (dose level -2) according to toxicity. Pts with an objective response or stable disease received maintenance capecitabine (at the same dose level) for up to 12 months or until progression. Responses were assessed with RECIST criteria and CA-125. Results: 19 of the 20 pts enrolled were evaluable for toxicity and response. Dose-limiting toxicity was observed at dose level 1 (G3 fatigue, G3 diarrhoea, G3 neutropenia of > 14 days; n = 3/5), dose level -1 (G3 angina (n = 2), G3 vomiting, G3 palmar plantar erythema; n = 4/7) and dose level-2 (diarrhoea / fatigue; n = 1/7). One patient had a G3 carboplatin hypersensivity reaction. 8 pts received maintenance capecitabine which was well tolerated. The overall RR was 53% with 10 partial responses and 5 stable diseases. The median progression free survival (PFS) was 6.5 months (m) and the 6mPFS was 63% with 2 pts currently ongoing treatment. The median PFS on maintenance was 3.2 m. Conclusions: The combination was well tolerated at the recommended phase II dose of carboplatin (AUC 5) and capecitabine (500 mg/m2 bd) with partial responses in over half of the cases. [Table: see text]

Download Full-text